Directions : In each of the following questions a statement is followe...
Correct option is D.
By imposing more income tax on wealthy people, who are able to bear it, the government would have more money to feed the poor(sort of like robin hood).
And the second option is helpful in two ways. Making primary education free and introducing free meals will counteract undernourishment as well as illiteracy.
Directions : In each of the following questions a statement is followe...
Understanding the Statement
The statement highlights a significant issue: despite the country's economic progress, many children in rural areas are undernourished. This calls for urgent action to address the needs of the deprived class.
Analyzing the Courses of Action
- Course of Action I: "Govt should increase Wealth Tax/Income Tax and use that money for upliftment of the deprived class."
- While this course of action seems beneficial in theory, it may not provide immediate relief to undernourished children. Increasing taxes could lead to political backlash and may not guarantee that the funds will be effectively allocated to address hunger and education. Thus, this course does not directly target the immediate issue of child undernourishment.
- Course of Action II: "Govt should introduce schemes like free meals in primary schools and make primary education compulsory."
- This course of action directly addresses the problem of undernourishment among children. Providing free meals in schools ensures that children receive at least one nutritious meal a day, which can significantly improve their health. Making primary education compulsory contributes to long-term development by ensuring that children are educated and have better opportunities in the future.
Conclusion
In summary, while Course of Action I lacks a direct impact on the immediate issue of child undernourishment, Course of Action II presents a practical solution. Therefore, the correct answer is option 'D', as it is only Course of Action II that follows logically from the statement.