Page 1
EMILE DURKHEIM
From Ritzer
Introduction
• According to Durkheim society and the large scale structures of society impact the
thoughts and actions of individual. So most of his study is based on the social structure and
culture.
• Durkheim is the one who differentiated sociology as a subject from psychology and
philosophy via the medium of empirical research (based on testing or experience).
• His study is based on positivism means to study the society on the same principles and
concepts as used in study of natural sciences.
• His major study is based on moral issues of society.
• He focused more on studying the causes and functions of social structures.
SOCIAL FACTS
• Social facts are the social structures and cultural norms that constrain people in all areas of
social life.
• He said that Social facts are external to and coercive of actors and to support this he said
that social factors should be treated as things.
• This means that we must study social facts by acquiring data from outside of our own
minds through observation and experimentation. The empirical study of social facts as
things sets Durkheimian sociology apart from more philosophical approaches.
• Social facts are external and coercive whereas psychological facts are clearly
internal(inherited)
• Further he classifies social facts as
Material social facts: These are real, material entities and clearly define the externality of
the social facts. Architecture and law are two examples of material social facts
Non material social facts: These are the ones which do not exist as material entities and
found only in the mind of actors for e.g. culture, norms etc.These are most important and
crucial components of sociology but it is bit harder for them to qualify the condition of
externality. However Durkheim cleared this condition by defining non material social facts
as the ones external to and coercive of another aspect of mental process-psychological
facts.
Page 2
EMILE DURKHEIM
From Ritzer
Introduction
• According to Durkheim society and the large scale structures of society impact the
thoughts and actions of individual. So most of his study is based on the social structure and
culture.
• Durkheim is the one who differentiated sociology as a subject from psychology and
philosophy via the medium of empirical research (based on testing or experience).
• His study is based on positivism means to study the society on the same principles and
concepts as used in study of natural sciences.
• His major study is based on moral issues of society.
• He focused more on studying the causes and functions of social structures.
SOCIAL FACTS
• Social facts are the social structures and cultural norms that constrain people in all areas of
social life.
• He said that Social facts are external to and coercive of actors and to support this he said
that social factors should be treated as things.
• This means that we must study social facts by acquiring data from outside of our own
minds through observation and experimentation. The empirical study of social facts as
things sets Durkheimian sociology apart from more philosophical approaches.
• Social facts are external and coercive whereas psychological facts are clearly
internal(inherited)
• Further he classifies social facts as
Material social facts: These are real, material entities and clearly define the externality of
the social facts. Architecture and law are two examples of material social facts
Non material social facts: These are the ones which do not exist as material entities and
found only in the mind of actors for e.g. culture, norms etc.These are most important and
crucial components of sociology but it is bit harder for them to qualify the condition of
externality. However Durkheim cleared this condition by defining non material social facts
as the ones external to and coercive of another aspect of mental process-psychological
facts.
He used these social Facts to describe Social reality.
Durkheim listed social facts into the below mentioned 2 categories in descending order of
generality as follows:
Material social facts:
1. Society
2. Structural components of society(for e.g. church and state)
3. Morphological components of society(for e.g. population distribution, channels of
communication, and housing arrangements)
Non material social facts:
1. Morality
2. Collective conscience
3. Collective representation
4. Social currents
Page 3
EMILE DURKHEIM
From Ritzer
Introduction
• According to Durkheim society and the large scale structures of society impact the
thoughts and actions of individual. So most of his study is based on the social structure and
culture.
• Durkheim is the one who differentiated sociology as a subject from psychology and
philosophy via the medium of empirical research (based on testing or experience).
• His study is based on positivism means to study the society on the same principles and
concepts as used in study of natural sciences.
• His major study is based on moral issues of society.
• He focused more on studying the causes and functions of social structures.
SOCIAL FACTS
• Social facts are the social structures and cultural norms that constrain people in all areas of
social life.
• He said that Social facts are external to and coercive of actors and to support this he said
that social factors should be treated as things.
• This means that we must study social facts by acquiring data from outside of our own
minds through observation and experimentation. The empirical study of social facts as
things sets Durkheimian sociology apart from more philosophical approaches.
• Social facts are external and coercive whereas psychological facts are clearly
internal(inherited)
• Further he classifies social facts as
Material social facts: These are real, material entities and clearly define the externality of
the social facts. Architecture and law are two examples of material social facts
Non material social facts: These are the ones which do not exist as material entities and
found only in the mind of actors for e.g. culture, norms etc.These are most important and
crucial components of sociology but it is bit harder for them to qualify the condition of
externality. However Durkheim cleared this condition by defining non material social facts
as the ones external to and coercive of another aspect of mental process-psychological
facts.
He used these social Facts to describe Social reality.
Durkheim listed social facts into the below mentioned 2 categories in descending order of
generality as follows:
Material social facts:
1. Society
2. Structural components of society(for e.g. church and state)
3. Morphological components of society(for e.g. population distribution, channels of
communication, and housing arrangements)
Non material social facts:
1. Morality
2. Collective conscience
3. Collective representation
4. Social currents
DIVISION OF LABOUR:
Durkheim considers it as material social fact because it is external in nature.
There are two types of society:
1. Primitive society (mechanical solidarity)
2. Modern society (organic solidarity)
• In Primitive society (mechanical solidarity) every person tends to be jack of all trades and
hence people are generally the same, so they stay connected by choice.
• In modern society (organic solidarity) every person has some specialization and so
everyone is interdependent, so they are connected by need.
• But Durkheim says that as population rises there is a conflict for sharing of limited
resources.
• Now in primitive society there occurs competition and leads to conflict.
• But in modern society since every other person has different task to perform so there is
less competition and better utilization of resources and coexistence is more peaceful.
• So to achieve this peaceful coexistence there needs to be transition from mechanical to
organic solidarity, this is achieved through other material social fact i.e. dynamic density.
Dynamic density: an increase in number of people and an increase in the interactions among
them lead to change from mechanical to organic solidarity because together they bring about
more competition for scarce resources and a more intense struggle for survival among the
various parallel and similar components of primitive society.
Law:
• Mechanical solidarity is characterized by repressive laws because people are very similar in
this type of society, and because they tend to believe very strongly in a common morality,
any offense against their shared value system is likely to be of significance to most
individuals.
Since everyone feels the offense and believes deeply in the common morality, a wrongdoer
is likely to be punished severely for any action that offends the collective moral system.
• Organic solidarity is characterized by restitutive law, which requires offenders to make
restitution for their crimes. In such societies, offenses are more likely to be seen as
committed against a particular individual or segment of society than against the moral
system itself.
Page 4
EMILE DURKHEIM
From Ritzer
Introduction
• According to Durkheim society and the large scale structures of society impact the
thoughts and actions of individual. So most of his study is based on the social structure and
culture.
• Durkheim is the one who differentiated sociology as a subject from psychology and
philosophy via the medium of empirical research (based on testing or experience).
• His study is based on positivism means to study the society on the same principles and
concepts as used in study of natural sciences.
• His major study is based on moral issues of society.
• He focused more on studying the causes and functions of social structures.
SOCIAL FACTS
• Social facts are the social structures and cultural norms that constrain people in all areas of
social life.
• He said that Social facts are external to and coercive of actors and to support this he said
that social factors should be treated as things.
• This means that we must study social facts by acquiring data from outside of our own
minds through observation and experimentation. The empirical study of social facts as
things sets Durkheimian sociology apart from more philosophical approaches.
• Social facts are external and coercive whereas psychological facts are clearly
internal(inherited)
• Further he classifies social facts as
Material social facts: These are real, material entities and clearly define the externality of
the social facts. Architecture and law are two examples of material social facts
Non material social facts: These are the ones which do not exist as material entities and
found only in the mind of actors for e.g. culture, norms etc.These are most important and
crucial components of sociology but it is bit harder for them to qualify the condition of
externality. However Durkheim cleared this condition by defining non material social facts
as the ones external to and coercive of another aspect of mental process-psychological
facts.
He used these social Facts to describe Social reality.
Durkheim listed social facts into the below mentioned 2 categories in descending order of
generality as follows:
Material social facts:
1. Society
2. Structural components of society(for e.g. church and state)
3. Morphological components of society(for e.g. population distribution, channels of
communication, and housing arrangements)
Non material social facts:
1. Morality
2. Collective conscience
3. Collective representation
4. Social currents
DIVISION OF LABOUR:
Durkheim considers it as material social fact because it is external in nature.
There are two types of society:
1. Primitive society (mechanical solidarity)
2. Modern society (organic solidarity)
• In Primitive society (mechanical solidarity) every person tends to be jack of all trades and
hence people are generally the same, so they stay connected by choice.
• In modern society (organic solidarity) every person has some specialization and so
everyone is interdependent, so they are connected by need.
• But Durkheim says that as population rises there is a conflict for sharing of limited
resources.
• Now in primitive society there occurs competition and leads to conflict.
• But in modern society since every other person has different task to perform so there is
less competition and better utilization of resources and coexistence is more peaceful.
• So to achieve this peaceful coexistence there needs to be transition from mechanical to
organic solidarity, this is achieved through other material social fact i.e. dynamic density.
Dynamic density: an increase in number of people and an increase in the interactions among
them lead to change from mechanical to organic solidarity because together they bring about
more competition for scarce resources and a more intense struggle for survival among the
various parallel and similar components of primitive society.
Law:
• Mechanical solidarity is characterized by repressive laws because people are very similar in
this type of society, and because they tend to believe very strongly in a common morality,
any offense against their shared value system is likely to be of significance to most
individuals.
Since everyone feels the offense and believes deeply in the common morality, a wrongdoer
is likely to be punished severely for any action that offends the collective moral system.
• Organic solidarity is characterized by restitutive law, which requires offenders to make
restitution for their crimes. In such societies, offenses are more likely to be seen as
committed against a particular individual or segment of society than against the moral
system itself.
Because there is a weak common morality, most people do not react emotionally to a
breach of the law.
The monitoring of repressive laws is largely in the hands of the masses.
The monitoring of restitutive laws is largely in the hands of the specialized agencies (like police,
courts).
Page 5
EMILE DURKHEIM
From Ritzer
Introduction
• According to Durkheim society and the large scale structures of society impact the
thoughts and actions of individual. So most of his study is based on the social structure and
culture.
• Durkheim is the one who differentiated sociology as a subject from psychology and
philosophy via the medium of empirical research (based on testing or experience).
• His study is based on positivism means to study the society on the same principles and
concepts as used in study of natural sciences.
• His major study is based on moral issues of society.
• He focused more on studying the causes and functions of social structures.
SOCIAL FACTS
• Social facts are the social structures and cultural norms that constrain people in all areas of
social life.
• He said that Social facts are external to and coercive of actors and to support this he said
that social factors should be treated as things.
• This means that we must study social facts by acquiring data from outside of our own
minds through observation and experimentation. The empirical study of social facts as
things sets Durkheimian sociology apart from more philosophical approaches.
• Social facts are external and coercive whereas psychological facts are clearly
internal(inherited)
• Further he classifies social facts as
Material social facts: These are real, material entities and clearly define the externality of
the social facts. Architecture and law are two examples of material social facts
Non material social facts: These are the ones which do not exist as material entities and
found only in the mind of actors for e.g. culture, norms etc.These are most important and
crucial components of sociology but it is bit harder for them to qualify the condition of
externality. However Durkheim cleared this condition by defining non material social facts
as the ones external to and coercive of another aspect of mental process-psychological
facts.
He used these social Facts to describe Social reality.
Durkheim listed social facts into the below mentioned 2 categories in descending order of
generality as follows:
Material social facts:
1. Society
2. Structural components of society(for e.g. church and state)
3. Morphological components of society(for e.g. population distribution, channels of
communication, and housing arrangements)
Non material social facts:
1. Morality
2. Collective conscience
3. Collective representation
4. Social currents
DIVISION OF LABOUR:
Durkheim considers it as material social fact because it is external in nature.
There are two types of society:
1. Primitive society (mechanical solidarity)
2. Modern society (organic solidarity)
• In Primitive society (mechanical solidarity) every person tends to be jack of all trades and
hence people are generally the same, so they stay connected by choice.
• In modern society (organic solidarity) every person has some specialization and so
everyone is interdependent, so they are connected by need.
• But Durkheim says that as population rises there is a conflict for sharing of limited
resources.
• Now in primitive society there occurs competition and leads to conflict.
• But in modern society since every other person has different task to perform so there is
less competition and better utilization of resources and coexistence is more peaceful.
• So to achieve this peaceful coexistence there needs to be transition from mechanical to
organic solidarity, this is achieved through other material social fact i.e. dynamic density.
Dynamic density: an increase in number of people and an increase in the interactions among
them lead to change from mechanical to organic solidarity because together they bring about
more competition for scarce resources and a more intense struggle for survival among the
various parallel and similar components of primitive society.
Law:
• Mechanical solidarity is characterized by repressive laws because people are very similar in
this type of society, and because they tend to believe very strongly in a common morality,
any offense against their shared value system is likely to be of significance to most
individuals.
Since everyone feels the offense and believes deeply in the common morality, a wrongdoer
is likely to be punished severely for any action that offends the collective moral system.
• Organic solidarity is characterized by restitutive law, which requires offenders to make
restitution for their crimes. In such societies, offenses are more likely to be seen as
committed against a particular individual or segment of society than against the moral
system itself.
Because there is a weak common morality, most people do not react emotionally to a
breach of the law.
The monitoring of repressive laws is largely in the hands of the masses.
The monitoring of restitutive laws is largely in the hands of the specialized agencies (like police,
courts).
ANOMIE:
? It occurs when individuals don’t face sufficient moral constraints and don’t have a clear
concept of what is and what is not proper and acceptable behavior.
? Durkheim classifies anomie as a social pathology caused due to rise of organic solidarity in
modern society.
? Primitive society has more collective morality but the modern society is more anomic due
to the increase of isolation and decrease of regulation.
COLLECTIVE CONSCIENCE:
? The totality of beliefs and sentiments common to average citizens of the same society
forms a determinate system which has its own life; one may call it the collective or common
conscience.
It is, thus, an entirely different thing from particular consciences, although it can be
realized only through them.
? People in primitive society had a more powerful and shared collective conscience but its
weak in modern society, because people in modern society are held together by need.
COLLECTIVE REPRESENTATION:
? It is a subset of collective conscience.
? It is narrower than collective conscience but broader than individual conscience.
? It includes common beliefs and norms of society for individual components like family,
occupation, state, education, religion, etc.
SOCIAL CURRENTS:
? Social facts “which do not present themselves in this already crystallized form” are social
currents.
? For example “the great waves of enthusiasm, indignation, and pity” that are produced in
public gatherings. Although social currents are less concrete than other social facts, they
are nevertheless social facts because they cannot be reduced to the individual.
We are swept along by such social currents, and this has a coercive power over us even if
we become aware of it only when we struggle against the common feelings.
Read More