Introduction
The term "moral" refers to a set of principles and standards that guide an individual's actions and behavior. While the word "ethics" is sometimes used interchangeably with "moral," they are not exactly the same. Ethics refers to the behavior that is considered customary within a particular culture or society. Therefore, ethical standards may vary as one moves from one society to another. On the other hand, moral standards pertain to an individual's personal beliefs about right and wrong, and they generally remain consistent across different societies.
Administrative ethics can be understood as a set of rules infused with moral values. It involves shared responsibility and the application of ethical standards to discuss and make decisions that promote the common welfare.
Why Administrative Ethics Required for Civil Servants?
- To uphold honesty and integrity in serving the society.
- To establish goals that prioritize the welfare of the public.
- To adhere to democratic and secular principles.
- To regulate the interaction between the government and the people.
- To embody the values enshrined in the Constitution and promote social justice.
- To ensure equal opportunities for all citizens.
- To safeguard civil rights.
- To uplift marginalized and disadvantaged individuals.
Civil servants are expected to possess comprehensive competence based on their verified knowledge, experience, and expertise. They should also maintain independence to provide official advice to ministers and effectively implement public policies and decisions in the best interest of the public.
Factors Affecting Ethics
Following factors affect the characteristics of ethics in an individual:
The values instilled in an individual during their formative years by parents, teachers, friends, and relatives significantly impact their ethics and moral compass. These influences subsequently shape the individual's decision-making capabilities, which are intertwined with factors such as ego strength, self-control, balanced personality, and sound judgment.
Individual Characteristics
When individuals join an organization, they bring with them a set of values that have been ingrained in them from a young age through influences such as parents, teachers, and friends. These values represent their fundamental beliefs about what is right and wrong.
Two personality factors have been identified as influential in an individual's actions:
- Ego strength: This is a measure of an individual's conviction and determination. Those with high ego strength are more likely to act according to their personal beliefs of what is right. They exhibit greater consistency in their moral judgments and actions.
- Locus of control: This reflects an individual's perception of the degree to which they have control over their own destiny. Individuals with an internal locus of control believe they have control over their fate, while those with an external locus of control attribute what happens to them to luck, chance, or destiny.
Therefore, individual characteristics play a significant role in shaping a person's behavior, influencing whether it leans towards ethical or unethical conduct.
Structure of Organisation/ Administration
The structure or design of an organization or administration has an impact on the ethical behavior of its employees. Certain structures offer clear guidance and convey a strong message about ethical conduct, while others create ambiguity and uncertainty, which can affect how individuals navigate ethical situations within the organization.
Culture of Organisation/Administration
Fostering a culture that promotes high ethical standards and embraces a willingness to take risks encourages employees to be proactive and innovative, while also instilling a sense of caution against engaging in unethical practices.
Approaches to Ethical Decision Making
In order to make ethical decisions when solving a problem, it is crucial to accurately identify the underlying issue.
This can be achieved by considering certain approaches, including:
- Rights-based approach: This approach emphasizes that an action or policy is ethical if it upholds and promotes moral rights, dignity, and respect for individuals. Ethical decision-making in this context revolves around protecting and advancing these rights.
- Utilitarian approach: The utilitarian approach is guided by the principle of maximizing benefits and minimizing harm or loss. Decisions should aim to avoid policies or rules that adversely affect people and instead prioritize actions that lead to overall positive outcomes.
- Virtue approach: The virtue approach focuses on developing moral virtues in decision-making. Actions and decisions should be based on qualities such as compassion, loyalty, and integrity, aiming to cultivate virtuous behavior.
- Fairness or justice approach: This approach is rooted in the principle of distributing burdens and benefits equally, unless there are morally justifiable reasons for differences. Ethical decisions should consider what individuals truly deserve based on principles of fairness and justice.
- Humane community approach: This approach centers around the idea that ethical actions are those that promote the common good for a community. Decisions should be made with the aim of benefiting the community as a whole.
Overall, ethical decision-making involves a process of evaluating alternatives and selecting the course of action that aligns with these approaches.
Question for Administrative Ethics & Decision Making
Try yourself:A person approaches you and makes a number of complaints about your department. What would be your initial response?
Question for Administrative Ethics & Decision Making
Try yourself:You have taken up a project to create night shelters for homeless people during the winter season. Within a week of establishing the shelters, you have received complaints from the residents of the area about the increase in theft cases with a demand to remove the shelters. You would
Explanation
- For selecting best alternative in such circumstances you are required to adopt Rights based approach. It says, decision making in ethical issues should be based on promoting rights dignity and respect to the individual.
- Selecting either option (c) or (d) will go against the ethics and morality. Assuring the residents and enquiring into the matter may not bring effective results to stop the thefts, so the problem needs the intervention of police. Thus, the right answer is option (a).
Report a problem
Question for Administrative Ethics & Decision Making
Try yourself:You are a teacher in a university and are setting a question paper on a particular subject. One of your colleagues, whose son is preparing for the examination on that subject, comes to you and informs you that it is his son’s last chance to pass that examination and asks you whether you could help him by indicating what questions are going to be set in the examination paper. In the past, your colleague had helped you in another matter. Your colleague adds that his son will suffer from depression, if he gets fail in this examination too. In such circumstances, what would you do?
Explanation
For selecting best alternative in these type of circumstances you are required to adopt Virtue Approach as in these circumstance you must be loyal to take ethical and moral decision. Selecting option (a) is complete negation of ethics and morality of a teacher while option (b) may do little help to convince your colleague. While option (d) would harm the relationship, so it is best option to explain your colleague that it would be the violation of trust of the university authorities. Thus, the correct answer is option (c).
Report a problem
Question for Administrative Ethics & Decision Making
Try yourself:You are head of a committee which is to award a public contract for executing an important government programme in a district. Your immediate superior officer calls you and tell that the application of a party X which is related to a prominent politician is to be favoured. This is to be done by citing technical deficiencies in the bids of other possible competitors. In case you disobey him, he suggest that you may be transferred to a different place.
Your response would be to
Explanation
- Being head of the committee, you should follow administrative ethics. So, you should examine the tenders only on merits and award the contract to the party which is satisfying the technical requirements and having the lowest financial bid.
- You have been informed by immediate superior officer to favour the party X without any written official order. So, blacklisting the party X is not prudent decision.
- Cancelling the process of examination of tenders and float fresh tenders will be time consuming and you should not follow this only based on informal suggestion of favouritism.
Report a problem
Question for Administrative Ethics & Decision Making
Try yourself:You are Deputy Secretary in a Ministry of Government of India where you are dealing with appointments of ‘programmers’. On the base of a written test, 10 candidates have been shortlisted for two posts. Based on their educational qualifications and work experience, you have to make you recommendations in order of preference. A senior officer of the Ministry, who i known to you, asks you to recommend the name of Y amongst the first two choices. What will you do?
Explanation
- You should avoid favouritism in the selection process and should uphold administrative ethics. So, you should examine the profile of to candidates and take decision on merit only, even if it means inclusion of Y in the first two.
- You should not comply with the request of senior officer about Y . In following option(a), the senior may either take disciplinary action against this senior officer or against both of you. In following option(d), there might be injustice the candidateY.
Report a problem
Question for Administrative Ethics & Decision Making
Try yourself:You are empowered to take action against those who indulge in selling fake/adulterated products. A number of inspectors working under your supervision visit shops, stores and other outlets. One of your inspectors discriminates among the owners of such traders, leaves some scot free while reports against others. What do you do about such an inspector?
Explanation
- You should reprim and this inspector for derilection of duties. In the question, there is no mention, that this inspector has been indulged in corrupt practice and accepting bribe or other favour. So, you need to know why he is discriminating the traders.
- Get him transferred to a different city or force him to resign would be harsh on him. You can give him chance but before that you need to give him warning.
Report a problem