CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Notes  >  Current Affairs & General Knowledge  >  Madhu Bala v. Suresh Kumar [1997 SC]

Madhu Bala v. Suresh Kumar [1997 SC] | Current Affairs & General Knowledge - CLAT PDF Download

The mode and manner of registration of such cases are laid down in the Rules framed by the different State Governments under the Indian Police Act, 1861. As in the instant case we are concerned with Punjab Police Rules, 1934 framed under the said Act we may now refer to the relevant provisions of those Rules. Chapter XXIV of the said Rules lays down the procedure an officer in charge of a police station has to follow on receipt of information of commission of crime. Under Rule 24.1 appearing in the Chapter every information covered by Section 154 of the Code must be entered in the First Information Report Register and the substance thereof in the daily diary. Rule 24.5 says that the First Information Report Register shall be a printed book in Form 24.5(1) consisting of 200 pages and shall be completely filled before a new one is commenced. It further requires that the cases shall bear an annual serial number in each police station for each calendar year. The other requirements of the said Rules need not be detailed as they have no relevance to the point at issue.

From the foregoing discussion it is evident that whenever a Magistrate directs an investigation on a “complaint” the police has to register a cognizable case on that complaint treating the same as the FIR and comply with the requirements of the above Rules. It, therefore, passes our comprehension as to how the direction of a Magistrate asking the police to “register a case” makes an order of investigation under Section 156(3) legally unsustainable. Indeed, even if a Magistrate does not pass a direction to register a case, still in view of the provisions of Section 156(1) of the Code which empowers the police to investigate into a cognizable “case” and the Rules framed under the Indian Police Act, 1861 it (the police) is duty-bound to formally register a case and then investigate into the same. The provisions of the Code, therefore, do not in any way stand in the way of a Magistrate to direct the police to register a case at the police station and then investigate into the same. In our opinion when an order for investigation under Section 156(3) of the Code is to be made the proper direction to the police would be “to register a case at the police station treating the complaint as the first information report and investigate into the same”.

The document Madhu Bala v. Suresh Kumar [1997 SC] | Current Affairs & General Knowledge - CLAT is a part of the CLAT Course Current Affairs & General Knowledge.
All you need of CLAT at this link: CLAT
125 videos|815 docs|33 tests

Top Courses for CLAT

FAQs on Madhu Bala v. Suresh Kumar [1997 SC] - Current Affairs & General Knowledge - CLAT

1. What is the case of Madhu Bala v. Suresh Kumar about?
Ans. The case of Madhu Bala v. Suresh Kumar is a legal case that was heard by the Supreme Court of India in 1997. It involved a dispute between Madhu Bala, the appellant, and Suresh Kumar, the respondent, over a property matter.
2. What is the significance of the Madhu Bala v. Suresh Kumar case?
Ans. The Madhu Bala v. Suresh Kumar case holds significance as it sets a legal precedent in property matters. The Supreme Court's decision in this case provides guidance and establishes principles that can be applied in similar disputes in the future.
3. What was the outcome of the Madhu Bala v. Suresh Kumar case?
Ans. The outcome of the Madhu Bala v. Suresh Kumar case was not mentioned in the given article. It is recommended to refer to the actual court judgment or legal resources for the specific details of the case's outcome.
4. What are the key arguments presented in the Madhu Bala v. Suresh Kumar case?
Ans. The given article does not provide information about the specific arguments presented in the Madhu Bala v. Suresh Kumar case. It is advisable to refer to the court records or legal resources to understand the arguments made by both parties in the case.
5. How does the Madhu Bala v. Suresh Kumar case relate to the CLAT exam?
Ans. The Madhu Bala v. Suresh Kumar case may be relevant to the CLAT (Common Law Admission Test) exam as it pertains to property law, which is one of the subjects covered in the exam syllabus. Familiarity with landmark cases and their legal principles, such as this one, can be beneficial for CLAT aspirants in answering questions related to property law.
125 videos|815 docs|33 tests
Download as PDF
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Related Searches

practice quizzes

,

pdf

,

Exam

,

Semester Notes

,

Viva Questions

,

mock tests for examination

,

Important questions

,

Previous Year Questions with Solutions

,

shortcuts and tricks

,

Extra Questions

,

Objective type Questions

,

MCQs

,

Madhu Bala v. Suresh Kumar [1997 SC] | Current Affairs & General Knowledge - CLAT

,

past year papers

,

video lectures

,

Summary

,

Madhu Bala v. Suresh Kumar [1997 SC] | Current Affairs & General Knowledge - CLAT

,

Madhu Bala v. Suresh Kumar [1997 SC] | Current Affairs & General Knowledge - CLAT

,

Free

,

study material

,

Sample Paper

,

ppt

;