CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > An auctioneer in Mumbai advertised in a newsp...
Start Learning for Free
An auctioneer in Mumbai advertised in a newspaper that a sale of office furniture would be held on Dec. 23, 2005 a broker came from Hyderabad to attend the auction, but all the furniture was withdrawn. The broker from Hyderabad sued the auctioneer for loss of his time and expenses.
Q. Which of the following statement is correct?
- a)The broker can get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expenses
- b)The broker will not get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expenses
- c)An invitation to make an offer is a valid offer
- d)A declaration of intention by a person will give right of action to another
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
An auctioneer in Mumbai advertised in a newspaper that a sale of offic...
An advertisement is only an invitation to an offer so the broker cannot claim his expenses from the auctioneer.
Most Upvoted Answer
An auctioneer in Mumbai advertised in a newspaper that a sale of offic...
Explanation:
The correct statement is option 'B': The broker will not get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expenses.
Reasoning:
In this case, the auctioneer advertised in a newspaper about a sale of office furniture that would be held on December 23, 2005. The broker from Hyderabad saw the advertisement and traveled to Mumbai to attend the auction. However, when the broker reached the auction, he found that all the furniture had been withdrawn.
To understand whether the broker can claim damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expenses, we need to consider the following legal principles:
1. Invitation to make an offer: The advertisement published by the auctioneer was an invitation to make an offer and not a valid offer itself. An invitation to make an offer is a preliminary step in the formation of a contract and does not create any legal obligation.
2. Offer and acceptance: For a contract to be formed, there must be a valid offer by one party and acceptance of that offer by the other party. In this case, the auctioneer did not make a specific offer to sell the office furniture to the broker. The advertisement only invited interested parties to attend the auction.
3. Withdrawal of offer: The auctioneer had the right to withdraw the offer at any time before acceptance. In this case, the auctioneer withdrew the offer by withdrawing the furniture from the auction. As a result, there was no valid offer for the broker to accept.
Based on these legal principles, it can be concluded that the broker will not be able to claim damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expenses. Since there was no valid offer and acceptance, there was no legally binding contract between the broker and the auctioneer. The broker chose to attend the auction voluntarily based on the invitation to make an offer, and he assumes the risk that the offer may be withdrawn.
Therefore, option 'B' is the correct statement. The broker will not get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expenses.
The correct statement is option 'B': The broker will not get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expenses.
Reasoning:
In this case, the auctioneer advertised in a newspaper about a sale of office furniture that would be held on December 23, 2005. The broker from Hyderabad saw the advertisement and traveled to Mumbai to attend the auction. However, when the broker reached the auction, he found that all the furniture had been withdrawn.
To understand whether the broker can claim damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expenses, we need to consider the following legal principles:
1. Invitation to make an offer: The advertisement published by the auctioneer was an invitation to make an offer and not a valid offer itself. An invitation to make an offer is a preliminary step in the formation of a contract and does not create any legal obligation.
2. Offer and acceptance: For a contract to be formed, there must be a valid offer by one party and acceptance of that offer by the other party. In this case, the auctioneer did not make a specific offer to sell the office furniture to the broker. The advertisement only invited interested parties to attend the auction.
3. Withdrawal of offer: The auctioneer had the right to withdraw the offer at any time before acceptance. In this case, the auctioneer withdrew the offer by withdrawing the furniture from the auction. As a result, there was no valid offer for the broker to accept.
Based on these legal principles, it can be concluded that the broker will not be able to claim damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expenses. Since there was no valid offer and acceptance, there was no legally binding contract between the broker and the auctioneer. The broker chose to attend the auction voluntarily based on the invitation to make an offer, and he assumes the risk that the offer may be withdrawn.
Therefore, option 'B' is the correct statement. The broker will not get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expenses.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
An auctioneer in Mumbai advertised in a newspaper that a sale of offic...
Option B is correct..because advertisement is only an invitation to an offer ...and not an agreement...so the broker cannot claim his expenses from the auctioneer
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Similar CLAT Doubts
Top Courses for CLATView all
An auctioneer in Mumbai advertised in a newspaper that a sale of office furniture would be held on Dec. 23, 2005 a broker came from Hyderabad to attend the auction, but all the furniture was withdrawn. The broker from Hyderabad sued the auctioneer for loss of his time and expenses.Q. Which of the following statement is correct?a)The broker can get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expensesb)The broker will not get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expensesc)An invitation to make an offer is a valid offerd)A declaration of intention by a person will give right of action to another Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
An auctioneer in Mumbai advertised in a newspaper that a sale of office furniture would be held on Dec. 23, 2005 a broker came from Hyderabad to attend the auction, but all the furniture was withdrawn. The broker from Hyderabad sued the auctioneer for loss of his time and expenses.Q. Which of the following statement is correct?a)The broker can get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expensesb)The broker will not get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expensesc)An invitation to make an offer is a valid offerd)A declaration of intention by a person will give right of action to another Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about An auctioneer in Mumbai advertised in a newspaper that a sale of office furniture would be held on Dec. 23, 2005 a broker came from Hyderabad to attend the auction, but all the furniture was withdrawn. The broker from Hyderabad sued the auctioneer for loss of his time and expenses.Q. Which of the following statement is correct?a)The broker can get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expensesb)The broker will not get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expensesc)An invitation to make an offer is a valid offerd)A declaration of intention by a person will give right of action to another Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for An auctioneer in Mumbai advertised in a newspaper that a sale of office furniture would be held on Dec. 23, 2005 a broker came from Hyderabad to attend the auction, but all the furniture was withdrawn. The broker from Hyderabad sued the auctioneer for loss of his time and expenses.Q. Which of the following statement is correct?a)The broker can get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expensesb)The broker will not get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expensesc)An invitation to make an offer is a valid offerd)A declaration of intention by a person will give right of action to another Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
An auctioneer in Mumbai advertised in a newspaper that a sale of office furniture would be held on Dec. 23, 2005 a broker came from Hyderabad to attend the auction, but all the furniture was withdrawn. The broker from Hyderabad sued the auctioneer for loss of his time and expenses.Q. Which of the following statement is correct?a)The broker can get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expensesb)The broker will not get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expensesc)An invitation to make an offer is a valid offerd)A declaration of intention by a person will give right of action to another Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about An auctioneer in Mumbai advertised in a newspaper that a sale of office furniture would be held on Dec. 23, 2005 a broker came from Hyderabad to attend the auction, but all the furniture was withdrawn. The broker from Hyderabad sued the auctioneer for loss of his time and expenses.Q. Which of the following statement is correct?a)The broker can get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expensesb)The broker will not get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expensesc)An invitation to make an offer is a valid offerd)A declaration of intention by a person will give right of action to another Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for An auctioneer in Mumbai advertised in a newspaper that a sale of office furniture would be held on Dec. 23, 2005 a broker came from Hyderabad to attend the auction, but all the furniture was withdrawn. The broker from Hyderabad sued the auctioneer for loss of his time and expenses.Q. Which of the following statement is correct?a)The broker can get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expensesb)The broker will not get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expensesc)An invitation to make an offer is a valid offerd)A declaration of intention by a person will give right of action to another Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for An auctioneer in Mumbai advertised in a newspaper that a sale of office furniture would be held on Dec. 23, 2005 a broker came from Hyderabad to attend the auction, but all the furniture was withdrawn. The broker from Hyderabad sued the auctioneer for loss of his time and expenses.Q. Which of the following statement is correct?a)The broker can get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expensesb)The broker will not get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expensesc)An invitation to make an offer is a valid offerd)A declaration of intention by a person will give right of action to another Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of An auctioneer in Mumbai advertised in a newspaper that a sale of office furniture would be held on Dec. 23, 2005 a broker came from Hyderabad to attend the auction, but all the furniture was withdrawn. The broker from Hyderabad sued the auctioneer for loss of his time and expenses.Q. Which of the following statement is correct?a)The broker can get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expensesb)The broker will not get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expensesc)An invitation to make an offer is a valid offerd)A declaration of intention by a person will give right of action to another Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
An auctioneer in Mumbai advertised in a newspaper that a sale of office furniture would be held on Dec. 23, 2005 a broker came from Hyderabad to attend the auction, but all the furniture was withdrawn. The broker from Hyderabad sued the auctioneer for loss of his time and expenses.Q. Which of the following statement is correct?a)The broker can get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expensesb)The broker will not get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expensesc)An invitation to make an offer is a valid offerd)A declaration of intention by a person will give right of action to another Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for An auctioneer in Mumbai advertised in a newspaper that a sale of office furniture would be held on Dec. 23, 2005 a broker came from Hyderabad to attend the auction, but all the furniture was withdrawn. The broker from Hyderabad sued the auctioneer for loss of his time and expenses.Q. Which of the following statement is correct?a)The broker can get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expensesb)The broker will not get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expensesc)An invitation to make an offer is a valid offerd)A declaration of intention by a person will give right of action to another Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of An auctioneer in Mumbai advertised in a newspaper that a sale of office furniture would be held on Dec. 23, 2005 a broker came from Hyderabad to attend the auction, but all the furniture was withdrawn. The broker from Hyderabad sued the auctioneer for loss of his time and expenses.Q. Which of the following statement is correct?a)The broker can get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expensesb)The broker will not get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expensesc)An invitation to make an offer is a valid offerd)A declaration of intention by a person will give right of action to another Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice An auctioneer in Mumbai advertised in a newspaper that a sale of office furniture would be held on Dec. 23, 2005 a broker came from Hyderabad to attend the auction, but all the furniture was withdrawn. The broker from Hyderabad sued the auctioneer for loss of his time and expenses.Q. Which of the following statement is correct?a)The broker can get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expensesb)The broker will not get damages from the auctioneer for loss of his time and expensesc)An invitation to make an offer is a valid offerd)A declaration of intention by a person will give right of action to another Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup