Statements:No tree is an animal.Some animals are humans.Conclusions:1....
Understanding the Statements
- Statement 1: No tree is an animal.
- Statement 2: Some animals are humans.
These two statements provide a basis for analyzing the conclusions.
Analyzing the Conclusions
1. Conclusion 1: Some trees are humans.
- This conclusion cannot be drawn because there is no connection established between trees and humans. The statements do not indicate any overlap between these categories.
2. Conclusion 2: No animal is a tree.
- This conclusion is valid. Since the first statement explicitly states that no tree is an animal, it logically follows that no animal can be a tree.
3. Conclusion 3: Some humans are not trees.
- This conclusion is also valid. Since some animals are humans (from the second statement), and no tree is an animal, it follows that those humans who are animals cannot be trees.
4. Conclusion 4: All animals are humans.
- This conclusion is false. The statements only indicate that some animals are humans; therefore, it cannot be concluded that all animals are humans.
Correct Answer Analysis
- Correct Option: a) Only (2)
- This option is correct because it includes conclusion (2), which is valid, while conclusions (1) and (4) are invalid. Conclusion (3) is valid but is not included in the answer choices.
Final Thoughts
In conclusion, the only definitive and supported conclusion from the given statements is that no animal is a tree, making option 'A' the accurate choice.
Statements:No tree is an animal.Some animals are humans.Conclusions:1....
From the first statement, "No tree is an animal" ⇒ "No animal is a tree" (converse) ⇒ (2) follows.
No relation between trees and humans ⇒ (1) and (3) do not follow.
No support for (4).
So Option A is correct