Question Description
Directions: Questions 21-24 are based on a common set of Principles and Facts. Answer accordingly.Principle 1 – An offer is made when one person signifies to another, his willingness to do or not do something, with a view to obtaining that person‘s assent.Principle 2 – When the person to whom the offer is made signifies his assent thereto, the offer is said to be accepted.Principle 3 - When, at the desire of the promisor, the promisee or any other person has done or abstained from doing, or does or abstains from doing, or promises to do or to abstain from doing something, such act or abstinence or promise is called a consideration for the promise.Principle 4 – An agreement without consideration is not enforceable under law.Principle 5 – Parties to a contract must agree upon the same thing in the same sense.Principle 6 – Parties competent to contract must be major, and of sound mind.Facts – Sonia is a gardener in the mansion of Mr. Kapoor. Mr. Kapoor is extremely fond of his pet dog, Cooper. One day, Kapoor realizes that Cooper is missing from his kennel. He is frantic with worry, and sends Sonia on a quest for the dog. Sonia sets out, pastes notices in public places and enquires about the dog. She has been instructed to return only if she finds the dog. In the meantime, Kapoor announces in the popular newspaper, The Statesman, that Cooperis missing, and that anybody who finds the Labrador and brings him back would be awarded a sum of Rs. 10,000. The next day, Kaza brings a brown Labrador with him and claims the reward. Mr. Kapoor immediately realizes that the dog is not Cooper, and refuses to pay the sum. Kaza asserts that the dog is named Cooper, is a brown Labrador resembling the picture in the newspaper, and since he has accepted the offer by bringing the dog, there is a valid contract formed, and Kapoor is bound to pay the consideration of Rs. 10,000. Three days later, Sonia manages to find Cooper in a nearby park, and brings him back home. Kapoor is overjoyed, and raises Sonia‘s salary from Rs. 12,000 per month to Rs. 20,000. Sonia then discovers the notice in the newspaper, goes to Kapoor, and claims the reward. Kapoor refuses to pay, as he as already given her an increment in salary.Q.Does Kaza‘s argument stand? Has there been a valid contract formed between Kazaand and Kapoor?a)Yes. Kapoor has made an offer through the notice in the paper. By bringing back the dog, Kaza has impliedly accepted the offer. There is also a valid consideration promised, and Kapoor is now bound to pay the same.b)No, Kaza has committed fraud, therefore, the contract stands vitiated.c)The facts are unclear.d)No, there is no contract, as the parties have not agreed upon the same thing in the same sense. Kaza‘s acceptance relates to a brown Labrador. Kapoor‘s offer relates to Cooper, his brown Labrador.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Questions 21-24 are based on a common set of Principles and Facts. Answer accordingly.Principle 1 – An offer is made when one person signifies to another, his willingness to do or not do something, with a view to obtaining that person‘s assent.Principle 2 – When the person to whom the offer is made signifies his assent thereto, the offer is said to be accepted.Principle 3 - When, at the desire of the promisor, the promisee or any other person has done or abstained from doing, or does or abstains from doing, or promises to do or to abstain from doing something, such act or abstinence or promise is called a consideration for the promise.Principle 4 – An agreement without consideration is not enforceable under law.Principle 5 – Parties to a contract must agree upon the same thing in the same sense.Principle 6 – Parties competent to contract must be major, and of sound mind.Facts – Sonia is a gardener in the mansion of Mr. Kapoor. Mr. Kapoor is extremely fond of his pet dog, Cooper. One day, Kapoor realizes that Cooper is missing from his kennel. He is frantic with worry, and sends Sonia on a quest for the dog. Sonia sets out, pastes notices in public places and enquires about the dog. She has been instructed to return only if she finds the dog. In the meantime, Kapoor announces in the popular newspaper, The Statesman, that Cooperis missing, and that anybody who finds the Labrador and brings him back would be awarded a sum of Rs. 10,000. The next day, Kaza brings a brown Labrador with him and claims the reward. Mr. Kapoor immediately realizes that the dog is not Cooper, and refuses to pay the sum. Kaza asserts that the dog is named Cooper, is a brown Labrador resembling the picture in the newspaper, and since he has accepted the offer by bringing the dog, there is a valid contract formed, and Kapoor is bound to pay the consideration of Rs. 10,000. Three days later, Sonia manages to find Cooper in a nearby park, and brings him back home. Kapoor is overjoyed, and raises Sonia‘s salary from Rs. 12,000 per month to Rs. 20,000. Sonia then discovers the notice in the newspaper, goes to Kapoor, and claims the reward. Kapoor refuses to pay, as he as already given her an increment in salary.Q.Does Kaza‘s argument stand? Has there been a valid contract formed between Kazaand and Kapoor?a)Yes. Kapoor has made an offer through the notice in the paper. By bringing back the dog, Kaza has impliedly accepted the offer. There is also a valid consideration promised, and Kapoor is now bound to pay the same.b)No, Kaza has committed fraud, therefore, the contract stands vitiated.c)The facts are unclear.d)No, there is no contract, as the parties have not agreed upon the same thing in the same sense. Kaza‘s acceptance relates to a brown Labrador. Kapoor‘s offer relates to Cooper, his brown Labrador.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Questions 21-24 are based on a common set of Principles and Facts. Answer accordingly.Principle 1 – An offer is made when one person signifies to another, his willingness to do or not do something, with a view to obtaining that person‘s assent.Principle 2 – When the person to whom the offer is made signifies his assent thereto, the offer is said to be accepted.Principle 3 - When, at the desire of the promisor, the promisee or any other person has done or abstained from doing, or does or abstains from doing, or promises to do or to abstain from doing something, such act or abstinence or promise is called a consideration for the promise.Principle 4 – An agreement without consideration is not enforceable under law.Principle 5 – Parties to a contract must agree upon the same thing in the same sense.Principle 6 – Parties competent to contract must be major, and of sound mind.Facts – Sonia is a gardener in the mansion of Mr. Kapoor. Mr. Kapoor is extremely fond of his pet dog, Cooper. One day, Kapoor realizes that Cooper is missing from his kennel. He is frantic with worry, and sends Sonia on a quest for the dog. Sonia sets out, pastes notices in public places and enquires about the dog. She has been instructed to return only if she finds the dog. In the meantime, Kapoor announces in the popular newspaper, The Statesman, that Cooperis missing, and that anybody who finds the Labrador and brings him back would be awarded a sum of Rs. 10,000. The next day, Kaza brings a brown Labrador with him and claims the reward. Mr. Kapoor immediately realizes that the dog is not Cooper, and refuses to pay the sum. Kaza asserts that the dog is named Cooper, is a brown Labrador resembling the picture in the newspaper, and since he has accepted the offer by bringing the dog, there is a valid contract formed, and Kapoor is bound to pay the consideration of Rs. 10,000. Three days later, Sonia manages to find Cooper in a nearby park, and brings him back home. Kapoor is overjoyed, and raises Sonia‘s salary from Rs. 12,000 per month to Rs. 20,000. Sonia then discovers the notice in the newspaper, goes to Kapoor, and claims the reward. Kapoor refuses to pay, as he as already given her an increment in salary.Q.Does Kaza‘s argument stand? Has there been a valid contract formed between Kazaand and Kapoor?a)Yes. Kapoor has made an offer through the notice in the paper. By bringing back the dog, Kaza has impliedly accepted the offer. There is also a valid consideration promised, and Kapoor is now bound to pay the same.b)No, Kaza has committed fraud, therefore, the contract stands vitiated.c)The facts are unclear.d)No, there is no contract, as the parties have not agreed upon the same thing in the same sense. Kaza‘s acceptance relates to a brown Labrador. Kapoor‘s offer relates to Cooper, his brown Labrador.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: Questions 21-24 are based on a common set of Principles and Facts. Answer accordingly.Principle 1 – An offer is made when one person signifies to another, his willingness to do or not do something, with a view to obtaining that person‘s assent.Principle 2 – When the person to whom the offer is made signifies his assent thereto, the offer is said to be accepted.Principle 3 - When, at the desire of the promisor, the promisee or any other person has done or abstained from doing, or does or abstains from doing, or promises to do or to abstain from doing something, such act or abstinence or promise is called a consideration for the promise.Principle 4 – An agreement without consideration is not enforceable under law.Principle 5 – Parties to a contract must agree upon the same thing in the same sense.Principle 6 – Parties competent to contract must be major, and of sound mind.Facts – Sonia is a gardener in the mansion of Mr. Kapoor. Mr. Kapoor is extremely fond of his pet dog, Cooper. One day, Kapoor realizes that Cooper is missing from his kennel. He is frantic with worry, and sends Sonia on a quest for the dog. Sonia sets out, pastes notices in public places and enquires about the dog. She has been instructed to return only if she finds the dog. In the meantime, Kapoor announces in the popular newspaper, The Statesman, that Cooperis missing, and that anybody who finds the Labrador and brings him back would be awarded a sum of Rs. 10,000. The next day, Kaza brings a brown Labrador with him and claims the reward. Mr. Kapoor immediately realizes that the dog is not Cooper, and refuses to pay the sum. Kaza asserts that the dog is named Cooper, is a brown Labrador resembling the picture in the newspaper, and since he has accepted the offer by bringing the dog, there is a valid contract formed, and Kapoor is bound to pay the consideration of Rs. 10,000. Three days later, Sonia manages to find Cooper in a nearby park, and brings him back home. Kapoor is overjoyed, and raises Sonia‘s salary from Rs. 12,000 per month to Rs. 20,000. Sonia then discovers the notice in the newspaper, goes to Kapoor, and claims the reward. Kapoor refuses to pay, as he as already given her an increment in salary.Q.Does Kaza‘s argument stand? Has there been a valid contract formed between Kazaand and Kapoor?a)Yes. Kapoor has made an offer through the notice in the paper. By bringing back the dog, Kaza has impliedly accepted the offer. There is also a valid consideration promised, and Kapoor is now bound to pay the same.b)No, Kaza has committed fraud, therefore, the contract stands vitiated.c)The facts are unclear.d)No, there is no contract, as the parties have not agreed upon the same thing in the same sense. Kaza‘s acceptance relates to a brown Labrador. Kapoor‘s offer relates to Cooper, his brown Labrador.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Questions 21-24 are based on a common set of Principles and Facts. Answer accordingly.Principle 1 – An offer is made when one person signifies to another, his willingness to do or not do something, with a view to obtaining that person‘s assent.Principle 2 – When the person to whom the offer is made signifies his assent thereto, the offer is said to be accepted.Principle 3 - When, at the desire of the promisor, the promisee or any other person has done or abstained from doing, or does or abstains from doing, or promises to do or to abstain from doing something, such act or abstinence or promise is called a consideration for the promise.Principle 4 – An agreement without consideration is not enforceable under law.Principle 5 – Parties to a contract must agree upon the same thing in the same sense.Principle 6 – Parties competent to contract must be major, and of sound mind.Facts – Sonia is a gardener in the mansion of Mr. Kapoor. Mr. Kapoor is extremely fond of his pet dog, Cooper. One day, Kapoor realizes that Cooper is missing from his kennel. He is frantic with worry, and sends Sonia on a quest for the dog. Sonia sets out, pastes notices in public places and enquires about the dog. She has been instructed to return only if she finds the dog. In the meantime, Kapoor announces in the popular newspaper, The Statesman, that Cooperis missing, and that anybody who finds the Labrador and brings him back would be awarded a sum of Rs. 10,000. The next day, Kaza brings a brown Labrador with him and claims the reward. Mr. Kapoor immediately realizes that the dog is not Cooper, and refuses to pay the sum. Kaza asserts that the dog is named Cooper, is a brown Labrador resembling the picture in the newspaper, and since he has accepted the offer by bringing the dog, there is a valid contract formed, and Kapoor is bound to pay the consideration of Rs. 10,000. Three days later, Sonia manages to find Cooper in a nearby park, and brings him back home. Kapoor is overjoyed, and raises Sonia‘s salary from Rs. 12,000 per month to Rs. 20,000. Sonia then discovers the notice in the newspaper, goes to Kapoor, and claims the reward. Kapoor refuses to pay, as he as already given her an increment in salary.Q.Does Kaza‘s argument stand? Has there been a valid contract formed between Kazaand and Kapoor?a)Yes. Kapoor has made an offer through the notice in the paper. By bringing back the dog, Kaza has impliedly accepted the offer. There is also a valid consideration promised, and Kapoor is now bound to pay the same.b)No, Kaza has committed fraud, therefore, the contract stands vitiated.c)The facts are unclear.d)No, there is no contract, as the parties have not agreed upon the same thing in the same sense. Kaza‘s acceptance relates to a brown Labrador. Kapoor‘s offer relates to Cooper, his brown Labrador.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Questions 21-24 are based on a common set of Principles and Facts. Answer accordingly.Principle 1 – An offer is made when one person signifies to another, his willingness to do or not do something, with a view to obtaining that person‘s assent.Principle 2 – When the person to whom the offer is made signifies his assent thereto, the offer is said to be accepted.Principle 3 - When, at the desire of the promisor, the promisee or any other person has done or abstained from doing, or does or abstains from doing, or promises to do or to abstain from doing something, such act or abstinence or promise is called a consideration for the promise.Principle 4 – An agreement without consideration is not enforceable under law.Principle 5 – Parties to a contract must agree upon the same thing in the same sense.Principle 6 – Parties competent to contract must be major, and of sound mind.Facts – Sonia is a gardener in the mansion of Mr. Kapoor. Mr. Kapoor is extremely fond of his pet dog, Cooper. One day, Kapoor realizes that Cooper is missing from his kennel. He is frantic with worry, and sends Sonia on a quest for the dog. Sonia sets out, pastes notices in public places and enquires about the dog. She has been instructed to return only if she finds the dog. In the meantime, Kapoor announces in the popular newspaper, The Statesman, that Cooperis missing, and that anybody who finds the Labrador and brings him back would be awarded a sum of Rs. 10,000. The next day, Kaza brings a brown Labrador with him and claims the reward. Mr. Kapoor immediately realizes that the dog is not Cooper, and refuses to pay the sum. Kaza asserts that the dog is named Cooper, is a brown Labrador resembling the picture in the newspaper, and since he has accepted the offer by bringing the dog, there is a valid contract formed, and Kapoor is bound to pay the consideration of Rs. 10,000. Three days later, Sonia manages to find Cooper in a nearby park, and brings him back home. Kapoor is overjoyed, and raises Sonia‘s salary from Rs. 12,000 per month to Rs. 20,000. Sonia then discovers the notice in the newspaper, goes to Kapoor, and claims the reward. Kapoor refuses to pay, as he as already given her an increment in salary.Q.Does Kaza‘s argument stand? Has there been a valid contract formed between Kazaand and Kapoor?a)Yes. Kapoor has made an offer through the notice in the paper. By bringing back the dog, Kaza has impliedly accepted the offer. There is also a valid consideration promised, and Kapoor is now bound to pay the same.b)No, Kaza has committed fraud, therefore, the contract stands vitiated.c)The facts are unclear.d)No, there is no contract, as the parties have not agreed upon the same thing in the same sense. Kaza‘s acceptance relates to a brown Labrador. Kapoor‘s offer relates to Cooper, his brown Labrador.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Questions 21-24 are based on a common set of Principles and Facts. Answer accordingly.Principle 1 – An offer is made when one person signifies to another, his willingness to do or not do something, with a view to obtaining that person‘s assent.Principle 2 – When the person to whom the offer is made signifies his assent thereto, the offer is said to be accepted.Principle 3 - When, at the desire of the promisor, the promisee or any other person has done or abstained from doing, or does or abstains from doing, or promises to do or to abstain from doing something, such act or abstinence or promise is called a consideration for the promise.Principle 4 – An agreement without consideration is not enforceable under law.Principle 5 – Parties to a contract must agree upon the same thing in the same sense.Principle 6 – Parties competent to contract must be major, and of sound mind.Facts – Sonia is a gardener in the mansion of Mr. Kapoor. Mr. Kapoor is extremely fond of his pet dog, Cooper. One day, Kapoor realizes that Cooper is missing from his kennel. He is frantic with worry, and sends Sonia on a quest for the dog. Sonia sets out, pastes notices in public places and enquires about the dog. She has been instructed to return only if she finds the dog. In the meantime, Kapoor announces in the popular newspaper, The Statesman, that Cooperis missing, and that anybody who finds the Labrador and brings him back would be awarded a sum of Rs. 10,000. The next day, Kaza brings a brown Labrador with him and claims the reward. Mr. Kapoor immediately realizes that the dog is not Cooper, and refuses to pay the sum. Kaza asserts that the dog is named Cooper, is a brown Labrador resembling the picture in the newspaper, and since he has accepted the offer by bringing the dog, there is a valid contract formed, and Kapoor is bound to pay the consideration of Rs. 10,000. Three days later, Sonia manages to find Cooper in a nearby park, and brings him back home. Kapoor is overjoyed, and raises Sonia‘s salary from Rs. 12,000 per month to Rs. 20,000. Sonia then discovers the notice in the newspaper, goes to Kapoor, and claims the reward. Kapoor refuses to pay, as he as already given her an increment in salary.Q.Does Kaza‘s argument stand? Has there been a valid contract formed between Kazaand and Kapoor?a)Yes. Kapoor has made an offer through the notice in the paper. By bringing back the dog, Kaza has impliedly accepted the offer. There is also a valid consideration promised, and Kapoor is now bound to pay the same.b)No, Kaza has committed fraud, therefore, the contract stands vitiated.c)The facts are unclear.d)No, there is no contract, as the parties have not agreed upon the same thing in the same sense. Kaza‘s acceptance relates to a brown Labrador. Kapoor‘s offer relates to Cooper, his brown Labrador.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Questions 21-24 are based on a common set of Principles and Facts. Answer accordingly.Principle 1 – An offer is made when one person signifies to another, his willingness to do or not do something, with a view to obtaining that person‘s assent.Principle 2 – When the person to whom the offer is made signifies his assent thereto, the offer is said to be accepted.Principle 3 - When, at the desire of the promisor, the promisee or any other person has done or abstained from doing, or does or abstains from doing, or promises to do or to abstain from doing something, such act or abstinence or promise is called a consideration for the promise.Principle 4 – An agreement without consideration is not enforceable under law.Principle 5 – Parties to a contract must agree upon the same thing in the same sense.Principle 6 – Parties competent to contract must be major, and of sound mind.Facts – Sonia is a gardener in the mansion of Mr. Kapoor. Mr. Kapoor is extremely fond of his pet dog, Cooper. One day, Kapoor realizes that Cooper is missing from his kennel. He is frantic with worry, and sends Sonia on a quest for the dog. Sonia sets out, pastes notices in public places and enquires about the dog. She has been instructed to return only if she finds the dog. In the meantime, Kapoor announces in the popular newspaper, The Statesman, that Cooperis missing, and that anybody who finds the Labrador and brings him back would be awarded a sum of Rs. 10,000. The next day, Kaza brings a brown Labrador with him and claims the reward. Mr. Kapoor immediately realizes that the dog is not Cooper, and refuses to pay the sum. Kaza asserts that the dog is named Cooper, is a brown Labrador resembling the picture in the newspaper, and since he has accepted the offer by bringing the dog, there is a valid contract formed, and Kapoor is bound to pay the consideration of Rs. 10,000. Three days later, Sonia manages to find Cooper in a nearby park, and brings him back home. Kapoor is overjoyed, and raises Sonia‘s salary from Rs. 12,000 per month to Rs. 20,000. Sonia then discovers the notice in the newspaper, goes to Kapoor, and claims the reward. Kapoor refuses to pay, as he as already given her an increment in salary.Q.Does Kaza‘s argument stand? Has there been a valid contract formed between Kazaand and Kapoor?a)Yes. Kapoor has made an offer through the notice in the paper. By bringing back the dog, Kaza has impliedly accepted the offer. There is also a valid consideration promised, and Kapoor is now bound to pay the same.b)No, Kaza has committed fraud, therefore, the contract stands vitiated.c)The facts are unclear.d)No, there is no contract, as the parties have not agreed upon the same thing in the same sense. Kaza‘s acceptance relates to a brown Labrador. Kapoor‘s offer relates to Cooper, his brown Labrador.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Questions 21-24 are based on a common set of Principles and Facts. Answer accordingly.Principle 1 – An offer is made when one person signifies to another, his willingness to do or not do something, with a view to obtaining that person‘s assent.Principle 2 – When the person to whom the offer is made signifies his assent thereto, the offer is said to be accepted.Principle 3 - When, at the desire of the promisor, the promisee or any other person has done or abstained from doing, or does or abstains from doing, or promises to do or to abstain from doing something, such act or abstinence or promise is called a consideration for the promise.Principle 4 – An agreement without consideration is not enforceable under law.Principle 5 – Parties to a contract must agree upon the same thing in the same sense.Principle 6 – Parties competent to contract must be major, and of sound mind.Facts – Sonia is a gardener in the mansion of Mr. Kapoor. Mr. Kapoor is extremely fond of his pet dog, Cooper. One day, Kapoor realizes that Cooper is missing from his kennel. He is frantic with worry, and sends Sonia on a quest for the dog. Sonia sets out, pastes notices in public places and enquires about the dog. She has been instructed to return only if she finds the dog. In the meantime, Kapoor announces in the popular newspaper, The Statesman, that Cooperis missing, and that anybody who finds the Labrador and brings him back would be awarded a sum of Rs. 10,000. The next day, Kaza brings a brown Labrador with him and claims the reward. Mr. Kapoor immediately realizes that the dog is not Cooper, and refuses to pay the sum. Kaza asserts that the dog is named Cooper, is a brown Labrador resembling the picture in the newspaper, and since he has accepted the offer by bringing the dog, there is a valid contract formed, and Kapoor is bound to pay the consideration of Rs. 10,000. Three days later, Sonia manages to find Cooper in a nearby park, and brings him back home. Kapoor is overjoyed, and raises Sonia‘s salary from Rs. 12,000 per month to Rs. 20,000. Sonia then discovers the notice in the newspaper, goes to Kapoor, and claims the reward. Kapoor refuses to pay, as he as already given her an increment in salary.Q.Does Kaza‘s argument stand? Has there been a valid contract formed between Kazaand and Kapoor?a)Yes. Kapoor has made an offer through the notice in the paper. By bringing back the dog, Kaza has impliedly accepted the offer. There is also a valid consideration promised, and Kapoor is now bound to pay the same.b)No, Kaza has committed fraud, therefore, the contract stands vitiated.c)The facts are unclear.d)No, there is no contract, as the parties have not agreed upon the same thing in the same sense. Kaza‘s acceptance relates to a brown Labrador. Kapoor‘s offer relates to Cooper, his brown Labrador.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.