Principle: If a professional doesnandrsquo;t take care like an ordinary prudent person, he is guilty of negligence and shall have to pay compensation to those who suffer.Fact: Kapoor, a businessman appointed a surgeon Dr. K.S. Pratap for completing surgery to remove deformation in the leg of his son, Amit. During the surgery an attendant nurse left a small needle inside, which resulted in a serious abyss requiring second operation. After the second operation, leg was shortened. Has the doctor committed any wrong?a)No, he has not committed any wrong; it was the nurse who was negligent.b)No, he has not committed any wrong; as such lapses are common in surgeries.c)Yes, the doctor is guilty of medical negligence, as there is absence of due cared)Yes, both the doctor as well as the nurse is liableCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Principle: If a professional doesn’t ta...

Principle: If a professional doesn’t take care like an ordinary prudent person, he is guilty of negligence and shall have to pay compensation to those who suffer.

Fact: Kapoor, a businessman appointed a surgeon Dr. K.S. Pratap for completing surgery to remove deformation in the leg of his son, Amit. During the surgery an attendant nurse left a small needle inside, which resulted in a serious abyss requiring second operation. After the second operation, leg was shortened. Has the doctor committed any wrong?

a)
No, he has not committed any wrong; it was the nurse who was negligent.
b)
No, he has not committed any wrong; as such lapses are common in surgeries.
c)
Yes, the doctor is guilty of medical negligence, as there is absence of due care
d)
Yes, both the doctor as well as the nurse is liable

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

Principle: If a professional doesn’t take care like an ordinary ...

The nurse works under the duty of the doctor So for the negligence of the nurse, Doctor will be HELD VICARIOUSLY liable.

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

Free Test

FREE

Test: Law Of Tort - 2
50 Ques | 30 Min

Start Free Test

View all free CLAT tests

Community Answer

Principle: If a professional doesn’t take care like an ordinary ...

Does not adhere to ethical standards, they may face disciplinary action or loss of their professional license.

Explanation: Professionals are expected to follow a set of ethical standards in their field to ensure the well-being and trust of their clients or patients. These ethical standards often include principles such as integrity, confidentiality, and putting the best interests of the client/patient first. If a professional fails to meet these standards and engages in unethical behavior, they may face consequences such as being reprimanded, fined, or having their license suspended or revoked. This principle serves to maintain the integrity and credibility of the profession and protect the public from potential harm.

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Negligence is the breach of a duty exercised by omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided by those considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs, would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do is essential ingredient of the offence. The negligence to be established by the prosecution must be culpable or gross and not the negligence merely based upon an error of judgment.The medical professional is expected to bring a reasonable degree of skill and knowledge and must exercise a reasonable degree of care.Neither the very highest nor a very low degree of care and competence judged in the light of the particular circumstances of each case is what the law requires.A medical practitioner would be liable only where his conduct fell below that of the standards of a reasonably competent practitioner in his field.In the realm of diagnosis and treatment there is scope for genuine difference of opinion and one professional doctor is clearly not negligent merely because his conclusion differs from that of other professional doctor.The medical professional is often called upon to adopt a procedure which involves higher element of risk, but which he honestly believes as providing greater chances of success for the patient rather than a procedure involving lesser risk but higher chances of failure.Just because a professional looking to the gravity of illness has taken higher element of risk to redeem the patient out of his/her suffering which did not yield the desired result may not amount to negligence.Negligence cannot be attributed to a doctor so long as he performs his duties with reasonable skill and competence. Merely because the doctor chooses one course of action in preference to the other one available, he would not be liable if the course of action chosen by him was acceptable to the medical profession.It would not be conducive to the efficiency of the medical profession if no Doctor could administer medicine without a halter round his neck.It is our bounden duty and obligation of the civil society to ensure that the medical professionals are not unnecessarily harassed or humiliated so that they can perform their professional duties without fear and apprehension.The medical practitioners at times also have to be saved from such a class of complainants who use criminal process as a tool for pressurizing the medical professionals/hospitals particularly private hospitals or clinics for extracting uncalled for compensation. Such malicious proceedings deserve to be discarded against the medical practitioners.The medical professionals are entitled to get protection so long as they perform their duties with reasonable skill and competence and in the interest of the patients. The interest and welfare of the patients have to be paramount for the medical professionals.Q. Anisha was suffering from pain due to appendicitis and required her a surgery that involved cutting her stomach open as per the advice of her doctor, Dr C. Though the operation was successful, after a few weeks, she started suffering from an infection which was a result of her stomach being cut open for the surgery though all the reasonable precautions to avoid any such infection had been taken by the group of surgeons who operated upon her. She visited another doctor, Dr K, after the development of this infection, and he told her that even a laser surgery could have cured her stomach ailment without exposing her to the risk of infection. However, as a matter of fact, there were many doctors in the country who supported the advice given by Dr C to cure her health condition, and there were many others who were of the same opinion as that of Dr K. Nevertheless, Anisha sued Dr C. Decide.

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Negligence is the breach of a duty exercised by omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided by those considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs, would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do is essential ingredient of the offence. The negligence to be established by the prosecution must be culpable or gross and not the negligence merely based upon an error of judgment.The medical professional is expected to bring a reasonable degree of skill and knowledge and must exercise a reasonable degree of care.Neither the very highest nor a very low degree of care and competence judged in the light of the particular circumstances of each case is what the law requires.A medical practitioner would be liable only where his conduct fell below that of the standards of a reasonably competent practitioner in his field.In the realm of diagnosis and treatment there is scope for genuine difference of opinion and one professional doctor is clearly not negligent merely because his conclusion differs from that of other professional doctor.The medical professional is often called upon to adopt a procedure which involves higher element of risk, but which he honestly believes as providing greater chances of success for the patient rather than a procedure involving lesser risk but higher chances of failure.Just because a professional looking to the gravity of illness has taken higher element of risk to redeem the patient out of his/her suffering which did not yield the desired result may not amount to negligence.Negligence cannot be attributed to a doctor so long as he performs his duties with reasonable skill and competence. Merely because the doctor chooses one course of action in preference to the other one available, he would not be liable if the course of action chosen by him was acceptable to the medical profession.It would not be conducive to the efficiency of the medical profession if no Doctor could administer medicine without a halter round his neck.It is our bounden duty and obligation of the civil society to ensure that the medical professionals are not unnecessarily harassed or humiliated so that they can perform their professional duties without fear and apprehension.The medical practitioners at times also have to be saved from such a class of complainants who use criminal process as a tool for pressurizing the medical professionals/hospitals particularly private hospitals or clinics for extracting uncalled for compensation. Such malicious proceedings deserve to be discarded against the medical practitioners.The medical professionals are entitled to get protection so long as they perform their duties with reasonable skill and competence and in the interest of the patients. The interest and welfare of the patients have to be paramount for the medical professionals.Q. Dr. X operated on a person Z on whom he held grudge as due to Z Dr, X's father had committed suicide. Z was unaware of this and came to know it after the operation. The operation was declared successful but a few days later in the symptoms of previous disease again returned which proved to be fatal. Decide.

View answer

Direction:In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple-choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle: Medical negligence is when a medical professional does not take the due care and attention which is taken by other medical professionals in a similar circumstance.Facts: Doctor Aubrey, a renowned surgeon, operated upon Shalini to remove a cyst from her stomach. After 10 days Shalini complained of pain in her stomach. On a second opinion it was found that a forceps had been left inside her stomach. Shalini had to go through another operation for the removal of the same. She sues Doctor Aubrey for damages on account of gross medical negligence. Decide.

View answer

Direction: In this section, every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle: Medical negligence is when a medical professional does not take the due care and attention which is taken by other medical professionals in a similar circumstance.Facts: Doctor Aubrey, a renowned surgeon, operated upon Shalini to remove a cyst from her stomach. After 10 days Shalini complained of pain in her stomach. On a second opinion it was found that a forceps had been left inside her stomach. Shalini had to go through another operation for the removal of the same. She sues Doctor Aubrey for damages on account of gross medical negligence.Decide.

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Negligence is the breach of a duty exercised by omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided by those considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs, would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do is essential ingredient of the offence. The negligence to be established by the prosecution must be culpable or gross and not the negligence merely based upon an error of judgment.The medical professional is expected to bring a reasonable degree of skill and knowledge and must exercise a reasonable degree of care.Neither the very highest nor a very low degree of care and competence judged in the light of the particular circumstances of each case is what the law requires.A medical practitioner would be liable only where his conduct fell below that of the standards of a reasonably competent practitioner in his field.In the realm of diagnosis and treatment there is scope for genuine difference of opinion and one professional doctor is clearly not negligent merely because his conclusion differs from that of other professional doctor.The medical professional is often called upon to adopt a procedure which involves higher element of risk, but which he honestly believes as providing greater chances of success for the patient rather than a procedure involving lesser risk but higher chances of failure.Just because a professional looking to the gravity of illness has taken higher element of risk to redeem the patient out of his/her suffering which did not yield the desired result may not amount to negligence.Negligence cannot be attributed to a doctor so long as he performs his duties with reasonable skill and competence. Merely because the doctor chooses one course of action in preference to the other one available, he would not be liable if the course of action chosen by him was acceptable to the medical profession.It would not be conducive to the efficiency of the medical profession if no Doctor could administer medicine without a halter round his neck.It is our bounden duty and obligation of the civil society to ensure that the medical professionals are not unnecessarily harassed or humiliated so that they can perform their professional duties without fear and apprehension.The medical practitioners at times also have to be saved from such a class of complainants who use criminal process as a tool for pressurizing the medical professionals/hospitals particularly private hospitals or clinics for extracting uncalled for compensation. Such malicious proceedings deserve to be discarded against the medical practitioners.The medical professionals are entitled to get protection so long as they perform their duties with reasonable skill and competence and in the interest of the patients. The interest and welfare of the patients have to be paramount for the medical professionals.Q. Amit was prescribed a medicine which caused allergy in his body. When asked about his medical history Amit did not mention the drugs he was allergic to. Amit sued the hospital and asked for compensation due to the problems he had to suffer.

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

CLAT Mock Test Series 2025

Crash Course for CLAT

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Principle: If a professional doesn’t take care like an ordinary prudent person, he is guilty of negligence and shall have to pay compensation to those who suffer.Fact: Kapoor, a businessman appointed a surgeon Dr. K.S. Pratap for completing surgery to remove deformation in the leg of his son, Amit. During the surgery an attendant nurse left a small needle inside, which resulted in a serious abyss requiring second operation. After the second operation, leg was shortened. Has the doctor committed any wrong?a)No, he has not committed any wrong; it was the nurse who was negligent.b)No, he has not committed any wrong; as such lapses are common in surgeries.c)Yes, the doctor is guilty of medical negligence, as there is absence of due cared)Yes, both the doctor as well as the nurse is liableCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Principle: If a professional doesn’t take care like an ordinary prudent person, he is guilty of negligence and shall have to pay compensation to those who suffer.Fact: Kapoor, a businessman appointed a surgeon Dr. K.S. Pratap for completing surgery to remove deformation in the leg of his son, Amit. During the surgery an attendant nurse left a small needle inside, which resulted in a serious abyss requiring second operation. After the second operation, leg was shortened. Has the doctor committed any wrong?a)No, he has not committed any wrong; it was the nurse who was negligent.b)No, he has not committed any wrong; as such lapses are common in surgeries.c)Yes, the doctor is guilty of medical negligence, as there is absence of due cared)Yes, both the doctor as well as the nurse is liableCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle: If a professional doesn’t take care like an ordinary prudent person, he is guilty of negligence and shall have to pay compensation to those who suffer.Fact: Kapoor, a businessman appointed a surgeon Dr. K.S. Pratap for completing surgery to remove deformation in the leg of his son, Amit. During the surgery an attendant nurse left a small needle inside, which resulted in a serious abyss requiring second operation. After the second operation, leg was shortened. Has the doctor committed any wrong?a)No, he has not committed any wrong; it was the nurse who was negligent.b)No, he has not committed any wrong; as such lapses are common in surgeries.c)Yes, the doctor is guilty of medical negligence, as there is absence of due cared)Yes, both the doctor as well as the nurse is liableCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle: If a professional doesn’t take care like an ordinary prudent person, he is guilty of negligence and shall have to pay compensation to those who suffer.Fact: Kapoor, a businessman appointed a surgeon Dr. K.S. Pratap for completing surgery to remove deformation in the leg of his son, Amit. During the surgery an attendant nurse left a small needle inside, which resulted in a serious abyss requiring second operation. After the second operation, leg was shortened. Has the doctor committed any wrong?a)No, he has not committed any wrong; it was the nurse who was negligent.b)No, he has not committed any wrong; as such lapses are common in surgeries.c)Yes, the doctor is guilty of medical negligence, as there is absence of due cared)Yes, both the doctor as well as the nurse is liableCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Principle: If a professional doesn’t take care like an ordinary prudent person, he is guilty of negligence and shall have to pay compensation to those who suffer.Fact: Kapoor, a businessman appointed a surgeon Dr. K.S. Pratap for completing surgery to remove deformation in the leg of his son, Amit. During the surgery an attendant nurse left a small needle inside, which resulted in a serious abyss requiring second operation. After the second operation, leg was shortened. Has the doctor committed any wrong?a)No, he has not committed any wrong; it was the nurse who was negligent.b)No, he has not committed any wrong; as such lapses are common in surgeries.c)Yes, the doctor is guilty of medical negligence, as there is absence of due cared)Yes, both the doctor as well as the nurse is liableCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Principle: If a professional doesn’t take care like an ordinary prudent person, he is guilty of negligence and shall have to pay compensation to those who suffer.Fact: Kapoor, a businessman appointed a surgeon Dr. K.S. Pratap for completing surgery to remove deformation in the leg of his son, Amit. During the surgery an attendant nurse left a small needle inside, which resulted in a serious abyss requiring second operation. After the second operation, leg was shortened. Has the doctor committed any wrong?a)No, he has not committed any wrong; it was the nurse who was negligent.b)No, he has not committed any wrong; as such lapses are common in surgeries.c)Yes, the doctor is guilty of medical negligence, as there is absence of due cared)Yes, both the doctor as well as the nurse is liableCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Principle: If a professional doesn’t take care like an ordinary prudent person, he is guilty of negligence and shall have to pay compensation to those who suffer.Fact: Kapoor, a businessman appointed a surgeon Dr. K.S. Pratap for completing surgery to remove deformation in the leg of his son, Amit. During the surgery an attendant nurse left a small needle inside, which resulted in a serious abyss requiring second operation. After the second operation, leg was shortened. Has the doctor committed any wrong?a)No, he has not committed any wrong; it was the nurse who was negligent.b)No, he has not committed any wrong; as such lapses are common in surgeries.c)Yes, the doctor is guilty of medical negligence, as there is absence of due cared)Yes, both the doctor as well as the nurse is liableCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle: If a professional doesn’t take care like an ordinary prudent person, he is guilty of negligence and shall have to pay compensation to those who suffer.Fact: Kapoor, a businessman appointed a surgeon Dr. K.S. Pratap for completing surgery to remove deformation in the leg of his son, Amit. During the surgery an attendant nurse left a small needle inside, which resulted in a serious abyss requiring second operation. After the second operation, leg was shortened. Has the doctor committed any wrong?a)No, he has not committed any wrong; it was the nurse who was negligent.b)No, he has not committed any wrong; as such lapses are common in surgeries.c)Yes, the doctor is guilty of medical negligence, as there is absence of due cared)Yes, both the doctor as well as the nurse is liableCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle: If a professional doesn’t take care like an ordinary prudent person, he is guilty of negligence and shall have to pay compensation to those who suffer.Fact: Kapoor, a businessman appointed a surgeon Dr. K.S. Pratap for completing surgery to remove deformation in the leg of his son, Amit. During the surgery an attendant nurse left a small needle inside, which resulted in a serious abyss requiring second operation. After the second operation, leg was shortened. Has the doctor committed any wrong?a)No, he has not committed any wrong; it was the nurse who was negligent.b)No, he has not committed any wrong; as such lapses are common in surgeries.c)Yes, the doctor is guilty of medical negligence, as there is absence of due cared)Yes, both the doctor as well as the nurse is liableCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Principle: If a professional doesn’t take care like an ordinary prudent person, he is guilty of negligence and shall have to pay compensation to those who suffer.Fact: Kapoor, a businessman appointed a surgeon Dr. K.S. Pratap for completing surgery to remove deformation in the leg of his son, Amit. During the surgery an attendant nurse left a small needle inside, which resulted in a serious abyss requiring second operation. After the second operation, leg was shortened. Has the doctor committed any wrong?a)No, he has not committed any wrong; it was the nurse who was negligent.b)No, he has not committed any wrong; as such lapses are common in surgeries.c)Yes, the doctor is guilty of medical negligence, as there is absence of due cared)Yes, both the doctor as well as the nurse is liableCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam