How were islamic architecture different from those of the roman empire?

Humanities/Arts Exam > Humanities/Arts Questions > How were islamic architecture different from ...

Join the Discussion on the App

How were islamic architecture different from those of the roman empire
?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

How were islamic architecture different from those of the roman empire...

By the tenth century, an Mamie world had emerged which was easily recognisable by travellers. Religious buildings were the greatest external symbols of this world. Mosques, shrine3 and tombs from Spain to Central Asia showed the same basic design-arches, domes, minarets and open courtyards and expressed the spirtual and practical needs of Muslims.

i. In the first Islamic century, the mosque acquired a distinct architectural form (roof supported by pillars) which transcended regional variations. The mosque had an open courtyard (sahn) where a fountain or pond was placed, leading to a vaulted hall which could accommodate long lines of worshippers and the prayer leader (imam).

Two special features were located inside the hall:a niche (mihrab) in the wall indicating the direction of Mecca (qibla), and a pulpit (minbar, pronounced mimbar) from where sermons were delivered during noon prayers on Friday.

ii. Attached to the building was the minaret, a tower used to call the faithful to prayer at the appointed times and to symbolise the presence of the new faith. Time was marked in cities and villages by the five daily prayers and weekly sermons.

iii. The same pattern of construction - of buildings built around a central courtyard (iwan)- appeared not only in mosques and mausoleums but also in caravanserais, hospitals and palaces.

The Umayyads built ‘desert palaces’ in oases, such as Khirbat al-Mafjar in Palestine and Qusayr Amra in Jordan, Which served as luxurious residences and retreats for hunting and pleasure.

iv. The palaces, modelled on Roman and Sasanian architecture, were lavishly decorated with sculptures, mosaics and paintings of people. The Abbasids built a new imperial city in Samarra amidst gardens and running waters which is mentioned in the stories and legends revolving around Harun al-Rashid.

The great palaces of the Abbasid caliphs in Baghdad or the Fatimids in Cairo have disappeared, leaving only traces in literary texts

This question is part of UPSC exam. View all Humanities/Arts courses

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

Similar Humanities/Arts Doubts

Different between roman architecture and islamic architecture?

View answer

Read the following extract carefully and answer the following question by choosing the correct option: A major difference between the two superpowers and their respective empires was that the Roman Empire was culturally much more diverse than that of Iran. The Parthians and later the Sasanians, the dynasties that ruled Iran in this period, ruled over a population that was largely Iranian. The Roman Empire, by contrast, was a mosaic of territories and cultures that were chiefly bound together by a common system of government. Many languages were spoken in the empire, but for the purposes of administration Latin and Greek were the most widely used, indeed the only languages. The upper classes of the east spoke and wrote in Greek, those of the west in Latin, and the boundary between these broad language areas ran somewhere across the middle of the Mediterranean, between the African provinces of Tripolitania (which was Latin speaking) and Cyrenaica (Greek-speaking). All those who lived in the empire were subjects of a single ruler, the emperor, regardless of where they lived and what language they spoke.Q. Parthians and Sasanians were what?

View answer

Read the following extract carefully and answer the following question by choosing the correct option: A major difference between the two superpowers and their respective empires was that the Roman Empire was culturally much more diverse than that of Iran. The Parthians and later the Sasanians, the dynasties that ruled Iran in this period, ruled over a population that was largely Iranian. The Roman Empire, by contrast, was a mosaic of territories and cultures that were chiefly bound together by a common system of government. Many languages were spoken in the empire, but for the purposes of administration Latin and Greek were the most widely used, indeed the only languages. The upper classes of the east spoke and wrote in Greek, those of the west in Latin, and the boundary between these broad language areas ran somewhere across the middle of the Mediterranean, between the African provinces of Tripolitania (which was Latin speaking) and Cyrenaica (Greek-speaking). All those who lived in the empire were subjects of a single ruler, the emperor, regardless of where they lived and what language they spoke.Q. Who were the two superpowers those days?

View answer

Read the following extract carefully and answer the following question by choosing the correct option: A major difference between the two superpowers and their respective empires was that the Roman Empire was culturally much more diverse than that of Iran. The Parthians and later the Sasanians, the dynasties that ruled Iran in this period, ruled over a population that was largely Iranian. The Roman Empire, by contrast, was a mosaic of territories and cultures that were chiefly bound together by a common system of government. Many languages were spoken in the empire, but for the purposes of administration Latin and Greek were the most widely used, indeed the only languages. The upper classes of the east spoke and wrote in Greek, those of the west in Latin, and the boundary between these broad language areas ran somewhere across the middle of the Mediterranean, between the African provinces of Tripolitania (which was Latin speaking) and Cyrenaica (Greek-speaking). All those who lived in the empire were subjects of a single ruler, the emperor, regardless of where they lived and what language they spoke.Q. Tripolitania is in

View answer

What are different between the Roman Empire and the iranian empire? Give two difference?

View answer

Top Courses for Humanities/ArtsView all

Chapter Notes for Humanities

NCERT Books & Solutions for Humanities

Online MCQ Tests for Humanities

Short & Long Question Answers for Humanities

Geography Class 11

Top Courses for Humanities/Arts

View all

How were islamic architecture different from those of the roman empire?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
How were islamic architecture different from those of the roman empire? for Humanities/Arts 2024 is part of Humanities/Arts preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about How were islamic architecture different from those of the roman empire? covers all topics & solutions for Humanities/Arts 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for How were islamic architecture different from those of the roman empire?.

Solutions for How were islamic architecture different from those of the roman empire? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Humanities/Arts. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of How were islamic architecture different from those of the roman empire? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of How were islamic architecture different from those of the roman empire?, a detailed solution for How were islamic architecture different from those of the roman empire? has been provided alongside types of How were islamic architecture different from those of the roman empire? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice How were islamic architecture different from those of the roman empire? tests, examples and also practice Humanities/Arts tests.

Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam