Table of contents | |
Perennial Disaster - Floods | |
Death Behind Bars | |
Plastic-Waste Management | |
Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) |
From 1998 to 2017, floods have impacted 2 billion people globally.
Legal Provisions:
The Mathura Case of 1972:
In addition to ratifying the convention, other steps should be taken to prevent torture and improve the treatment of detainees:
In summary, India has taken several significant steps to raise awareness and tackle the issue of single-use plastics and plastic waste management. These initiatives include a nationwide campaign, mobile app, new regulations, collaborative efforts, and the promotion of sustainable alternatives.
- Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) refers to the process of resolving disputes, particularly those of small to medium value, by utilizing digital technology and alternative dispute resolution techniques such as arbitration, conciliation, and mediation. It is more than just incorporating technology into traditional dispute resolution methods; ODR actively uses technology to facilitate the resolution process.
- ODR can be offered as an extension of the public court system or as a separate service outside of it. It is not limited to simply integrating technology for administrative tasks like scheduling sessions, but rather involves actively using technology to help resolve disputes.
- Various technology tools powered by Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) can be employed in ODR, including automated dispute resolution, script-based solutions, and specialized platforms designed for specific types of disputes. This innovative approach to dispute resolution allows for a more efficient and accessible system for resolving conflicts in the digital age.
- Transforming Justice Delivery Paradigm: ODR allows courts to be seen as a service rather than a place, making it more accessible, efficient, and focused on outcomes. This can lead to better legal health for the country by promoting dispute resolution, containment, and avoidance.
- Enhancing Legal Health: ODR not only helps resolve disputes but also contains and avoids them, thereby improving the overall legal health of the country.
- Accessibility: ODR eliminates the need for physical courtrooms, making justice more easily accessible to the parties involved. This convenience removes the need for travel and aligning everyone's schedules.
- Reducing Court Backlogs: ODR can handle cases such as motor accident claims, cheque bouncing cases, and personal injury claims, thereby reducing the burden on courts that are already facing large case backlogs.
- Fostering Innovation: Legal technology start-ups have been striving to improve justice delivery systems in India. Collaborations between the private sector and the judiciary have proven successful in resolving disputes, as seen with e-Lok Adalats. The Department of Legal Affairs has recently invited applications from ADR/ODR service providers to be listed on its website, giving recognition and legitimacy to these start-ups.
- Legislative Support: Various legislations provide support for the ADR aspects of ODR (e.g., the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 or the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908) and the technology aspects of ODR (e.g., the Indian Evidence Act, 1972 and the Information and Technology Act, 2000).
- Crisis Management: ODR has gained momentum across governments, businesses, and judicial processes to overcome constraints imposed by crises such as the Covid-19 pandemic.
- Solving Storage Issues: ODR has replaced document storage as a common problem in Indian courts, thereby resolving storage issues.
- Global Adoption: ODR has been integrated into several jurisdictions, including the US, Canada, Brazil, and the UAE, where governments, judiciaries, and private institutions collaborate to enhance access to justice. In the UK, the CASEMAN system performs tasks like creating initial court records, issuing summons, storing electronic evidence, generating cause-lists, and maintaining court diaries. In Australia, the Federal Court uses the e-Lodgment system for electronic filing and sealing of documents. Canada's Civil Resolution Tribunal (CRT) handles small claims disputes and property issues in British Columbia.
- The integration of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) into the Indian judiciary began in 1990 with the National Informatics Centre (NIC) initiating computerization efforts. However, it was not until 2005 that comprehensive steps were taken to incorporate ICT across all levels of the judiciary, from the Tehsils to the Supreme Court, in a phased manner. This led to the development of the 'National Policy and Action Plan for Implementation of Information and Communication Technology in the Indian Judiciary,' which ultimately resulted in the eCourts Mission Mode Project (eCourts Project).
- The eCourts Project has been successful in implementing technology infrastructure and standardized software in District Courts throughout India. Key accomplishments include the establishment of eCourts websites, the creation of the National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG), and the development of a unified Case Information System (CIS). Additionally, the project has introduced litigant-centric services such as electronic cause lists, e-filings, e-payments, and easy access to case status and daily orders, streamlining the judicial process.
- Launched in 2017, the Integrated Case Management System (ICMS) aims to connect the Supreme Court and High Courts across the country, allowing for nationwide e-filing. Several High Courts, including those in Delhi, Punjab, Bombay, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, and Allahabad, have already enabled e-filing and electronic presentation of evidence in their commercial divisions.
- To further enhance ICT integration, the Supreme Court has developed the artificial intelligence-powered Supreme Court Vidhik Anuvaad Software (SUVAS). This innovative software can translate judgments, orders, and judicial documents between English and nine vernacular languages (Marathi, Hindi, Kannada, Tamil, Telugu, Punjabi, Gujarati, Malayalam, and Bengali), and vice versa.
- In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, India has organized various e-Lok Adalats across states. The first of these, held by the Chhattisgarh High Court and State Legal Services Authority on July 13, 2020, settled 2,270 cases in one day through video conferencing. This approach has since been replicated in other states, with some State Legal Service Authorities collaborating with ODR service providers to organize e-Lok Adalats.
- Structural challenges, such as inadequate digital literacy and digital infrastructure, pose significant obstacles to implementing online dispute resolution (ODR) in India. Digital infrastructure encompasses access to computers, smartphones, and a stable internet connection with sufficient bandwidth to conduct meaningful hearings. However, only 38% of Indian households are considered digitally literate, according to the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology.
- Behavioral challenges also exist, including a lack of awareness and trust in ODR, as well as the government's reluctance to adopt this technology. Mistrust in ODR arises from various factors, such as doubts about technology's effectiveness and concerns about the enforceability of ODR outcomes.
- Operational issues, including difficulties in enforcing ODR outcomes, privacy concerns, outdated legal processes, and a scarcity of skilled neutrals, further hinder the adoption of ODR in India. Privacy concerns involve risks such as online impersonation, breaches of confidentiality through unauthorized document sharing, and tampering with digital evidence or awards/agreements delivered electronically.
- Improve access to digital infrastructure: For technology-related innovations, including Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), widespread access to digital infrastructure is essential. This access should not only involve physical access to technology and tools but also include their utilization, which requires digital literacy. Moreover, it is crucial that such access addresses existing gaps caused by class, caste, gender, and age differences, ensuring the inclusion of marginalized individuals.
- Enhance capacity: Increasing the capacity of professionals and service providers is necessary for scaling up ODR in India, in addition to improving access to digital infrastructure for end-users. This can only be achieved through systematic and coordinated engagement of all relevant stakeholders, including the government, businesses, and the judiciary. To accomplish this, it is essential to introduce training programs, strengthen community paralegal services, promote private sector growth, and incorporate ODR in legal education.
- Establish trust in ODR: Building infrastructure and enhancing capacity can lay the foundation for ODR, but mainstream adoption requires increased trust in ODR processes from end-users, businesses, and governments. This trust can only be developed through collaborative and coordinated efforts from all stakeholders, including neutrals, lawyers, ODR/ADR institutions, ODR platforms, the government, and the judiciary. The government has already initiated this process by inviting submissions to recognize ADR and ODR service providers. By providing a list of such providers, the government can offer users a clear description of the services they provide (e.g., e-arbitration, e-mediation) and the sectors they serve. This list can then be shared among government departments and public sector undertakings (PSUs) to help them choose service providers that meet their requirements.
- Implement appropriate regulation for ODR: India has the potential to become a hub for innovation and dynamic development in ODR, given sufficient time and room for growth. As the ecosystem expands with new entrants, there will be a corresponding need to ensure that end-users' rights are protected. However, ODR technology solutions are still in their early stages of development. Therefore, it is crucial that the regulatory model adopted by India protects end-users' rights without stifling innovation due to over-regulation. A light-touch approach to regulation is well-suited for India, particularly during the early stages of growth and innovation in various ODR solutions.
39 videos|4108 docs|861 tests
|
39 videos|4108 docs|861 tests
|
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|