BANKING IN INDIA
History of banking in India
Nationalisation of banks
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
Reserve Bank of India:
Governors
Reserve Bank of India and its functions:
Reserve Bank of India Amendment Bill 2005 Approved:
List of RBI Governors
|
S. |
|
Governor |
Tenure |
|
Notes |
|
|||||
|
No. |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
1 |
|
|
Sir Osborne |
|
|
1935-1937 |
|
|
First Governor of the RBI |
|
|
|
|
|
Smith |
|
|
|
|
Did not sign any bank notes |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
2 |
|
|
Sir James Taylor |
1937-1943 |
|
|
Governor during WWII |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
Started the practice of signing bank notes |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Indian Governor of RBI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oversaw Independence & Partition |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Sir C D |
|
|
1943-1949 |
|
|
Represented India at the Bretton Woods |
|
|
|
|
|
Deshmukh |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conference 1944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Served as Minister of Finance 1950-1956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Longest serving Governor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sir Benegal |
|
|
|
|
Was Indian Ambassador to USA prior to RBI |
|
||
4 |
|
|
1949-1957 |
|
|
Witnessed commencement of Five Year Plans, |
|
|||||
|
|
Rama Rao |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and transformation of Imperial Bank of India to |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBI |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
K G |
|
|
Jan 1957 – |
|
|
Did not sign any bank notes |
|
|
|
|
|
Ambegaonkar |
|
|
Feb 1957 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
6 |
|
|
H V R Iyengar |
1957-1962 |
|
|
Witnessed introduction of decimal coinage |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
Variable cash reserve ration (CRR) introduced |
|
|||||||
|
7 |
|
|
P C Bhattacharya |
|
|
1962-1967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
L K Jha |
1967-1970 |
|
|
Witnessed nationalization of banks (1969) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
Appointed as Ambassador to US in 1970 |
|
|||||||
|
9 |
|
|
B N Adarkar |
|
|
May 1970 – |
|
|
Served as India’s Executive Director at the IMF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 1970 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Witnessed oil shock, expansion of banking |
|
|
10 |
|
|
S Jagannathan |
1970-1975 |
|
|
services, shift to floating rates |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
Relinquished office to serve as Executive |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director at IMF |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
N C Sen Gupta |
|
|
May 1975 – |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 1975 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
12 |
|
|
K R Puri |
1975-1977 |
|
|
|
|
|
13 M Narasimhan May 1977 –Nov 1977 |
Only Governor to be appointed from the Reserve Bank cadreChairperson of Committee on Financial System (1991) and Committee on Banking Sector Reforms (1998)Served as Executive Director for India |
14 |
Dr. I G Patel |
1977-1982 |
Served as Secretary at the United Nations |
|
|
|
at the World Bank and the IMF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development Programme (UNDP) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Witnessed demonetisation of high |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
denomination bank notes and “gold auctions” |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Witnessed nationalization of six banks (1980) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured IMF’s Extended Fund Facility (1981). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This was the largest arrangement of the IMF at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the time |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
Dr. Manmohan |
|
|
1982-1985 |
|
|
Witnessed comprehensive legal reforms in |
|
|
|
|
|
Singh |
|
|
|
|
banking sector |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
16 |
|
A Ghosh |
Jan 1985 – |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Feb 1985 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
17 |
|
|
R N Malhotra |
|
|
1985-1990 |
|
|
Served as Executive Director of IMF prior to RBI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Made efforts to develop money markets |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed balance of payments crisis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adopted IMF’s stabilisation programme |
|
|
18 |
|
|
S Venkitaraman |
1990-1992 |
|
|
Supervised devaluation of the Rupee |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Witnessed launch of economic reforms |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ushered in unprecedented central bank activism |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introduced comprehensive measures to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
strengthen and improve efficiency of banking |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
Dr. C |
|
|
1992-1997 |
|
|
sector |
|
|
|
|
|
Rangarajan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Establishment of unified exchange rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cap on automatic finance by the Bank to the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government |
|
|
20 |
|
|
Dr. Bimal Jalan |
1997-2003 |
|
|
Represented India on the Executive Boards of |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
the IMF and World Bank prior to RBI |
|
|||||||
|
21 |
|
|
Dr Y V Reddy |
|
|
2003-2008 |
|
|
Executive Director to IMF prior to RBI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to RBI, he has been |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secretary to the PM’s Economic Advisory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Council (2005-2007) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
Dr. D Subbarao |
2008- |
|
|
Lead economist in the World Bank (1999-2004) |
|
||||
|
|
Present |
|
Finance Secretary to the Government of |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andhra Pradesh (1993-1998) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint Secretary, Dept. of Economic Affairs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1988-1993) |
|
|
STATE BANK OF INDIA
CATEGORIES OF BANKS IN INDIA
sector banks include Indian banks and foreign banks
Cooperative Banks
India. It was established Vithal Laxman (aka Bhausaheb Kavthekar) in 1889 under the name Anyonya Sahayakari Mandali Cooperative Bank Ltd. The bank closed functioning in March 2008 following an order by the RBI. Re-opening is under consideration
The share of RRBs in agricultural credit is around 5%.
Scheduled Banks
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES IN BANKING
Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI)
Industrial Finance Corporation of India (IFCI)
National Bank for Agricultural and Rural Development (NABARD)
NABARD serves as the apex development bank in India for economic activities in rural areas
National Housing Bank (NHB)
Export-Import Bank of India (EXIM Bank)
Bharatiya Reserve Bank Note Mudran Private Ltd (BRBNMPL)
Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation (DICGC)
Banking sector reforms
From the 1991 India economic crisis to its status of third largest economy in the world by 2011, India has grown significantly in terms of economic development. So has its banking sector.
During this period, recognizing the evolving needs of the sector, the Finance Ministry of Government of India (GOI) set up various committees with the task of analyzing India's banking sector and recommending legislation and regulations to make it more effective, competitive and efficient.
Two such expert Committees were set up under the chairmanship of M. Narsimha. They submitted their recommendations in the 1990s in reports widely known as the Narasimham Committee-I (1991) report and the Narasimham Committee-II (1998) Report.
These recommendations not only helped unleash the potential of banking in India, they are also recognized as a factor towards minimizing the impact of global financial crisis starting in 2007.
The purpose of the Narasimham-I Committee was to study all aspects relating to the structure, organization, functions and procedures of the financial systems and to recommend improvements in their efficiency and productivity. The Committee submitted its report to the Finance Minister in November 1991 which was tabled in Parliament on 17 December 1991.
The Narasimham-II Committee was tasked with the progress review of the implementation of the banking reforms since 1992 with the aim of further strengthening the financial institutions of India.It focussed on issues like size of banks and capital adequacy ratio among other things.
Problems Identified By the Narasimham Committee
Along with these major problem areas M. Narasimham's Committee also found various inconsistencies regarding the banking system in India. In order to remove them and make it more vibrant and efficient, it has given the following recommendations.
Narasimham Committee Report I - 1991
The Narsimham Committee was set up in order to study the problems of the Indian financial system and to suggest some recommendations for improvement in the efficiency and productivity of the financial institution.
The committee has given the following major recommendations:-
Some of these recommendations were later accepted by the Government of India and became banking reforms.
Narasimham Committee Report II - 1998
In 1998 the government appointed yet another committee under the chairmanship of Mr. Narsimham. It is better known as the Banking Sector Committee. It was told to review the banking reform progress and design a programme for further strengthening the financial system of India. The committee focused on various areas such as capital adequacy, bank mergers, bank legislation, etc.
It submitted its report to the Government in April 1998 with the following recommendations.
Narrow Banking : Those days many public sector banks were facing a problem of the Non-performing assets (NPAs). Some of them had NPAs were as high as 20 percent of their assets. Thus for successful rehabilitation of these banks it recommended 'Narrow Banking Concept' where weak banks will be allowed to place their funds only in short term and risk free assets.
Apart from these major recommendations, the committee has also recommended faster computerization, technology upgradation, training of staff, depoliticizing of banks, professionalism in banking, reviewing bank recruitment, etc.
Evaluation of Narsimham Committee Reports
The Committee was first set up in 1991 under the chairmanship of Mr. M. Narasimham who was 13th governor of RBI. Only a few of its recommendations became banking reforms of India and others were not at all considered. Because of this a second committee was again set up in 1998.
As far as recommendations regarding bank restructuring, management freedom, strengthening the regulation are concerned, the RBI has to play a major role. If the major recommendations of this committee are accepted, it will prove to be fruitful in making Indian banks more profitable and efficient.
Capital adequacy ratio
Capital adequacy ratios (CARs) are a measure of the amount of a bank's core capital expressed as a percentage of its risk-weighted asset.
Capital adequacy ratio is defined as:
TIER 1 CAPITAL - (paid up capital + statutory reserves + disclosed free reserves) - (equity investments in subsidiary + intangible assets + current & b/f losses)TIER 2 CAPITAL -A)Undisclose d Reserves, B)General Loss reserves, C) hybri d debt capital instruments and subordinated de bts where Risk can either be weight ed assets ( ) or the respective national regulator's minimum total capital requirement. If using risk weighted assets,
≥ 10%.
The percent threshold varies from bank to bank (10% in this case, a common requirement for regulators conforming to the Basel Accords) is set by the national bankin regulator of different countries. Two types of capital are meas ured: tier one capital ( above), which can absorb losses without a bank being required to cease trading, and tier two capital ( above ), which can absorb losses in the event of a winding-up and so provides a lesser degree of protection to depositors.
Use
Capital adequacy ratio is the ratio which determines the bank's capacity to m eet the time liabilities and other risks such a s credit risk, operational risk etc. In the simplest formulation, a bank's capital is the "cushion" for potential losses, and protects the bank's d epositors andother lenders. Banking regulat ors in most countries define and monitor CA R to protect depositors, thereby maintaining confidence in the banking system.
CAR is similar to leverage; in the most basic formulation, it is comparable tothe inverse of debt-to-equity leve rage formulations (although CAR uses equityover assets instead of debt-to-eq uity; since assets are by definition equal to deb t plus equity, a transformation is required). Unlike traditional leverage, however, CAR recognizes that assets can have different le vels of risk.
Basel Accords
The Basel Accords refer to the banking supervision Accords (recommendations on banking
regulations)—Basel I, Basel II and Basel III—issued by the Basel Committee on Banking
Supervision (BCBS).
The Basel Committee
Formerly, the Basel Committee consisted of representatives from central banks and regulatory authorities of the Group of Ten countries plus Luxembourg and Spain. Since 2009, all of the other G-20 major economies are represented, as well as some other major banking locales such as Hong Kong and Singapore. (See the Committee article for a full list of members.)
The committee does not have the authority to enforce recommendations, although most member countries as well as some other countries tend to implement the Committee's policies. This means that recommendations are enforced through national (or EU-wide) laws and regulations, rather than as a result of the committee's recommendations - thus some time may pass between recommendations and implementation as law at the national level.
Basel I
Basel I is the round of deliberations by central bankers from around the world, and in 1988, the Basel Committee (BCBS) in Basel, Switzerland, published a set of minimum capital requirements for banks. This is also known as the 1988 Basel Accord, and was enforced by law in the Group of Ten (G-10) countries in 1992. Basel I is now widely viewed as outmoded. Indeed, the world has changed as financial conglomerates, financial innovation and risk management have developed. Therefore, a more comprehensive set of guidelines, known as Basel II are in the process of implementation by several countries. New updates, BaselIII, were developed in response to the financial crisis.
Basel II is the second of the Basel Accords, (now extended and effectively superseded by Basel III), which are recommendations on banking laws and regulations issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.
Basel II, initially published in June 2004, was intended to create an international standard for banking regulators to control how much capital banks need to put aside to guard against the types of financial and operational risks banks (and the whole economy) face.
One focus was to maintain sufficient consistency of regulations so that this does not become a source of competitive inequality amongst internationally active banks. Advocates of Basel II believed that such an international standard could help protect the international financial system from the types of problems that might arise should a major bank or a series of banks collapse.
In theory, Basel II attempted to accomplish this by setting up risk and capital management requirements designed to ensure that a bank has adequate capital for the risk the bank exposes itself to through its lending and investment practices. Generally speaking, these rules mean that the greater risk to which the bank is exposed, the greater the amount of capital the bank needs to hold to safeguard its solvency and overall economic stability.
Politically, it was difficult to implement Basel II in the regulatory environment prior to 2008, and progress was generally slow until that year's major banking crisis caused mostly by credit default swaps, mortgage-backed security markets and similar derivatives. As Basel III was negotiated, this was top of mind, and accordingly much more stringent standards were contemplated, and quickly adopted in some key countries including the USA.
Objective
The final version aims at:
While the final accord has largely addressed the regulatory arbitrage issue, there are still areas where regulatory capital requirements will diverge from the economic capital.
Basel III (or the Third Basel Accord) is a global regulatory standard on bank capital adequacy, stress testing and market liquidity risk agreed upon by the members of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in 2010–11, and scheduled to be introduced from 2013 until 2018.
The third installment of the Basel Accords was developed in response to the deficiencies in financial regulation revealed by the late-2000s financial crisis.Basel III strengthens bank capital requirements and introduces new regulatory requirements on bank liquidity and bank leverage.
The OECD estimates that the implementation of Basel III will decrease annual GDP growth by 0.05–0.15%. Critics suggest that greater regulation is responsible for the slow recovery from the late-2000s financial crisis, and that the Basel III requirements will increase the incentives of banks to game the regulatory framework and further negatively affect the stability of the financial system.
Overview
Basel III will require banks to hold 4.5% of common equity (up from 2% in Basel II) and 6% of Tier I capital (up from 4% in Basel II) of risk-weighted assets (RWA). Basel III also introduces additional capital buffers, (i) a mandatory capital conservation buffer of 2.5% and (ii) a discretionary countercyclical buffer, which allows national regulators to require up to another 2.5% of capital during periods of high credit growth. In addition, Basel III introduces a minimum leverage ratio and two required liquidity ratios. The leverage ratio is calculated by dividing Tier 1 capital by the bank's average total consolidated assets; the banks are expected to maintain the leverage ratio in excess of 3%. The Liquidity Coverage Ratio requires a bank to hold sufficient high-quality liquid assets to cover its total net cash outflows over 30 days; the Net Stable Funding Ratio requires the available amount of stable funding to exceed the required amount of stable funding over a one-year period of extended stress.
36 videos|62 docs|78 tests
|
1. What is the role of banking in India's economy? |
2. What is the significance of banking in the UPSC and IAS exams? |
3. How does the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) regulate banking in India? |
4. What are the challenges faced by the banking sector in India? |
5. How can aspiring UPSC and IAS candidates prepare for the banking-related topics? |
36 videos|62 docs|78 tests
|
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|