Download, print and study this document offline |
Page 1 www.YouTube.com/SleepyClasses Sleepy Classes C (ii) Rural and Agrarian transformation in India Green Revolution and Changing modes of production in Indian agriculture: Imagine the changing mode of production in Indian agriculture to be like this: • The initial MoP of agriculture in Indian sub-continent can be imagined to have started as Asiatic MoP (Primitive communism) • Then British arrived, changing it to Semi–feudalistic type. They commercialized the agriculture. • Presently, LR, GR are moving it towards capitalism. What happened in Green Revolution: - Breakthrough in agricultural production in 1960s - Application of HYV seeds - Chemical fertilizers - Assured Irrigation - Agri machinery used William Wiser: - Indian feudalism different from European (Jajmani) (Dependencies were there) - Indian agri -> feudalistic but changing to capitalistic Multidimensional effect of GR: 1. Increased agricultural productivity 2. Self sufficiency in food grain production Andre Beteille: It created a new faith in the dynamism of Indian farmer to absorb technology Rudolph & Rudolph Called GR Farmers to be Bullock Capitalists. That, GR farmers were “Progressive Farmers”. Page 2 www.YouTube.com/SleepyClasses Sleepy Classes C (ii) Rural and Agrarian transformation in India Green Revolution and Changing modes of production in Indian agriculture: Imagine the changing mode of production in Indian agriculture to be like this: • The initial MoP of agriculture in Indian sub-continent can be imagined to have started as Asiatic MoP (Primitive communism) • Then British arrived, changing it to Semi–feudalistic type. They commercialized the agriculture. • Presently, LR, GR are moving it towards capitalism. What happened in Green Revolution: - Breakthrough in agricultural production in 1960s - Application of HYV seeds - Chemical fertilizers - Assured Irrigation - Agri machinery used William Wiser: - Indian feudalism different from European (Jajmani) (Dependencies were there) - Indian agri -> feudalistic but changing to capitalistic Multidimensional effect of GR: 1. Increased agricultural productivity 2. Self sufficiency in food grain production Andre Beteille: It created a new faith in the dynamism of Indian farmer to absorb technology Rudolph & Rudolph Called GR Farmers to be Bullock Capitalists. That, GR farmers were “Progressive Farmers”. www.YouTube.com/SleepyClasses Sleepy Classes Sociological implications of GR: 1. Increased inequalities (increased class based division of society) 2. Displacement of tenant cultivators 3. Introduction of machinery led to displacement of service caste groups 4. Rural – Urban migration 5. Rich getting richer and poor getting poorer 6. This economic influence got extended to political sphere also 7. Search for exclusive political identity – Khalistan in Punjab 8. Intensified Patriarchy; increase in dowry demands, increased female infanticide, great gender imbalance, cross regional demand for brides (Kerala, Orrisa, Assam to Haryana) 9. Worsening of regional inequalities (Bihar, E. UP, Telangana, Vidharbha ? relatively undeveloped); resulted into inter caste conflict (Bihar), farmers suicide (Vidarbha & Telangana) and agrarian unrest Some Views: 1. PC Joshi : it has contributed for the rise of capitalist agriculture and offered an economic foundation for the rise of big bourgeoise in the country side. 2. Kathleen Gough: domination in economic base lead to domination in the superstructure of social life 3. JPS Oberoi: affluence gave rise to the search for an exclusive political identity – Khalistan 4. Deepankar Gupta: GR contributed for the intensification of caste consciousness; W.UP – Jats, Punjab – Sikhs, Haryana – Jats 5. Lakshmi Menon: worst victims Women – intensified patriarchy 6. AR Desai: Indian Agriculture was: ? Before British -> Semi Feudal ? During British -> Peasantry ? After Independence -> Agrarian 7. Utsa Patnaik: ? 1990 afterwards -> Indian agri became Capitalistic & Commercial. ? Increase in Conspicuous income ? Increase in Farmer Suicides. Page 3 www.YouTube.com/SleepyClasses Sleepy Classes C (ii) Rural and Agrarian transformation in India Green Revolution and Changing modes of production in Indian agriculture: Imagine the changing mode of production in Indian agriculture to be like this: • The initial MoP of agriculture in Indian sub-continent can be imagined to have started as Asiatic MoP (Primitive communism) • Then British arrived, changing it to Semi–feudalistic type. They commercialized the agriculture. • Presently, LR, GR are moving it towards capitalism. What happened in Green Revolution: - Breakthrough in agricultural production in 1960s - Application of HYV seeds - Chemical fertilizers - Assured Irrigation - Agri machinery used William Wiser: - Indian feudalism different from European (Jajmani) (Dependencies were there) - Indian agri -> feudalistic but changing to capitalistic Multidimensional effect of GR: 1. Increased agricultural productivity 2. Self sufficiency in food grain production Andre Beteille: It created a new faith in the dynamism of Indian farmer to absorb technology Rudolph & Rudolph Called GR Farmers to be Bullock Capitalists. That, GR farmers were “Progressive Farmers”. www.YouTube.com/SleepyClasses Sleepy Classes Sociological implications of GR: 1. Increased inequalities (increased class based division of society) 2. Displacement of tenant cultivators 3. Introduction of machinery led to displacement of service caste groups 4. Rural – Urban migration 5. Rich getting richer and poor getting poorer 6. This economic influence got extended to political sphere also 7. Search for exclusive political identity – Khalistan in Punjab 8. Intensified Patriarchy; increase in dowry demands, increased female infanticide, great gender imbalance, cross regional demand for brides (Kerala, Orrisa, Assam to Haryana) 9. Worsening of regional inequalities (Bihar, E. UP, Telangana, Vidharbha ? relatively undeveloped); resulted into inter caste conflict (Bihar), farmers suicide (Vidarbha & Telangana) and agrarian unrest Some Views: 1. PC Joshi : it has contributed for the rise of capitalist agriculture and offered an economic foundation for the rise of big bourgeoise in the country side. 2. Kathleen Gough: domination in economic base lead to domination in the superstructure of social life 3. JPS Oberoi: affluence gave rise to the search for an exclusive political identity – Khalistan 4. Deepankar Gupta: GR contributed for the intensification of caste consciousness; W.UP – Jats, Punjab – Sikhs, Haryana – Jats 5. Lakshmi Menon: worst victims Women – intensified patriarchy 6. AR Desai: Indian Agriculture was: ? Before British -> Semi Feudal ? During British -> Peasantry ? After Independence -> Agrarian 7. Utsa Patnaik: ? 1990 afterwards -> Indian agri became Capitalistic & Commercial. ? Increase in Conspicuous income ? Increase in Farmer Suicides. www.YouTube.com/SleepyClasses Sleepy Classes Changing Powers structure in Rural Areas Earlier: In the hands of Zamindars. After Independence: MNS -> Dominant caste based on • Numerical • Economy • Political Power Y. Singh-> 4 Phases - Leadership based: o Pragmatism + Reconciliatory b/w castes. o Orenstein -> Mumbai village study - Factions developed b/w castes: o Brothers contesting against each other o Studies to quote: Harper -> Tottagadi, A Beals -> Namhalli - Regaining by Dominant caste: o Jaats in UP o Patels in Gujarat (Andre Beteille) - PRIs & its Impact: o Empowering women, SC | ST Jeffrey & Jeffrey: Book “Dev. Failure & Identity Political” - Class based identity - Caste based identity - Interest based identity - Increasing DemocratisationRead More
129 videos|87 docs
|
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|