Question Description
Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should non-vegetarian food be totally banned in our country?Arguments:I. Yes, it is expensive and therefore it is beyond the means of most people in our country.II. No, nothing should be banned in a democratic country like ours.a)if only argument I is strongb)if neither argument I nor II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if only argument II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should non-vegetarian food be totally banned in our country?Arguments:I. Yes, it is expensive and therefore it is beyond the means of most people in our country.II. No, nothing should be banned in a democratic country like ours.a)if only argument I is strongb)if neither argument I nor II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if only argument II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should non-vegetarian food be totally banned in our country?Arguments:I. Yes, it is expensive and therefore it is beyond the means of most people in our country.II. No, nothing should be banned in a democratic country like ours.a)if only argument I is strongb)if neither argument I nor II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if only argument II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should non-vegetarian food be totally banned in our country?Arguments:I. Yes, it is expensive and therefore it is beyond the means of most people in our country.II. No, nothing should be banned in a democratic country like ours.a)if only argument I is strongb)if neither argument I nor II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if only argument II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should non-vegetarian food be totally banned in our country?Arguments:I. Yes, it is expensive and therefore it is beyond the means of most people in our country.II. No, nothing should be banned in a democratic country like ours.a)if only argument I is strongb)if neither argument I nor II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if only argument II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should non-vegetarian food be totally banned in our country?Arguments:I. Yes, it is expensive and therefore it is beyond the means of most people in our country.II. No, nothing should be banned in a democratic country like ours.a)if only argument I is strongb)if neither argument I nor II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if only argument II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should non-vegetarian food be totally banned in our country?Arguments:I. Yes, it is expensive and therefore it is beyond the means of most people in our country.II. No, nothing should be banned in a democratic country like ours.a)if only argument I is strongb)if neither argument I nor II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if only argument II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should non-vegetarian food be totally banned in our country?Arguments:I. Yes, it is expensive and therefore it is beyond the means of most people in our country.II. No, nothing should be banned in a democratic country like ours.a)if only argument I is strongb)if neither argument I nor II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if only argument II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should non-vegetarian food be totally banned in our country?Arguments:I. Yes, it is expensive and therefore it is beyond the means of most people in our country.II. No, nothing should be banned in a democratic country like ours.a)if only argument I is strongb)if neither argument I nor II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if only argument II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.