Download, print and study this document offline |
Page 1 Robert Merton Functional Postulates Robert Merton Summarized & Modified all earlier functional approaches into 3 postulates Postulates of: Functional Unity: unity of constituents needed for smooth functioning. Merton Added: Some constituents may be non – functional or dysfunctional. Eg. – Certain elements of Religion can be divisive. Functional Indispensability: 2 waysIndispensability of certain functions Radcliffe Brown’s necessary conditions Parson’s functional requisite (AGIL) Indispensability of existing social Institutions Malinowski’s Theory of needs Durkheim’s DoL Religion indispensable for society Merton Added: Functional Alternatives Eg. Creche – Socialization of children (alternative of family) Universal Functionalism Existing social forms, inevitably functional Comte’s emphasis on consensus Malinowski’s emphasis on vital functions Merton Added Items may be dysfunctional or non– functional Task of investigator to identify net balance Latent & Manifest functions Manifest (Inspired from Weber) (Parsons – Motivational orientation) Intended meanings of the actor. Subjective to Individual. Psychological dimension to understand reality. To understand Micro–perspective. Merton favored non–positivist techniques for identifying manifest Latent (Inspired from Durkheim & Redcliffe Brown) (Hopi tribe dancing, religion etc.) Hidden to actor Unintended consequence Actor unaware Structural dimension to understand social reality Merton recommended using Quanta & Quail methods to identify Significance of M & L functions Increased the preview of Sociology (objecting both subjective dispositions and objective consequences) Multi–disciplinary approach (Socio & Psycho) Resolved contradiction between positions & non– positivism Functional Paradigm Methodological push to functional analysis Steps to be followed by the investigator (to develop functional theories) Social item under study = standardized pattern Page 2 Robert Merton Functional Postulates Robert Merton Summarized & Modified all earlier functional approaches into 3 postulates Postulates of: Functional Unity: unity of constituents needed for smooth functioning. Merton Added: Some constituents may be non – functional or dysfunctional. Eg. – Certain elements of Religion can be divisive. Functional Indispensability: 2 waysIndispensability of certain functions Radcliffe Brown’s necessary conditions Parson’s functional requisite (AGIL) Indispensability of existing social Institutions Malinowski’s Theory of needs Durkheim’s DoL Religion indispensable for society Merton Added: Functional Alternatives Eg. Creche – Socialization of children (alternative of family) Universal Functionalism Existing social forms, inevitably functional Comte’s emphasis on consensus Malinowski’s emphasis on vital functions Merton Added Items may be dysfunctional or non– functional Task of investigator to identify net balance Latent & Manifest functions Manifest (Inspired from Weber) (Parsons – Motivational orientation) Intended meanings of the actor. Subjective to Individual. Psychological dimension to understand reality. To understand Micro–perspective. Merton favored non–positivist techniques for identifying manifest Latent (Inspired from Durkheim & Redcliffe Brown) (Hopi tribe dancing, religion etc.) Hidden to actor Unintended consequence Actor unaware Structural dimension to understand social reality Merton recommended using Quanta & Quail methods to identify Significance of M & L functions Increased the preview of Sociology (objecting both subjective dispositions and objective consequences) Multi–disciplinary approach (Socio & Psycho) Resolved contradiction between positions & non– positivism Functional Paradigm Methodological push to functional analysis Steps to be followed by the investigator (to develop functional theories) Social item under study = standardized pattern Social context, meanings, boundaries of study to be specified Using both primary + Secondary techniques & sources Identify Manifest function Identify Latent functions (motives not identified by individuals) Study dysfunction of both L & M Functional Alternatives Net Balance Middle range Theories Bridged gap or raw empiricism (facts ,[ethnographic]& abstract generalizations (only theory (like Parsons)] Triple Alliance Theory Method – functional Paradigm Data – 1) Primary 2) Secondary Combine MRTs to form Grand theories Advantages of MRTs More scientific – Testable, based on data Practically Applicable Shorter / Smaller sample Less time + cost Disadvantages Limited scope of farming universal Theory (of less absractions) Hard to see what is M.R. phenomenon (subjectivity will creep in ) Over – emphasizes data (over – empiricism) Theory of Deviance | Anomy Book: “Social structure & Anomy, 1938” “Social Theory & Social Structure, 1949” Deviance: Non – conformity to norms & policy Goffman: “We all are socially deviant”. All criminal acts = Deviant but not deviant = cremini Various sociological theories Deviance result of – Subcultural characteristics Faulty socializations Parental deprivation Differential opportunities etc Not always dysfunctional Durkheim – “particular rate of crime is Normal”. Merton conception Discrepancy between – culturally defined goals & structural means to achieve goals Merton vs Durkheim on anomy Both consider it problem in normative order Durkheim Merton Temporary Discrepancy b/w desired goals & available means Cause: social currents Not temporary Waves of enthusiasm, distress etc Structural property of every society Page 3 Robert Merton Functional Postulates Robert Merton Summarized & Modified all earlier functional approaches into 3 postulates Postulates of: Functional Unity: unity of constituents needed for smooth functioning. Merton Added: Some constituents may be non – functional or dysfunctional. Eg. – Certain elements of Religion can be divisive. Functional Indispensability: 2 waysIndispensability of certain functions Radcliffe Brown’s necessary conditions Parson’s functional requisite (AGIL) Indispensability of existing social Institutions Malinowski’s Theory of needs Durkheim’s DoL Religion indispensable for society Merton Added: Functional Alternatives Eg. Creche – Socialization of children (alternative of family) Universal Functionalism Existing social forms, inevitably functional Comte’s emphasis on consensus Malinowski’s emphasis on vital functions Merton Added Items may be dysfunctional or non– functional Task of investigator to identify net balance Latent & Manifest functions Manifest (Inspired from Weber) (Parsons – Motivational orientation) Intended meanings of the actor. Subjective to Individual. Psychological dimension to understand reality. To understand Micro–perspective. Merton favored non–positivist techniques for identifying manifest Latent (Inspired from Durkheim & Redcliffe Brown) (Hopi tribe dancing, religion etc.) Hidden to actor Unintended consequence Actor unaware Structural dimension to understand social reality Merton recommended using Quanta & Quail methods to identify Significance of M & L functions Increased the preview of Sociology (objecting both subjective dispositions and objective consequences) Multi–disciplinary approach (Socio & Psycho) Resolved contradiction between positions & non– positivism Functional Paradigm Methodological push to functional analysis Steps to be followed by the investigator (to develop functional theories) Social item under study = standardized pattern Social context, meanings, boundaries of study to be specified Using both primary + Secondary techniques & sources Identify Manifest function Identify Latent functions (motives not identified by individuals) Study dysfunction of both L & M Functional Alternatives Net Balance Middle range Theories Bridged gap or raw empiricism (facts ,[ethnographic]& abstract generalizations (only theory (like Parsons)] Triple Alliance Theory Method – functional Paradigm Data – 1) Primary 2) Secondary Combine MRTs to form Grand theories Advantages of MRTs More scientific – Testable, based on data Practically Applicable Shorter / Smaller sample Less time + cost Disadvantages Limited scope of farming universal Theory (of less absractions) Hard to see what is M.R. phenomenon (subjectivity will creep in ) Over – emphasizes data (over – empiricism) Theory of Deviance | Anomy Book: “Social structure & Anomy, 1938” “Social Theory & Social Structure, 1949” Deviance: Non – conformity to norms & policy Goffman: “We all are socially deviant”. All criminal acts = Deviant but not deviant = cremini Various sociological theories Deviance result of – Subcultural characteristics Faulty socializations Parental deprivation Differential opportunities etc Not always dysfunctional Durkheim – “particular rate of crime is Normal”. Merton conception Discrepancy between – culturally defined goals & structural means to achieve goals Merton vs Durkheim on anomy Both consider it problem in normative order Durkheim Merton Temporary Discrepancy b/w desired goals & available means Cause: social currents Not temporary Waves of enthusiasm, distress etc Structural property of every society Merton Added Every deviance has some conformity Can be functional or dysfunctional Reference Groups A RG is one to which you always refer to in order to evaluate your achievements, aspiration & ambitions. An outline of social psychology.Read More
129 videos|87 docs
|
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|