- Process of economic reforms was launched on 23 July 1991 in response to a fiscal and Balance of Payment crisis.
- The crisis was immediate by the first Gulf War (1991) which had two –ve impacts:
(i) Increased oil prices led to faster use of Forex Reserve in short period
(ii) Private remittance from the Indians working in the Gulf region fell down fast
- The Balance of Payment crisis also reflected deeper problems of raising foreign debt, a fiscal deficit of over 8% of GDP and hyper inflation (13%) situation.
- Under the IMF’s Extended Fund facility Programme member countries get external currency support from the fund to mitigate their Balance of Payment crisis but on certain conditions.
- Devaluation of rupee by 22%
- Drastic reduction in peak import tariff (130 to 30%)
- Excise duty (now CENVAT) to be hiked by 20% to neutralize the revenue short falls due to custom cut
- All govt expenditure to be cut down by 10% annually
- LPG: The process of reforms a to be completed via three other process namely – Liberalisation, Privatisation & Globalisation (LPG).
- Liberalisation: It is pro-market or pro-capitalist inclination in the economic policies of an economy
- Privatisation: It means de-nationalisation i.e. transfer of the state ownership of the assets to the private sector to the tune of 100%
- Globalisation: It means economic integration among the nations.
First Generation Reforms (1991-2000)
- Promotion to private sector This includes de-licensing and de-reservation of industries, abolition of MRTP limit etc.
- Public sector reforms Steps taken to make public sector undertakings profitable, efficient; Disinvestment, corporatisation was its major part.
- External sector reforms Abolishing quantitative restrictions on imports, announcing full account convertibility, permission to foreign investment
- Financial sector reforms Reforms in banking sector, insurance etc.
- Tax reforms Policy initiative directed towards simplifying, modernization, broad basing, checking evasion etc.
Second Generation Reforms (2000-01 onwards)
- Factor market reforms It consisted of dismantling of the Administered Price Mechanism (APM). Products like petrol, sugar, drugs were to be brought into the market fold.
- Public sector reforms These included greater functional autonomy, international tie-ups and Greenfield ventures etc
- Reforms in government & public institution It involves all those moves which go to convert the role of the government from the “controller” to “facilitator”
- Legal sector reform Reforms in Labour Law, Company Laws, enacting Cyber Laws etc
- Reforms in critical areas Such as power, road, telecom, education, healthcare etc
Third generation reforms
- Made on the margins of launching Xth Plan (2002-07)
- Commits to the cause of fully functional PRIs so that benefits can reach the grass-root level.
AGRICULTURE IN INDIA
Agriculture remains the most important sector of the Indian economy. Today, India ranks second worldwide in farm output. Agriculture and allied sectors like forestry and fisheries accounted for 16.6% of the GDP in 2009, about 50% of the total workforce.
The economic contribution of agriculture to India's GDP is steadily declining with the country's broad-based economic growth. Still, agriculture is demographically the broadest economic sector and plays a significant role in the overall socio-economic fabric of India.
65-70% people of India depend of agriculture sector. it is the biggest unorganised sector of the economy accounting for more than 90% share in the total unorganised labour force.
It accounts for 10.23% of the total export income of India and 2.74% of the import.
Agrarian Reform in India
Agrarian Reform in India had been adopted to reallocate the agricultural resources among all the people directly connected with agriculture. After independence, the Government of India started the process of building equity in rural population and improvement of the employment rate and productivity. So for this reason the Government had started agrarian reform.
Reasons Behind Agrarian reform:
- Since India had been under several rulers for a long time, i.e right from the beginning of the middle age, that's why it's rural economic policies kept changing. The main focus of those policies was to earn more money by exploiting the poor farmers.
- In the British period the scenario had not changed much. The British Government introduced the "Zamindari" system where the the authority of land had been captured by some big and rich landowners called Zamindar. Moreover they created an intermediate class to collect tax easily.
- This class had no direct relationship with agriculture or land. Those Zamindars could acquire land from the British Government almost free of cost. So the economic security of the poor peasants lost completely. After independence, the Government's main focus was to remove those intermediate classes and secure a proper land management system. Since India is a large country, the redistribution process was a big challenge for the Government.
According to agrarian reform land was declared as a property of State Government. So agrarian reform varied from state to state. But the main objectives of agrarian reform in India were:
- Setting proper land management,
- Abolition of Intermediaries
- Preventing fragmentation of lands,
- Tenancy reform.
The land policies of different states faced several controversies. In some state the reform measures were biased in favour of th big land owners who could wield their political influence. However, agrarian reform in India had set a healthy socio-economic structure in the rural areas
The reforms have been undertaken along the following lines:
- Abolition of zamindars and other intermediaries (jagirdars, inamdars, malgujars, etc) between the/state and the cultivator;
- Tenancy reforms and the reconstruction of the land ownership system;
- Fixation of ceiling on holdings and distribution of surplus land among the landless;
- Reorganization of agriculture through consolidation of holding and prevention of further fragmentation; and
- Development of co-operative farming and co-operative village management systems.
REVIEW OF LAND REFORM MEASURES
Reasons for Low Progress of Land Reforms: The task force on agrarian relations set up by the Planning Commission to appraise the progress and problems of land reforms, identified the following reasons for the poor performance of land reform measures.
(i) Lack of political will: In the context of the socio-economic conditions prevailing in the country, no tangible progress can be expected in the field of land reforms in the absence of requisite political will. The sad truth is that this crucial factor has been wanting. In no sphere of public activity in our country since independence has had such a big gap between precept and practice i.e. between policy pronouncement and actual execution.
(ii) Absence of pressure from below: Except in a few scattered and localized pockets, practically allover the country, the poor peasants and agricultural workers are passive, unorganized and inarticulate. The basic difficulty in our situation arises from the fact that the beneficiaries of land reforms do not constitute a homogeneous social or economic group.
(iii) Negative attitude of the bureaucracy: Towards the implementation of land reforms, attitude of bureaucracy has been generally lukewarm and indifferent. This is, of course, inevitable because, as in the case of men who wield political power, those in the high echelons of the administration also are either big land- owners themselves or have close nexus with big land- owners.
(iv) Legal hurdles: Legal hurdles also stand in the way of land reforms. l The task force categorically states: "in a society in which the entire weight of civil and criminal laws, judicial pronouncements and precedents, .administrative procedure and practice is thrown on the side of the existing social order based on the inviolability of the private property, an isolated law aiming at the restructuring of the property relation in the rural area has little chance of success. And whatever little chance of success was there, completely evaporated because of the loopholes in the laws and protracted legislations".
(v) Absence of correct and up-to-date land records: The absence of correct and complete land records further added a good deal of confusion. It is because of this that no amount of legislative measures could help the tenant in the court unless he could prove that he is the e actual tenant. This he could only do if there were reliable, and up-to-date records of tenants.
The main reason for the unsatisfactory state of affairs are
- Many of the areas in the country have never been cadastrally surveyed,
- In some areas where cadestral surveys were done for a long time, no resurveys have been taken,
- No machinery , of any kind existed for maintaining village records,
- Even where records were kept by government officials, there is no uniform system, and
- It has been found that even official records in many cases have not been correct.
(vi) Lack of financial support: Lack of financial support plagued the Land Reform Act from the beginning. No separate allocation of funds was made in the fifth plan for financing land reforms. Many states declined to include even expenditure of such essential items like preparation of records of rights in their plan budget. The state plans which are nothing but aggregate of expenditure programmes hardly made any reference to land reforms. Whatever funds were needed for finalizing of this programme had to be provided in non-plan budgets. It is because of this that the expenditure for land reforms was always postponed. or kept to ' the minimum.
(vii) Land reforms have been treated as an administrative issue: The implementation of land reforms is not an administrative issue, it is more of a political issue. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the political will for implementing land reforms. The task force of the Planning Commission in a very forthright manner states: "it should, however, be clearly understood that the mere setting up of an efficient administrative machinery will not by itself lead to any substantial improvement unless the political and economic hurdles operating against the programme are removed."
GREEN REVOLUTION IN INDIA
Components of Green Revolution
(i) High Yielding Varieties of Seeds (HYV): One of the basic pre- requisite of technical changes is the high yielding variety of seeds (HYV). With this programme it becomes possible to lead intensive agriculture. It was, thus, during mid-sixties that the high yielding variety of wheat was evolved. Since then a number of HYV seeds of wheat, paddy, maize, and bajra have been developed and widely distributed throughout the country. In 1966-67, only 1.89 million hectares of land had been brought under HYV seeds which rose to 56.18 million hectares in 1986-87. During 1991-92, the area under high yielding varieties of seeds was 64.7 million hectares which rose to 79.0 million hectares in 2000-01.
(ii) Chemical Fertilizers: The use of chemical fertilizer is another reason promoting for accelerating the growth of agricultural output in the short period. In this regard, National Commission on Agriculture has rightly said, "It has been the experience throughout the world that increased agricultural production is related to increased consumption of fertilizers. Since 1950-51 Indian fertilizer industry has continuously expanded.
The total production capacity which was 0.31 million tonnes in 1950-51 has reached to 9.04 million tonnes in 1990-91 and further to 15.23 million tonnes in 2002-03, As regards the consumption of fertilizers it was only 0.13 million tonnes at the beginning of the First five year plan.
The consumption of fertilizers increased from 5.51 million tonnes in 1980-81 to 12.9 million tonnes in 1990-91. In 2001-02, consumption was recorded to be 17.3 million tonnes.
(iii) Irrigation: Water along with HYV seeds and fertilizer forms a significant input, to raise agricultural production. Thus, availability of water is possible either from rain or surface flow or below ground. In India, availability of irrigation is highly scanty and more than 70 per cent of agriculture is dependent on rainfall.
The rainfall is confined to few months i.e., June to September. Moreover, rainfall in most parts of the country is very low, where, it is high, and the available soil moisture is not adequate to support multiple cropping. Hence, there is an urgent need for providing assured supplies of irrigation.
(iv) Pesticides: It has been estimated that about 10 per cent crop is damaged every year due to defective and inadequate plant protection measures. The adoption of HYV has strengthened the need of such measures because it is conducive to the growth of the plant population.
In order to meet these problems, central insecticides laboratory with its two branches at Hyderabad and Bombay and two regional centres at Kanpur and Chandigarh continue to augment efforts to ensure pesticides to cultivators.
(v) Credit Facilities: Farmers have been getting more credit facilities. Previously, farmers have to depend on money lenders for their credit requirements. But now most of the credit needs are filled by credit institutions. Thus, with the availability of cheap credit, farmers are in position to use improved seeds, fertilizers, machines etc. They have also arranged for minor irrigation facilities.
Impact of Green Revolution on Indian Economy
The green revolution has two types of effects on Indian economy, namely, (a) economic effects and (b) sociological effects.
(a) Increase in agricultural production and productivity: Due to adoption of HYV technology the production of food grains increased considerably in the country. The production of wheat has increased from 8.8 million tones in 1965-66 to 184 million tones in 1991-92. The productivity of other food grains has increased considerably. It was 71% in case of cereals, 104% for wheat and 52% for paddy over the period 1965-66 and 1989-90.
The index number of productivity on agriculture (Base -1969 - 70) increased from 88.9 in 1965-66 to 156 in 1991-92 indicating an increase of about 100% in productivity over the period.
Though the food grain production has increased considerably but the green revolution has no impact on coarse cereals, pulses and few cash corps. In short the gains of green revolution have not been shared equally by all the crops.
(b) Employment: The new agricultural technology has created more amounts of employment opportunities in the agricultural sector. The new technology is early maturing and makes multiple cropping possible.
(c) Market Orientation: The new technology has made the farmers market- oriented. Due to excess production the farmers have to go to the market for selling their surplus production.
(d) Forward and Backward Linkage: Due to new technology the demand for industrial products like fertilizers, pesticides and insecticides increased which gave rise to industrialization of the economy. Similarly due to excessive production more employments were created in the tertiary sector like transportation, marketing and storage.
(a) Personal inequalities: Due to Green Revolution the income of rich farmers increased considerably whereas the poor farmers couldn't reap any benefit. Hence in Punjab it led to concentration of wealth, income and assets with the rich farmers on the one hand and gradual pauperization of the rural poor. This led to a class conflict between the rich and the poor farmers. The small and marginal farmers were deprived of enjoying the gains of new technology.
(b) Regional Inequality: The new technology was successfully implemented in the wheat-producing belt of the country whereas the rice producing zones were not at all affected by this Green Revolution. Hence the disparity between the two regions increased considerably. Father Green Revolution became successful in irrigated areas whereas in the rained belt the new technology couldn't be properly implemented.
- Increase in Production / yield.
- Advantage to farmers: this includes their economic situation improving, even small and marginal farmers (although they were late in joining) getting better yield, control on many insects and pests, mechanizing improved working conditions.
- Better land use by employing two and three crop pattern
- better scientific methods applied as per requirement of farms.
- New seeds have been developed with better yield and disease fighting capability.
- Degradation of land: Due to change in land use pattern and employing two and three crop rotation every year land quality has gone down and yield has sufferred.
- Degradation of land part 2: Due to heavy chemical fertilizer inputs land has become hard and carbon material has gone down.
- Weeds have increased: Due to heavy crop rotation pattern we do not give rest to land nor we have time to employ proper weed removal system which has increased weeds.
- Pest infestation has gone up: Pests which we used to control by bio degradable methods have become resistant to many pesticides and now these chemical pesticides have become non effective.
- Loss of bio diversity: Due to heavy use of chemical pesticides, insecticides and fertilizers we have lost many birds and friendly insects and this is a big loss in long term.
- Chemicals in water: These chemicals which we have been using in our farms go down and contiminate ground water which effect our and our children health.
- Water table has gone down: Water table has gone down due to lack of water harvesting systems and now we have to pull water from 300 to 400 ft. depth which was 40 to 50 feet earlier.
- Loss of old seeds: We have started using new seeds and lost old once since new once give better yield but due to this we have lost many important geens in these seeds.
Minimum support price
The price at which the government purchases crop from the farmers, whatever may be the price of the crops.
The MSP was announced by the govt for the first time in 1966-67 for the wheat in the wake of the Green Revolution and extended harvest, to save the farmers from depleting profits.
MSP of Rabi and Kharif crops
- Since then the MSP regime has been extended for many crops.
- MSP is announced every year for a number of crops
- To prevent fall in prices in the situation of over production
- To protect the interest of farmers by ensuring them a minimum price for their crops in the situation of a price fall in the market
- MSP is announced on the recommendation of the : Commission for Agriculture Cost & Prices (CACP)” which takes into consideration the inputs costs and favourable returns to the farmers.
AGRICULTURAL CREDIT AND INSURANCE
Kisan Credit Card
- Launched in 1998 to provide short-term credit
- Simple, flexible procedures
- Helps buy seeds and fertilizers at farmer’s convenience
- Operated by major nationalized banks
- Includes personal accident insurance coverage
National Agricultural Insurance Scheme (NAIS) / Rashtriya Krishi Bima Yojana (RKBY)
- Launched in 2008
- Provides insurance coverage in the event of failure of crop due to natural causes, pests and diseases
- Covers food crops, oilseeds, sugarcane, cotton and potato
- Joint programme of Central and State governments
- 50% subsidy for small and medium farmers
- Implemented by Agriculture Insurance Company of India (combination of NABARD and other nationalized insurance companies)
Livestock Insurance Scheme
- Launched in 2005
- Provides protection to farmers and cattle rearers against loss due to animal death
- Covers crossbred and high yielding cattle and buffaloes
- Fully funded by the Central government
- 50% subsidy
- Implemented by livestock development boards of each state
Rainfall Insurance / Varsha Bima
- Launched in 2004
- Provides protection against anticipated shortfall in crop yield due to deficit rainfall
- Implemented by Agriculture Insurance Company of India Ltd. (AIC)
Weather Based Crop Insurance Scheme (WBCIS)
- Launched in 2003
- Provides protection against loss due to adverse weather conditions including rainfall, frost, temperature etc
- Jointly funded by Central and State governments
- Up to 50% subsidy
Rainfall Insurance Scheme for Coffee Growers (RISC)
- Launched in 2009
- Protects against loss due to deficit rainfall during blossom and backing periods and excess rains during monsoon period
- Covers Robusta/Arabica variety of coffee in Karnataka, Kerala, TN
- Funded by the Coffee Board (Central government)
- 50% subsidy
- Implemented by AIC
AGRICULTURAL SCHEMES AND PROGRAMMES
All programmes fall under the purview of the Ministry of Agriculture unless otherwise noted.
National Food Security Mission
- Launched in Aug 2007
- Objectives: To increase production of wheat, rice and pulses on a sustainable basis to ensure food security of the country
- Restore soil fertility
- Employment generation
- Enhance farm-level economy
- Seeks to disseminate improved technologies and farm practices
- Central Govt. provides 50% subsidy
- Three components: NFSM Rice, NFSM Wheat, NFSM Pulses
- Targeted increase in production: Rice 10 million tonnes, Wheat 8 m t, Pulses 2 m t Structure:
- Chairman: Minister of Agriculture
- Members: Secretaries of Dept of Agriculture and Cooperation, Finance, Adviser Planning Commission, Agriculture Commissioner
The National Food Security Bill, 2011
Highlights of the Bill
- Up to 75% of the rural population (with at least 46% from priority category) and up to 50% of urban population (with at least 28% from priority category) are to be covered under Targeted Public Distribution System.
- 7 kg of food-grains per person per month to be given to priority category households which include rice, wheat and coarse grains at Rs. 3, 2, and 1 per kg, respectively.
- At least 3 kg of food-grains per person per month to be given to general category households, at prices not exceeding 50% of Minimum Support Price.
- Women to be made head of the household for the purpose of issue of ration cards.
- Maternity benefit to pregnant women and lactating mothers.
- End-to-end computerisation of Targeted Public Distribution System. Three-tier independent grievance redressal mechanism.
- Social audit by local bodies such as Gram Panchayats, Village Councils etc.
- Meals for special groups such as destitute, homeless persons, emergency/disaster affected persons and persons on the verge of starvation.
- Food Security Allowance in case of non-supply of food-grains or meals.
National Horticulture Mission
- Launched in 2005
- Objective: provide growth of horticulture and enhance horticulture production
- Promotes use of technology to farmers for high-tech horticulture cultivation
- Promotes diversification from traditional crops to plantations, orchards, vineyards etc
- Funded by Central (85%) and State (15%) governments
- Chairman: Minister of Agriculture
- Members: Ministers of Commerce, Health, Finance, Food Processing, Industries, Panchayati Raj, Science & Technology, Rural Development
National Agriculture Development Program (NADP) / Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojana (RKVY)
(i) Launched in 2007
- To incentivise states to increase their investment in agriculture
- To provide flexibility and autonomy to states in agricultural planning
- To maximise returns for farmers
- To reduce yield gaps in important crops
- Fully funded by the Central government, executed by the State governments
- Areas of focus
- Integrated development of food crops
- Agriculture mechanization
- Soil health and productivity
- Animal husbandry
- Use of technology
Agricultural Debt Waiver and Debt Relief Scheme 2008
- Launched in 2008
- Covers direct loans by certain commercial banks, rural banks and cooperatives
- For small and marginal farmers the entire eligible amount shall be waived
- For other farmers there will be a onetime settlement under which the farmer will be relieved of 25% of the loan amount
- Implemented by NABARD and RBI
Agri Clinics and Agri Business Centres Scheme
- Launched in 2002
- Agriclinics provide expert services and advice to farmers on cropping practices, technology dissemination, crop protection, market trends, clinical services for animal health etc.
- Agribusiness Centres provide input supply, farm equipment on hire etc
- To make available supplementary sources of input and services to farmers
- To provide gainful employment to agriculture graduates
- To create agriculture entrepreneurs
- Example projects:
- Soil and water testing
- Pest control services
- Micro irrigation systems
- Seed processing units
- Hatcheries, apiaries
- Setting up of IT kiosks in rural areas
- Financial support from NABARD
National Commission on Farmers
- Constituted in 2004
- Chairman Dr. M.S. Swaminathan (instrumental in Green Revolution in India)
- Submitted final report in 2006
- Suggests measure to enhance productivity, profitability and sustainability of farming in different regions of the country
- Suggests measures to attract and retain youth in the agriculture sector
- Suggests medium term strategy for food and nutrition security
- Resulted in the National Policy for Farmers – 2007
National Policy for Farmers – 2007
- Focus on economic well being of farmers rather than just production
- Efficiency of water use and maximizing yield per unit of water
- Drought code, flood code and good weather code
- Use of technology to increase productivity
- Agricultural credit and insurance
- Support services for women
- Setting up of farm schools
- Gyan Chaupals to harness the help of IT
- Community foodgrain banks
- National social security system for farmers
- Cabinet Committee on Food Security to be constituted