Bank Exams Exam  >  Bank Exams Questions  >  What technology is utilized in the Hyperloop ... Start Learning for Free
What technology is utilized in the Hyperloop system to reduce friction and enable high-speed travel?
  • a)
    Hydraulic systems
  • b)
    Magnetic Levitation (Maglev)
  • c)
    Steam propulsion
  • d)
    Internal combustion engines
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
What technology is utilized in the Hyperloop system to reduce friction...
The Hyperloop system uses Magnetic Levitation (Maglev) technology, which allows the pods to float on magnets, minimizing physical contact with the track and thus significantly reducing friction. This innovative approach enables the pods to achieve high speeds, with maximum capacities up to 1,100 km/h. The development of such advanced transportation systems is not only aimed at improving travel efficiency but also at providing sustainable transit solutions with zero direct emissions, highlighting the potential for environmentally friendly transportation in the future.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
What technology is utilized in the Hyperloop system to reduce friction...
Hyperloop Technology Overview
The Hyperloop is an innovative transportation system designed to achieve high-speed travel while minimizing friction. The key technology that enables this is Magnetic Levitation (Maglev).
How Magnetic Levitation Works
- Levitation: Maglev technology uses powerful magnets to lift the Hyperloop pod off the track. This eliminates contact between the pod and the track, thereby reducing friction to almost zero.
- Propulsion: The same magnetic technology is utilized for propulsion. Linear motors create magnetic fields that push and pull the pod along the track, allowing it to accelerate rapidly.
Benefits of Maglev in Hyperloop
- High Speeds: With reduced friction, the Hyperloop can potentially reach speeds of over 700 miles per hour, significantly faster than traditional transportation methods.
- Energy Efficiency: The reduced friction also means less energy is needed for propulsion, leading to a more sustainable and cost-effective travel solution.
- Comfort and Safety: The smooth and silent operation of Maglev technology enhances passenger comfort and reduces wear and tear on the system.
Conclusion
In summary, the use of Magnetic Levitation in the Hyperloop system is crucial for achieving high-speed travel. By eliminating friction through levitation and utilizing magnetic propulsion, the Hyperloop can offer a revolutionary alternative to current transportation systems.
Explore Courses for Bank Exams exam

Similar Bank Exams Doubts

Direction:Read the given passage and answer the questions that follow. Certain words are printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of these.With the successful launch of the first technologydemonstratorof the indigenously made Reusable Launch Vehicle (RLV), the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) has taken a baby step in building a vehicle that can be reused multiple times to launch satellites into orbit. The hypersonic flight, that lasted about 770 seconds from lift-off tosplashdownin the Bay of Bengal, reached an altitude of about 65 km before re-entering the atmosphere at nearly five times the speed of sound. Many more such successful launches have to be undertaken before the RLV becomes a reusable launch system to put satellites into orbit. Some of the objectives of this week’s launch were to test the aero-thermodynamic characterisation of the vehicle with wings when it re-enters the atmosphere at hypersonic speed; the control and guidance system; the control system to land the vehicle at a specific location; and the hot structure, the basic body-carrying part of the vehicle with heat protecting tiles. The ultimate objective is to test the vehicle’s performance when it travels at a speed of Mach 25 using air-breathingpropulsion. It will take 10 to 15 years, and several more launches, before ISRO readies a reusable launch vehicle for commercial use.Building a fully and rapidly reusable launch vehicle will play apivotalrole in cutting down by as much as 80 per cent the cost of launching satellites into orbit. In fact, ISRO is already well-known for launching satellites at a far cheaper cost than other space agencies. Currently, the bulk of the launch cost comes from building the rocket, which can be used just once, as the rockets get burnt on re-entry into the atmosphere. No other space agency has reusable launch vehicles in operation, and ISRO has taken a lead in developing one. Learning from the mistakes of the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NAS

Direction:Read the given passage and answer the questions that follow. Certain words are printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of these.With the successful launch of the first technologydemonstratorof the indigenously made Reusable Launch Vehicle (RLV), the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) has taken a baby step in building a vehicle that can be reused multiple times to launch satellites into orbit. The hypersonic flight, that lasted about 770 seconds from lift-off tosplashdownin the Bay of Bengal, reached an altitude of about 65 km before re-entering the atmosphere at nearly five times the speed of sound. Many more such successful launches have to be undertaken before the RLV becomes a reusable launch system to put satellites into orbit. Some of the objectives of this week’s launch were to test the aero-thermodynamic characterisation of the vehicle with wings when it re-enters the atmosphere at hypersonic speed; the control and guidance system; the control system to land the vehicle at a specific location; and the hot structure, the basic body-carrying part of the vehicle with heat protecting tiles. The ultimate objective is to test the vehicle’s performance when it travels at a speed of Mach 25 using air-breathingpropulsion. It will take 10 to 15 years, and several more launches, before ISRO readies a reusable launch vehicle for commercial use.Building a fully and rapidly reusable launch vehicle will play apivotalrole in cutting down by as much as 80 per cent the cost of launching satellites into orbit. In fact, ISRO is already well-known for launching satellites at a far cheaper cost than other space agencies. Currently, the bulk of the launch cost comes from building the rocket, which can be used just once, as the rockets get burnt on re-entry into the atmosphere. No other space agency has reusable launch vehicles in operation, and ISRO has taken a lead in developing one. Learning from the mistakes of the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NAS

Directions: The passage given below is followed by a set of questions. Read the passage carefully to answer the questions that follow:The internationalisation of business transactions, which forces changes in product lines and process, has enabled a handful of advanced nations to dominate and control technology. This has put developing nations like India at a disadvantage, because it is difficult for a developing nation to shorten product cycles, matching the developed nations. In the near absence of a level-playing field, it is important for India to look for new avenues in technology.The scarcity of capital has led to a weak R&D base, making technological self-sufficiency a distant dream for the country. The gap between what the country spends on R&D and what needs to be spent, to develop optimum technological capability, is wide. The USA spends annually about $150 billion on R&D followed by about $100 billion by Japan. The amount made available in India for S&T efforts is a nominal $1 billion. India's R&D spending is less than one percent of sales against 3 to 4 percent in OECD countries. Besides, nearly 90 percent of patents currently in force in India are meant to protect foreign patent-holders regarding technology innovations.To top it, Indian industry has been reluctant in developing technology-intensive production lines. There has been a general hesitance to either invest in indigenous R&D or go in for technology imports. What is interesting is that despite the technological backwardness, our expenditure on indigenous R&D has exceeded that of technology imports. In fact, royalty payments and technical fees as a percentage of sales- a proxy for technology imports - by large industrial houses is below 0.5 percent compared to R&D to sales ratio of about one percent.Perhaps, the need to resolve the immediate problems of production is better served by local R&D rather than imported technology. The large domestic market and inadequate investable resources is made to justify near autarky in technology acquisition.Of late, Indian industry, spurred by the liberalisation process, is taking a decisive turn to scale the technology barrier. It is, however, feared that the Indian entrepreneurs’ bid to integrate their production pattern with the world system might be met by technological production by western industries.The transnational corporations would ideally prefer the diffusion of technology embodied in exportable products then technology transfer. But, with the development of a strong manufacturing base in India, it is no longer possible for the transnationals to technologically monopolise all the production lines in the manufacturing industry. Hence, the multinationals from the industrial countries have changed their attitude towards sharing their technology with India. There has been discernible shift towards supply of know-how through foreign direct investment and licences in both low and medium R&D intensive areas.Enquiries from recipient firms in India have revealed that foreign firms are amenable to supplying know-how in manufacturing and capital goods industry. In fact, many engineering units have obtained the best possible technology in their area of operation. Similarly, a number of automobiles and chemicals units are reported to have obtained the latest technology, which has enabled them to become market leaders in their fields.Assimilation of technology, supplied by foreign companies to Indian firms, has brought discernible improvements in product quality, besides leading to energy conservation, capacity increase and pollution control. In such cases, the efficacy of technology transfer depends upon the relationship of the buyer with the supplier, which ultimately decides the success of the deal.In order to facilitate technology orientation, the government has taken some initiatives. Nevertheless, the efficient science-industry linkage, considered to be imperative for technology progress, has not yet materialised.Besides, our technology programme has yet to take stock of the present scenario, whereby internationalisation of business transactions has become a new reality. Our policies have failed to counter the threat posed by the globalisation process which, by moving towards the inter-dependence of nations, would result in the dependence of developing countries on the advanced nations.Our policy makers have chosen to ignore the glaring reality that it is the synergy between the industrial, financial and trade policies in identified areas of national priorities which could help work the technology miracle. Though the government encourages foreign investment in hi-tech areas, there has been no attempt to match technology with the scale of production. The country does not even have a credible policy for taking advantage of the advanced foreign sector, whose dominant presence is sought by the policy maker. The result: an increase in foreign investment and technology transfer and a refurbished manufacturing base but such that it would hardly enable us to break away from the dependency syndrome experienced vis-a-vis transnationals. In this connection, it may be noted that Japan carefully screened all technology contracts so that investment took place on favourable terms and placed severe restriction on foreign capital which was perceived to be detrimental to its interests.We have the capability to move from our present position of peripheral dependence to that of a mainstream player. It needs the will to re-orient our technology imperatives, evaluate its applicability and focus on a few strategic areas in which we have dynamic comparative advantage.There is no gainsaying that the ongoing protectionist tendency has compelled India to resort to import substitution in strategic hitech areas. Nevertheless, our endeavour should be to further strengthen our expertise in the traditional sphere of adaptive technology. But it is most important that apart from the above, we should focus on developing our human resources in which we have a potential comparative advantage.A large reservoir of scientific manpower could be effectively utilised to help India make a dent in the technology market where knowledge-intensive industries enjoy a monopoly status. Our human resources can be optimally deployed to make us world leaders in resource-based industries like information technology, computer software, systems engineering, design and biotechnology.A suitable policy framework, which at the outset, would aim at encouraging foreign investment, to develop our resource endowment areas which will utilise our existing talent and strengthen our comparative advantage in the long run, is necessary. India has the capability to penetrate the technology cartel created by multinationals in mainstream developed nations.Q. Globalisation is the new reality but there is a threat inherent to the interdependence of countries. This threat is

Directions: The passage given below is followed by a set of questions. Read the passage carefully to answer the questions that follow:The internationalisation of business transactions, which forces changes in product lines and process, has enabled a handful of advanced nations to dominate and control technology. This has put developing nations like India at a disadvantage, because it is difficult for a developing nation to shorten product cycles, matching the developed nations. In the near absence of a level-playing field, it is important for India to look for new avenues in technology.The scarcity of capital has led to a weak R&D base, making technological self-sufficiency a distant dream for the country. The gap between what the country spends on R&D and what needs to be spent, to develop optimum technological capability, is wide. The USA spends annually about $150 billion on R&D followed by about $100 billion by Japan. The amount made available in India for S&T efforts is a nominal $1 billion. India's R&D spending is less than one percent of sales against 3 to 4 percent in OECD countries. Besides, nearly 90 percent of patents currently in force in India are meant to protect foreign patent-holders regarding technology innovations.To top it, Indian industry has been reluctant in developing technology-intensive production lines. There has been a general hesitance to either invest in indigenous R&D or go in for technology imports. What is interesting is that despite the technological backwardness, our expenditure on indigenous R&D has exceeded that of technology imports. In fact, royalty payments and technical fees as a percentage of sales- a proxy for technology imports - by large industrial houses is below 0.5 percent compared to R&D to sales ratio of about one percent.Perhaps, the need to resolve the immediate problems of production is better served by local R&D rather than imported technology. The large domestic market and inadequate investable resources is made to justify near autarky in technology acquisition.Of late, Indian industry, spurred by the liberalisation process, is taking a decisive turn to scale the technology barrier. It is, however, feared that the Indian entrepreneurs’ bid to integrate their production pattern with the world system might be met by technological production by western industries.The transnational corporations would ideally prefer the diffusion of technology embodied in exportable products then technology transfer. But, with the development of a strong manufacturing base in India, it is no longer possible for the transnationals to technologically monopolise all the production lines in the manufacturing industry. Hence, the multinationals from the industrial countries have changed their attitude towards sharing their technology with India. There has been discernible shift towards supply of know-how through foreign direct investment and licences in both low and medium R&D intensive areas.Enquiries from recipient firms in India have revealed that foreign firms are amenable to supplying know-how in manufacturing and capital goods industry. In fact, many engineering units have obtained the best possible technology in their area of operation. Similarly, a number of automobiles and chemicals units are reported to have obtained the latest technology, which has enabled them to become market leaders in their fields.Assimilation of technology, supplied by foreign companies to Indian firms, has brought discernible improvements in product quality, besides leading to energy conservation, capacity increase and pollution control. In such cases, the efficacy of technology transfer depends upon the relationship of the buyer with the supplier, which ultimately decides the success of the deal.In order to facilitate technology orientation, the government has taken some initiatives. Nevertheless, the efficient science-industry linkage, considered to be imperative for technology progress, has not yet materialised.Besides, our technology programme has yet to take stock of the present scenario, whereby internationalisation of business transactions has become a new reality. Our policies have failed to counter the threat posed by the globalisation process which, by moving towards the inter-dependence of nations, would result in the dependence of developing countries on the advanced nations.Our policy makers have chosen to ignore the glaring reality that it is the synergy between the industrial, financial and trade policies in identified areas of national priorities which could help work the technology miracle. Though the government encourages foreign investment in hi-tech areas, there has been no attempt to match technology with the scale of production. The country does not even have a credible policy for taking advantage of the advanced foreign sector, whose dominant presence is sought by the policy maker. The result: an increase in foreign investment and technology transfer and a refurbished manufacturing base but such that it would hardly enable us to break away from the dependency syndrome experienced vis-a-vis transnationals. In this connection, it may be noted that Japan carefully screened all technology contracts so that investment took place on favourable terms and placed severe restriction on foreign capital which was perceived to be detrimental to its interests.We have the capability to move from our present position of peripheral dependence to that of a mainstream player. It needs the will to re-orient our technology imperatives, evaluate its applicability and focus on a few strategic areas in which we have dynamic comparative advantage.There is no gainsaying that the ongoing protectionist tendency has compelled India to resort to import substitution in strategic hitech areas. Nevertheless, our endeavour should be to further strengthen our expertise in the traditional sphere of adaptive technology. But it is most important that apart from the above, we should focus on developing our human resources in which we have a potential comparative advantage.A large reservoir of scientific manpower could be effectively utilised to help India make a dent in the technology market where knowledge-intensive industries enjoy a monopoly status. Our human resources can be optimally deployed to make us world leaders in resource-based industries like information technology, computer software, systems engineering, design and biotechnology.A suitable policy framework, which at the outset, would aim at encouraging foreign investment, to develop our resource endowment areas which will utilise our existing talent and strengthen our comparative advantage in the long run, is necessary. India has the capability to penetrate the technology cartel created by multinationals in mainstream developed nations.Q. Which of the following reveals that foreign firms are willing to supply know-how to the Indian manufacturing and capital goods industry?

Question Description
What technology is utilized in the Hyperloop system to reduce friction and enable high-speed travel?a) Hydraulic systemsb) Magnetic Levitation (Maglev)c) Steam propulsiond) Internal combustion enginesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for Bank Exams 2025 is part of Bank Exams preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Bank Exams exam syllabus. Information about What technology is utilized in the Hyperloop system to reduce friction and enable high-speed travel?a) Hydraulic systemsb) Magnetic Levitation (Maglev)c) Steam propulsiond) Internal combustion enginesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Bank Exams 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for What technology is utilized in the Hyperloop system to reduce friction and enable high-speed travel?a) Hydraulic systemsb) Magnetic Levitation (Maglev)c) Steam propulsiond) Internal combustion enginesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for What technology is utilized in the Hyperloop system to reduce friction and enable high-speed travel?a) Hydraulic systemsb) Magnetic Levitation (Maglev)c) Steam propulsiond) Internal combustion enginesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Bank Exams. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Bank Exams Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of What technology is utilized in the Hyperloop system to reduce friction and enable high-speed travel?a) Hydraulic systemsb) Magnetic Levitation (Maglev)c) Steam propulsiond) Internal combustion enginesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of What technology is utilized in the Hyperloop system to reduce friction and enable high-speed travel?a) Hydraulic systemsb) Magnetic Levitation (Maglev)c) Steam propulsiond) Internal combustion enginesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for What technology is utilized in the Hyperloop system to reduce friction and enable high-speed travel?a) Hydraulic systemsb) Magnetic Levitation (Maglev)c) Steam propulsiond) Internal combustion enginesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of What technology is utilized in the Hyperloop system to reduce friction and enable high-speed travel?a) Hydraulic systemsb) Magnetic Levitation (Maglev)c) Steam propulsiond) Internal combustion enginesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice What technology is utilized in the Hyperloop system to reduce friction and enable high-speed travel?a) Hydraulic systemsb) Magnetic Levitation (Maglev)c) Steam propulsiond) Internal combustion enginesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Bank Exams tests.
Explore Courses for Bank Exams exam
Signup to solve all Doubts
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev