UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Notes  >  Sociology Optional for UPSC (Notes)  >  Science, scientific method and its critique

Science, scientific method and its critique | Sociology Optional for UPSC (Notes) PDF Download

Science can be defined as an organized body of knowledge that is primarily based on empirical data or sensory observations. This information is then analyzed and structured in a way that makes it comprehensible and useful. The goal of science is to develop general explanations or laws that can be derived from these observations. To collect and process this empirical data, science employs a specific methodology.

Science and the Scientific Method in the Context of Social Sciences

Science and the scientific method have their roots in the physical and natural sciences, which have been successful in exploring the physical and natural world and establishing near-universal laws. The quantification of data in these sciences has allowed for exactitude and precise comparisons. Sociology, as a latecomer to the field, has also been influenced by these positive sciences, with early sociologists such as Herbert Spencer and Emile Durkheim advocating for the use of scientific methods in the study of social phenomena.

  1. Defining Scientific Method in Social Sciences: The scientific method in social sciences is a systematic and objective attempt to study a problem for the purpose of deriving general principles. It involves a systematic investigation to find solutions to a problem, guided by previously collected information. Scientific social research focuses on formulating and seeking answers to questions about the social world, such as rural poverty, urban slums, youth crime, political corruption, exploitation of the weak, environmental pollution, and more. To answer these questions, social scientists have developed basic guidelines, principles, and techniques.
  2. Types of Research in Social Sciences: Social scientific research can take various forms, including empirical research, library research, historical research, and social research. Empirical research involves observation of facts or interaction with people, while library research is done in a library situation. Historical research studies history or biographical research, and social research focuses on the study of human groups or processes of social interaction.
  3. Characteristics of Scientific Research: According to Manheim, scientific research involves a method characterized by objectivity, accuracy, and systematization. Objectivity eliminates biases in fact-collection and interpretation, accuracy ensures that things are exactly as described, and systematization aims at consistency and comprehension. The assumption is that any statement made on the basis of scientific inquiry can be accepted as true and meaningful if it is empirically verifiable.
  4. The Role of Theory Construction in Scientific Inquiry: Although scientific research methods depend on the collection of empirical facts, facts alone do not constitute a science. For meaningful understanding, facts must be ordered, analyzed, generalized, and related to other facts. Thus, theory construction is a vital part of the scientific inquiry. Scientific knowledge is a cumulative process, as facts collected and findings evolved through the scientific method are interrelated with previous findings and theories.
  5. Inductive and Deductive Methods in Scientific Inquiry: The scientific method can be either inductive or deductive. Inductive method involves establishing generalizations inferred from specific facts, while deductive method involves testing generalizations by reasoning from general principles to particular instances.

Characteristics of Scientific Research

  • Verifiable Evidence: Scientific research relies on verifiable evidence, which means that the observations and data collected in the research can be examined and checked by other observers. This ensures that the research findings are reliable and can be replicated by others, contributing to the credibility of the scientific method.
  • Accuracy: Accuracy is another critical characteristic of scientific research. It involves describing the research findings precisely and truthfully, without exaggerating or distorting the facts. Accurate representation of the data helps maintain the integrity of the research and ensures that the conclusions drawn are valid and reliable.
  • Precision: Precision in scientific research involves providing exact measurements and numbers to support the research findings. This means avoiding vague statements and generalizations, and instead, presenting specific data and statistics that accurately represent the research observations. The level of precision required in social science research depends on the needs and goals of the study.
  • Systematization: Systematization in scientific research refers to the process of collecting data in a systematic and organized manner. By gathering data systematically, researchers can ensure that their conclusions are reliable and that they have not overlooked any relevant information. This approach also helps to minimize errors and biases in the research.
  • Objectivity: Being objective is essential in scientific research. Researchers must strive to remain unbiased and free from personal beliefs, values, and preferences when conducting their studies. By maintaining objectivity, researchers can ensure that their observations and conclusions are based on facts and not influenced by personal biases or emotions.
  • Recording: Recording data is a crucial aspect of scientific research. Since human memory is fallible, researchers must record all data collected during their studies to ensure that their conclusions are based on accurate and reliable information. Relying on unrecorded data can lead to unreliable judgments and conclusions.
  • Controlling Conditions: In scientific research, controlling conditions involves controlling all variables except one and examining the effects when that variable is changed. This experimental technique allows researchers to determine which variable is responsible for the observed results. While physical scientists can typically control variables in a laboratory setting, social scientists often face challenges in controlling all variables due to various constraints.
  • Training Investigators: Properly training investigators is essential in ensuring the reliability and credibility of scientific research. Investigators must be educated and trained in the research methods and techniques necessary to collect accurate data and interpret the findings. A well-trained investigator is more likely to produce reliable and valid research results.

Question for Science, scientific method and its critique
Try yourself:What are two key characteristics of scientific research in social sciences?
View Solution

Major Steps in Scientific Research

  1. Defining the Problem in Scientific Research: In the initial stage of scientific research, the problem or the research question is identified and defined. This involves specifying the area of investigation, the issue to be addressed, and the objectives of the study. It is crucial to have a clear understanding of the problem and its relevance in the context of previous research and existing theoretical frameworks.
  2. Reviewing Literature and Theoretical Frameworks: Before proceeding with the research, it is essential to review the existing literature and understand the theories and findings related to the problem. This helps in avoiding duplication of work and gaining insights into the subject matter. It also helps in formulating the research question within a specific theoretical framework, which guides the study and provides a basis for interpreting the findings.
  3. Formulating Hypotheses: After defining the problem and understanding the relevant literature, the researcher formulates a hypothesis or a set of hypotheses. A hypothesis is a tentative statement about the relationship between variables, which can be tested empirically. It is derived from the theoretical framework and aims to address the research problem.
  4. Research Design and Data Collection: Once the hypothesis is formulated, the researcher needs to plan the research design, which outlines the process of data collection, processing, and analysis. The research design should be appropriate for testing the hypothesis and should consider factors such as the target population, sampling techniques, data sources, and data collection methods.
    Data collection is the process of gathering relevant information and facts as per the research design. This may involve primary data collection through methods such as surveys, interviews, and observations, or secondary data collection from existing sources.
  5. Data Analysis: After collecting the data, it is analyzed to test the hypothesis and draw inferences. Data analysis involves organizing, classifying, tabulating, and comparing the data using statistical tools and techniques. The analysis should be rigorous and systematic to ensure the validity and reliability of the research findings.
  6. Drawing Conclusions and Testing Hypotheses: Based on the data analysis, the researcher draws conclusions about the research problem and tests the hypotheses. This involves determining whether the hypotheses are confirmed or rejected, and if the research has contributed to the existing knowledge in the field. The conclusions should also address the implications of the findings for the theoretical framework and identify new questions for further research.
  7. Replication of the Study: Although a single research study may provide valuable insights, research findings are considered more robust and reliable when they are confirmed through multiple studies. Replication is the process of repeating the study with the same methodology to verify the original findings. This helps in establishing the generalizability and external validity of the research.
  8. Importance of Scientific Research in Sociology: Scientific research in sociology has several applications and benefits, including improving decision-making, reducing uncertainty, adopting new strategies, planning for the future, and ascertaining trends. Due to the value of scientific research, many sociologists are engaged in research on a full-time or part-time basis, with funding provided by various organizations and institutions.

However, scientific inquiry should be conducted with caution, considering factors such as data availability, time constraints, and cost-effectiveness. It is essential to ensure that the research is relevant, rigorous, and contributes to the advancement of knowledge in the field of sociology.

Critique Proposition


Non-Positivist and Anti-Positivist critics have expressed concerns about the attempts to establish Sociology as a positive science. Some of the main limitations they present include:

  • Issue of Experimentation: Establishing precise relationships between variables through experimentation is crucial in scientific observation. However, in Sociology, experimentation is rarely possible due to practical and ethical limitations. Controlling human behavior in a laboratory setting is not only practically impossible but also ethically undesirable. Nonetheless, experimentation is not a necessary feature of a science, as evidenced by fields like astronomy where experiments cannot be conducted. Thus, the inability to conduct experiments does not automatically disqualify Sociology from being a science.
  • Issue of Quantification: While some aspects of sociological phenomena can be quantified using statistical methods, much of it is inherently qualitative and not suitable for quantitative techniques. Even Neo-positivist attempts to apply quantitative techniques to sociological phenomena have had limited success.
  • Issue of Generalization: Sociologists have not been successful in deriving law-like generalizations through their studies. This failure is due to the nature of Sociology's subject matter – human behavior does not follow consistent patterns like physical objects. Human volition plays a significant role in shaping behavior, and some actions are unique and unrepeatable. Furthermore, the inability to conduct experiments makes it difficult to establish precise causal relationships. Sociologists can, at best, establish statistical correlations, and their generalizations often take the form of statements representing trends or tendencies.
  • Issue of Objectivity: Objectivity refers to a mindset where personal biases and preferences of scientists do not affect data collection and analysis. However, achieving objectivity is nearly impossible in sociological research, and sociologists can only strive to minimize subjectivity.

Question for Science, scientific method and its critique
Try yourself:What is one major limitation of applying the scientific method in sociology, as pointed out by non-positivist and anti-positivist critics?
View Solution

Conclusion

The scientific method in social sciences, particularly in sociology, is characterized by objectivity, accuracy, systematization, and empirical data collection. While critics argue that limitations such as the inability to conduct experiments, quantification, generalization, and objectivity make it difficult to establish sociology as a positive science, the field continues to employ research methods that contribute to the understanding of human behavior and social phenomena. Scientific inquiry in sociology has practical applications and benefits, aiding in decision-making, planning, and policy formulation. Despite the challenges, the pursuit of scientific research in sociology remains essential to expanding knowledge and understanding the complex dynamics of human societies.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) of What is Science & Scientific method

What is the scientific method in social sciences?

The scientific method in social sciences is a systematic and objective attempt to study a problem for the purpose of deriving general principles. It involves a systematic investigation to find solutions to a problem, guided by previously collected information.

What are the main types of research in social sciences?

The main types of research in social sciences include empirical research, library research, historical research, and social research.

What are the key characteristics of scientific research?

Some key characteristics of scientific research include verifiable evidence, accuracy, precision, systematization, objectivity, recording, controlling conditions, and proper training of investigators.

What are the major steps in scientific research?

The major steps in scientific research include defining the problem, reviewing literature and theoretical frameworks, formulating hypotheses, designing and collecting data, analyzing data, drawing conclusions and testing hypotheses, and replicating the study.

What are some criticisms and limitations of applying the scientific method to sociology?

Some criticisms and limitations include the issue of experimentation, the issue of quantification, the issue of generalization, and the issue of objectivity.

The document Science, scientific method and its critique | Sociology Optional for UPSC (Notes) is a part of the UPSC Course Sociology Optional for UPSC (Notes).
All you need of UPSC at this link: UPSC
122 videos|252 docs

Top Courses for UPSC

FAQs on Science, scientific method and its critique - Sociology Optional for UPSC (Notes)

1. What is the scientific method in the context of social sciences?
Ans. The scientific method in the context of social sciences is a systematic and empirical approach used to study and understand human behavior, societies, and social phenomena. It involves formulating hypotheses, collecting data through various research methods, analyzing the data, and drawing conclusions based on evidence. The scientific method helps social scientists to ensure objectivity, reliability, and validity in their research.
2. What are the characteristics of scientific research in social sciences?
Ans. The characteristics of scientific research in social sciences include: 1. Objectivity: Scientific research aims to be impartial and free from personal biases or opinions. 2. Empirical: It relies on evidence obtained through observation and experimentation. 3. Systematic: It follows a structured and organized approach, involving clear steps and procedures. 4. Replicable: The research process should be detailed and transparent enough for other researchers to replicate the study. 5. Generalizable: Findings from scientific research in social sciences should have the potential to be applied to larger populations or contexts.
3. What are the major steps involved in scientific research in social sciences?
Ans. The major steps involved in scientific research in social sciences are: 1. Formulating a research question or hypothesis: This involves identifying the specific area of study and the question to be answered or hypothesis to be tested. 2. Designing the research study: This includes selecting the appropriate research method, sampling techniques, and data collection tools. 3. Collecting data: Researchers gather relevant data through surveys, interviews, observations, or experiments. 4. Analyzing the data: The collected data is analyzed using statistical methods or qualitative analysis techniques. 5. Drawing conclusions: Researchers interpret the analyzed data and draw conclusions based on the findings. 6. Communicating the results: The final step involves sharing the research findings through academic publications, presentations, or reports.
4. How does the scientific method ensure reliability and validity in social sciences?
Ans. The scientific method ensures reliability and validity in social sciences through various ways: 1. Reliability: By following standardized research procedures, collecting data consistently, and using appropriate statistical techniques, researchers aim to achieve reliability. This means that if the study were repeated, it would yield similar results. 2. Validity: Researchers use various techniques to ensure the validity of their findings. This includes using appropriate research methods, ensuring the accuracy and representativeness of data collection, and addressing potential biases or confounding factors that could influence the results. Overall, the scientific method in social sciences aims to minimize errors and biases, ensuring that the research findings are reliable and valid.
5. How does the scientific method contribute to the advancement of knowledge in social sciences?
Ans. The scientific method contributes to the advancement of knowledge in social sciences by providing a systematic and objective approach to studying human behavior, societies, and social phenomena. It helps researchers in generating new theories, testing existing theories, and acquiring evidence-based knowledge. By following the scientific method, researchers can build upon previous studies, replicate findings, and refine or challenge existing theories, leading to a deeper understanding of social phenomena. This cumulative process of research and knowledge generation contributes to the growth and development of the social sciences field.
122 videos|252 docs
Download as PDF
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Related Searches

Objective type Questions

,

scientific method and its critique | Sociology Optional for UPSC (Notes)

,

Science

,

Exam

,

scientific method and its critique | Sociology Optional for UPSC (Notes)

,

ppt

,

Semester Notes

,

mock tests for examination

,

Viva Questions

,

Science

,

Science

,

Previous Year Questions with Solutions

,

Free

,

pdf

,

past year papers

,

scientific method and its critique | Sociology Optional for UPSC (Notes)

,

study material

,

practice quizzes

,

Extra Questions

,

Summary

,

video lectures

,

Important questions

,

shortcuts and tricks

,

MCQs

,

Sample Paper

;