Table of contents | |
Introduction | |
Bureaucracy and Development | |
Complementary Relationship between Bureaucracy and Development | |
Case Studies and Examples |
Bureaucracy and development, despite appearing to possess contrasting values, are interdependent components in the context of development administration. Bureaucracy represents a static and rigid system, while development embodies dynamic values of change and adaptability. In developing countries, bureaucracy, shedding its traditional Weberian character, serves as a stable machinery that plays a crucial role in achieving and leading the way towards development. Sensitizing bureaucracy for development requires attitudinal changes, incorporating dynamic and social values, and utilizing their specialist knowledge. Bureaucrats are encouraged to act as facilitators, coordinators, guardians, philosophers, and guides, working in collaboration with market forces, civil societies, and other instruments of development administration.
In the realm of development administration, bureaucracy and development are not opposing values but rather complementary aspects. Bureaucracy provides stability and continuity, while development embraces change and progress. Sensitizing bureaucracy for development involves training and instilling dynamic and social values. Bureaucrats play various roles such as friend, facilitator, coordinator, guardian, philosopher, and guide to effectively implement development programs. Through their expertise and administrative machinery, bureaucrats lead the way towards achieving socio-economic development in developing nations.
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|