UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Notes  >  History for UPSC CSE  >  Old NCERT Textbook (Satish Chandra): Climax and Disintegration of the Mughal Empire - 1

Old NCERT Textbook (Satish Chandra): Climax and Disintegration of the Mughal Empire - 1 | History for UPSC CSE PDF Download

Download, print and study this document offline
Please wait while the PDF view is loading
 Page 1


EIGHTEEN
Climax and Disintegration of the
Mughal Empire—I
PROBLEMS OF SUCCESSION
The last years of Shah Jahan’s reign were clouded by a bitter war of succession
among his sons. There was no clear tradition of succession among the
Muslims or the Timurids. The right of nomination by the ruler had been
accepted by some of the Muslim political thinkers. But it could not be
asserted in India during the Sultanat period. The Timurid tradition of
partitioning had not been successful either and was never applied in India.
Hindu traditions were also not very clear in the matter of succession.
According to Tulsidas, a contemporary of Akbar, a ruler had the right of
giving the tika to any one of his sons. But there were many cases among the
Rajputs where such a nomination had not been accepted by the other
brothers. Thus, Sanga had to wage a bitter struggle with his brothers before he
could assert his claim to the gaddi.
Towards the end of 1657, Shah Jahan was taken ill at Delhi and for some
time, his life was despaired of. But he rallied and gradually recovered his
strength under the loving care of Dara. Meanwhile, all kinds of rumours had
gained currency. It was said that Shah Jahan had already died, and Dara was
concealing the reality to serve his own purposes. After some time, Shah Jahan
slowly made his way by boat to Agra. Meanwhile, the princes, Shuja in
Bengal, Murad in Gujarat and Aurangzeb in the Deccan, had either been
persuaded that these rumours were true, or pretended to believe them, and
made preparations for the inevitable war of succession.
Anxious to avert a conflict between his sons, which might spell ruin to the
empire, and anticipating his speedy end, Shah Jahan now decided to
nominate his eldest son Dara as his successor (wali-ahd). He raised Dara’s
Page 2


EIGHTEEN
Climax and Disintegration of the
Mughal Empire—I
PROBLEMS OF SUCCESSION
The last years of Shah Jahan’s reign were clouded by a bitter war of succession
among his sons. There was no clear tradition of succession among the
Muslims or the Timurids. The right of nomination by the ruler had been
accepted by some of the Muslim political thinkers. But it could not be
asserted in India during the Sultanat period. The Timurid tradition of
partitioning had not been successful either and was never applied in India.
Hindu traditions were also not very clear in the matter of succession.
According to Tulsidas, a contemporary of Akbar, a ruler had the right of
giving the tika to any one of his sons. But there were many cases among the
Rajputs where such a nomination had not been accepted by the other
brothers. Thus, Sanga had to wage a bitter struggle with his brothers before he
could assert his claim to the gaddi.
Towards the end of 1657, Shah Jahan was taken ill at Delhi and for some
time, his life was despaired of. But he rallied and gradually recovered his
strength under the loving care of Dara. Meanwhile, all kinds of rumours had
gained currency. It was said that Shah Jahan had already died, and Dara was
concealing the reality to serve his own purposes. After some time, Shah Jahan
slowly made his way by boat to Agra. Meanwhile, the princes, Shuja in
Bengal, Murad in Gujarat and Aurangzeb in the Deccan, had either been
persuaded that these rumours were true, or pretended to believe them, and
made preparations for the inevitable war of succession.
Anxious to avert a conflict between his sons, which might spell ruin to the
empire, and anticipating his speedy end, Shah Jahan now decided to
nominate his eldest son Dara as his successor (wali-ahd). He raised Dara’s
mansab from 40,000 zatto the unprecedented rank of 60,000. Dara was given
a chair next to the throne, and all the nobles were instructed to obey Dara as
their future sovereign. But these actions, far from ensuring a smooth
succession as Shah Jahan had hoped, convinced the other princes of Shah
Jahan’s partiality to Dara. It thus strengthened their resolve of making a bid
for the throne.
It is not necessary for us to follow in detail the events leading to the
ultimate triumph of Aurangzeb. There were many reasons for Aurangzeb’s
success. Divided counsel and under-estimation of his opponents by Dara
were two of the major factors responsible for Dara’s defeat. On hearing of the
military preparations of his sons and their decision to march on the capital,
Shah Jahan had sent an army to the east led by Dara’s son, Sulaiman Shikoh,
aided by Mirza Raja Jai Singh, to deal with Shuja who had crowned himself.
Another army was sent to Malwa under Raja Jaswant Singh, the ruler of
Jodhpur. On his arrival in Malwa, Jaswant found that he was faced with the
combined forces of Aurangzeb and Murad. The two princes were intent on a
conflict and invited Jaswant to stand aside. Jaswant could have retreated but
deeming retreat to be a matter of dishonour, he decided to stand and fight,
though the odds were definitely against him. The victory of Aurangzeb at
Dharmat (15 April 1658) emboldened his supporters and raised his prestige,
while it dispirited Dara and his supporters.
Meanwhile, Dara made a serious mistake. Over-confident of the strength of
his position, he had assigned for the eastern campaign some of his best
troops. Thus, he denuded the capital, Agra. Led by Sulaiman Shikoh, the
army moved to the east and gave a good account of itself It surprised and
defeated Shuja near Banaras (February 1658). It then decided to pursue him
into Bihar—as if the issue at Agra had been already decided. After the defeat
at Dharmat, express letters were sent to these forces to hurry back to Agra.
After patching up a hurried treaty (7 May 1658), Sulaiman Shikoh started his
march to Agra from his camp near Monghyr in eastern Bihar. But it was
hardly likely that he could return to Agra in time for the conflict with
Aurangzeb.
After Dharmat, Dara made frantic efforts to seek allies. He sent repeated
letters to Jaswant Singh who had retired to Jodhpur. The rana of Udaipur was
Page 3


EIGHTEEN
Climax and Disintegration of the
Mughal Empire—I
PROBLEMS OF SUCCESSION
The last years of Shah Jahan’s reign were clouded by a bitter war of succession
among his sons. There was no clear tradition of succession among the
Muslims or the Timurids. The right of nomination by the ruler had been
accepted by some of the Muslim political thinkers. But it could not be
asserted in India during the Sultanat period. The Timurid tradition of
partitioning had not been successful either and was never applied in India.
Hindu traditions were also not very clear in the matter of succession.
According to Tulsidas, a contemporary of Akbar, a ruler had the right of
giving the tika to any one of his sons. But there were many cases among the
Rajputs where such a nomination had not been accepted by the other
brothers. Thus, Sanga had to wage a bitter struggle with his brothers before he
could assert his claim to the gaddi.
Towards the end of 1657, Shah Jahan was taken ill at Delhi and for some
time, his life was despaired of. But he rallied and gradually recovered his
strength under the loving care of Dara. Meanwhile, all kinds of rumours had
gained currency. It was said that Shah Jahan had already died, and Dara was
concealing the reality to serve his own purposes. After some time, Shah Jahan
slowly made his way by boat to Agra. Meanwhile, the princes, Shuja in
Bengal, Murad in Gujarat and Aurangzeb in the Deccan, had either been
persuaded that these rumours were true, or pretended to believe them, and
made preparations for the inevitable war of succession.
Anxious to avert a conflict between his sons, which might spell ruin to the
empire, and anticipating his speedy end, Shah Jahan now decided to
nominate his eldest son Dara as his successor (wali-ahd). He raised Dara’s
mansab from 40,000 zatto the unprecedented rank of 60,000. Dara was given
a chair next to the throne, and all the nobles were instructed to obey Dara as
their future sovereign. But these actions, far from ensuring a smooth
succession as Shah Jahan had hoped, convinced the other princes of Shah
Jahan’s partiality to Dara. It thus strengthened their resolve of making a bid
for the throne.
It is not necessary for us to follow in detail the events leading to the
ultimate triumph of Aurangzeb. There were many reasons for Aurangzeb’s
success. Divided counsel and under-estimation of his opponents by Dara
were two of the major factors responsible for Dara’s defeat. On hearing of the
military preparations of his sons and their decision to march on the capital,
Shah Jahan had sent an army to the east led by Dara’s son, Sulaiman Shikoh,
aided by Mirza Raja Jai Singh, to deal with Shuja who had crowned himself.
Another army was sent to Malwa under Raja Jaswant Singh, the ruler of
Jodhpur. On his arrival in Malwa, Jaswant found that he was faced with the
combined forces of Aurangzeb and Murad. The two princes were intent on a
conflict and invited Jaswant to stand aside. Jaswant could have retreated but
deeming retreat to be a matter of dishonour, he decided to stand and fight,
though the odds were definitely against him. The victory of Aurangzeb at
Dharmat (15 April 1658) emboldened his supporters and raised his prestige,
while it dispirited Dara and his supporters.
Meanwhile, Dara made a serious mistake. Over-confident of the strength of
his position, he had assigned for the eastern campaign some of his best
troops. Thus, he denuded the capital, Agra. Led by Sulaiman Shikoh, the
army moved to the east and gave a good account of itself It surprised and
defeated Shuja near Banaras (February 1658). It then decided to pursue him
into Bihar—as if the issue at Agra had been already decided. After the defeat
at Dharmat, express letters were sent to these forces to hurry back to Agra.
After patching up a hurried treaty (7 May 1658), Sulaiman Shikoh started his
march to Agra from his camp near Monghyr in eastern Bihar. But it was
hardly likely that he could return to Agra in time for the conflict with
Aurangzeb.
After Dharmat, Dara made frantic efforts to seek allies. He sent repeated
letters to Jaswant Singh who had retired to Jodhpur. The rana of Udaipur was
also approached. Jaswant Singh moved out tardily to Pushkar near Ajmer.
After raising an army with the money provided by Dara, he waited there for
the rana to join him. But the rana had already been won over by Aurangzeb
with a promise of a rank of 7000, and the return of the parganas seized by
Shah Jahan and Dara from him in 1654 following a dispute over the re-
fortification of Chittor. Aurangzeb also held out to the rana a promise of
religious freedom and ‘favours equal to those of Rana Sanga’. Thus, Dara
failed to win over even the important Rajput rajas to his side.
The battle of Samugarh (29 May 1658) was basically a battle of good
generalship, the two sides being almost equally matched in numbers (about
50,000 to 60,000 on each side). In this field, Dara was no match for
Aurangzeb. The Hada Rajputs and the Saiyids of Barha upon whom Dara
largely depended could not make up for the weakness of the rest of the hastily
recruited army. Aurangzeb’s troops were battle hardened and well led.
Aurangzeb had all along pretended that his only object of coming to Agra
was to see his ailing father and to release him from the control of the
‘heretical’ Dara. But the war between Aurangzeb and Dara was not between
religious orthodoxy on the one hand, and liberalism on the other. Both
Muslim and Hindu nobles were equally divided in their support to the two
rivals. We have already seen the attitude of the leading Rajput rajas. In this
conflict, as in so many others, the attitude of the nobles depended upon their
personal interests and their association with individual princes.
After the defeat and flight of Dara, Shah Jahan was besieged in the fort of
Agra. Aurangzeb forced Shah Jahan into surrender by seizing the source of
water supply to the fort. Shah Jahan was confined to the female apartments in
the fort and strictly supervised though he was not ill-treated. There he lived
for eight long years, lovingly nursed by his favourite daughter, Jahanara, who
voluntarily chose to live within the fort. She re-emerged into public life after
Shah Jahan’s death and was accorded great honour by Aurangzeb who
restored her to the position of the first lady of the realm. He also raised her
annual pension from twelve lakh rupees to seventeen lakhs.
According to the terms of Aurangzeb’s agreement with Murad, the
kingdom was to be partitioned between the two. But Aurangzeb had no
Page 4


EIGHTEEN
Climax and Disintegration of the
Mughal Empire—I
PROBLEMS OF SUCCESSION
The last years of Shah Jahan’s reign were clouded by a bitter war of succession
among his sons. There was no clear tradition of succession among the
Muslims or the Timurids. The right of nomination by the ruler had been
accepted by some of the Muslim political thinkers. But it could not be
asserted in India during the Sultanat period. The Timurid tradition of
partitioning had not been successful either and was never applied in India.
Hindu traditions were also not very clear in the matter of succession.
According to Tulsidas, a contemporary of Akbar, a ruler had the right of
giving the tika to any one of his sons. But there were many cases among the
Rajputs where such a nomination had not been accepted by the other
brothers. Thus, Sanga had to wage a bitter struggle with his brothers before he
could assert his claim to the gaddi.
Towards the end of 1657, Shah Jahan was taken ill at Delhi and for some
time, his life was despaired of. But he rallied and gradually recovered his
strength under the loving care of Dara. Meanwhile, all kinds of rumours had
gained currency. It was said that Shah Jahan had already died, and Dara was
concealing the reality to serve his own purposes. After some time, Shah Jahan
slowly made his way by boat to Agra. Meanwhile, the princes, Shuja in
Bengal, Murad in Gujarat and Aurangzeb in the Deccan, had either been
persuaded that these rumours were true, or pretended to believe them, and
made preparations for the inevitable war of succession.
Anxious to avert a conflict between his sons, which might spell ruin to the
empire, and anticipating his speedy end, Shah Jahan now decided to
nominate his eldest son Dara as his successor (wali-ahd). He raised Dara’s
mansab from 40,000 zatto the unprecedented rank of 60,000. Dara was given
a chair next to the throne, and all the nobles were instructed to obey Dara as
their future sovereign. But these actions, far from ensuring a smooth
succession as Shah Jahan had hoped, convinced the other princes of Shah
Jahan’s partiality to Dara. It thus strengthened their resolve of making a bid
for the throne.
It is not necessary for us to follow in detail the events leading to the
ultimate triumph of Aurangzeb. There were many reasons for Aurangzeb’s
success. Divided counsel and under-estimation of his opponents by Dara
were two of the major factors responsible for Dara’s defeat. On hearing of the
military preparations of his sons and their decision to march on the capital,
Shah Jahan had sent an army to the east led by Dara’s son, Sulaiman Shikoh,
aided by Mirza Raja Jai Singh, to deal with Shuja who had crowned himself.
Another army was sent to Malwa under Raja Jaswant Singh, the ruler of
Jodhpur. On his arrival in Malwa, Jaswant found that he was faced with the
combined forces of Aurangzeb and Murad. The two princes were intent on a
conflict and invited Jaswant to stand aside. Jaswant could have retreated but
deeming retreat to be a matter of dishonour, he decided to stand and fight,
though the odds were definitely against him. The victory of Aurangzeb at
Dharmat (15 April 1658) emboldened his supporters and raised his prestige,
while it dispirited Dara and his supporters.
Meanwhile, Dara made a serious mistake. Over-confident of the strength of
his position, he had assigned for the eastern campaign some of his best
troops. Thus, he denuded the capital, Agra. Led by Sulaiman Shikoh, the
army moved to the east and gave a good account of itself It surprised and
defeated Shuja near Banaras (February 1658). It then decided to pursue him
into Bihar—as if the issue at Agra had been already decided. After the defeat
at Dharmat, express letters were sent to these forces to hurry back to Agra.
After patching up a hurried treaty (7 May 1658), Sulaiman Shikoh started his
march to Agra from his camp near Monghyr in eastern Bihar. But it was
hardly likely that he could return to Agra in time for the conflict with
Aurangzeb.
After Dharmat, Dara made frantic efforts to seek allies. He sent repeated
letters to Jaswant Singh who had retired to Jodhpur. The rana of Udaipur was
also approached. Jaswant Singh moved out tardily to Pushkar near Ajmer.
After raising an army with the money provided by Dara, he waited there for
the rana to join him. But the rana had already been won over by Aurangzeb
with a promise of a rank of 7000, and the return of the parganas seized by
Shah Jahan and Dara from him in 1654 following a dispute over the re-
fortification of Chittor. Aurangzeb also held out to the rana a promise of
religious freedom and ‘favours equal to those of Rana Sanga’. Thus, Dara
failed to win over even the important Rajput rajas to his side.
The battle of Samugarh (29 May 1658) was basically a battle of good
generalship, the two sides being almost equally matched in numbers (about
50,000 to 60,000 on each side). In this field, Dara was no match for
Aurangzeb. The Hada Rajputs and the Saiyids of Barha upon whom Dara
largely depended could not make up for the weakness of the rest of the hastily
recruited army. Aurangzeb’s troops were battle hardened and well led.
Aurangzeb had all along pretended that his only object of coming to Agra
was to see his ailing father and to release him from the control of the
‘heretical’ Dara. But the war between Aurangzeb and Dara was not between
religious orthodoxy on the one hand, and liberalism on the other. Both
Muslim and Hindu nobles were equally divided in their support to the two
rivals. We have already seen the attitude of the leading Rajput rajas. In this
conflict, as in so many others, the attitude of the nobles depended upon their
personal interests and their association with individual princes.
After the defeat and flight of Dara, Shah Jahan was besieged in the fort of
Agra. Aurangzeb forced Shah Jahan into surrender by seizing the source of
water supply to the fort. Shah Jahan was confined to the female apartments in
the fort and strictly supervised though he was not ill-treated. There he lived
for eight long years, lovingly nursed by his favourite daughter, Jahanara, who
voluntarily chose to live within the fort. She re-emerged into public life after
Shah Jahan’s death and was accorded great honour by Aurangzeb who
restored her to the position of the first lady of the realm. He also raised her
annual pension from twelve lakh rupees to seventeen lakhs.
According to the terms of Aurangzeb’s agreement with Murad, the
kingdom was to be partitioned between the two. But Aurangzeb had no
intention of sharing the empire. Hence, he treacherously imprisoned Murad
and sent him to the Gwaliyar jail. He was killed two years later.
After losing the battle at Samugarh, Dara had fled to Lahore and was
planning to retain control of its surrounding areas. But Aurangzeb soon
arrived in the neighbourhood, leading a strong army. Dara’s courage failed
him. He abandoned Lahore without a fight and fled to Sindh. Thus, he
virtually sealed his fate. Although the civil war dragged on for more than two
years, its outcome was hardly in doubt. Dara’s move from Sindh into Gujarat
and then into Ajmer on an invitation from Jaswant Singh, the ruler of
Marwar, and the subsequent treachery of the latter are too well known. The
battle of Deorai near Ajmer (March 1659) was the last major battle Dara
fought against Aurangzeb. Dara might well have escaped into Iran, but he
wanted to try his luck again in Afghanistan. On the way, in the Bolan Pass, a
treacherous Afghan chief made him a prisoner and handed him over to his
dreaded enemy. A panel of jurists decreed that Dara could not be suffered to
live ‘out of necessity to protect the faith and Holy law, and also for reasons of
state (and) as a destroyer of the public peace’. This is typical of the manner in
which Aurangzeb used religion as a cloak for his political motives. Two years
after Dara’s execution, his son, Sulaiman Shikoh, who had sought shelter with
the ruler of Garhwai was handed over by him to Aurangzeb on an imminent
threat of invasion. He soon suffered the same fate as his father.
Earlier, Aurangzeb had defeated Shuja at Khajwah near Allahabad
(December 1658). Further campaigning against him was entrusted to Mir
Jumla who steadily exerted pressure till Shuja was hounded out of India into
Arakan (April 1660). Soon afterwards, he and his family met a dishonourable
death at the hands of the Arakanese on a charge of fomenting rebellion.
The civil war which kept the empire distracted for more than two years
showed that neither nomination by the ruler, nor plans of division of the
empire were likely to be accepted by the contenders for the throne. Military
force became the only arbiter for succession and the civil wars became
steadily more destructive. After being seated securely on the throne,
Aurangzeb tried to mitigate, to some extent, the effects of the harsh Mughal
custom of war unto death between brothers. At the instance of Jahanara
Begum, Siphir Shikoh, son of Dara, was released from prison in 1673, given a
Page 5


EIGHTEEN
Climax and Disintegration of the
Mughal Empire—I
PROBLEMS OF SUCCESSION
The last years of Shah Jahan’s reign were clouded by a bitter war of succession
among his sons. There was no clear tradition of succession among the
Muslims or the Timurids. The right of nomination by the ruler had been
accepted by some of the Muslim political thinkers. But it could not be
asserted in India during the Sultanat period. The Timurid tradition of
partitioning had not been successful either and was never applied in India.
Hindu traditions were also not very clear in the matter of succession.
According to Tulsidas, a contemporary of Akbar, a ruler had the right of
giving the tika to any one of his sons. But there were many cases among the
Rajputs where such a nomination had not been accepted by the other
brothers. Thus, Sanga had to wage a bitter struggle with his brothers before he
could assert his claim to the gaddi.
Towards the end of 1657, Shah Jahan was taken ill at Delhi and for some
time, his life was despaired of. But he rallied and gradually recovered his
strength under the loving care of Dara. Meanwhile, all kinds of rumours had
gained currency. It was said that Shah Jahan had already died, and Dara was
concealing the reality to serve his own purposes. After some time, Shah Jahan
slowly made his way by boat to Agra. Meanwhile, the princes, Shuja in
Bengal, Murad in Gujarat and Aurangzeb in the Deccan, had either been
persuaded that these rumours were true, or pretended to believe them, and
made preparations for the inevitable war of succession.
Anxious to avert a conflict between his sons, which might spell ruin to the
empire, and anticipating his speedy end, Shah Jahan now decided to
nominate his eldest son Dara as his successor (wali-ahd). He raised Dara’s
mansab from 40,000 zatto the unprecedented rank of 60,000. Dara was given
a chair next to the throne, and all the nobles were instructed to obey Dara as
their future sovereign. But these actions, far from ensuring a smooth
succession as Shah Jahan had hoped, convinced the other princes of Shah
Jahan’s partiality to Dara. It thus strengthened their resolve of making a bid
for the throne.
It is not necessary for us to follow in detail the events leading to the
ultimate triumph of Aurangzeb. There were many reasons for Aurangzeb’s
success. Divided counsel and under-estimation of his opponents by Dara
were two of the major factors responsible for Dara’s defeat. On hearing of the
military preparations of his sons and their decision to march on the capital,
Shah Jahan had sent an army to the east led by Dara’s son, Sulaiman Shikoh,
aided by Mirza Raja Jai Singh, to deal with Shuja who had crowned himself.
Another army was sent to Malwa under Raja Jaswant Singh, the ruler of
Jodhpur. On his arrival in Malwa, Jaswant found that he was faced with the
combined forces of Aurangzeb and Murad. The two princes were intent on a
conflict and invited Jaswant to stand aside. Jaswant could have retreated but
deeming retreat to be a matter of dishonour, he decided to stand and fight,
though the odds were definitely against him. The victory of Aurangzeb at
Dharmat (15 April 1658) emboldened his supporters and raised his prestige,
while it dispirited Dara and his supporters.
Meanwhile, Dara made a serious mistake. Over-confident of the strength of
his position, he had assigned for the eastern campaign some of his best
troops. Thus, he denuded the capital, Agra. Led by Sulaiman Shikoh, the
army moved to the east and gave a good account of itself It surprised and
defeated Shuja near Banaras (February 1658). It then decided to pursue him
into Bihar—as if the issue at Agra had been already decided. After the defeat
at Dharmat, express letters were sent to these forces to hurry back to Agra.
After patching up a hurried treaty (7 May 1658), Sulaiman Shikoh started his
march to Agra from his camp near Monghyr in eastern Bihar. But it was
hardly likely that he could return to Agra in time for the conflict with
Aurangzeb.
After Dharmat, Dara made frantic efforts to seek allies. He sent repeated
letters to Jaswant Singh who had retired to Jodhpur. The rana of Udaipur was
also approached. Jaswant Singh moved out tardily to Pushkar near Ajmer.
After raising an army with the money provided by Dara, he waited there for
the rana to join him. But the rana had already been won over by Aurangzeb
with a promise of a rank of 7000, and the return of the parganas seized by
Shah Jahan and Dara from him in 1654 following a dispute over the re-
fortification of Chittor. Aurangzeb also held out to the rana a promise of
religious freedom and ‘favours equal to those of Rana Sanga’. Thus, Dara
failed to win over even the important Rajput rajas to his side.
The battle of Samugarh (29 May 1658) was basically a battle of good
generalship, the two sides being almost equally matched in numbers (about
50,000 to 60,000 on each side). In this field, Dara was no match for
Aurangzeb. The Hada Rajputs and the Saiyids of Barha upon whom Dara
largely depended could not make up for the weakness of the rest of the hastily
recruited army. Aurangzeb’s troops were battle hardened and well led.
Aurangzeb had all along pretended that his only object of coming to Agra
was to see his ailing father and to release him from the control of the
‘heretical’ Dara. But the war between Aurangzeb and Dara was not between
religious orthodoxy on the one hand, and liberalism on the other. Both
Muslim and Hindu nobles were equally divided in their support to the two
rivals. We have already seen the attitude of the leading Rajput rajas. In this
conflict, as in so many others, the attitude of the nobles depended upon their
personal interests and their association with individual princes.
After the defeat and flight of Dara, Shah Jahan was besieged in the fort of
Agra. Aurangzeb forced Shah Jahan into surrender by seizing the source of
water supply to the fort. Shah Jahan was confined to the female apartments in
the fort and strictly supervised though he was not ill-treated. There he lived
for eight long years, lovingly nursed by his favourite daughter, Jahanara, who
voluntarily chose to live within the fort. She re-emerged into public life after
Shah Jahan’s death and was accorded great honour by Aurangzeb who
restored her to the position of the first lady of the realm. He also raised her
annual pension from twelve lakh rupees to seventeen lakhs.
According to the terms of Aurangzeb’s agreement with Murad, the
kingdom was to be partitioned between the two. But Aurangzeb had no
intention of sharing the empire. Hence, he treacherously imprisoned Murad
and sent him to the Gwaliyar jail. He was killed two years later.
After losing the battle at Samugarh, Dara had fled to Lahore and was
planning to retain control of its surrounding areas. But Aurangzeb soon
arrived in the neighbourhood, leading a strong army. Dara’s courage failed
him. He abandoned Lahore without a fight and fled to Sindh. Thus, he
virtually sealed his fate. Although the civil war dragged on for more than two
years, its outcome was hardly in doubt. Dara’s move from Sindh into Gujarat
and then into Ajmer on an invitation from Jaswant Singh, the ruler of
Marwar, and the subsequent treachery of the latter are too well known. The
battle of Deorai near Ajmer (March 1659) was the last major battle Dara
fought against Aurangzeb. Dara might well have escaped into Iran, but he
wanted to try his luck again in Afghanistan. On the way, in the Bolan Pass, a
treacherous Afghan chief made him a prisoner and handed him over to his
dreaded enemy. A panel of jurists decreed that Dara could not be suffered to
live ‘out of necessity to protect the faith and Holy law, and also for reasons of
state (and) as a destroyer of the public peace’. This is typical of the manner in
which Aurangzeb used religion as a cloak for his political motives. Two years
after Dara’s execution, his son, Sulaiman Shikoh, who had sought shelter with
the ruler of Garhwai was handed over by him to Aurangzeb on an imminent
threat of invasion. He soon suffered the same fate as his father.
Earlier, Aurangzeb had defeated Shuja at Khajwah near Allahabad
(December 1658). Further campaigning against him was entrusted to Mir
Jumla who steadily exerted pressure till Shuja was hounded out of India into
Arakan (April 1660). Soon afterwards, he and his family met a dishonourable
death at the hands of the Arakanese on a charge of fomenting rebellion.
The civil war which kept the empire distracted for more than two years
showed that neither nomination by the ruler, nor plans of division of the
empire were likely to be accepted by the contenders for the throne. Military
force became the only arbiter for succession and the civil wars became
steadily more destructive. After being seated securely on the throne,
Aurangzeb tried to mitigate, to some extent, the effects of the harsh Mughal
custom of war unto death between brothers. At the instance of Jahanara
Begum, Siphir Shikoh, son of Dara, was released from prison in 1673, given a
mansab and married to a daughter of Aurangzeb. Murad’s son, Izzat Bakhsh,
was also released, given a mansab and married to another daughter of
Aurangzeb. Earlier, in 1669, Dara’s daughter, Jani Begum, who had been
looked after by Jahanara as her own daughter, was married to Aurangzeb’s
third son, Muhammad Azam. There are many other marriages between
Aurangzeb’s family and the children and grandchildren of his defeated
brothers. Thus, in the third generation, the families of Aurangzeb and his
defeated brothers became one.
AURANGZEB’S REIGN—HIS RELIGIOUS POLICY
Aurangzeb ruled for almost 50 years. During his long reign, the Mughal
empire reached its territorial climax. At its height, it stretched from Kashmir
in the north to Jinji in the south, and from the Hindukush in the west to
Chittagong in the east. Aurangzeb proved to be a hardworking ruler, and
never spared himself or his subordinates in the tasks of government. His
letters show the close attention he paid to all affairs of the state. He was a
strict disciplinarian who did not spare his own sons. In 1686, he imprisoned
prince Muazzam on a charge of intriguing with the ruler of Golconda, and
kept him in prison for 12 long years. His other sons also had to face his wrath
on various occasions. Such was the awe of Aurangzeb that even late in his life
when Muazzam was the Governor of Kabul, he trembled every time he
received a letter from his father who was then in south India. Unlike his
predecessors, Aurangzeb did not like ostentation. His personal life was
marked by simplicity. He had the reputation of being an orthodox, God-
fearing Muslim. In course of time, he began to be regarded as a zindapir, or ‘a
living saint’.
Historians are, however, deeply divided about Aurangzeb’s achievements
as a ruler. According to some, he reversed Akbar’s policy of religious
toleration and thus undermined the loyalty of the Hindus to the empire.
According to them, this, in turn, led to popular uprisings » which sapped the
vitality of the empire. His suspicious nature added to his problems so that in
the words of Khafi Khan, ‘all his enterprises were long drawn out’ and ended
in failure. Another set of historians think that Aurangzeb has been unjustly
Read More
121 videos|490 docs|176 tests

Top Courses for UPSC

FAQs on Old NCERT Textbook (Satish Chandra): Climax and Disintegration of the Mughal Empire - 1 - History for UPSC CSE

1. What were the major causes for the climax and disintegration of the Mughal Empire?
Ans. The major causes for the climax and disintegration of the Mughal Empire were: 1. Weak Succession: The weak succession system of the Mughal Empire, with constant power struggles among the princes, led to instability and infighting within the empire. 2. Religious Intolerance: The policies of Aurangzeb, who imposed Islamic orthodoxy and persecuted non-Muslims, created discontent among various religious groups, leading to rebellions and revolts. 3. Economic Drain: The continuous wars and expansionist policies of the Mughals resulted in a huge economic drain on the empire. The constant need for resources and funds weakened the economy and caused financial instability. 4. Regional Fragmentation: The empire faced challenges from regional powers such as the Marathas, Rajputs, and Sikhs, who gradually gained power and independence, further weakening the central authority of the Mughals. 5. External Invasions: The Mughal Empire faced invasions from external forces like the Persian ruler Nadir Shah and the Afghan ruler Ahmad Shah Durrani, which further destabilized the empire and contributed to its downfall.
2. How did the weak succession system contribute to the decline of the Mughal Empire?
Ans. The weak succession system of the Mughal Empire played a significant role in its decline. Here's how it contributed to the downfall: 1. Power Struggles: The lack of a clear and defined succession process led to constant power struggles among the princes. This resulted in infighting, civil wars, and assassinations, which weakened the empire from within. 2. Political Instability: The frequent changes in leadership and the uncertainty of the next ruler created a sense of political instability. The empire lacked strong and effective leadership, causing a decline in governance and administration. 3. Fragmentation: The power struggles often led to the fragmentation of the empire, as different princes and regional leaders sought to establish their own independent kingdoms. This further weakened the central authority of the Mughals. 4. External Interference: The weak succession system also made the empire vulnerable to external interference. Rival powers took advantage of the internal conflicts, leading to invasions and further destabilization of the empire. 5. Loss of Loyalty: The continuous power struggles and uncertainty of the succession system eroded the loyalty of the nobles and military commanders towards the Mughal emperor. This weakened the empire's military strength and its ability to defend against external threats.
3. How did religious intolerance contribute to the disintegration of the Mughal Empire?
Ans. Religious intolerance played a significant role in the disintegration of the Mughal Empire. Here's how it contributed to its decline: 1. Alienation of Non-Muslims: Aurangzeb's policies of imposing Islamic orthodoxy and persecuting non-Muslims, particularly Hindus, created a sense of alienation among various religious groups. This led to widespread discontent and resistance against the Mughal rule. 2. Revolts and Rebellions: The religious persecution by Aurangzeb sparked several revolts and rebellions by the non-Muslims, particularly the Jats, Rajputs, and Sikhs. These rebellions further weakened the empire's control and authority over different regions. 3. Economic Consequences: The religious policies of Aurangzeb, such as the imposition of the jizya tax on non-Muslims, led to economic hardships for the non-Muslim population. This resulted in a decline in trade, agriculture, and overall economic prosperity, further weakening the empire. 4. Loss of Support: The religious intolerance and persecution also resulted in a loss of support from the nobles and regional powers. Many Rajput kings, who had previously been loyal to the Mughals, shifted their allegiance to other powers, leading to a loss of control over important territories. 5. Fragmentation: The religious policies of Aurangzeb contributed to the fragmentation of the empire, as different religious groups sought to establish their own independent states. This further weakened the central authority and unity of the Mughal Empire.
4. How did external invasions contribute to the decline of the Mughal Empire?
Ans. External invasions played a significant role in the decline of the Mughal Empire. Here's how they contributed to its downfall: 1. Weakening of Military Strength: The external invasions, such as those by Nadir Shah and Ahmad Shah Durrani, led to the weakening of the Mughal military. The empire faced significant losses in terms of manpower, resources, and territories, which weakened its ability to defend against further invasions. 2. Economic Drain: The invasions resulted in massive economic drain on the empire. The plunder and looting of wealth by the external forces depleted the Mughal treasury, leading to financial instability and further decline. 3. Loss of Territories: The external invasions resulted in the loss of important territories for the Mughals. Nadir Shah's invasion, for example, led to the loss of the Koh-i-Noor diamond and significant parts of the empire's northwest territories. 4. Fragmentation: The external invasions also contributed to the fragmentation of the empire. The regional powers, such as the Marathas and Sikhs, took advantage of the empire's weakened state and gained independence or established their own kingdoms. 5. Decline in Prestige and Authority: The successful invasions by external forces caused a decline in the prestige and authority of the Mughal Empire. The empire's inability to protect its territories and people from foreign invasions further eroded its legitimacy and control over the subcontinent.
5. How did regional fragmentation contribute to the disintegration of the Mughal Empire?
Ans. Regional fragmentation played a significant role in the disintegration of the Mughal Empire. Here's how it contributed to its decline: 1. Power Struggles: The regional fragmentation led to power struggles among the different regional powers, such as the Marathas, Rajputs, and Sikhs. These power struggles often resulted in conflicts and wars between these regional powers, weakening the overall authority of the Mughals. 2. Loss of Control: The regional fragmentation resulted in the loss of control over important territories for the Mughals. The regional powers gradually gained independence or established their own kingdoms, reducing the central authority and influence of the Mughal Empire. 3. Economic Drain: The regional fragmentation led to a further economic drain on the empire. The constant conflicts and wars between the regional powers required resources and funds, which weakened the overall economy of the empire. 4. Resistance Movements: The regional fragmentation also gave rise to various resistance movements against the Mughal rule. The Marathas, for example, led a significant resistance against the Mughals, gradually gaining power and influence in western India. 5. Fragmented Loyalties: The regional fragmentation resulted in fragmented loyalties among the nobles and military commanders. Many regional powers, such as the Rajputs, shifted their allegiance to other regional leaders, further weakening the central authority of the Mughals.
121 videos|490 docs|176 tests
Download as PDF
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Related Searches

pdf

,

Objective type Questions

,

ppt

,

Old NCERT Textbook (Satish Chandra): Climax and Disintegration of the Mughal Empire - 1 | History for UPSC CSE

,

Summary

,

shortcuts and tricks

,

MCQs

,

Sample Paper

,

Old NCERT Textbook (Satish Chandra): Climax and Disintegration of the Mughal Empire - 1 | History for UPSC CSE

,

Extra Questions

,

Previous Year Questions with Solutions

,

mock tests for examination

,

study material

,

practice quizzes

,

Free

,

Exam

,

Viva Questions

,

Important questions

,

past year papers

,

video lectures

,

Old NCERT Textbook (Satish Chandra): Climax and Disintegration of the Mughal Empire - 1 | History for UPSC CSE

,

Semester Notes

;