Page 1
www.YouTube.com/SleepyClasses
https://testseries.sleepyclasses.com/
Sleepy Classes
Modernisation of Indian Tradition
Define
Modernity –
- Modernity is ADAPCO.
Ascription VS Achievement
Diffusion VS Specificity
Affectivity VS Affective neutrality
Particularism VS Universalism
Collective orientation VS Individual orientation
- Rationalisation in PEST
Overall societal process which brings about social changein norms, ethos, values, culture, structure
and function of the society. Thus influences all facets of society
Weber- Historic process with its roots in- Rennaisance,--> rise in democracy, growth of nation states,
expansion of markets
Others- Saint Simon, Simmel- Its a 19th century product-> secularisation, industrilisation,
bureaucratisation
Theory of modernisation not unique to India and various studies
Features
- Normative- norms changing
- Individualisation
- Social phenomenon- transforming MOP, ROP, political participation
Modernity various Point of Views in India
- Nationalist
- Marxist
- MNS
- Gurnar Myrdal
- L. D. & A. B.
- Y. Singh
Page 2
www.YouTube.com/SleepyClasses
https://testseries.sleepyclasses.com/
Sleepy Classes
Modernisation of Indian Tradition
Define
Modernity –
- Modernity is ADAPCO.
Ascription VS Achievement
Diffusion VS Specificity
Affectivity VS Affective neutrality
Particularism VS Universalism
Collective orientation VS Individual orientation
- Rationalisation in PEST
Overall societal process which brings about social changein norms, ethos, values, culture, structure
and function of the society. Thus influences all facets of society
Weber- Historic process with its roots in- Rennaisance,--> rise in democracy, growth of nation states,
expansion of markets
Others- Saint Simon, Simmel- Its a 19th century product-> secularisation, industrilisation,
bureaucratisation
Theory of modernisation not unique to India and various studies
Features
- Normative- norms changing
- Individualisation
- Social phenomenon- transforming MOP, ROP, political participation
Modernity various Point of Views in India
- Nationalist
- Marxist
- MNS
- Gurnar Myrdal
- L. D. & A. B.
- Y. Singh
www.YouTube.com/SleepyClasses
https://testseries.sleepyclasses.com/
Sleepy Classes
Modernity has been taken as a frame of reference by various thinkers
Nationalist thinkers such as Ghurye and Mukherjee, RN Sharma, UtpalDutt
o Effective instrument for development of Indian society
o They were sceptical of colonial attempts
o Synthesis should be there between tradition and modernity
o Mahatama Gandhi- "While rejecting on modernity, indicated that man in India
should be open to diverse thoughts, without compromising with his potential
Indianness"
o Vivekanand- "Synthesis between western materialism and Indian spritualism"
o Arya Samaj- "English and sanskrit was taught in schools"- judicious mixture of Indian
values and western thoughts
o Conclusion- It is never an attempt to evolve (we are not bad), our process of
modernisation is unique and specific to India
o Tradition and modernity co exist in India
Nationalists’ P.O.V. –
- Synthesis be there b/w Tradition & Modernity.
- Uniqueness of India shall be preserved
Page 3
www.YouTube.com/SleepyClasses
https://testseries.sleepyclasses.com/
Sleepy Classes
Modernisation of Indian Tradition
Define
Modernity –
- Modernity is ADAPCO.
Ascription VS Achievement
Diffusion VS Specificity
Affectivity VS Affective neutrality
Particularism VS Universalism
Collective orientation VS Individual orientation
- Rationalisation in PEST
Overall societal process which brings about social changein norms, ethos, values, culture, structure
and function of the society. Thus influences all facets of society
Weber- Historic process with its roots in- Rennaisance,--> rise in democracy, growth of nation states,
expansion of markets
Others- Saint Simon, Simmel- Its a 19th century product-> secularisation, industrilisation,
bureaucratisation
Theory of modernisation not unique to India and various studies
Features
- Normative- norms changing
- Individualisation
- Social phenomenon- transforming MOP, ROP, political participation
Modernity various Point of Views in India
- Nationalist
- Marxist
- MNS
- Gurnar Myrdal
- L. D. & A. B.
- Y. Singh
www.YouTube.com/SleepyClasses
https://testseries.sleepyclasses.com/
Sleepy Classes
Modernity has been taken as a frame of reference by various thinkers
Nationalist thinkers such as Ghurye and Mukherjee, RN Sharma, UtpalDutt
o Effective instrument for development of Indian society
o They were sceptical of colonial attempts
o Synthesis should be there between tradition and modernity
o Mahatama Gandhi- "While rejecting on modernity, indicated that man in India
should be open to diverse thoughts, without compromising with his potential
Indianness"
o Vivekanand- "Synthesis between western materialism and Indian spritualism"
o Arya Samaj- "English and sanskrit was taught in schools"- judicious mixture of Indian
values and western thoughts
o Conclusion- It is never an attempt to evolve (we are not bad), our process of
modernisation is unique and specific to India
o Tradition and modernity co exist in India
Nationalists’ P.O.V. –
- Synthesis be there b/w Tradition & Modernity.
- Uniqueness of India shall be preserved
www.YouTube.com/SleepyClasses
https://testseries.sleepyclasses.com/
Sleepy Classes
Marxist school
DP Mukherjee-
? Modernity in India accelerated during British rule
? Modern trade, education, liberal thinking, growth of Indian middle class
? But our modernity is different from west (which came by Industrial
revolution), which has come without industrialism
? Middle class in India engaged in transforming politics
? But confused, due to Modes of production not emerging as it is aspirational,
want work but means not available
Marxist P.O.V. ->
Middle class with education formed, and has no MoP (no industrialisation), .: only politically active.
Became agent of modernity & spread the idea of independence to ensure self – rule.
But this is criticised by AR Desai
o Modernity is a colonial construct
o It has destroyed weavers, handicrafts, village industries, independent guils
o New market centers have evolved selling foreign goods. Work is done for
accumulation of wealth
o Various classes have formed- Industrialists, landlords, middle class, industrial
workers. They all have different interests and feel depressed; so they start
participating in freedom struggle to get personal freedom
o So Indian modernity is largely influenced by segmentory interest of class than the
collective interest of masses
Y Singh contradicts
o This theory does not have much empirical evidence
o It is more of an ideology than facts
Page 4
www.YouTube.com/SleepyClasses
https://testseries.sleepyclasses.com/
Sleepy Classes
Modernisation of Indian Tradition
Define
Modernity –
- Modernity is ADAPCO.
Ascription VS Achievement
Diffusion VS Specificity
Affectivity VS Affective neutrality
Particularism VS Universalism
Collective orientation VS Individual orientation
- Rationalisation in PEST
Overall societal process which brings about social changein norms, ethos, values, culture, structure
and function of the society. Thus influences all facets of society
Weber- Historic process with its roots in- Rennaisance,--> rise in democracy, growth of nation states,
expansion of markets
Others- Saint Simon, Simmel- Its a 19th century product-> secularisation, industrilisation,
bureaucratisation
Theory of modernisation not unique to India and various studies
Features
- Normative- norms changing
- Individualisation
- Social phenomenon- transforming MOP, ROP, political participation
Modernity various Point of Views in India
- Nationalist
- Marxist
- MNS
- Gurnar Myrdal
- L. D. & A. B.
- Y. Singh
www.YouTube.com/SleepyClasses
https://testseries.sleepyclasses.com/
Sleepy Classes
Modernity has been taken as a frame of reference by various thinkers
Nationalist thinkers such as Ghurye and Mukherjee, RN Sharma, UtpalDutt
o Effective instrument for development of Indian society
o They were sceptical of colonial attempts
o Synthesis should be there between tradition and modernity
o Mahatama Gandhi- "While rejecting on modernity, indicated that man in India
should be open to diverse thoughts, without compromising with his potential
Indianness"
o Vivekanand- "Synthesis between western materialism and Indian spritualism"
o Arya Samaj- "English and sanskrit was taught in schools"- judicious mixture of Indian
values and western thoughts
o Conclusion- It is never an attempt to evolve (we are not bad), our process of
modernisation is unique and specific to India
o Tradition and modernity co exist in India
Nationalists’ P.O.V. –
- Synthesis be there b/w Tradition & Modernity.
- Uniqueness of India shall be preserved
www.YouTube.com/SleepyClasses
https://testseries.sleepyclasses.com/
Sleepy Classes
Marxist school
DP Mukherjee-
? Modernity in India accelerated during British rule
? Modern trade, education, liberal thinking, growth of Indian middle class
? But our modernity is different from west (which came by Industrial
revolution), which has come without industrialism
? Middle class in India engaged in transforming politics
? But confused, due to Modes of production not emerging as it is aspirational,
want work but means not available
Marxist P.O.V. ->
Middle class with education formed, and has no MoP (no industrialisation), .: only politically active.
Became agent of modernity & spread the idea of independence to ensure self – rule.
But this is criticised by AR Desai
o Modernity is a colonial construct
o It has destroyed weavers, handicrafts, village industries, independent guils
o New market centers have evolved selling foreign goods. Work is done for
accumulation of wealth
o Various classes have formed- Industrialists, landlords, middle class, industrial
workers. They all have different interests and feel depressed; so they start
participating in freedom struggle to get personal freedom
o So Indian modernity is largely influenced by segmentory interest of class than the
collective interest of masses
Y Singh contradicts
o This theory does not have much empirical evidence
o It is more of an ideology than facts
www.YouTube.com/SleepyClasses
https://testseries.sleepyclasses.com/
Sleepy Classes
Alternate views
Marriot and Milton Singer
o Theory of orthogenetic and heterogenetic change (Urban [melting pot type] culture)
o Which concludes-- In India is present "Indianisation of modern tradition" than
"modernisation of Indian tradition"
o Contradicted by SC Dubey
? Social Change in India is not always synchronic
? Though tradition influences modernity, but there have been examples
where modernity has absolutely influenced tradition- as Brahminical
tradition is slowly disintegrating under the influence of urban class
consciousness
Milton Singer & Marriot ->
Ortho (indigenous change) & Hetro (imported or because of contact with other tradition
DRAW DIAGRAM SHOWING RELATION OF LITTLE AND GREAT TRADITION wrt Parochialisation &
Universalisation
Parochialisation & Universalisation
Parochialisation –
- same elements of great tradition
- circulate down to little tradition.
- A new tradition emerges
- Example, veil by Rajputs adopted from Islam.
- Go–vardhan (cow- Protector) became Gobar Dhan (People started valuing cow dung)
- Holi’s transformation to Hola – Mohalla in Punjab
Universalisation -
- element of Little tradition that have become part of Great Tradition.
- Example, Rakshabandhan
- Saluno festival in UP -> Precursors to Raksha Bandhan
- Chhath Pooja of Bihar, being celebrated in Delhi
- Ganesh Mahotsav of Mumbai being celebrated across India
- Lohri of Punjab
Contemporary -> Continuum: Because Of Globalisation, Migration, IT - Globalisation becoming
Glocalisation.
Little & Great Tradition (Robert Redfield, Mexico)
Singer & Marriot used it in India to study Social changes
(Robert Redfield, Mexico) (Used in India by Mckim Marriot)
Page 5
www.YouTube.com/SleepyClasses
https://testseries.sleepyclasses.com/
Sleepy Classes
Modernisation of Indian Tradition
Define
Modernity –
- Modernity is ADAPCO.
Ascription VS Achievement
Diffusion VS Specificity
Affectivity VS Affective neutrality
Particularism VS Universalism
Collective orientation VS Individual orientation
- Rationalisation in PEST
Overall societal process which brings about social changein norms, ethos, values, culture, structure
and function of the society. Thus influences all facets of society
Weber- Historic process with its roots in- Rennaisance,--> rise in democracy, growth of nation states,
expansion of markets
Others- Saint Simon, Simmel- Its a 19th century product-> secularisation, industrilisation,
bureaucratisation
Theory of modernisation not unique to India and various studies
Features
- Normative- norms changing
- Individualisation
- Social phenomenon- transforming MOP, ROP, political participation
Modernity various Point of Views in India
- Nationalist
- Marxist
- MNS
- Gurnar Myrdal
- L. D. & A. B.
- Y. Singh
www.YouTube.com/SleepyClasses
https://testseries.sleepyclasses.com/
Sleepy Classes
Modernity has been taken as a frame of reference by various thinkers
Nationalist thinkers such as Ghurye and Mukherjee, RN Sharma, UtpalDutt
o Effective instrument for development of Indian society
o They were sceptical of colonial attempts
o Synthesis should be there between tradition and modernity
o Mahatama Gandhi- "While rejecting on modernity, indicated that man in India
should be open to diverse thoughts, without compromising with his potential
Indianness"
o Vivekanand- "Synthesis between western materialism and Indian spritualism"
o Arya Samaj- "English and sanskrit was taught in schools"- judicious mixture of Indian
values and western thoughts
o Conclusion- It is never an attempt to evolve (we are not bad), our process of
modernisation is unique and specific to India
o Tradition and modernity co exist in India
Nationalists’ P.O.V. –
- Synthesis be there b/w Tradition & Modernity.
- Uniqueness of India shall be preserved
www.YouTube.com/SleepyClasses
https://testseries.sleepyclasses.com/
Sleepy Classes
Marxist school
DP Mukherjee-
? Modernity in India accelerated during British rule
? Modern trade, education, liberal thinking, growth of Indian middle class
? But our modernity is different from west (which came by Industrial
revolution), which has come without industrialism
? Middle class in India engaged in transforming politics
? But confused, due to Modes of production not emerging as it is aspirational,
want work but means not available
Marxist P.O.V. ->
Middle class with education formed, and has no MoP (no industrialisation), .: only politically active.
Became agent of modernity & spread the idea of independence to ensure self – rule.
But this is criticised by AR Desai
o Modernity is a colonial construct
o It has destroyed weavers, handicrafts, village industries, independent guils
o New market centers have evolved selling foreign goods. Work is done for
accumulation of wealth
o Various classes have formed- Industrialists, landlords, middle class, industrial
workers. They all have different interests and feel depressed; so they start
participating in freedom struggle to get personal freedom
o So Indian modernity is largely influenced by segmentory interest of class than the
collective interest of masses
Y Singh contradicts
o This theory does not have much empirical evidence
o It is more of an ideology than facts
www.YouTube.com/SleepyClasses
https://testseries.sleepyclasses.com/
Sleepy Classes
Alternate views
Marriot and Milton Singer
o Theory of orthogenetic and heterogenetic change (Urban [melting pot type] culture)
o Which concludes-- In India is present "Indianisation of modern tradition" than
"modernisation of Indian tradition"
o Contradicted by SC Dubey
? Social Change in India is not always synchronic
? Though tradition influences modernity, but there have been examples
where modernity has absolutely influenced tradition- as Brahminical
tradition is slowly disintegrating under the influence of urban class
consciousness
Milton Singer & Marriot ->
Ortho (indigenous change) & Hetro (imported or because of contact with other tradition
DRAW DIAGRAM SHOWING RELATION OF LITTLE AND GREAT TRADITION wrt Parochialisation &
Universalisation
Parochialisation & Universalisation
Parochialisation –
- same elements of great tradition
- circulate down to little tradition.
- A new tradition emerges
- Example, veil by Rajputs adopted from Islam.
- Go–vardhan (cow- Protector) became Gobar Dhan (People started valuing cow dung)
- Holi’s transformation to Hola – Mohalla in Punjab
Universalisation -
- element of Little tradition that have become part of Great Tradition.
- Example, Rakshabandhan
- Saluno festival in UP -> Precursors to Raksha Bandhan
- Chhath Pooja of Bihar, being celebrated in Delhi
- Ganesh Mahotsav of Mumbai being celebrated across India
- Lohri of Punjab
Contemporary -> Continuum: Because Of Globalisation, Migration, IT - Globalisation becoming
Glocalisation.
Little & Great Tradition (Robert Redfield, Mexico)
Singer & Marriot used it in India to study Social changes
(Robert Redfield, Mexico) (Used in India by Mckim Marriot)
www.YouTube.com/SleepyClasses
https://testseries.sleepyclasses.com/
Sleepy Classes
Little Tradition Great Tradition
- Folks & Peasants (Both interact ) -> Foster
collaboration, cooperation
- Of illetrates
- Local version of textual knowledge
- Moulds the roles according to local settings
- Local versions of epics with local examples
for easy comprehension of folk people.
- Low culture
- Folk culture
- Not scrutinised
Pare chialisation –
- Changes made to meat traditions at village
level
- Desans Kritisation occurs as local priests
mould the great tradition according to their
needs.
- Elite or Reflection few
- Literates
- Textual or ‘Shastriya’
- Decides role of caste system, education,
priests, teachers
- Ramayana, Mahabharata major source of
Great Tradition.
- High culture
- Popular culture
- Classical culture
- Up for scrutiny
Universalisation –
Read More