What are similarities between colonial management of forests in bastar...
The similarities in the Colonial management of forests in Bastar and Java given below:
1. Both were colonies ruled by foreign powers.
2. In both the regions a proper system of forest management was established by the colonial Masters. Scientific Forestry was started and forest were controlled.
3. The local people from villages were not permitted to collect any forest produce. Large parts of forest cover were reserved where the villagers were not allowed to stay.
4. The livelihood of the local people was threatened by colonial policies . Hence they organised themselves to resist colonial intrusion.
This question is part of UPSC exam. View all Class 9 courses
What are similarities between colonial management of forests in bastar...
Similarities between Colonial Management of Forests in Bastar and Java
Introduction:
The colonial management of forests in Bastar (India) and Java (Indonesia) during the colonial era shared several similarities in terms of objectives, strategies, and outcomes. Both regions were under colonial rule and experienced similar approaches to forest management by the respective colonial powers. This article explores these similarities in detail.
1. Objective of Forest Management:
- Both colonial powers aimed to exploit the forests for economic gain, primarily through timber extraction and other forest resources.
- The forests were seen as valuable resources that could be exploited to meet the growing demands of the industrializing economies of the colonial powers.
2. Forest Policies:
- In both Bastar and Java, the colonial powers implemented policies that facilitated the extraction of forest resources for export to the home country.
- These policies included granting concessions to private companies or individuals for logging and other resource extraction activities.
- The colonial administrations established strict control over the forests, limiting access to local communities and regulating forest use.
3. Infrastructure Development:
- Both colonial powers invested in infrastructure development to facilitate the extraction and transportation of forest resources.
- Roads, railways, and waterways were constructed to connect forest areas with ports for export.
- This infrastructure development not only facilitated resource extraction but also enabled better control and surveillance of the forests.
4. Impact on Indigenous Communities:
- In both Bastar and Java, the colonial forest management policies had a significant impact on indigenous communities.
- Local communities were often displaced from their ancestral lands, as their access to the forests was restricted or completely denied.
- The traditional livelihoods and cultural practices of these communities, which were closely tied to the forests, were disrupted.
5. Environmental Consequences:
- The colonial forest management practices in both regions resulted in severe environmental consequences.
- Massive deforestation occurred as a result of extensive logging, leading to the loss of biodiversity and ecological imbalance.
- The disruption of forest ecosystems had long-term implications for the local climate, water resources, and soil fertility.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the colonial management of forests in Bastar and Java exhibited several similarities. Both regions were subjected to similar objectives, policies, and outcomes, driven by the colonial powers' economic interests. The exploitation of forest resources, infrastructure development, impacts on indigenous communities, and environmental consequences were common features in both regions. Understanding these similarities helps us recognize the broader patterns of colonial forest management and its lasting impacts on the affected regions.
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed Class 9 study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in Class 9.