Middle Phase of the Freedom Struggle (1915 - 1930)
The period from 1917 to 1947, commonly referred to as the Gandhian Era, marked a transformative phase in India's struggle for independence, characterized by Mahatma Gandhi's leadership and his principles of non-violence and Satyagraha. Here's an overview of the key aspects and influences of this era:
1. Leadership of Mahatma Gandhi
- Return from South Africa: Gandhiji's return to India from South Africa in January 1915 marked the beginning of the Gandhian Era, with him emerging as the undisputed leader of the National Movement.
- Principles of Non-violence and Satyagraha: Gandhiji's philosophy of non-violence and Satyagraha (truth-force) became the cornerstone of the nationalist movement, guiding its strategies and tactics against British colonial rule.
- Mass Mobilization: Under Gandhi's leadership, the nationalist movement transformed into a mass movement, mobilizing millions of Indians from diverse backgrounds and regions.
2. Influences on Gandhiji
- Philosophical Inspirations: Gandhiji drew inspiration from the works of Leo Tolstoy's 'Civil Disobedience' and John Ruskin's 'Unto This Last,' which influenced his ideas on non-violence, simplicity, and self-reliance.
- Tolstoy's Ideal of Non-possession: Gandhiji developed Tolstoy's ideal of non-possession into his concept of 'trusteeship,' advocating for the equitable distribution of wealth and resources.
- Influence of Swami Vivekananda: Gandhiji was deeply influenced by the life and teachings of Swami Vivekananda, particularly his emphasis on service, selflessness, and spiritual strength.
- Political Mentors: Gandhiji's political mentors, including Gokhale and Dadabhai Naoroji, played significant roles in shaping his political ideologies and strategies.
3. Strategies of Non-violent Resistance
- Satyagraha and Civil Disobedience: Gandhiji's non-violent Satyagraha involved peaceful violation of specific laws, challenging the legitimacy of British rule through civil disobedience campaigns.
- Mass Mobilization Tactics: He organized mass movements, including courting arrests, hartals (strikes), and spectacular marches like the Salt March, to galvanize public support and pressure the British government.
- Negotiation and Compromise: Despite his firm stance against British rule, Gandhiji remained open to negotiations and compromise, demonstrating his willingness to engage in dialogue for the greater good.
4. 'Struggle-Truce-Struggle' Approach: Gandhiji's approach against foreign rule is characterized by the 'struggle-truce-struggle' cycle, where periods of intense resistance are followed by negotiations and compromises, before renewed struggles.
During the course of 1917 and early 1918, Gandhiji was involved in three significant struggles:
(i) Champaran Satyagraha (1917)
- Gandhi’s first great experiment in satyagraha came in 1917 in Champaran, a district in Bihar.
- The peasantry on the indigo plantations in the district was excessively oppressed by the European planters and was compelled to grow indigo on at least 3/20th of their land and so sell it at prices fixed by the planters.
- This system was popularly known as the ‘Tin-Kathia system’.
- Several peasants of Champaran invited Gandhi to come and help them.
- Accompanied by Babu Rajendra Prasad, Mazhar-ul-Huq, J.B. Kripalani, Narhari Parekh and Mahadev Desai, Gandhiji reached Champaran in 1917 and through his method and efforts, the disabilities from which the peasantry was suffering were reduced and Gandhiji won his first battle of civil disobedience in India.
(ii) Ahmadabad Mill Strike (1918)
- Gandhiji did his second experiment at Ahmadabad in 1918 when he had to intervene in a dispute between the workers and the mill owners.
- He advised the workers to go on strike and to demand a 35 per cent increase in wages.
- He insisted that the workers should not use violence against the employers during the strike.
- He undertook a fast unto death to strengthen the workers’ resolve to continue the strike.
- This put pressure on the mill owners who relented on the fourth day and agreed to give the workers a 35 per cent increase in wages.
(iii) Kheda Satyagraha (1918)
- The farmers of the Kheda district in Gujarat were in distress because of the failure of crops.
- The government refused to remit land revenue and insisted on its full collection.
- As part of the experiment, Mahatma Gandhi advised the peasants to withhold payment of revenue till their demand for its remission was met.
- The struggle was withdrawn when it was learnt that the government had issued instructions that revenue should be recovered only from those peasants who could afford to pay.
- Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel became a follower of Gandhiji during the Kheda movement.
Question for Nationalist Movement Phase 2 (1915-1922) - 2
Try yourself:
What were the key principles of Mahatma Gandhi's leadership during the Gandhian Era?Explanation
- Mahatma Gandhi's leadership during the Gandhian Era was characterized by his principles of non-violence and Satyagraha.
- Gandhi firmly believed in the power of non-violence as a means to challenge British colonial rule and achieve independence.
- Satyagraha, meaning truth-force, involved peaceful violation of specific laws and civil disobedience campaigns to challenge the legitimacy of British rule.
- Gandhi's leadership focused on mobilizing millions of Indians from diverse backgrounds and regions into a mass movement against British rule, guided by the principles of non-violence and Satyagraha.
Report a problem
The Government of India Act, 1919
The Montague-Chelmsford Reforms, enacted through the Government of India Act of 1919, represented a significant attempt by the British government to introduce constitutional changes in India. Here's an overview of its major provisions:
1. Introduction of the Dyarchy System
- Provincial Administration: The reforms introduced the Dyarchy system in the provinces, dividing administrative subjects into two categories: Transferred and Reserved.
- Transferred Subjects: These subjects were to be administered by the Governor with the aid of ministers responsible to the Legislative Council.
- Reserved Subjects: The Governor and the Executive Council were to administer reserved subjects without any responsibility to the legislature.
2. Devolution of Powers: The reforms classified subjects of administration into Central and Provincial categories. Matters of all-India importance, such as railways and finance, were designated as Central subjects, while provincial matters fell under the Provincial category.
3. Composition of Legislative Bodies
- Provincial Legislature: Each province was to have a unicameral Legislative Council.
- Governor General's Executive Council: The number of Indians in the Governor General's Executive Council was increased to three out of a total of eight members. Indian members were allocated departments such as Law, Education, Labour, Health, and Industries.
4. Introduction of Bicameral Legislature: While the Montague-Chelmsford Reforms proposed a bicameral legislature for the centre, it was not implemented until the Government of India Act of 1935.
5. Communal Representation: Communal representation was extended beyond Hindus and Muslims to include Sikhs, Christians, Anglo-Indians, and other communities, ensuring broader representation in legislative bodies.
6. Changes in Administrative Expenses: The salary of the Secretary of State for India was to be paid out of British revenue, signifying a shift in financial arrangements.
Hence, the Montague-Chelmsford Reforms, enacted through the Government of India Act of 1919, introduced significant changes to India's constitutional framework, including the introduction of the Dyarchy system, devolution of powers, expansion of legislative bodies, and extension of communal representation. While these reforms represented a step towards greater Indian participation in governance, they fell short of meeting nationalist aspirations for full self-government. Nevertheless, they laid the groundwork for future constitutional developments and paved the way for the eventual transfer of power from British rule to Indian hands.
Rowlatt Act and Jallianwala Bagh Massacre (1919)
The Rowlatt Act of 1919, enacted in response to militant nationalist activities, and the subsequent Jallianwala Bagh massacre, had profound consequences for India's struggle for independence. Here's a detailed account of these events:
1. Rowlatt Act (1919)
- Committee and Legislation: A committee led by Sir Sydney Rowlatt was formed in 1917 to investigate militant nationalist activities. Based on its recommendations, the Rowlatt Act was passed by the Central Legislative Council in March 1919.
- Curbing Civil Liberties: Dubbed the "Black Act," the Rowlatt Act curtailed the liberties of the people, allowing for speedy trials by special courts without appeal. It granted authorities sweeping powers to arrest and imprison suspects without trial for up to two years, suspending the right of Habeas Corpus.
- Nationalist Reaction: The passage of the Rowlatt Act sparked widespread anger across India, uniting various sections of society in opposition. Mahatma Gandhi organized Satyagraha on February 14, 1919, initiating the Non-Cooperation Movement against the unjust law.
2. Jallianwala Bagh Massacre (1919)
- Background: In Punjab, support for the Rowlatt Satyagraha was immense. However, the situation turned violent when prominent leaders like Dr Satya Pal and Dr Saifuddin Kitchlew were arrested in Amritsar.
- Military Administration: The Government of Punjab, facing unrest, handed over administration to military authorities under General Dyer, who imposed martial law, banned public meetings, and detained political leaders.
- Massacre at Jallianwala Bagh: On April 13, 1919, at the Baisakhi festival, a public meeting was organized at Jallianwala Bagh in Amritsar. Without warning, General Dyer ordered troops to open fire on the unarmed crowd, leading to a massacre that lasted for about 10 to 15 minutes.
- Casualties and Outrage: Official reports indicated 379 people were killed and 1137 wounded in the massacre. The indiscriminate violence shocked the nation and led to widespread protests and condemnation both in India and abroad.
- Impact: The Jallianwala Bagh massacre galvanized the freedom struggle, serving as a rallying cry against British oppression. It inspired increased unity and determination among Indians to fight for their rights and freedom.
3. Aftermath
- Hunter Commission: In response to public outcry, the British government appointed the Hunter Commission to investigate the Jallianwala Bagh massacre and its causes.
- Assassination of Michael O'Dyer: Sardar Udham Singh, seeking retribution for the massacre, assassinated Michael O'Dyer, the former Lieutenant Governor of Punjab, on March 13, 1940, in London.
4. Legacy
- Turning Point: The Jallianwala Bagh massacre marked a turning point in India's freedom movement, intensifying resistance against British rule and strengthening the resolve of Indians to fight for independence.
- Symbol of Struggle: It became a symbol of sacrifice and resilience, reminding future generations of the atrocities committed during colonial rule and fueling the quest for justice and freedom.
In conclusion, the Rowlatt Act and the Jallianwala Bagh massacre were pivotal events in India's struggle for independence, igniting mass protests and solidifying the resolve of Indians to challenge British oppression and strive for self-rule.
Question for Nationalist Movement Phase 2 (1915-1922) - 2
Try yourself:
What was the purpose of the Rowlatt Act of 1919?Explanation
- The Rowlatt Act of 1919 was enacted to curtail civil liberties and suppress nationalist activities in India.
- It allowed for speedy trials without appeal and granted authorities sweeping powers to arrest and imprison suspects without trial for up to two years.
- This act was met with widespread anger and opposition, leading to protests and the initiation of the Non-Cooperation Movement by Mahatma Gandhi.
- It marked a significant event in India's struggle for independence as it intensified resistance against British rule and strengthened the resolve of Indians to fight for self-rule.
Report a problem
Khilafat Movement
The Khilafat Movement, born out of Muslim outrage over the harsh terms of the Treaty of Sevres and the perceived insult to the Caliphate, played a significant role in India's struggle for independence. Here's a comprehensive overview:
1. Background and Objectives
- Impact of Treaty of Sevres: After Turkey's defeat in World War I, the harsh terms of the Treaty of Sevres (1920) deeply affected Muslims, who viewed the Caliph (the Sultan of Turkey) as their religious leader.
- Objective: The main goal of the Khilafat Movement was to pressure the British government to change its stance towards Turkey and restore the Caliph to his former position, viewed as essential to Muslim identity and unity.
2. Leadership and Initiatives
- Prominent Leaders: Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, M.A. Ansari, Saifuddin Kitchlew, and the Ali brothers were among the prominent leaders of the Khilafat Movement.
- Formation of Khilafat Committee: A Khilafat Committee was established to coordinate efforts, culminating in the observation of Khilafat Day on October 19, 1919.
- Joint Conference with Mahatma Gandhi: On November 23, 1919, a joint conference of Hindus and Muslims, chaired by Mahatma Gandhi, emphasized the importance of unity in the independence struggle.
3. Merger with Non-Cooperation Movement
- Gandhiji's Involvement: Mahatma Gandhi proposed a program of nonviolent non-cooperation to protest against the government's behaviour, suggesting four stages: surrender of titles, resignation from civil services, resignation from Police and Army services, and non-payment of taxes.
- Acceptance of Non-Cooperation: On June 9, 1920, the Khilafat Committee unanimously accepted the proposal and urged Gandhiji to lead the movement.
- Integration with Congress Movement: Despite initial opposition from some Congress leaders like C.R. Das, the idea of non-cooperation was eventually embraced by the Congress, marking the merger of the Khilafat Movement with the Non-Cooperation Movement launched by Gandhi in 1920.
4. Subsequent Developments
- Change in Turkey's Status: The relevance of the Khilafat Movement diminished after Mustafa Kemal Atatürk abolished the Caliphate and established Turkey as a secular state, altering the movement's original objectives.
- Merger with Non-Cooperation Movement: Subsequently, the Khilafat Movement merged with Gandhi's Non-Cooperation Movement, consolidating efforts towards achieving India's independence through nonviolent resistance and mass mobilization.
In conclusion, the Khilafat Movement, driven by Muslim grievances and aspirations, played a crucial role in India's struggle for independence, leading to its merger with the Non-Cooperation Movement and contributing to the broader movement for self-rule and freedom from British colonial rule.
The Non-cooperation Movement (1920 - 22)
The Non-Cooperation Movement, launched in August 1920 under the leadership of Mahatma Gandhi, aimed to challenge British rule in India through nonviolent resistance. Here's an in-depth look at its objectives, actions, and outcomes:
1. Objectives of the Movement:
- Response to Injustice: Initiated as a response to injustices like the Rowlatt Act, the Jallianwala Bagh massacre, and the harsh terms of the Treaty of Sevres, which deeply angered Indians.
- Non-Cooperation: The main resolution for non-cooperation was moved by C.R. Das and approved by the Indian National Congress at the Nagpur session in December 1920.
- Programs and Actions: The movement outlined various programs to boycott government institutions, promote indigenous education, encourage hand-spinning and weaving, foster Hindu-Muslim unity, and combat untouchability.
2. Implementation and Response:
- Leadership and Support: Led by Mahatma Gandhi, with support from leaders like C.R. Das and Subhas Bose. The movement received significant support from various sections of Indian society, including students, lawyers, peasants, and workers.
- Educational Boycott: Successful implementation of the educational boycott, particularly in Bengal, where students initiated province-wide strikes to pressure institutions to disaffiliate from the government.
- Boycott of Foreign Goods: The boycott of foreign cloth was widely embraced, with the picketing of shops selling foreign goods becoming a major form of protest.
- Prince of Wales Visit: The empty streets and shutters during the Prince of Wales's visit in November 1921 reflected the extent of the movement's impact.
- Regional Actions: The movement spread across different regions, with strikes, protests, and movements for better conditions of life occurring in places like Kerala, Assam, Rajasthan, and Punjab.
3. Outcomes and Controversies:
- Hindu-Muslim Unity: The Non-Cooperation Movement marked a peak in Hindu-Muslim unity, owing to the merger with the Khilafat Movement, which aimed to support Turkey and protect the Caliphate.
- Mass Participation: The movement witnessed the active participation of various sections of Indian society, demonstrating the willingness and ability of the masses to endure hardships and make sacrifices for the cause of independence.
- Controversial End: The movement came to an abrupt end in February 1922 following the violent clash at Chauri Chaura, where 22 policemen were killed. Mahatma Gandhi's decision to withdraw the movement raised controversy, with some leaders expressing bewilderment.
4. Outcomes of the Movement:
- Mass Movement: The Non-Cooperation Movement emerged as a real mass movement, involving diverse sections of Indian society and spreading nationalism to remote corners of the country.
- National Unity: It strengthened Hindu-Muslim unity and demonstrated the potential for collective action against British rule.
- Endurance and Sacrifice: The movement showcased the willingness of the masses to endure hardships and make sacrifices for the cause of independence, reflecting the spirit of nationalism and resistance against colonial oppression.
In conclusion, the Non-Cooperation Movement, with its wide-ranging objectives, mass participation, and significant outcomes, played a pivotal role in India's struggle for independence, leaving a lasting impact on the course of the freedom movement.
Question for Nationalist Movement Phase 2 (1915-1922) - 2
Try yourself:
What was the main objective of the Khilafat Movement?Explanation
- The main objective of the Khilafat Movement was to restore the Caliph to his former position and change the British government's stance towards Turkey.
- Muslims viewed the Caliph as their religious leader and saw his position as essential to Muslim identity and unity.
- The harsh terms of the Treaty of Sevres and the perceived insult to the Caliphate deeply affected Muslims and led to the formation of the Khilafat Movement.
- The movement aimed to pressure the British government to reconsider its stance and support the reinstatement of the Caliph.
Report a problem