CA Foundation Exam > CA Foundation Questions > M purchased a hot water bottle from a chemist...
Start Learning for Free
M purchased a hot water bottle from a chemist. The bottle burst and injured his wife. The chemist is liable on account of:
- a)Breach of express condition as to quality
- b)Breach of implied condition as to quality
- c)Personal injury caused to the Buyer’s wife
- d)Hot water bottle sales are illegal
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
M purchased a hot water bottle from a chemist. The bottle burst and in...
B)Breach of implied condition as to quality.
When a buyer purchases a product from a seller, there is an implied condition that the product will be of merchantable quality and fit for its intended purpose. In this case, the hot water bottle burst and injured M's wife, indicating a breach of this implied condition. The chemist is therefore liable for any harm caused to the buyer or their property as a result of the defective product.
When a buyer purchases a product from a seller, there is an implied condition that the product will be of merchantable quality and fit for its intended purpose. In this case, the hot water bottle burst and injured M's wife, indicating a breach of this implied condition. The chemist is therefore liable for any harm caused to the buyer or their property as a result of the defective product.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
M purchased a hot water bottle from a chemist. The bottle burst and in...
The answer is B because whenever a commodity is purchased, it is an implied condition that the commodity is of a good quality. So, any damage of the commodity because of its poor quality will result in the breach of the implied condition of quality.Hence,the chemist will be liable to pay for the damages incurred to the customer.
|
Explore Courses for CA Foundation exam
|
|
Similar CA Foundation Doubts
Top Courses for CA FoundationView all
M purchased a hot water bottle from a chemist. The bottle burst and injured his wife. The chemist is liable on account of:a)Breach of express condition as to qualityb)Breach of implied condition as to qualityc)Personal injury caused to the Buyer’s wifed)Hot water bottle sales are illegalCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
M purchased a hot water bottle from a chemist. The bottle burst and injured his wife. The chemist is liable on account of:a)Breach of express condition as to qualityb)Breach of implied condition as to qualityc)Personal injury caused to the Buyer’s wifed)Hot water bottle sales are illegalCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CA Foundation 2025 is part of CA Foundation preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CA Foundation exam syllabus. Information about M purchased a hot water bottle from a chemist. The bottle burst and injured his wife. The chemist is liable on account of:a)Breach of express condition as to qualityb)Breach of implied condition as to qualityc)Personal injury caused to the Buyer’s wifed)Hot water bottle sales are illegalCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CA Foundation 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for M purchased a hot water bottle from a chemist. The bottle burst and injured his wife. The chemist is liable on account of:a)Breach of express condition as to qualityb)Breach of implied condition as to qualityc)Personal injury caused to the Buyer’s wifed)Hot water bottle sales are illegalCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
M purchased a hot water bottle from a chemist. The bottle burst and injured his wife. The chemist is liable on account of:a)Breach of express condition as to qualityb)Breach of implied condition as to qualityc)Personal injury caused to the Buyer’s wifed)Hot water bottle sales are illegalCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CA Foundation 2025 is part of CA Foundation preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CA Foundation exam syllabus. Information about M purchased a hot water bottle from a chemist. The bottle burst and injured his wife. The chemist is liable on account of:a)Breach of express condition as to qualityb)Breach of implied condition as to qualityc)Personal injury caused to the Buyer’s wifed)Hot water bottle sales are illegalCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CA Foundation 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for M purchased a hot water bottle from a chemist. The bottle burst and injured his wife. The chemist is liable on account of:a)Breach of express condition as to qualityb)Breach of implied condition as to qualityc)Personal injury caused to the Buyer’s wifed)Hot water bottle sales are illegalCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for M purchased a hot water bottle from a chemist. The bottle burst and injured his wife. The chemist is liable on account of:a)Breach of express condition as to qualityb)Breach of implied condition as to qualityc)Personal injury caused to the Buyer’s wifed)Hot water bottle sales are illegalCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CA Foundation.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CA Foundation Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of M purchased a hot water bottle from a chemist. The bottle burst and injured his wife. The chemist is liable on account of:a)Breach of express condition as to qualityb)Breach of implied condition as to qualityc)Personal injury caused to the Buyer’s wifed)Hot water bottle sales are illegalCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
M purchased a hot water bottle from a chemist. The bottle burst and injured his wife. The chemist is liable on account of:a)Breach of express condition as to qualityb)Breach of implied condition as to qualityc)Personal injury caused to the Buyer’s wifed)Hot water bottle sales are illegalCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for M purchased a hot water bottle from a chemist. The bottle burst and injured his wife. The chemist is liable on account of:a)Breach of express condition as to qualityb)Breach of implied condition as to qualityc)Personal injury caused to the Buyer’s wifed)Hot water bottle sales are illegalCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of M purchased a hot water bottle from a chemist. The bottle burst and injured his wife. The chemist is liable on account of:a)Breach of express condition as to qualityb)Breach of implied condition as to qualityc)Personal injury caused to the Buyer’s wifed)Hot water bottle sales are illegalCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice M purchased a hot water bottle from a chemist. The bottle burst and injured his wife. The chemist is liable on account of:a)Breach of express condition as to qualityb)Breach of implied condition as to qualityc)Personal injury caused to the Buyer’s wifed)Hot water bottle sales are illegalCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CA Foundation tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CA Foundation exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup