Which economist said that money is the measuring rod of utility?a)A.C ...
According to Pigou, welfare resides in a man’s state of mind or consciousness which is made up of his satisfactions or utilities. The basis of welfare, therefore, is necessarily the extent to which an individual’s desires are met. Social welfare is regarded as the summation of all individual welfares in a society. Since general welfare is a very wide, complicated and impracticable notion, Pigou delimits the range of his study to economic welfare. As he himself observes, economic welfare is by no means an index of total welfare because many other elements in the latter, like the quality of work, one’s environment, human relationships, status, housing, and public security are absent from economic welfare.
He, therefore, defines economic welfare as “that part of social (general) welfare that can be brought directly or indirectly into relation with the measuring rod of money.” Thus economic welfare, in the Pigovian sense, implies the satisfaction of utility derived by an individual from the use of exchangeable goods and services.
Which economist said that money is the measuring rod of utility?a)A.C ...
A.C. Pigou is the economist who said that "money is the measuring rod of utility."
Explanation:
Money is an important component of any economic system. It serves as a medium of exchange, a store of value, and a unit of account. As a unit of account, money is used to measure the value of goods and services exchanged in the economy. In other words, it is used to measure the utility of goods and services.
A.C. Pigou, a British economist, argued that money is the most reliable and accurate way to measure the utility of goods and services. In his book "The Economics of Welfare," published in 1920, Pigou wrote that "the money value of a good is a measure of the utility which it yields to its possessor."
According to Pigou, money serves as a measuring rod of utility because:
• Money is a common denominator: Money is a common unit of account that allows us to compare the utility of different goods and services. By expressing the value of goods and services in terms of money, we can compare them on a common basis.
• Money is objective: Unlike subjective measures of utility, such as happiness or satisfaction, money is an objective measure that can be quantified and compared across individuals and time periods.
• Money reflects opportunity costs: The price of a good reflects the opportunity cost of acquiring it. The opportunity cost is the value of the next best alternative foregone. By paying money for a good, we are giving up the opportunity to use that money for some other purpose. Thus, the price of a good reflects the utility we derive from acquiring it relative to the utility we could have derived from using the money for some other purpose.
In conclusion, Pigou's statement that "money is the measuring rod of utility" highlights the importance of money as a unit of account in measuring the value of goods and services exchanged in the economy.