What is the primary purpose of sanctions imposed by countries like the U.S. on nations such as Russia?a) To enhance trade relations with targeted nationsb) To restrict trade and financial transactions with targeted nationsc) To promote military collaboration among alliesd) To increase the price of goods in the global marketCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > What is the primary purpose of sanctions impo...

Join the Discussion on the App

What is the primary purpose of sanctions imposed by countries like the U.S. on nations such as Russia?

a)
To enhance trade relations with targeted nations
b)
To restrict trade and financial transactions with targeted nations
c)
To promote military collaboration among allies
d)
To increase the price of goods in the global market

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Test: Weekly Current Affairs: October 22nd to 31st

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Verified Answer

What is the primary purpose of sanctions imposed by countries like the...

Sanctions are primarily designed to restrict trade and financial transactions with targeted nations, serving as a tool for countries to exert political pressure or influence behavior without resorting to military action. By limiting economic activities, sanctions aim to compel the targeted nation to change its policies or actions. An interesting fact about sanctions is that they can have significant unintended consequences on the global economy, affecting not just the targeted nation but also allies and trading partners.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has almost doubled its borders with Russia with the addition of Finland as its 31st member in April 2023. Sweden will become a member eventually, once the ratification process gets over, which will swell NATO’s territorial expanse like never before, and also make the Baltic Sea a NATO lake. The accession of Finland was the fastest on record. For long, Nordic countries Finland and Sweden had refused to take sides, maintaining military nonalignment and being focused more on their internal socioeconomic development, thus making them models of modern welfare states. Their relations with Russia were moderate at best, if not deep enough. But the Russian invasion of Ukraine changed the way they had viewed their eastern neighbour and the predictability of its leader, Vladimir Putin. For sure, Mr. Putin’s actions have brought certain changes in the regional security dynamics of Europe.First, engaging Russia has never been so easy for the European Union, mostly because of differences among member-states. Some European countries such as Germany and France had a soft corner for Russia, unlike some Baltic states such as Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania which have been in favor of treading a cautious path. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has not only brought back war to the European realm in the post-second World War era but is also a blow to the EU’s image as an actor, having failed to avert the war in its neighborhood. An interesting outcome in this adverse situation is that Russia’s actions have now united European countries more than ever before. Second, Mr. Putin might not have expected that Finland and Sweden would give up their neutrality so soon. Their membership will also mean more expenditure, militarily, and restructuring apart from a stationing of NATO forces under the new command structure. As a response, Russia will also build its military presence in the adjoining northern areas and the Kaliningrad exclave. Bordering Finland, these northern areas (starting from St. Petersburg to Murmansk) come under the Russian Core region, which is strategically and economically important for Russia. Having NATO at its Finnish door will further fuel Russian anxiety. Spotlight on the Arctic Third, apart from these immediate border areas, another region where Nordic countries (or for that matter NATO) may face a standoff with Russia is the Arctic region, which has received little attention as being too hostile an environment to merit any attention. But, due to climate change and prospects of harnessing untapped oil, gas and mineral resources, it is receiving wide attention, creating unexpected and complex challenges. Apart from the United States, Canada, and Russia, the Nordic countries such as Norway, Denmark, Iceland, Sweden and Finland are members of the Arctic Council and have a direct stake in Arctic affairs. There have been localized confrontations between Russia and other actors here. NATO membership for the Nordic countries has brought a new geostrategic dimension to the Arctic’s future.Q.According to the passage, how has Russias actions impacted the security dynamics in Europe?

View answer

Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.The friendship between India and Bangladesh is historic, evolving over the last 50 years. India's political, diplomatic, military and humanitarian support during Bangladesh's Liberation War played an important role towards Bangladesh's independence.Post-Independence, the India-Bangladesh relationship has oscillated as Bangladesh passed through different regimes. The relationship remained cordial until the assassination of Bangladesh's founding President Sheikh Mujibur Rahman in August 15, 1975, followed by a period of military rule and the rise of General Ziaur Rahman who became President and also assassinated in 1981. It thawed again between 1982-1991 when a military-led government by General H.M. Ershad ruled the country. Since Bangladesh's return to parliamentary democracy in 1991, relations have gone through highs and lows. However, in the last decade, India-Bangladesh relations have warmed up, entering a new era of cooperation, and moving beyond historical and cultural ties to become more assimilated in the areas of trade, connectivity, energy, and defence.Bangladesh and India have achieved the rare feat of solving their border issues peacefully by ratifying the historic Land Boundary Agreement in 2015, where enclaves were swapped allowing inhabitants to choose their country of residence and become citizens of either India or Bangladesh. The Bangladesh government led by Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has uprooted anti-India insurgency elements from its borders, making the India-Bangladesh border one of the region's most peaceful, and allowing India to make a massive redeployment of resources to its more contentious borders elsewhere.Bangladesh today is India's biggest trading partner in South Asia with exports to Bangladesh in FY 2018-19 at $9.21 billion and imports at $1.04 billion. Trade could be more balanced if non-tariff barriers from the Indian side could be removed. Bangladeshis make up a large portion of tourists in India, outnumbering all tourists arriving from Western Europe in 2017, with one in every five tourists being a Bangladeshi. Bangladesh accounts for more than 35% of India's international medical patients and contributes more than 50% of India's revenue from medical tourism.India-Bangladesh relations have been gaining positive momentum over the last decade. As Bangladesh celebrates its 50 years of independence (March 26, 1971), India continues to be one of its most important neighbours and strategic partners. As the larger country, the onus is on India to be generous enough to let the water flow as this issue is constraining positive relations between the two neighbours. These small but important steps can remove long-standing snags in a relationship which otherwise is gradually coming of age in 50 years. To make the recent gains irreversible, both countries need to continue working on the three C's — cooperation, collaboration, and consolidation.Q. Which of the following is TRUE about the relations between India and Bangladesh?(

View answer

Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.Climate change is a global concern and requires a well-coordinated global approach to address it. In simple terms, what needs to be done is to assess and monitor the net stock of GHG (greenhouse gases) present in the atmosphere at any given time, and work out ways to contain/reduce it.Unlike many pollutant gases that have a relatively shorter life span once emitted, GHG can remain in the atmosphere for a fairly long time. For instance, carbon dioxide, the major constituent of GHG, can remain in the atmosphere for as long as a thousand years.The Industrial Revolution in the 19th century and industrialisation in the world added to great volumes of GHG in the atmosphere over time. Unfortunately, the realisation of their adverse impact on climate came quite late.To address this, substantial financial resources and the latest technologies are required. Developed countries, which are responsible for creating this mess in the first place and have the better financial capacity and technological capability, have to bear the major burden for this. They need to provide funds to the developing countries and facilitate technology transfers. This is the basic philosophy behind the "common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities" principle.Unfortunately, despite all the talk, this is not happening. In the COP (Conference of the Parties) meeting in Copenhagen in 2009, developed countries pledged to channel $100 billion a year to developing countries by 2020 to help them adapt to and mitigate climate change. This pledge is nowhere near being honoured. Developed countries have tried to further confuse the matter with accounting issues. Many have come out with various win-win solutions trying to obfuscate the need for financial transfers.Excessive hot weather, untimely and excessive rains, flooding and extreme climatic conditions this year have affected people across the world. It is, however, the poor and developing countries in Africa, South Asia and Latin America which suffer the most due to a lack of resources to deal with the problem. Even if these countries were to follow the emissions discipline strictly individually, they might still suffer the climate change consequences.India has shown leadership in declaring voluntary, ambitious NDCs (Nationally Determined Contribution) in Paris, followed by bold commitments in COPs thereafter. This is likely to motivate others, especially developing countries, to follow. But this is certainly not enough and may only serve a limited purpose.India should use its global stature, lobbying power and leadership to take the bull by its horns – make developed countries do what they should rightly be doing, be it during the COP meetings on climate change or in other forums like G-20. As India takes over the G-20 presidency, this should be our main agenda. The developed country members of G-20 routinely corner developing countries over the subsidy issue in these meetings. It is time now to show them the mirror.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?

View answer

The COVID-19 pandemic has taken the entire world hostage in less than four months, and the global economy has been hit the hardest with governments across the globe implementing stringent policies including lockdown to control the coronavirus outbreak. The pandemic today presents unprecedented challenges and impediments to businesses in conducting their normal operations. The lockdown across the world has caused delays in the performance of contracts and transactions. Now, the question that arises is whether the current situation can enable parties to a contract to alter their obligations with non-compliance of terms neither being regarded as a "default committed by any party" nor a "breach of contract"? There are certain well-accepted practices for dealing with such extraordinary situations in commercial transactions by the inclusion of force majeure & material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Determination of the types of circumstances so covered by the force majeure clause contained in a contract is essential. Provisions of force majeure often cover natural disasters like hurricanes, floods, and earthquakes as "acts of God." Other covered events may include war, terrorism, civil disorder, fire, disease medical epidemics or by reasons of applicable laws or regulations. Broadly, the Courts have interpreted the term "Force Majeure" as an event that can neither be anticipated nor controlled by either of the contracting parties. A force majeure clause applies in the context of ongoing contractual arrangements, whereas, an MAE or material adverse change (MAC) clause applies to the allocation of risk in transactions before their closure or completion. Pandemic and related consequences such as government action is a type of event covered by a force majeure clause, however, its impact on the affected partys ability to perform its contractual obligations may vary depending upon contractual terms. It is common for force majeure clauses to specify the impact that the event or circumstances in question must have, in order for the clause to be triggered. References may be made, for example, to the event or circumstances having "prevented", "hindered" or "delayed" performance. These terms require different levels of impact on performance before a party can claim recourse to these clauses. In other words, the force majeure and MAC clauses act as an exception to what would otherwise be treated as a breach of contract. Certain contracts may state that, if a force majeure clause is applied, the contract may automatically be terminated. On the other hand, some contracts may even state that the duty to fulfil the contractual obligation may be suspended for a certain period of time and if the force majeure event is not curbed or treated even after such time, then eventually the contract may be terminated. Though there cannot be a one-size-fits-all solution to this question, and it depends upon how the force majeure clause is worded in a specific contract; and in the absence of the same, applicable laws related to the same will be required to be taken into consideration.Q.Typically, the MAE (Material Adverse Chang e) provision in an agreement contemplates events which if they occur, or are likely occur, would have a “materially adverse change or effect on the assets, business, property, liabilities, financial condition, results, operations of the target” or that “affects the ability of the transacting parties to consummate the transaction” or the “validity or enforceability of the transacting parties to its rights and remedies under the transaction documents”. Which of the following sample clauses in a contract resembles an MAE clause?

View answer

What is the primary goal behind India and Russia's plan to establish a "dynamic reference rate" for their currencies?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

CLAT Mock Test Series 2025

Crash Course for CLAT

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

What is the primary purpose of sanctions imposed by countries like the U.S. on nations such as Russia?a) To enhance trade relations with targeted nationsb) To restrict trade and financial transactions with targeted nationsc) To promote military collaboration among alliesd) To increase the price of goods in the global marketCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
What is the primary purpose of sanctions imposed by countries like the U.S. on nations such as Russia?a) To enhance trade relations with targeted nationsb) To restrict trade and financial transactions with targeted nationsc) To promote military collaboration among alliesd) To increase the price of goods in the global marketCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about What is the primary purpose of sanctions imposed by countries like the U.S. on nations such as Russia?a) To enhance trade relations with targeted nationsb) To restrict trade and financial transactions with targeted nationsc) To promote military collaboration among alliesd) To increase the price of goods in the global marketCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for What is the primary purpose of sanctions imposed by countries like the U.S. on nations such as Russia?a) To enhance trade relations with targeted nationsb) To restrict trade and financial transactions with targeted nationsc) To promote military collaboration among alliesd) To increase the price of goods in the global marketCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for What is the primary purpose of sanctions imposed by countries like the U.S. on nations such as Russia?a) To enhance trade relations with targeted nationsb) To restrict trade and financial transactions with targeted nationsc) To promote military collaboration among alliesd) To increase the price of goods in the global marketCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of What is the primary purpose of sanctions imposed by countries like the U.S. on nations such as Russia?a) To enhance trade relations with targeted nationsb) To restrict trade and financial transactions with targeted nationsc) To promote military collaboration among alliesd) To increase the price of goods in the global marketCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of What is the primary purpose of sanctions imposed by countries like the U.S. on nations such as Russia?a) To enhance trade relations with targeted nationsb) To restrict trade and financial transactions with targeted nationsc) To promote military collaboration among alliesd) To increase the price of goods in the global marketCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for What is the primary purpose of sanctions imposed by countries like the U.S. on nations such as Russia?a) To enhance trade relations with targeted nationsb) To restrict trade and financial transactions with targeted nationsc) To promote military collaboration among alliesd) To increase the price of goods in the global marketCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of What is the primary purpose of sanctions imposed by countries like the U.S. on nations such as Russia?a) To enhance trade relations with targeted nationsb) To restrict trade and financial transactions with targeted nationsc) To promote military collaboration among alliesd) To increase the price of goods in the global marketCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice What is the primary purpose of sanctions imposed by countries like the U.S. on nations such as Russia?a) To enhance trade relations with targeted nationsb) To restrict trade and financial transactions with targeted nationsc) To promote military collaboration among alliesd) To increase the price of goods in the global marketCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam