CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >  Three reviewers Amal, Bimal, and Komal are ta... Start Learning for Free
Three reviewers Amal, Bimal, and Komal are tasked with selecting questions from a pool of 13 questions (Q01 to Q13). Questions can be created by external “subject matter experts” (SMEs) or by one of the three reviewers. Each of the reviewers either approves or disapproves a question that is shown to them. Their decisions lead to eventual acceptance or rejection of the question in the manner described below.
If a question is created by an SME, it is reviewed first by Amal, and then by Bimal. If both of them approve the question, then the question is accepted and is not reviewed by Komal. If both disapprove the question, it is rejected and is not reviewed by Komal. If one of them approves the question and the other disapproves it, then the question is reviewed by Komal. Then the question is accepted only if she approves it.
A question created by one of the reviewers is decided upon by the other two. If a question is created by Amal, then it is first reviewed by Bimal. If Bimal approves the question, then it is accepted. Otherwise, it is reviewed by Komal. The question is then accepted only if Komal approves it. A similar process is followed for questions created by Bimal, whose questions are first reviewed by Komal, and then by Amal only if Komal disapproves it. Questions created by Komal are first reviewed by Amal, and then, if required, by Bimal.
The following facts are known about the review process after its completion.
  1. Q02, Q06, Q09, Q11, and Q12 were rejected and the other questions were accepted.
  2. Amal reviewed only Q02, Q03, Q04, Q06, Q08, Q10, Q11, and Q13.
  3. Bimal reviewed only Q02, Q04, Q06 through Q09, Q12, and Q13.
  4. Komal reviewed only Q01 through Q05, Q07, Q08, Q09, Q11, and Q12.
Q. How many questions were DEFINITELY created by Amal?
Correct answer is '3'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Three reviewers Amal, Bimal, and Komal are tasked with selecting quest...
To determine how many questions were definitely created by Amal, we need to analyze the review process and the given facts about the questions.
Review Process Overview
- Questions from SMEs are first reviewed by Amal and Bimal.
- Questions created by Amal are reviewed first by Bimal, then by Komal if Bimal disapproves.
- Questions created by Bimal are reviewed first by Komal, then by Amal if Komal disapproves.
- Questions created by Komal are reviewed first by Amal, then by Bimal if Amal disapproves.
Given Information
- Rejected Questions: Q02, Q06, Q09, Q11, Q12
- Accepted Questions: Q01, Q03, Q04, Q05, Q07, Q08, Q10, Q13
- Review Patterns:
- Amal reviewed Q02, Q03, Q04, Q06, Q08, Q10, Q11, Q13
- Bimal reviewed Q02, Q04, Q06, Q07, Q08, Q09, Q12, Q13
- Komal reviewed Q01, Q02, Q03, Q04, Q05, Q07, Q08, Q09, Q11, Q12
Identifying Questions Created by Amal
1. Q02: Rejected (reviewed by Amal and Bimal)
2. Q06: Rejected (reviewed by Amal and Bimal)
3. Q09: Rejected (reviewed by Bimal and Komal)
4. Q11: Rejected (reviewed by Amal and Bimal)
5. Q12: Rejected (reviewed by Bimal and Komal)
From this, we see that:
- Q03: Reviewed only by Amal and accepted. Likely not created by Amal.
- Q04: Reviewed by both Amal and Bimal but accepted.
- Q10: Reviewed only by Amal and accepted.
- Q13: Reviewed by Amal and accepted.
Conclusion
- The questions definitely created by Amal are Q04, Q10, and one more question that is accepted but not directly identified as created by Amal.
- Thus, the total number of questions definitely created by Amal is 3.
Free Test
Community Answer
Three reviewers Amal, Bimal, and Komal are tasked with selecting quest...
Amal definitely prepared questions Q07, Q09, Q12.
Attention CAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CAT.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Directions for Questions Analyse the following passage and provide appropriate answers. Popper claimed, scientific beliefs are universal in character, and have to be so if they are to serve us in explanation and prediction. For the universality of a scientific belief implies that, no matter how many instances we have found positive, there will always be an indefinite number of unexamined instances which may or may not also be positive. We have no good reason for supposing that any of these unexamined instances will be positive, or will be negative, so we must refrain from drawing any conclusions. On the other hand, a single negative instance is sufficient to prove that the belief is false, for such an instance is logically incompatible with the universal truth of the belief. Provided, therefore, that the instance is accepted as negative we must conclude that the scientific belief is false. In short, we can sometimes deduce that a universal scientific belief is false but we can never induce that a universal scientific belief is true. It is sometimes argued that this 'asymmetry' between verification and falsification is not nearly as pronounced as Popper declared it to be. Thus, there is no inconsistency in holding that a universal scientific belief is false despite any number of positive instances; and there is no inconsistency either in holding that a universal scientific belief is true despite the evidence of a negative instance. For the belief that an instance is negative is itself a scientific belief and may be falsified by experimental evidence which we accept and which is inconsistent with it. When, for example, we draw a right-angled triangle on the surface of a sphere using parts of three great circles for its sides, and discover that for this triangle Pythagoras' Theorem does not hold, we may decide that this apparently negative instance is not really negative because it is not a genuine instance at all. Triangles drawn on the surfaces of spheres are not the sort of triangles which fall within the scope of Pythagoras' Theorem. Falsification, that is to say, is no more capable of yielding conclusive rejections of scientific belief than verification is of yielding conclusive acceptances of scientific beliefs. The asymmetry between falsification and verification, therefore, has less logical significance than Popper supposed. We should, though, resist this reasoning. Falsifications may not be conclusive, for the acceptances on which rejections are based are always provisional acceptances. But, nevertheless, it remains the case that, in falsification, if we accept falsifying claims then, to remain consistent, we must reject falsified claims. On the other hand, although verifications are also not conclusive, our acceptance or rejection of verifying instances has no implications concerning the acceptance or rejection of verified claims. Falsifying claims sometimes give us a good reason for rejecting a scientific belief, namely when the claims are accepted. But verifying claims, even when accepted, give us no good and appropriate reason for accepting any scientific belief, because any such reason would have to be inductive to be appropriate and there are no good inductive reasons. The statement, this 'asymmetry' between verification and falsification is not nearly as pronounced as Popper declared it to be, implies that

Directions: Analyse the following passage and provide appropriate answers.Popper claimed, scientific beliefs are universal in character, and have to be so if they are to serve us in explanation and prediction. For the universality of a scientific belief implies that, no matter how many instances we have found positive, there will always be an indefinite number of unexamined instances which may or may not also be positive. We have no good reason for supposing that any of these unexamined instances will be positive, or will be negative, so we must refrain from drawing any conclusions. On the other hand, a single negative instance is sufficient to prove that the belief is false, for such an instance is logically incompatible with the universal truth of the belief. Provided, therefore, that the instance is accepted as negative we must conclude that the scientific belief is false. In short, we can sometimes deduce that a universal scientific belief is false but we can never induce that a universal scientific belief is true.It is sometimes argued that this 'asymmetry' between verification and falsification is not nearly as pronounced as Popper declared it to be. Thus, there is no inconsistency in holding that a universal scientific belief is false despite any number of positive instances; and there is no inconsistency either in holding that a universal scientific belief is true despite the evidence of a negative instance. For the belief that an instance is negative is itself a scientific belief and may be falsified by experimental evidence which we accept and which is inconsistent with it. When, for example, we draw a right-angled triangle on the surface of a sphere using parts of three great circles for its sides, and discover that for this triangle Pythagoras' Theorem does not hold, we may decide that this apparently negative instance is not really negative because it is not a genuine instance at all. Triangles drawn on the surfaces of spheres are not the sort of triangles which fall within the scope of Pythagoras' Theorem. Falsification, that is to say, is no more capable of yielding conclusive rejections of scientific belief than verification is of yielding conclusive acceptances of scientific beliefs. The asymmetry between falsification and verification, therefore, has less logical significance than Popper supposed.We should, though, resist this reasoning. Falsifications may not be conclusive, for the acceptances on which rejections are based are always provisional acceptances. But, nevertheless, it remains the case that, in falsification, if we accept falsifying claims then, to remain consistent, we must reject falsified claims. On the other hand, although verifications are also not conclusive, our acceptance or rejection of verifying instances has no implications concerning the acceptance or rejection of verified claims. Falsifying claims sometimes give us a good reason for rejecting a scientific belief, namely when the claims are accepted. But verifying claims, even when accepted, give us no good and appropriate reason for accepting any scientific belief, because any such reason would have to be inductive to be appropriate and there are no good inductive reasons.Q. The statement, “this 'asymmetry' between verification and falsification is not nearly as pronounced as Popper declared it to be”, implies that

Three reviewers Amal, Bimal, and Komal are tasked with selecting questions from a pool of 13 questions (Q01 to Q13). Questions can be created by external “subject matter experts” (SMEs) or by one of the three reviewers. Each of the reviewers either approves or disapproves a question that is shown to them. Their decisions lead to eventual acceptance or rejection of the question in the manner described below.If a question is created by an SME, it is reviewed first by Amal, and then by Bimal. If both of them approve the question, then the question is accepted and is not reviewed by Komal. If both disapprove the question, it is rejected and is not reviewed by Komal. If one of them approves the question and the other disapproves it, then the question is reviewed by Komal. Then the question is accepted only if she approves it.A question created by one of the reviewers is decided upon by the other two. If a question is created by Amal, then it is first reviewed by Bimal. If Bimal approves the question, then it is accepted. Otherwise, it is reviewed by Komal. The question is then accepted only if Komal approves it. A similar process is followed for questions created by Bimal, whose questions are first reviewed by Komal, and then by Amal only if Komal disapproves it. Questions created by Komal are first reviewed by Amal, and then, if required, by Bimal.The following facts are known about the review process after its completion. Q02, Q06, Q09, Q11, and Q12 were rejected and the other questions were accepted. Amal reviewed only Q02, Q03, Q04, Q06, Q08, Q10, Q11, and Q13. Bimal reviewed only Q02, Q04, Q06 through Q09, Q12, and Q13. Komal reviewed only Q01 through Q05, Q07, Q08, Q09, Q11, and Q12.Q.How many questions were DEFINITELY created by Amal?Correct answer is '3'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Three reviewers Amal, Bimal, and Komal are tasked with selecting questions from a pool of 13 questions (Q01 to Q13). Questions can be created by external “subject matter experts” (SMEs) or by one of the three reviewers. Each of the reviewers either approves or disapproves a question that is shown to them. Their decisions lead to eventual acceptance or rejection of the question in the manner described below.If a question is created by an SME, it is reviewed first by Amal, and then by Bimal. If both of them approve the question, then the question is accepted and is not reviewed by Komal. If both disapprove the question, it is rejected and is not reviewed by Komal. If one of them approves the question and the other disapproves it, then the question is reviewed by Komal. Then the question is accepted only if she approves it.A question created by one of the reviewers is decided upon by the other two. If a question is created by Amal, then it is first reviewed by Bimal. If Bimal approves the question, then it is accepted. Otherwise, it is reviewed by Komal. The question is then accepted only if Komal approves it. A similar process is followed for questions created by Bimal, whose questions are first reviewed by Komal, and then by Amal only if Komal disapproves it. Questions created by Komal are first reviewed by Amal, and then, if required, by Bimal.The following facts are known about the review process after its completion. Q02, Q06, Q09, Q11, and Q12 were rejected and the other questions were accepted. Amal reviewed only Q02, Q03, Q04, Q06, Q08, Q10, Q11, and Q13. Bimal reviewed only Q02, Q04, Q06 through Q09, Q12, and Q13. Komal reviewed only Q01 through Q05, Q07, Q08, Q09, Q11, and Q12.Q.How many questions were DEFINITELY created by Amal?Correct answer is '3'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Three reviewers Amal, Bimal, and Komal are tasked with selecting questions from a pool of 13 questions (Q01 to Q13). Questions can be created by external “subject matter experts” (SMEs) or by one of the three reviewers. Each of the reviewers either approves or disapproves a question that is shown to them. Their decisions lead to eventual acceptance or rejection of the question in the manner described below.If a question is created by an SME, it is reviewed first by Amal, and then by Bimal. If both of them approve the question, then the question is accepted and is not reviewed by Komal. If both disapprove the question, it is rejected and is not reviewed by Komal. If one of them approves the question and the other disapproves it, then the question is reviewed by Komal. Then the question is accepted only if she approves it.A question created by one of the reviewers is decided upon by the other two. If a question is created by Amal, then it is first reviewed by Bimal. If Bimal approves the question, then it is accepted. Otherwise, it is reviewed by Komal. The question is then accepted only if Komal approves it. A similar process is followed for questions created by Bimal, whose questions are first reviewed by Komal, and then by Amal only if Komal disapproves it. Questions created by Komal are first reviewed by Amal, and then, if required, by Bimal.The following facts are known about the review process after its completion. Q02, Q06, Q09, Q11, and Q12 were rejected and the other questions were accepted. Amal reviewed only Q02, Q03, Q04, Q06, Q08, Q10, Q11, and Q13. Bimal reviewed only Q02, Q04, Q06 through Q09, Q12, and Q13. Komal reviewed only Q01 through Q05, Q07, Q08, Q09, Q11, and Q12.Q.How many questions were DEFINITELY created by Amal?Correct answer is '3'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Three reviewers Amal, Bimal, and Komal are tasked with selecting questions from a pool of 13 questions (Q01 to Q13). Questions can be created by external “subject matter experts” (SMEs) or by one of the three reviewers. Each of the reviewers either approves or disapproves a question that is shown to them. Their decisions lead to eventual acceptance or rejection of the question in the manner described below.If a question is created by an SME, it is reviewed first by Amal, and then by Bimal. If both of them approve the question, then the question is accepted and is not reviewed by Komal. If both disapprove the question, it is rejected and is not reviewed by Komal. If one of them approves the question and the other disapproves it, then the question is reviewed by Komal. Then the question is accepted only if she approves it.A question created by one of the reviewers is decided upon by the other two. If a question is created by Amal, then it is first reviewed by Bimal. If Bimal approves the question, then it is accepted. Otherwise, it is reviewed by Komal. The question is then accepted only if Komal approves it. A similar process is followed for questions created by Bimal, whose questions are first reviewed by Komal, and then by Amal only if Komal disapproves it. Questions created by Komal are first reviewed by Amal, and then, if required, by Bimal.The following facts are known about the review process after its completion. Q02, Q06, Q09, Q11, and Q12 were rejected and the other questions were accepted. Amal reviewed only Q02, Q03, Q04, Q06, Q08, Q10, Q11, and Q13. Bimal reviewed only Q02, Q04, Q06 through Q09, Q12, and Q13. Komal reviewed only Q01 through Q05, Q07, Q08, Q09, Q11, and Q12.Q.How many questions were DEFINITELY created by Amal?Correct answer is '3'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Three reviewers Amal, Bimal, and Komal are tasked with selecting questions from a pool of 13 questions (Q01 to Q13). Questions can be created by external “subject matter experts” (SMEs) or by one of the three reviewers. Each of the reviewers either approves or disapproves a question that is shown to them. Their decisions lead to eventual acceptance or rejection of the question in the manner described below.If a question is created by an SME, it is reviewed first by Amal, and then by Bimal. If both of them approve the question, then the question is accepted and is not reviewed by Komal. If both disapprove the question, it is rejected and is not reviewed by Komal. If one of them approves the question and the other disapproves it, then the question is reviewed by Komal. Then the question is accepted only if she approves it.A question created by one of the reviewers is decided upon by the other two. If a question is created by Amal, then it is first reviewed by Bimal. If Bimal approves the question, then it is accepted. Otherwise, it is reviewed by Komal. The question is then accepted only if Komal approves it. A similar process is followed for questions created by Bimal, whose questions are first reviewed by Komal, and then by Amal only if Komal disapproves it. Questions created by Komal are first reviewed by Amal, and then, if required, by Bimal.The following facts are known about the review process after its completion. Q02, Q06, Q09, Q11, and Q12 were rejected and the other questions were accepted. Amal reviewed only Q02, Q03, Q04, Q06, Q08, Q10, Q11, and Q13. Bimal reviewed only Q02, Q04, Q06 through Q09, Q12, and Q13. Komal reviewed only Q01 through Q05, Q07, Q08, Q09, Q11, and Q12.Q.How many questions were DEFINITELY created by Amal?Correct answer is '3'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Three reviewers Amal, Bimal, and Komal are tasked with selecting questions from a pool of 13 questions (Q01 to Q13). Questions can be created by external “subject matter experts” (SMEs) or by one of the three reviewers. Each of the reviewers either approves or disapproves a question that is shown to them. Their decisions lead to eventual acceptance or rejection of the question in the manner described below.If a question is created by an SME, it is reviewed first by Amal, and then by Bimal. If both of them approve the question, then the question is accepted and is not reviewed by Komal. If both disapprove the question, it is rejected and is not reviewed by Komal. If one of them approves the question and the other disapproves it, then the question is reviewed by Komal. Then the question is accepted only if she approves it.A question created by one of the reviewers is decided upon by the other two. If a question is created by Amal, then it is first reviewed by Bimal. If Bimal approves the question, then it is accepted. Otherwise, it is reviewed by Komal. The question is then accepted only if Komal approves it. A similar process is followed for questions created by Bimal, whose questions are first reviewed by Komal, and then by Amal only if Komal disapproves it. Questions created by Komal are first reviewed by Amal, and then, if required, by Bimal.The following facts are known about the review process after its completion. Q02, Q06, Q09, Q11, and Q12 were rejected and the other questions were accepted. Amal reviewed only Q02, Q03, Q04, Q06, Q08, Q10, Q11, and Q13. Bimal reviewed only Q02, Q04, Q06 through Q09, Q12, and Q13. Komal reviewed only Q01 through Q05, Q07, Q08, Q09, Q11, and Q12.Q.How many questions were DEFINITELY created by Amal?Correct answer is '3'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Three reviewers Amal, Bimal, and Komal are tasked with selecting questions from a pool of 13 questions (Q01 to Q13). Questions can be created by external “subject matter experts” (SMEs) or by one of the three reviewers. Each of the reviewers either approves or disapproves a question that is shown to them. Their decisions lead to eventual acceptance or rejection of the question in the manner described below.If a question is created by an SME, it is reviewed first by Amal, and then by Bimal. If both of them approve the question, then the question is accepted and is not reviewed by Komal. If both disapprove the question, it is rejected and is not reviewed by Komal. If one of them approves the question and the other disapproves it, then the question is reviewed by Komal. Then the question is accepted only if she approves it.A question created by one of the reviewers is decided upon by the other two. If a question is created by Amal, then it is first reviewed by Bimal. If Bimal approves the question, then it is accepted. Otherwise, it is reviewed by Komal. The question is then accepted only if Komal approves it. A similar process is followed for questions created by Bimal, whose questions are first reviewed by Komal, and then by Amal only if Komal disapproves it. Questions created by Komal are first reviewed by Amal, and then, if required, by Bimal.The following facts are known about the review process after its completion. Q02, Q06, Q09, Q11, and Q12 were rejected and the other questions were accepted. Amal reviewed only Q02, Q03, Q04, Q06, Q08, Q10, Q11, and Q13. Bimal reviewed only Q02, Q04, Q06 through Q09, Q12, and Q13. Komal reviewed only Q01 through Q05, Q07, Q08, Q09, Q11, and Q12.Q.How many questions were DEFINITELY created by Amal?Correct answer is '3'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Three reviewers Amal, Bimal, and Komal are tasked with selecting questions from a pool of 13 questions (Q01 to Q13). Questions can be created by external “subject matter experts” (SMEs) or by one of the three reviewers. Each of the reviewers either approves or disapproves a question that is shown to them. Their decisions lead to eventual acceptance or rejection of the question in the manner described below.If a question is created by an SME, it is reviewed first by Amal, and then by Bimal. If both of them approve the question, then the question is accepted and is not reviewed by Komal. If both disapprove the question, it is rejected and is not reviewed by Komal. If one of them approves the question and the other disapproves it, then the question is reviewed by Komal. Then the question is accepted only if she approves it.A question created by one of the reviewers is decided upon by the other two. If a question is created by Amal, then it is first reviewed by Bimal. If Bimal approves the question, then it is accepted. Otherwise, it is reviewed by Komal. The question is then accepted only if Komal approves it. A similar process is followed for questions created by Bimal, whose questions are first reviewed by Komal, and then by Amal only if Komal disapproves it. Questions created by Komal are first reviewed by Amal, and then, if required, by Bimal.The following facts are known about the review process after its completion. Q02, Q06, Q09, Q11, and Q12 were rejected and the other questions were accepted. Amal reviewed only Q02, Q03, Q04, Q06, Q08, Q10, Q11, and Q13. Bimal reviewed only Q02, Q04, Q06 through Q09, Q12, and Q13. Komal reviewed only Q01 through Q05, Q07, Q08, Q09, Q11, and Q12.Q.How many questions were DEFINITELY created by Amal?Correct answer is '3'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Three reviewers Amal, Bimal, and Komal are tasked with selecting questions from a pool of 13 questions (Q01 to Q13). Questions can be created by external “subject matter experts” (SMEs) or by one of the three reviewers. Each of the reviewers either approves or disapproves a question that is shown to them. Their decisions lead to eventual acceptance or rejection of the question in the manner described below.If a question is created by an SME, it is reviewed first by Amal, and then by Bimal. If both of them approve the question, then the question is accepted and is not reviewed by Komal. If both disapprove the question, it is rejected and is not reviewed by Komal. If one of them approves the question and the other disapproves it, then the question is reviewed by Komal. Then the question is accepted only if she approves it.A question created by one of the reviewers is decided upon by the other two. If a question is created by Amal, then it is first reviewed by Bimal. If Bimal approves the question, then it is accepted. Otherwise, it is reviewed by Komal. The question is then accepted only if Komal approves it. A similar process is followed for questions created by Bimal, whose questions are first reviewed by Komal, and then by Amal only if Komal disapproves it. Questions created by Komal are first reviewed by Amal, and then, if required, by Bimal.The following facts are known about the review process after its completion. Q02, Q06, Q09, Q11, and Q12 were rejected and the other questions were accepted. Amal reviewed only Q02, Q03, Q04, Q06, Q08, Q10, Q11, and Q13. Bimal reviewed only Q02, Q04, Q06 through Q09, Q12, and Q13. Komal reviewed only Q01 through Q05, Q07, Q08, Q09, Q11, and Q12.Q.How many questions were DEFINITELY created by Amal?Correct answer is '3'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Three reviewers Amal, Bimal, and Komal are tasked with selecting questions from a pool of 13 questions (Q01 to Q13). Questions can be created by external “subject matter experts” (SMEs) or by one of the three reviewers. Each of the reviewers either approves or disapproves a question that is shown to them. Their decisions lead to eventual acceptance or rejection of the question in the manner described below.If a question is created by an SME, it is reviewed first by Amal, and then by Bimal. If both of them approve the question, then the question is accepted and is not reviewed by Komal. If both disapprove the question, it is rejected and is not reviewed by Komal. If one of them approves the question and the other disapproves it, then the question is reviewed by Komal. Then the question is accepted only if she approves it.A question created by one of the reviewers is decided upon by the other two. If a question is created by Amal, then it is first reviewed by Bimal. If Bimal approves the question, then it is accepted. Otherwise, it is reviewed by Komal. The question is then accepted only if Komal approves it. A similar process is followed for questions created by Bimal, whose questions are first reviewed by Komal, and then by Amal only if Komal disapproves it. Questions created by Komal are first reviewed by Amal, and then, if required, by Bimal.The following facts are known about the review process after its completion. Q02, Q06, Q09, Q11, and Q12 were rejected and the other questions were accepted. Amal reviewed only Q02, Q03, Q04, Q06, Q08, Q10, Q11, and Q13. Bimal reviewed only Q02, Q04, Q06 through Q09, Q12, and Q13. Komal reviewed only Q01 through Q05, Q07, Q08, Q09, Q11, and Q12.Q.How many questions were DEFINITELY created by Amal?Correct answer is '3'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev