UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Notes  >  History Optional for UPSC (Notes)  >  Fascist Counter-Revolution: Italy

Fascist Counter-Revolution: Italy | History Optional for UPSC (Notes) PDF Download

Introduction 

 Italy was only fully united in 1870, and the new country faced several economic and political challenges. 

 Economic Strain and Political Instability:

  •  The First World War put a significant strain on Italy's economy. 
  •  There was widespread disappointment with how Italy was treated in the Versailles settlement after the war. 
  •  Between 1919 and 1922, Italy saw five different governments, none of which were able to take the strong actions needed to address the country's problems. 

 Rise of Fascism:

  •  In 1919, Benito Mussolini started the Italian Fascist Party, which gained 35 seats in the 1921 elections. 
  •  During this time, there was a real threat of a left-wing revolution, with widespread strikes and riots. 

 March on Rome:

  • In this chaotic atmosphere, the fascists organized a 'March on Rome.' 
  • This event led King Victor Emmanuel to invite Mussolini to form a government in October 1922. 
  • Mussolini remained in power until July 1943. 

Fascist Counter-Revolution: Italy | History Optional for UPSC (Notes)

Mussolini’s Rise to Power 

 Mussolini's ascent to power in Italy was facilitated by a mix of public discontent, political instability, and his ability to adapt his political stance. Initially a socialist, he shifted to a nationalist and conservative platform, appealing to various social groups. The government's failure to address post-war issues, along with Mussolini's portrayal as a strong leader against communism, allowed him to gain significant support. The turning point came during the  'March on Rome'  in October 1922, where Mussolini's Fascist Party threatened a coup. King Victor Emmanuel III's decision not to resist and to invite Mussolini to form a government marked the legal yet forceful rise of Fascism in Italy. 

Disillusionment and Frustration 

Disappointment at Italy’s Gains from the Versailles Settlement

  •  Promised Gains:  When Italy joined the Allies in World War I, she was promised various territories, including Trentino, South Tyrol, Istria, Trieste, parts of Dalmatia, and a protectorate over Albania. 
  •  Actual Gains:  Post-war, Italy received only a fraction of what was promised, leading to a sense of betrayal. The promised areas were mostly awarded to other states, primarily Yugoslavia, and Albania was declared independent. 
  •  Human Cost:  The Italian public felt cheated, especially considering the significant human cost of the war, with around 700,000 soldiers lost. 
  •  Fiume Dispute:  One of the most contentious issues was Fiume. Although not promised, the city became a symbol of national pride. Gabriele D’Annunzio, a nationalist poet, occupied Fiume in 1919, claiming it for Italy. 
  •  Government Intervention:  In 1920, Prime Minister Giovanni Giolitti ordered the army to remove D’Annunzio from Fiume, aiming to restore government authority. This decision was controversial, as D’Annunzio was seen as a national hero. 
  •  Public Reaction:  The army's compliance and D’Annunzio’s surrender without resistance did not restore faith in the government. Instead, it contributed to the growing unpopularity of the ruling authorities. 

 Economic Struggles 

 The aftermath of World War I left Italy in a state of economic turmoil and social distress: 

  •  War Debts:  The Italian government had borrowed extensively during the war, particularly from the United States, and now faced the challenge of repaying these debts. 
  •  Declining Currency:  The value of the Italian lira plummeted, leading to a rising cost of living. Basic goods became more expensive, exacerbating the difficulties faced by ordinary citizens. 
  •  Unemployment Crisis:  With the war over, heavy industries scaled back their wartime production, resulting in massive layoffs. Approximately 2.5 million ex-servicemen returned home to find limited job prospects, adding to the unemployment crisis. 
  •  Social Unrest:  The combination of economic hardship and high unemployment sparked social unrest. Strikes and protests became more frequent as workers and citizens expressed their frustration with the government’s inability to manage the post-war recovery. 

 Discontent with the Parliamentary System 

 The introduction of votes for all men and proportional representation in the 1919 elections aimed to create a fairer political system in Italy. However, this change had unintended consequences that contributed to the instability of the parliamentary system. 

  •  Fragmentation of Parliament:  The new electoral system led to the emergence of a wide variety of political parties, making it challenging for any single party to secure an overall majority. In the 1921 elections, for instance, at least nine different parties were represented in parliament, including liberals, nationalists, socialists, communists, the Catholic Popular Party, and fascists. 
  •  Coalition Governments:  With no party able to achieve a majority, coalition governments became the norm. This situation resulted in a lack of decisive leadership and contributed to the perception that the government was weak and ineffective. 
  •  Instability and Indecisiveness:  The necessity for coalitions led to frequent changes in government and a failure to address pressing issues. The public grew impatient with a system that appeared unable to provide stable governance. 
  •  Wave of Strikes:  The period of 1919 to 1920 saw a significant increase in strikes, driven by the industrialization of Italy and the strength of the socialist party and trade unions. Workers protested against the government’s failure to manage the post-war economy, leading to riots, looting, and factory occupations. In the south, socialist leagues of farmworkers seized land from wealthy landowners, further demonstrating the social unrest. 
  •  Perception of Imminent Revolution:  The government’s inability to protect private property during this upheaval led many property-owners to believe a left-wing revolution was imminent. The formation of the Italian Communist Party in January 1921 heightened these fears, even though the actual likelihood of a revolution was diminishing at that time. 
  •  Decline of Left-Wing Protests:  The strikes and factory occupations began to lose momentum as workers struggled to maintain production without necessary supplies and expertise. The establishment of the Communist Party, which divided the leftist factions, ironically made a revolution less probable. Despite this, the fear of a leftist takeover remained strong among many segments of society. 

 Mussolini’s Appeal 

  •  Early Political Stance:  Mussolini started his political career as a socialist and gained recognition as a journalist, eventually becoming the editor of the socialist newspaper Avanti. His initial support for the factory occupations of 1919-20 reflected his socialist roots. 
  •  Founding of the Fascist Party:  In 1919, Mussolini founded the Fascist Party with a platform that included socialist and republican ideas. The local branches of the party, known as fasci di combattimento, aimed to symbolize authority and power, drawing from the ancient Roman tradition. At this stage, the fascists were anti-monarchy, anti-Church, and anti-big business. 
  •  Shift to the Right:  After the party’s poor performance in the 1919 elections and the failure of factory occupations, Mussolini shifted his stance to defend private enterprise and property. This change attracted support from wealthy business interests. 
  •  Use of Violence:  Beginning in late 1920, fascist squads, known for their black shirts, began attacking and destroying socialist headquarters, newspaper offices, and assaulting socialist councillors. This campaign of violence helped to position Mussolini as a defender of property and law and order. 
  •  Gaining Support:  By the end of 1921, despite having a vague political programme, Mussolini had garnered the support of property-owners and businesses who viewed him as a guarantor of stability, especially after the formation of the Communist Party. His conciliatory gestures towards the Roman Catholic Church also helped him gain further support. 
  •  Royal Approval:  As Mussolini dropped the republican aspect of his programme in September 1922, even King Victor Emmanuel III began to view the fascists more favorably, paving the way for Mussolini’s rise to power. 

 Weakness of Opposition 

  •  Fragmentation of Anti-Fascist Groups:  The various anti-fascist groups were unable to unite and coordinate their efforts effectively. This disunity weakened their ability to present a strong front against the rising fascist movement. 
  •  Communist and Socialist Rivalry:  The communists refused to collaborate with the socialists, which further divided the left-wing opposition. This lack of cooperation hindered any potential joint efforts to curb fascist violence and influence. 
  •  Giolitti’s Strategy:  Giovanni Giolitti, who served as Prime Minister from June 1920 to July 1921, believed that allowing the fascists to gain seats in parliament would make them more responsible. His decision to hold the May 1921 elections, expecting the fascists to win some seats, underestimated the growing strength of the fascist squads across the country. 
  •  Electoral Results:  In the May 1921 elections, the fascists won only 35 seats, while the socialists secured 123 seats. Despite this, the increasing number of fascist squads indicated their rising influence and power. 
  •  Missed Opportunities:  The socialists had the opportunity to work with Giolitti to form a stable government that could exclude the fascists. However, their refusal to cooperate led to Giolitti's resignation and allowed the fascists to gain more ground. 
  •  Failed General Strike:  The socialists’ attempt to call a general strike in the summer of 1922 backfired. Instead of weakening the fascists, it provided them with an opportunity to position themselves as the saviors of the nation from communist threats. 

 The General Strike of Summer 1922 

  •  Context:  The summer of 1922 was a period of increasing tension in Italy, with the fascist movement gaining strength and the socialist party seeking to assert its influence. The socialists aimed to use a general strike as a means to rally support and challenge the growing power of the fascists. 
  •  Failure of the Strike:  The general strike did not garner the expected support and failed to mobilize a broad base of workers and citizens. This lack of support indicated a weakening of the socialist position and an inability to challenge the fascist narrative effectively. 
  •  Fascist Response:  The fascists seized the opportunity presented by the failed strike. They portrayed themselves as the protectors of the nation, ready to step in and restore order against the perceived threat of a leftist uprising. This narrative helped them gain further legitimacy and support. 
  •  March on Rome:  Encouraged by their success in framing the situation, the fascists felt emboldened to stage the "March on Rome." This event, which involved a show of force and the occupation of key areas, was portrayed as a heroic struggle for power. In reality, it was a calculated move that capitalized on the existing political chaos. 

 The March on Rome 

  •  Overview:  The March on Rome was a pivotal event in October 1922, where approximately 50,000 black-shirted fascists converged on the Italian capital, along with other fascist groups occupying important northern towns. This display aimed to showcase fascist strength and demand control over the government. 
  •  Government Response:  Prime Minister Luigi Facta was initially prepared to resist the fascist advance. However, King Victor Emmanuel III refused to declare a state of emergency, which would have allowed for military intervention against the fascists. This decision was crucial in determining the outcome of the crisis. 
  •  King’s Decision:  The king’s choice to invite Mussolini to Rome to form a new government, rather than using the army to suppress the fascists, marked a significant turning point. Historians debate the reasons behind the king’s reluctance to use armed force, suggesting factors such as lack of confidence in Prime Minister Facta, doubts about the army’s loyalty, and fears of a prolonged civil conflict. 
  •  Fascist Narrative:  After the successful takeover, the fascists promoted the myth that they had seized power through a heroic struggle. In reality, their rise was achieved legally through the threat of force, while the existing authorities, including the army and police, stood aside. 
  •  Historical Impact:  The March on Rome is often seen as the moment Mussolini became the first fascist premier in history. The king’s decision not to resist, despite the army’s potential capability to disperse the fascist groups, underscored the complex dynamics of power and authority in post-war Italy. 

Question for Fascist Counter-Revolution: Italy
Try yourself:
What event marked a turning point in Mussolini's rise to power in Italy?
View Solution

Characteristics of Fascism

Introduction

  •  Fascism is a complex and often misunderstood political ideology that emerged in the early 20th century, most notably in Italy under the leadership of Benito Mussolini. While it shares some characteristics with other political systems, such as nationalism and authoritarianism, it has unique features that set it apart. This article explores the key characteristics of fascism, drawing from historical sources and Mussolini's own writings. 
  •  The term ‘fascist’ was later applied to other regimes and rulers, such as Hitler, Franco (Spain), Salazar (Portugal) and Peron (Argentina), which were sometimes quite different from the Italian version of fascism. 
  •  The fact that fascism never produced a great theoretical writer who could explain its philosophies clearly in the way that Marx did for communism makes it difficult to pin down exactly what was involved. 
  •  Mussolini’s constantly changing aims before 1923 suggest that his main concern was simply to acquire power; after that he seems to have improvised his ideas as he went along. 

 Main Characteristics of Fascism 

Apart from other things, “  The Doctrine of Fascism  “, an essay attributed to Benito Mussolini and first published in the Enciclopedia Italiana of 1932, gives us main clue about characteristics of Fascism. 

 The Doctrine of Fascism  as an authoritative document of the fascism emphasised on 

  •  nationalism, 
  •  corporatism, 
  •  totalitarianism and 
  •  militarism. 

 It eventually emerged that the type of fascism that Mussolini had in mind included certain basic features: 

 A Stable and Authoritarian Government :

  •  Fascism emerged as a response to a crisis that rendered stable democratic governance impossible, highlighting the need for strong and decisive leadership. 
  •  An authoritarian regime was seen as capable of mobilizing and controlling the masses, imposing discipline, and overseeing various aspects of citizens' lives. 
  •  A key component was the establishment of a ‘corporate state’, aimed at promoting efficiency by creating separate organizations for workers and employers in each economic sector, with government oversight to control the workforce. 

Extreme Nationalism :

  •  Nationalism is often regarded as the core aspect of fascism, although Mussolini emphasized the state over the nation. 
  •  The state is central to fascist ideology, with Mussolini asserting its absolute primacy over individuals and groups. 
  •  Fascism advocates for the rejuvenation of the nation following a period of decline, promoting the idea of national superiority and the enhancement of state prestige. 

Rejection of Individualism :

  •  Fascism rejects individualistic concepts rooted in 18th-century materialism, prioritizing the interests of the state above individual concerns. 
  •  The state is viewed as the guardian of national safety and the transmitter of cultural heritage, ensuring the continuity of the nation’s spirit and history. 
  •  The state is not only a present entity but also a custodian of the past and the architect of the future. 

One-Party Rule :

  •  Fascism advocates for a one-party state to eliminate democratic debate, which is seen as an impediment to decisive governance and progress. 
  •  The fascist party, led by a charismatic leader, is portrayed as the only force capable of ensuring a prosperous future for the nation. 
  •  The cult of the leader is crucial, with figures like Mussolini adopting titles that emphasize their leadership role, similar to Hitler’s use of “Fuhrer.” 

Anti-Communism :

  •  Fascism is vehemently anti-communist, which contributes to its appeal among business elites and the wealthy. 

Elitism :

  •  Fascism posits that salvation from mob rule and the restoration of social order can only be achieved through an authoritarian leader who embodies the nation’s highest ideals. 
  •  The leader is envisioned as a hero or superman, and party members are regarded as the nation’s elite, with the leader gaining support through compelling speeches and propaganda. 

Totalitarian Governance :

  •  Totalitarianism in fascism involves the state exerting authority over all aspects of public and private life, with minimal limits on its power. 
  •  The government seeks to organize and control various facets of life with strict discipline, aiming to foster the state’s greatness. 
  •  Fascists implement rigorous press censorship, replacing anti-fascist media with sympathetic figures, and exert control over radio, film, theatre, and education. 

Economic Self-Sufficiency (Autarky) :

  •  Economic self-sufficiency is important for state greatness, with the government directing economic life through corporatism rather than state ownership, differentiating fascism from communism. 

Use of Propaganda :

  •  Fascists employ uniforms, marches, songs, and displays to present themselves as a dynamic alternative to traditional parties and rally support for the leader. 
  •  Propaganda includes the promotion of fascist youth organizations that indoctrinate children with fascist ideals and the necessity of obedience to authority, framed in terms of struggle. 

Militarism and Social Darwinism :

  •  Fascism is prepared to use extreme violence against domestic opponents and pursue an aggressive foreign policy, though the narrative of seizing power by force is more myth than reality. 
  •  Social Darwinism informs the belief that nations must struggle for survival, with peaceful nations deemed weak and aggressive militarism becoming a hallmark of the fascist state. 
  •  Imperialism emerges as a natural extension of this doctrine. 

Radicalism :

  •  While fascism is a movement of the right, it is a radical right movement rather than a reactionary one. 
  •  It seeks to suppress socialism and liberalism not to revert to past norms but to establish a new national order, moving beyond the old feudal and monarchical structures. 

Corporatism :

  • Mussolini’s statement that fascism is essentially corporatism highlights the integration of state and corporate powers. 
  • The corporate state model views private enterprise in production as the most effective means of serving national interests, with producers accountable to the state for their operations. 
  • State intervention in production is limited to instances where private efforts are inadequate or when political interests necessitate involvement, such as control, assistance, or direct management. 
  • The corporate state aims to foster cooperation between employers and workers, eliminating class conflict, with fascist-controlled unions holding exclusive negotiation rights for workers. 
  • Strikes and lockouts are prohibited, promoting harmonious labor relations.

How Mussolini Tried to Establish the Fascist State 

 Initial Steps: 

  • Mussolini's takeover wasn't abrupt; he started as prime minister in a coalition government with limited fascist representation.
  • With royal approval, he gained special powers until the end of 1923 to address the crisis.
  • His blackshirt army was officially recognized as the National State Voluntary Militia (MVSN).

 The Acerbo Law and Electoral Success: 

  • Introduced in November 1923, the Acerbo Law ensured that the party with the most votes in an election would receive two-thirds of parliamentary seats.
  • In the April 1924 election, this led to a fascist and ally victory of 404 seats against 107 for opposition parties.
  • This success was partly due to a public desire for a strong government but also involved violence and fraud that suppressed free voting.

 Consolidation of Power: 

  • From mid-1924, Mussolini used violence, intimidation, and opposition divisions to gradually reshape the Italian government and society along fascist lines.
  • By 1930, he had solidified his political control, although his primary goal was personal power rather than a revolutionary vision for Italy.

 Suppression of Opposition: 

  • The fascist regime eliminated dissent by exiling or murdering persistent opponents.
  • Notable cases include the assassination of socialist leader Giacomo Matteotti and the beating of liberal-conservative Giovanni Amendola.
  • Despite initial backlash and a dramatic drop in fascist popularity, Mussolini survived because he was seen as a bulwark against communism and socialism.

 Institutional Changes: 

  •  1925-1926:  The prime minister was made accountable only to the king, and the power to rule by decree was granted, bypassing parliamentary discussion.
  •  Electorate Reduction:  The electorate was narrowed from about 10 million to 3 million, consisting of the wealthiest citizens.
  •  Fascist Grand Council:  Though parliament continued to convene, significant decisions were made by the Fascist Grand Council, which followed Mussolini's directives.
  •  Il Duce:  Mussolini adopted the title "il Duce" (the Leader), consolidating his role as a dictator.

 Local Government Reforms: 

  • Elected town councils and mayors were abolished.
  • Towns were managed by officials appointed directly from Rome, centralizing control.

 Educational Supervision: 

  • Education at all levels was closely monitored by the regime.
  • Teachers were required to wear uniforms and pledge loyalty to the fascist regime.
  • New textbooks were created to glorify fascism, and children were encouraged to report teachers who lacked enthusiasm for the party.
  • Membership in government youth organizations, which promoted sports and military parades, became compulsory from 1937.

 Employment Policies: Corporatism 

The regime promoted corporatism, aiming to mediate between different social groups and organize the economy through corporate bodies.

 Agreement with the Papacy: 

  • The Papacy had been at odds with the Italian government since 1870 when the Papal States were absorbed into the Kingdom of Italy.
  • Pope Pius XI, initially sympathetic to Mussolini, grew wary of the fascist regime's totalitarian tendencies.
  • Mussolini, recognizing the Church's influence and Pius's anti-communist sentiments, sought to mend relations.
  • This culminated in the Lateran Treaty of 1929, which included:
  • Italy acknowledging Vatican City as a sovereign state.
  • Compensation to the pope for the Papal States' loss.
  • Catholicism declared the state religion.
  • Religious instruction mandated in schools.
  • The Church's spiritual autonomy upheld.

 Propaganda and Censorship: 

  • The regime prioritized propaganda to instill fascist values and culture in the populace.
  • Control over the press, radio, theatre, and cinema was tightened, with anti-fascist outlets banned or replaced by fascist sympathizers.
  • In 1937, a Ministry of Popular Culture was established to enhance the spread of the fascist message, focusing on Mussolini's cult of personality and military prowess.
  • Slogans like "Mussolini is always right" and the glorification of ancient Rome's military might were emphasized.

 Racial Policies: 

  • Initially, Mussolini showed little concern for racial issues and even supported Zionism.
  • He had criticized Nazi anti-Semitism and maintained that there was no Jewish problem in Italy.
  • However, he later asserted the superiority of the Italian race and began to introduce anti-Jewish laws in 1939, aligning more closely with Nazi policies.

 Shift towards Anti-Semitism: 

  • The shift towards anti-Semitism in Italy was influenced by several factors:
  • Mussolini's desire to strengthen ties with Hitler following international sanctions against Italy.
  • The Rome-Berlin Axis and the Anti-Comintern Pact, which aligned Italy with Germany against communism.
  • A political strategy to emulate Hitler and bolster fascist ideology, despite previous anti-racist stances.
  • The need to assert racial superiority over African and Arab populations in Italian territories.
  • The Charter of Race in 1938 declared Jews, Arabs, and Africans as inferior races, leading to policies that excluded Jews from employment and public life.
  • The regime's complicity in the Nazi genocide of Jews, despite public resistance and some bureaucratic sabotage of deportation orders.

Mussolini's Regime: Totalitarian or Authoritarian?

 Unable to Create a Totalitarian System 

  • Mussolini's attempts fell short of establishing a totalitarian regime where the state controlled every individual and group.
  • His system was not as all-encompassing as Nazi Germany.
  • A more fitting description of Mussolini's regime would be authoritarian rather than totalitarian.

 Influence of the King 

  • Mussolini never fully eliminated the influence of the king.
  • The king remained head of state and had the power to dismiss Mussolini in 1943.

 Power of the Pope 

  • The Roman Catholic Church was a powerful institution and provided an alternative focus of loyalty for the Italian people.
  • Mussolini could not sidelined the Church, and there were several clashes between the two even after the Lateran Treaty.
  • The pope became critical of Mussolini, especially during the persecution of Jews in the late 1930s.

 Survival of Critics 

  • Critics of fascism, including historians, philosophers, and professors, survived under Mussolini's regime.
  • Mussolini was reportedly afraid of hostile foreign reaction if he arrested them.
  • In contrast, such critics would not have been tolerated in Nazi Germany.

 Failure of the Corporative System 

  • The corporative system failed to control production and eliminate class warfare.
  • Big industrialists only made gestures of submission and bought their freedom from the fascist state through generous subscriptions to Fascist party funds.
  • Most economic decisions were made by the government in consultation with business leaders, leaving workers with little say.
  • Workers had to make all the concessions, such as agreeing not to strike and giving up their trade unions, while big employers enjoyed considerable freedom.
  • The corporate state was essentially a propaganda exercise and a means of controlling workers.
  • The general population tolerated fascism as long as it seemed beneficial, but grew tired of it as its inadequacies became apparent during World War II.

 Benefits of Fascism for the Italian People 

 A Promising Beginning:

  • Fascist policy focused heavily on the economy, despite Mussolini's limited knowledge of economics.
  • The primary goal was self-sufficiency (autarky), essential for a 'warrior-nation' not reliant on other countries for vital commodities like raw materials and food.
  • Mussolini framed policies as struggles, leading to various 'Battles' for the lira, wheat, and births.
  • Initial years appeared successful, with government propaganda highlighting increases in iron-steel production, artificial silk, and hydro-electric production by the 1930s.

 The ‘Battle for the Lira’:

  • Mussolini aimed for a strong currency to bolster Italy's strength by revaluing the lira from 150 to 90 to the pound sterling in 1926.
  • This had mixed results:
  • Benefited industries like steel and chemicals by lowering imported raw material costs.
  • Hurt exports by making Italian goods more expensive, particularly in the cotton industry.
  • Led to wage reductions for workers.

 The ‘Battle for Wheat’:

  • Encouraged wheat production and raised tariffs on imported wheat to promote self-sufficiency.
  • Achieved a 75% reduction in wheat imports by 1935, nearing self-sufficiency in wheat.
  • Popular among wealthy cereal-growing farmers in the north, but with unexpected negative side effects.

 The ‘Battle for Births’:

  • Launched in 1927 to increase the birth rate, targeting a population expansion for military purposes.
  • Aimed to double the birth rate by 1950 through measures like taxing unmarried men, rewarding large families, and penalizing abortions.
  • Specified 12 children as the ideal family size.
  • This initiative failed as young couples did not find it appealing, leading to a decline in the birth rate.

 Land Reclamation Programme:

  • Initiated in 1928 to improve agricultural yield through marsh draining, irrigation, and forest planting in mountainous areas.
  • The Pontine Marshes near Rome became a notable success story.

 Public Works Programme:

  • Aimed at reducing unemployment through the construction of motorways, bridges, flats, railway stations, sports stadiums, schools, and new towns on reclaimed land.
  • Included plans for electrifying main railway lines, with a notable claim of improved train punctuality.
  • Italian soccer teams also enjoyed success, winning the World Cup in 1934 and 1938.

 ‘After-Work’ (Dopolavoro) Organization:

  • Provided leisure activities for Italians, including cheap holidays, tours, and cruises.
  • Controlled theatres, libraries, orchestras, brass bands, and sporting organizations.
  • Offered welfare support to very poor families.
  • Aimed to appease workers for the loss of trade unions and the right to strike, gaining genuine popularity.
  • However, it failed to generate strong enthusiasm for the fascist system as a propaganda tool.

 Foreign Policy:

  • Mussolini pursued a robust foreign policy to project Italy as a great power, particularly in the later 1920s and early 1930s.
  • Despite early promises, the potential of Mussolini's rule was not fully realized.

 Unresolved Issues 

 Raw Material Shortages:

  • Italy faced ongoing shortages of essential raw materials like coal, oil, and steel by 1940, crucial for Mussolini's war ambitions.
  • Despite modest increases in iron and steel production, Italy's output lagged behind smaller nations like Belgium.
  • This inadequacy led to increased economic dependence on Nazi Germany.

 ‘Battle of Wheat’ Consequences:

  • The 'Battle of Wheat' success came at the cost of declining dairy and arable farming outputs.
  • Southern Italy's climate favored grazing and orchards over wheat production, leading to inefficiencies and making farm laborers the poorest class.
  • Farm wages decreased during the 1930s, exacerbating regional disparities between the industrial north and the agrarian, impoverished south.
  • By 1940, land ownership was highly concentrated, with the wealthiest 1% owning 40% of the land.

 Self-Sufficiency Failure:

  • The self-sufficiency goal failed, resulting in shortages of consumer goods and escalating national debt.

 Impact of the Great Depression:

  • The Great Depression, initiated by the 1929 Wall Street Crash in the USA, exacerbated Italy's economic problems.
  • Exports plummeted, and unemployment rose, yet Mussolini delayed devaluing the lira until 1936.
  • Instead of improving conditions, wages and salaries were cut, leading to a decline in real wages for workers despite falling living costs.
  • Industrial workers faced additional frustrations due to the illegality of strikes and the weakness of unions.
  • Economic challenges were further compounded by sanctions from the League of Nations following Italy's invasion of Ethiopia in 1935.
  • Some banks struggled as manufacturing sectors faltered, impacting loan repayments.

 Social Service Deficiencies:

  • The regime lacked a comprehensive welfare state, with no government health insurance until 1943 and inadequate unemployment insurance.

 Regime Inefficiency and Corruption:

  • The regime's inefficiency and corruption hindered policy implementation, with significant funds disappearing into corrupt officials' pockets. 
  • Despite extensive publicity, only a fraction of the land reclamation programme was completed by 1939. 
  • Mussolini's desire for total control led him to micromanage, issuing numerous orders without effective oversight on their execution. 

Opposition and Downfall of Mussolini 

 Mussolini's initial popularity waned as Italians felt little lasting benefit from his regime, leading to early disenchantment. Despite this, organized opposition was challenging due to parliamentary difficulties, severe punishments for critics, and the fear of political police, which, while less brutal than Hitler’s Gestapo, still suppressed dissent. Italians also had a tradition of political resignation. The media, controlled by the government, portrayed Mussolini as a hero. 

Mussolini retained support from traditional elites like the king, aristocracy, wealthy landlords, and industrialists, who saw him as a bulwark against communism. His downfall was precipitated by several factors:

  •  Entry into World War II:  Mussolini’s decision to side with Germany was widely opposed. Initial public support for the Abyssinia invasion did not translate into backing for the war.
  •  Economic Readiness:  Italy was unprepared for a prolonged conflict, with outdated military equipment and insufficient resources.
  •  Alienation of Supporters:  The declaration of war on the USA and increasing economic controls alienated right-wing supporters.
  •  Public Discontent:  Propaganda failed to inspire public enthusiasm for war.
  •  Economic Hardships:  The public faced rising taxes, food rationing, inflation, and declining wages.
  •  Military Defeats:  Early successes were overshadowed by defeats, culminating in the surrender of Italian forces in North Africa.
  •  Mussolini’s Decline:  As Mussolini’s health deteriorated, his leadership became increasingly ineffective.
  •  Allied Advances:  The capture of Sicily by Allied forces in July 1943 was a turning point.
  •  Loss of Support:  The Fascist Grand Council and King Victor Emmanuel III turned against Mussolini, leading to his dismissal.
  •  End of Fascism:  Mussolini’s fall marked the end of fascism in Italy, with little resistance to his removal.

 Verdict on Italian Fascism 

  • The assessment of Italian fascism is a contentious issue in Italy, with differing views on its impact and origins.
  •  Temporary Aberration:  Some believe fascism was a brief deviation in Italian history, driven solely by Mussolini.
  •  Historical Continuity:  Others argue that fascism emerged naturally from Italian history, shaped by societal conditions post-World War I. Most historians now support this view, seeing fascism's roots in traditional Italian society.
  •  Renzo de Felice’s Perspective:  The Italian historian Renzo de Felice viewed fascism as a movement of an emerging middle class seeking to challenge the liberal ruling class. He credited fascism with modernizing Italy's economy, which was lagging behind in 1918.
  •  Martin Blinkhorn’s Critique:  British historian Martin Blinkhorn disagreed with de Felice, emphasizing the negative and brutal aspects of fascism and questioning its economic achievements.
  •  Revisionist Historians:  Some revisionist historians portray Mussolini as a capable leader whose downfall was due to the mistake of entering World War II. They argue that Mussolini rescued Italy from chaos and communist threats, and his domestic policies improved living standards. They highlight successes like reconciling with the Roman Catholic Church and suggest that better handling by Britain and France might have kept Mussolini allied with them during the war.
  •  1934 Stand Against Hitler:  An example cited is Mussolini's 1934 opposition to Hitler's attempt to annex Austria, suggesting that a different approach by Britain and France might have prevented the Second World War.

Question for Fascist Counter-Revolution: Italy
Try yourself:
Which characteristic of fascism emphasizes the state's absolute primacy over individuals and groups?
View Solution

Comparison between Nazism and Fascism 

 Similarities: 

  • Both Nazism and Fascism were intensely anti-communist, garnering support across various social classes.
  • They shared anti-democratic ideals and aimed to establish totalitarian states, regulating industry, agriculture, and citizens' lifestyles, thereby limiting personal freedoms.
  • Both movements pursued economic self-sufficiency and emphasized class unity in achieving national goals.
  • They prioritized state supremacy, nationalism, and the glorification of war, alongside the cult of the leader who would spearhead national rejuvenation.

 Differences: 

  •  Depth of Control:  Nazism entrenched itself more deeply in German society than Fascism did in Italy.
  •  Efficiency:  The Nazi regime was more efficient, achieving goals like unemployment reduction and greater economic self-sufficiency, while Fascist Italy struggled with rising unemployment and economic challenges. 
  • Brutality:  The Nazi regime was more brutal, committing mass atrocities, whereas Italy's Fascist regime, despite incidents like the murders of Matteotti and Amendola, was not as ruthless. 
  • Nationalism and Racism:  Fascism was driven by nationalism but did not initially reject other nationalities, focusing on territorial expansion rather than ethnic cleansing. Fascism became anti-Jewish and racist later, particularly in 1938, while Nazism was rooted in racial purity from the start. 
  • Ideological Focus:  Nazism prioritized Aryan racial supremacy and viewed the state as a territory for the master race, while Fascism emphasized the state as the highest ideal. 
  • Religious Policy:  Mussolini's regime was more successful in religious policy, particularly after the 1929 agreement with the Pope, compared to Hitler's approach. 
  • Constitutional Framework:  Italy retained the monarchy, with King Victor Emmanuel III playing a crucial role in Mussolini's dismissal in 1943. In contrast, there was no equivalent authority to dismiss Hitler in Germany. 
  • Attitudes Towards Modernism and Art:  Fascism supported corporatism and artistic expression, encouraging creativity without promoting a specific artistic style. Nazis, however, rejected modernism, viewing it as cultural degeneration, and promoted "healthy" art aligning with Nazi ideals. 
  • Class System and Social Mobility:  Fascism aimed to preserve the class system and accepted social mobility, while Nazism opposed class-based society and social mobility, focusing on racial unity.

The document Fascist Counter-Revolution: Italy | History Optional for UPSC (Notes) is a part of the UPSC Course History Optional for UPSC (Notes).
All you need of UPSC at this link: UPSC
71 videos|819 docs

Top Courses for UPSC

FAQs on Fascist Counter-Revolution: Italy - History Optional for UPSC (Notes)

1. Mussolini ka samrajya kis prakar se shuru hua?
Ans. Mussolini ka samrajya 1920 ke dashak ke madhya mein shuru hua, jab unhone apne Fasci di Combattimento (Combat Leagues) ko sthalit kiya. Unhone 1922 ke March on Rome ke dauran apne saamrajya ko majbooti dene ke liye kiya aur us samay ke Italian sarkar ko dhamaka diya. Is prakar, unhone pradhan mantri ke roop mein pad grahan kiya.
2. Fascism ke mukhya lakshan kya hain?
Ans. Fascism ke mukhya lakshan mein rashtravad, autocracy, aur samajik ekta shamil hain. Ismein ek majboot sarkar ki avashyakta hoti hai jo ki samaj ke sabhi pehluon par niyantran rakhti hai. Iske alawa, yeh vyakti ke adhikaron ko dabata hai aur sarkar ki policies ko prathamikta deti hai.
3. Mussolini ke raj mein Italian logon ko kya fayde hue?
Ans. Mussolini ke raj mein Italian logon ko kuch fayde mile, jaise ki arthik vikas, rozgar ki avsar, aur rashtriya garv ka anubhav. Unhone bahut se infrastructure projects jaise sadke aur rail lineon ka vikas kiya, jisse logon ki zindagi mein sudhar aaya.
4. Mussolini ke khilaf pratikriya kya thi aur unka patan kaise hua?
Ans. Mussolini ke khilaf pratikriya samay ke saath badh gayi, jab logon ne unki niyamon aur yatharth ki kami ko dekhna shuru kiya. 1943 mein unhe sarkar se hata diya gaya, aur uske baad unhone German forces ke saath milkar ek alag sarkar banayi, lekin 1945 mein unka patan hua jab unhe giraftar kiya gaya aur unka hatya kar diya gaya.
5. Italy mein Fascist counter-revolution ka kya maayane tha?
Ans. Italy mein Fascist counter-revolution ka maayane yeh tha ki Mussolini ki sarkar ke khilaf hui pratikriyaon ke dauran unhone apne superimposed regime ko surakshit karne ke liye koshish ki. Yeh ek aisa samay tha jab unhone apne virodhiyon ko dabaane aur apne niyantran ko majboot karne ka prayaas kiya, lekin ant mein yeh unki samriddhi aur shakti ko aur kamzor kar diya.
71 videos|819 docs
Download as PDF
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Related Searches

Previous Year Questions with Solutions

,

past year papers

,

Fascist Counter-Revolution: Italy | History Optional for UPSC (Notes)

,

mock tests for examination

,

Semester Notes

,

pdf

,

Important questions

,

shortcuts and tricks

,

Fascist Counter-Revolution: Italy | History Optional for UPSC (Notes)

,

practice quizzes

,

Free

,

Objective type Questions

,

ppt

,

Sample Paper

,

Summary

,

MCQs

,

Exam

,

Fascist Counter-Revolution: Italy | History Optional for UPSC (Notes)

,

study material

,

Extra Questions

,

Viva Questions

,

video lectures

;