What is one of the main concerns raised by activists regarding the government's approach to defining Persons with Disabilities (PwDs)?a) It completely eliminates the need for guardian-based consent.b) It aligns perfectly with the RPWD Act, 2016.c) It creates confusion and complicates the matter further.d) It simplifies the decision-making process for PwDs.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Question

Answer

Activists believe the government's refinement of the definition of Persons with Disabilities (PwDs) complicates the situation rather than clarifying it. They argue that the changes could restrict decision-making autonomy for PwDs, which is a crucial aspect of their rights and independence. This concern highlights the ongoing struggle for clarity and empowerment within the legal frameworks surrounding disability rights. An interesting fact is that many countries are now moving towards inclusive policies that prioritize the autonomy of individuals with disabilities, emphasizing their right to make decisions about their own lives.

Answer

Concerns Raised by Activists
Activists have voiced significant concerns regarding the government's approach to defining Persons with Disabilities (PwDs), particularly focusing on how these definitions may complicate rather than clarify the situation.
Confusion in Definitions
- The lack of a clear, standardized definition can lead to multiple interpretations of what constitutes a disability.
- This ambiguity can create barriers for PwDs in accessing benefits and services they are entitled to, as eligibility criteria may vary from one context to another.
Impact on Policy Implementation
- When definitions are not aligned or are overly complex, it hinders effective policy implementation.
- Activists argue that a convoluted approach can lead to inconsistencies in how services are provided, leaving many PwDs unsupported.
Legal and Social Ramifications
- Confusion surrounding definitions may complicate legal protections and rights for PwDs, making it difficult for them to advocate for themselves.
- It may also result in social stigma as misunderstandings about disabilities proliferate.
Advocacy for Clarity
- Activists emphasize the need for a clear and coherent approach that simplifies the understanding of disabilities.
- A well-defined framework would not only empower PwDs but also facilitate better access to resources and rights.
Conclusion
In summary, the main concern is that the government's approach creates confusion and complicates the understanding and treatment of Persons with Disabilities. A clear and unified definition is essential for effective advocacy, policy implementation, and social acceptance.

Top Courses for Bank ExamsView all

SBI PO Prelims & Mains Preparation

IBPS PO Prelims & Mains Preparation

Crash Course for Banking Exams

RBI Grade B Phase 1 Preparation

Cheatsheets for Bank Exams

Top Courses for Bank Exams

Top Courses for Bank Exams

Related Content

Schools

Competitive Examinations

Quick Access Links

Technical Exams