CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  What is the significance of the basic structu... Start Learning for Free
What is the significance of the basic structure doctrine established in the Kesavananda Bharati case?
  • a)
    It allows Parliament to amend any part of the Constitution without restrictions.
  • b)
    It identifies federalism as a fundamental feature of the Constitution that cannot be altered.
  • c)
    It mandates a uniform approach to governance across all states.
  • d)
    It supports the supremacy of state laws over central laws.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
What is the significance of the basic structure doctrine established i...
The basic structure doctrine, established in the landmark Kesavananda Bharati case in 1973, asserts that certain fundamental aspects of the Constitution, including federalism, cannot be amended by Parliament. This doctrine serves as a critical check on central power, ensuring that states retain significant rights and autonomy, thus reinforcing the principle of decentralized governance. An interesting fact is that this case set a precedent for how the Indian judiciary interprets constitutional amendments and the balance of power between the Centre and the states.
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Constitution of India guarantees to all its citizens certain fundamental freedoms, which are recognized as their fundamental rights. However, these fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution of India are not absolute as no right can be. Each of these fundamental rights is liable to be controlled, curtailed and regulated to some extent by laws made by the Parliament or the State Legislatures. Accordingly, the Constitution of India lays down the grounds and the purposes for which a legislature can impose reasonable restrictions on the rights guaranteed to citizens. The State cannot travel beyond the contours of these reasonable restrictions in curbing the fundamental rights guaranteed to citizens. While determining the constitutional validity of a restriction imposed on a fundamental right by a legislation, the Court is not concerned with the necessity of the restriction or the wisdom of the policy underlying it, but only whether the restriction is in excess of the requirement, and whether the legislature has overstepped the Constitutional limitations. Two of the fundamental rights guaranteed to every citizen of India are- the right to move freely throughout the territory of India and the right to reside and settle in any part of India. However, the State may impose reasonable restrictions on these rights by law, in the interests of the general public or for the protection of the interests of any Scheduled tribes.Q.A group of Indian students of XYZ University located in New Delhi, India posted on social networking sites that they would hold a demonstration outside the university campus, protesting against a recently passed law which made it compulsory for university students to wear uniforms while attending classes. The students further threatened to use whatever means necessary to stop the oppression of students. Therefore, the State Authorities placed barricades around the university campus in order to restrict movement of the students carrying out the demonstration and ensuring that the demonstration does not turn violent. In the given situation, which of the following statements is correct regarding the act of placing of barricades by State Authorities?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Constitution of India guarantees to all its citizens certain fundamental freedoms, which are recognized as their fundamental rights. However, these fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution of India are not absolute as no right can be. Each of these fundamental rights is liable to be controlled, curtailed and regulated to some extent by laws made by the Parliament or the State Legislatures. Accordingly, the Constitution of India lays down the grounds and the purposes for which a legislature can impose reasonable restrictions on the rights guaranteed to citizens. The State cannot travel beyond the contours of these reasonable restrictions in curbing the fundamental rights guaranteed to citizens. While determining the constitutional validity of a restriction imposed on a fundamental right by a legislation, the Court is not concerned with the necessity of the restriction or the wisdom of the policy underlying it, but only whether the restriction is in excess of the requirement, and whether the legislature has overstepped the Constitutional limitations. Two of the fundamental rights guaranteed to every citizen of India are- the right to move freely throughout the territory of India and the right to reside and settle in any part of India. However, the State may impose reasonable restrictions on these rights by law, in the interests of the general public or for the protection of the interests of any Scheduled tribes.Q.The appropriate authority in a State passed an externment order against Mr. A, a citizen of India. The externment order prohibited Mr. A, from residing within the State, from the date specified in such order. The externment order was passed by virtue of powers conferred on the appropriate authority by law, and the constitutional validity of this law had been upheld by the Supreme Court of India. The externment order was passed on the ground that Mr. A was found to be frequently engaged in illegal business of narcotic drugs and was also involved in several cases of riot and criminal intimidation. In the given situation, which of the following statements is correct regarding the externment order?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Constitution of India guarantees to all its citizens certain fundamental freedoms, which are recognized as their fundamental rights. However, these fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution of India are not absolute as no right can be. Each of these fundamental rights is liable to be controlled, curtailed and regulated to some extent by laws made by the Parliament or the State Legislatures. Accordingly, the Constitution of India lays down the grounds and the purposes for which a legislature can impose reasonable restrictions on the rights guaranteed to citizens. The State cannot travel beyond the contours of these reasonable restrictions in curbing the fundamental rights guaranteed to citizens. While determining the constitutional validity of a restriction imposed on a fundamental right by a legislation, the Court is not concerned with the necessity of the restriction or the wisdom of the policy underlying it, but only whether the restriction is in excess of the requirement, and whether the legislature has overstepped the Constitutional limitations. Two of the fundamental rights guaranteed to every citizen of India are- the right to move freely throughout the territory of India and the right to reside and settle in any part of India. However, the State may impose reasonable restrictions on these rights by law, in the interests of the general public or for the protection of the interests of any Scheduled tribes.Q. Mr. Z, a citizen of India, was issued a passport on June 1, 2020 by the Passport Office. Mr. Z was due to travel to Spain on July 15, 2021. On July 11, 2021, Mr. Z received a letter from the Regional Passport Officer intimating him that it was decided by the Government of India to seize his passport in public interest. Mr. Z was required to surrender his passport within seven days of the receipt of that letter. In the given situation, which of the following statements is correct?

The Writ Jurisdiction of Supreme Court can be invoked under Article 32 of the Constitution for the violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Part - III of the Constitution. Any provision in any Constitution for Fundamental Rights is meaningless unless there are adequate safeguards to ensure enforcement of such provisions. Since the reality of such rights is tested only through the judiciary, the safeguards assume even more importance. In addition, enforcement also depends upon the degree of independence of the Judiciary and the availability of relevant instruments with the executive authority. Indian Constitution, like most of Western Constitutions, lays down certain provisions to ensure the enforcement of Fundamental Rights. However, Article 32 is referred to as the “Constitutional Remedy” for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. This provision itself has been included in the Fundamental Rights and hence it cannot be denied to any person. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar described Article 32 as the most important one, without which the Constitution would be reduced to nullity. It is also referred to as the heart and soul of the Constitution. By including Article 32 in the Fundamental Rights, the Supreme Court has been made the protector and guarantor of these Rights. An application made under Article 32 of the Constitution before the Supreme Court, cannot be refused on technical grounds. In addition to the prescribed five types of writs, the Supreme Court may pass any other appropriate order. Moreover, only the questions pertaining to the Fundamental Rights can be determined in proceedings against Article 32. Under Article 32, the Supreme Court may issue a Writ against any person or government within the territory of India. Where the infringement of a Fundamental Right has been established, the Supreme Court cannot refuse relief on the ground that the aggrieved person may have remedy before some other court or under the ordinary law.The relief can also not be denied on the ground that the disputed facts have to be investigated or some evidence has to be collected. Even if an aggrieved person has not asked for a particular Writ, the Supreme Court, after considering the facts and circumstances, may grant the appropriate Writ and may even modify it to suit the exigencies of the case. Normally, only the aggrieved person is allowed to move the Court. But it has been held by the Supreme Court that in social or public interest matters, any one may move the Court. A Public Interest Litigation can be filed before the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution or before the High Court of a State under Article 226 of the Constitution under their respective Writ Jurisdictions.All of the following can be inferred from the passage except

Top Courses for CLAT

What is the significance of the basic structure doctrine established in the Kesavananda Bharati case?a) It allows Parliament to amend any part of the Constitution without restrictions.b) It identifies federalism as a fundamental feature of the Constitution that cannot be altered.c) It mandates a uniform approach to governance across all states.d) It supports the supremacy of state laws over central laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
What is the significance of the basic structure doctrine established in the Kesavananda Bharati case?a) It allows Parliament to amend any part of the Constitution without restrictions.b) It identifies federalism as a fundamental feature of the Constitution that cannot be altered.c) It mandates a uniform approach to governance across all states.d) It supports the supremacy of state laws over central laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about What is the significance of the basic structure doctrine established in the Kesavananda Bharati case?a) It allows Parliament to amend any part of the Constitution without restrictions.b) It identifies federalism as a fundamental feature of the Constitution that cannot be altered.c) It mandates a uniform approach to governance across all states.d) It supports the supremacy of state laws over central laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for What is the significance of the basic structure doctrine established in the Kesavananda Bharati case?a) It allows Parliament to amend any part of the Constitution without restrictions.b) It identifies federalism as a fundamental feature of the Constitution that cannot be altered.c) It mandates a uniform approach to governance across all states.d) It supports the supremacy of state laws over central laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for What is the significance of the basic structure doctrine established in the Kesavananda Bharati case?a) It allows Parliament to amend any part of the Constitution without restrictions.b) It identifies federalism as a fundamental feature of the Constitution that cannot be altered.c) It mandates a uniform approach to governance across all states.d) It supports the supremacy of state laws over central laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of What is the significance of the basic structure doctrine established in the Kesavananda Bharati case?a) It allows Parliament to amend any part of the Constitution without restrictions.b) It identifies federalism as a fundamental feature of the Constitution that cannot be altered.c) It mandates a uniform approach to governance across all states.d) It supports the supremacy of state laws over central laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of What is the significance of the basic structure doctrine established in the Kesavananda Bharati case?a) It allows Parliament to amend any part of the Constitution without restrictions.b) It identifies federalism as a fundamental feature of the Constitution that cannot be altered.c) It mandates a uniform approach to governance across all states.d) It supports the supremacy of state laws over central laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for What is the significance of the basic structure doctrine established in the Kesavananda Bharati case?a) It allows Parliament to amend any part of the Constitution without restrictions.b) It identifies federalism as a fundamental feature of the Constitution that cannot be altered.c) It mandates a uniform approach to governance across all states.d) It supports the supremacy of state laws over central laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of What is the significance of the basic structure doctrine established in the Kesavananda Bharati case?a) It allows Parliament to amend any part of the Constitution without restrictions.b) It identifies federalism as a fundamental feature of the Constitution that cannot be altered.c) It mandates a uniform approach to governance across all states.d) It supports the supremacy of state laws over central laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice What is the significance of the basic structure doctrine established in the Kesavananda Bharati case?a) It allows Parliament to amend any part of the Constitution without restrictions.b) It identifies federalism as a fundamental feature of the Constitution that cannot be altered.c) It mandates a uniform approach to governance across all states.d) It supports the supremacy of state laws over central laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev