Dhritarashtra in Mahabharata wanted his son Dhuryodhana to be the king of Hastinapur. In the process, he did many wrong things and failed to stop his son from doing wrong. In the end, the same son led to the destruction of whole Kuru Empire. This episode highlights the importance of inculcating values, moral and ethics in our younger generation.
Gandhiji has declared ‘Knowledge without character’ as a deadly sin. Albert Camus said, ‘A man without ethics is a wild beast loosed upon this world’. Not focusing on character development of children will have huge repercussions for society –
Parents must adopt holistic approach to educate their children. This can be done through:
There is one aspect of discussion in Moral education regarding technique of development of morality among children. In this regard let’s discuss Socratic dialogue technique – “teaching by asking instead of telling”. This method of questioning is named after the Greek philosopher Socrates (469 BC–399 BC). The Socratic method is a means of evaluating beliefs by examining contradictions among their implications or in other words: learn to make room in our minds for different ideas and perspectives no matter how much they challenge our current beliefs. The ultimate aim of Socrates’ philosophical method is always ethical. It should make us aware of our misconceptions, delusions and self-deceptions and bring us to a better understanding of the good and thus help us attain the goal that all human beings desire – happiness (eudaimonia).
At the beginning of 20th century, the German philosopher Leonard Nelson developed the Socratic Dialogue method to philosophise dialogically in groups. The aim of a Socratic Dialogue is to achieve a genuine consensus about the answer to the general question. The starting point of the analysis is an example from a real life.
In the classroom, Socratic method can be used as a shared dialogue about values, principles and believes between teacher and students. For example, if the general question is: “What is friendship?” then students would choose an example that they “think” is an exemplary case of friendship. Both the teacher and students are responsible for pushing the dialogue forward through questioning. The “teacher”, or facilitator of the dialogue, asks probing questions trying to expose the values and beliefs which frame and support the thoughts and statements of the students. The teacher imparts no information. The inquiry is always open ended. The classroom must share rules like raise hand to contribute, let others finish their sentences, be concise, use arguments that come from your own experience. The relevance of Socratic dialogue for ethics and value education is high, since it enables us to reflect upon our own beliefs and put them in opposition to beliefs and attitudes of others. The rational dialogue is the cornerstone of every rational discourse and practice. It helps children to develop skills in oral communication, critical thinking, interpret and evaluate information, transform information into knowledge and knowledge into judgment and action, interpersonal skills, respect for others and intellectual honesty.
The ethical process is a steady experience. Because the teachers today are more and more involved in the general education of the child, they have a very important role for ethics education of children too. There is no possibility to educate ethically without the teachers’ experience of ethics. The most important part of this is a consciousness of necessity to overcome the self-interests and be more open for the common good. The children should face the reality of daily life in the community and interpersonal exchange. The pillar of this exchange is the teacher. Consequently, the teacher is also an example of the related autonomy. In this autonomy, the respect of person of pupils, parents and teachers in their relation to each other is included.
In dialogue, critical thinking could be achieved and children can be trained in exchange of human resources for this task of the healthy society. Not only the parents but especially teachers and educators should be more involved to dialogize critically as autonomous persons with the pupils about these ethical topics.
To read more information on this topic:
Case Study 1: You are a responsible district level officer in Maharashtra who is known for his efficiency and innovations in resolving issues at district level. Region under you is a drought prone area where major occupation of people is agriculture. Central Water Commission (CWC) has recently issued drought advisory for your district. It has asked for judicious use of water as water level available in nearby reservoirs is reducing at a very fast rate.
In fact, this problem is reoccurring, and you want to have some long-term solution for it. Monsoon will take at least 50 days to reach your district and replenish water reservoirs. What strategy can be adopted by you to redress the immediate problem and steps that can be taken in long term to redress the issue permanently?
Indicative Solution
The case presents a challenge for me and for the district administration to deal with water crisis and usher in good governance. Since the major occupation of people in the district is agriculture, the issue must be looked into with empathy, compassion and urgency.
Following are important issues in the case –
Strategy for Long Term Solution
Crisis also creates opportunity for mutual cooperation and improvement and innovation. I must deal with the situation with positivity and look for short-term and long term solution.
Case Study 2: Mr. X is the head of a village Panchayat in Delhi NCR region. He is very popular among his community and people adore him for his leadership and humility. Communities belonging to different religions also lives in this village as well as nearby areas.
Small clashes are quite common but this time a murder has taken place. The son in law of Mr. X got killed in an altercation with a group of three young men who belonged to some other community. The fight started as his son in law objected to lewd remarks made against his wife by these three men.
The incident has led to immense tension and a Maha panchayat has been called by community members. On the day of cremation, thousands of angry people have gathered in Maha-panchayat to decide on future course. In this context, explain the contrasting emotions and dilemmas Mr. X is going through and what shall be his conduct?
Indicative Solution
The case presents a highly charged-up situation which demands sound emotional intelligence to deal with.
Following are contrasting emotions Mr. X might be going through:
The situation is very tense and fragile on account the murder. There is also mob gathering in form of Maha Panchayat. It may lead to communal clashes as permanent rift. In such a scenario Mr. X must show extra ordinary courage and leadership ability. He must take following course of action –
It is said that true test of integrity is at the time of adversity. Mr. X must fall back on his values to come out of this painful situation without loss of values. This will serve the public interest and larger national interest of peace and communal harmony.
To read more information on this topic:
1. What is moral education? |
2. Why is moral education important? |
3. How can moral education be incorporated in schools? |
4. What role does integrity play in moral education? |
5. How does moral education contribute to the overall development of individuals? |