UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Notes  >  Current Affairs & Hindu Analysis: Daily, Weekly & Monthly  >  The Hindu Editorial Analysis- 14th December 2023

The Hindu Editorial Analysis- 14th December 2023 | Current Affairs & Hindu Analysis: Daily, Weekly & Monthly - UPSC PDF Download

The Hindu Editorial Analysis- 14th December 2023 | Current Affairs & Hindu Analysis: Daily, Weekly & Monthly - UPSC

Article 370 judgment is a case of constitutional monism

Why in News?

Recently, Constitution Bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) D.Y. Chandrachud unanimously upheld the Central government’s 2019 decision to abrogate Article 370 of the Constitution which conferred special status on the erstwhile State of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K).

Article 370 of the Constitution of India

  • Article 370 Overview:
    • Controversial and debated provision in the Indian Constitution.
    • Grants special autonomy to Jammu and Kashmir.
    • Allows the region to have its own constitution, flag, and significant decision-making powers.
  • Origins and Significance:
    • Enshrined in the Indian Constitution.
    • Subject of immense political, legal, and social discussions.
    • Originated due to the unique status of Jammu and Kashmir.
  • Provisions of Article 370:
    • Grants Jammu and Kashmir its own constitution.
    • Allows the region to have a distinct state flag.
    • Provides significant decision-making powers to the region.
  • Controversies and Discussions:
    • Focal point of conflict involving India, Pakistan, and China since 1947.
    • Governed by India but with internal administrative autonomy.
    • Significant discussions on the political, legal, and social implications.
  • Timeline of Governance:
    • Jammu and Kashmir governed as a state by India from 1952.
    • Special status continued until October 31, 2019.
  • Post-October 31, 2019:
    • Central government's decision to abrogate Article 370 upheld in 2023.
    • Region loses its special status and becomes a union territory.
  • Ongoing Relevance:
    • Ongoing implications and discussions regarding the aftermath of Article 370 abrogation.
    • Continuing impact on the political and social landscape of the region.

Article 370 of Indian Constitution Removed

  • Constitutional Background:
    • Title: Part XXI of the Indian Constitution
    • Focus: Temporary, Transitional, and Special Provisions
    • Key Provision: Article 370
  • Article 370 Overview:
    • Authority: Jammu and Kashmir Constituent Assembly
    • Role: Suggested the extent of the Indian Constitution's application in the state
    • Power: Could recommend revoking Article 370, applying the entire Indian Constitution
  • State Constituent Assembly's Role:
    • Recommendations: Determined specific provisions of the Indian Constitution for Jammu and Kashmir
    • Outcome: 1954 Presidential order issued based on the assembly's suggestions
  • Article 370 Status:
    • Assumption: If the state assembly didn't propose repeal, Article 370 considered permanent
    • Disbandment: State constituent assembly disbanded without suggesting Article 370 repeal.

Article 370 Origins and Inclusion in the Constitution

  • Background of Article 370:
    • Negotiations in 1947: Article 370 originated from negotiations between Jammu and Kashmir leaders and the Indian government during India's independence in 1947.
    • Purpose: Incorporated to address concerns of Jammu and Kashmir, respecting its unique history, culture, and autonomy.
  • Abrogation of Article 370 in 2019:
    • Presidential Order (August 5, 2019): Replaced the 1954 order, subjecting Jammu and Kashmir to all articles of the Indian Constitution.
    • Parliamentary Approval: A resolution with two-thirds majority in both chambers of the Indian parliament supported the order.
    • Inoperative Clauses: All clauses of Article 370, except for clause 1, were made inoperative by an order on August 6, 2019.
    • Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization Act, 2019: Approved by parliament, leading to the division of Jammu and Kashmir into two Union Territories: Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh. Implemented on October 31, 2019.
  • Legal Challenges and Supreme Court Involvement:
    • Petitions: The Supreme Court of India received 23 petitions in response to the government's intention to repeal Article 370.
    • Five-Judge Bench: Formed to address the legal challenges arising from the petitions.
  • Instrument of Accession (October 1947):
    • Maharaja Hari Singh: Signed the Instrument of Accession in October 1947, ceding authority in foreign affairs, defense, and communications to the Indian government.
    • Sheikh Abdullah's Role: Appointed as prime minister in March 1948, played a key role in negotiating and drafting Article 370.
    • Unique Status: Article 370 granted special autonomy to Jammu and Kashmir.

Article 370 of the Constitution of India Special Autonomy to Jammu and Kashmir

  • Article 370: Special Status of Jammu and Kashmir
    • Unique autonomy for Jammu and Kashmir under Article 370.
    • Special privileges compared to other Indian states.
    • Own constitution, flag, and dual citizenship for residents.
  • Exclusive Benefits for Permanent Residents
    • Separate laws for citizenship, property ownership, and fundamental rights.
    • Residents enjoy advantages in housing, real estate, education, and government employment.
  • Article 35A: Protection from Constitutional Challenges
    • Prevents contesting state laws solely on the basis of violating national constitutional rights.
    • Ensures unique rights for Kashmiri residents.
  • Partial Application of Fundamental Rights
    • 1954 Presidential order extends some Fundamental Rights to Kashmir with reservations.
    • State assembly introduces "preventive detention laws" shielded from human rights complaints for 25 years.
  • Human Rights Concerns
    • Autonomy and special status raise concerns about weaker human rights standards.
    • Unique legal provisions contribute to apprehensions regarding human rights in Jammu and Kashmir.

Article 370 of the Constitution of India Limited Application of Indian Laws

  • Article 370 Overview:
    • Key Restriction: Article 370 limits the application of Indian laws in Jammu and Kashmir.
  • Parliament Jurisdiction: Parliament's authority is confined to defense, foreign affairs, finance, and communications.
  • Constitutional Approval: Other provisions require the state government's approval to apply to Jammu and Kashmir.
  • Autonomy and Laws in Jammu and Kashmir:
    • Special Autonomy: Article 370 grants special autonomy, allowing the region its own constitution and laws.
    • Distinct Laws: Residents have separate citizenship, property, and fundamental rights compared to the rest of India.
    • Property Restrictions: Residents of other states are barred from buying real estate in Jammu and Kashmir.
  • Financial Emergency and Constitutional Link:
    • Financial Emergency Limitation: Article 370 does not authorize the Centre to declare a state financial emergency.
    • Constitutional Link: Article 370(1)(c) ties Jammu and Kashmir to the Indian Union by applying Article 1 of the Indian Constitution.
  • Removal Implications:
    • Presidential Power: Removal of Article 370 requires a Presidential Order.
    • Independence Risk: Without new overriding laws, removal could make the state independent of India.
  • Kashmir's Complex History:
    • Territorial Dispute: India and Pakistan both claim sovereignty over Kashmir.
    • Partition Background: Jammu and Kashmir became part of India in 1947 post-British rule partition.
    • Ceasefire Line: India and Pakistan control separate portions after a war, leading to a ceasefire line.
  • Ongoing Conflict:
    • Violence in Jammu and Kashmir: A three-decade-long separatist uprising against Indian rule.
  • Distinct Constitutional Integration:
    • Selective Application: Other Indian Constitution provisions require explicit approval by Jammu and Kashmir's government.
    • Integration Balance: Designed to respect the region's identity while integrating into India's federal structure.
Article 370 of the Constitution of India Significance and Rationale
  • Preservation of Regional Identity:
    • Significance: Article 370 serves to respect and maintain the unique identity, history, and culture of Jammu and Kashmir.
    • Rationale: Allows the region to possess its own constitution, flag, and substantial decision-making powers.
  • Addressing Historical Context:
    • Significance: Article 370 emerged as a response to the historical context of Jammu and Kashmir's accession to India post-independence.
    • Rationale: Resulted from negotiations between state leaders and the Indian government to address local concerns and aspirations.
  • Accommodating Regional Aspirations:
    • Significance: Reflects India's federal structure by accommodating diverse regional aspirations.
    • Rationale: Grants special autonomy to Jammu and Kashmir within the Indian Constitution, acknowledging the need for regional flexibility and self-governance.
  • Safeguarding Territorial Integrity:
    • Significance: Article 370 plays a role in safeguarding the territorial integrity of Jammu and Kashmir within the Indian Union.
    • Rationale: Affirms the state's integral part of India while allowing unique privileges and autonomy.
  • Promoting Harmonious Relations:
    • Significance: Intended to foster harmonious relations between Jammu and Kashmir and the rest of India.
    • Rationale: Aims to create trust and cooperation by granting special status.
  • Upholding Democratic Principles:
    • Significance: Article 370 exemplifies India’s commitment to democratic principles.
    • Rationale: Respects the people's choice in Jammu and Kashmir to have their own constitution and laws, embodying the idea of "unity in diversity" within a democratic framework.
Article 370 Controversies and Criticisms
  • Limited Integration:
    • Critics contend that Article 370 impedes the complete assimilation of Jammu and Kashmir with the rest of India.
    • They argue that this provision sustains separatist sentiments and obstructs the region from fully embracing its Indian identity.
  • Unequal Treatment:
    • Article 370 grants special privileges to Jammu and Kashmir residents in areas like property ownership, education, and government employment.
    • Critics assert that this results in perceived discrimination against citizens from other parts of India.
  • Hindrance to Development:
    • Some critics argue that the special status obstructs the development of Jammu and Kashmir.
    • They believe that autonomy limits the central government's effectiveness in implementing welfare and development programs.
  • Misuse of Autonomy:
    • Allegations have arisen regarding the misuse of autonomy by certain political leaders in Jammu and Kashmir.
    • Critics claim that this has led to governance lacking in accountability, transparency, and effective resource management.
  • Security Concerns:
    • Article 370 is criticized for hindering the application of central laws related to security and anti-terrorism measures.
    • Critics argue that this compromise in national security undermines efforts against terrorism.
  • Legal Complexity:
    • The intricate legal framework surrounding Article 370 has resulted in legal complexities and ambiguities.
    • The special status has triggered debates and disputes over various issues, adding to the overall legal complexity.
  • Opposition from Political Groups:
    • Some political groups oppose Article 370, asserting that it disrupts uniformity and equal treatment among Indian states.
    • They advocate for its abrogation to foster a more unified and integrated India.

The ongoing debate over Article 370 reflects the complex nature of addressing regional autonomy within India's diverse federal structure. Proponents emphasize its respect for regional identity and autonomy, while critics highlight concerns such as unequal treatment, development hindrance, and national security implications.

Article 370 Constitutional Amendments and Interpretations
  • Presidential Orders: Article 370 in the Indian Constitution, which requires the Jammu and Kashmir Constituent Assembly's consent for changes, has undergone modifications through a series of Presidential orders. These orders aimed to integrate the state with the rest of India.
  • Fundamental Rights: Initially, Jammu and Kashmir had its distinct fundamental rights. However, a 1954 Presidential order extended some of the Fundamental Rights from the Indian Constitution to the state, with specific exceptions and modifications.
  • Application of Central Laws: Constitutional amendments and Presidential orders have progressively extended various central laws to Jammu and Kashmir, encompassing citizenship, banking, finance, and other critical areas.
  • Abrogation of Article 35A: In August 2019, the Indian government revoked Article 35A, which granted special privileges to Jammu and Kashmir's permanent residents. This move aimed to ensure equal rights for all Indian citizens in the state.
  • Scrapping of State’s Special Status: Simultaneously, the Indian government revoked the special status of Jammu and Kashmir by abrogating Article 370. This significant decision aimed at fully integrating the state with the Indian Union.
  • Legal Challenges: The constitutional changes related to Article 370 have faced legal challenges in various courts, questioning their validity and seeking clarification on the implications and scope of the amendments.
  • Interpretations by the Supreme Court: The Supreme Court of India has played a crucial role in interpreting Article 370, providing guidance on matters related to the application of central laws and constitutional provisions in Jammu and Kashmir.

Article 370's Future: Article 370 continues to be a critical aspect of India’s constitutional landscape, representing the delicate balance between regional autonomy and national integration. While providing a unique governance framework for Jammu and Kashmir, it remains a subject of political debates and controversies, reflecting India's ongoing efforts to reconcile unity with diversity within the principles of democracy and federalism.

The document The Hindu Editorial Analysis- 14th December 2023 | Current Affairs & Hindu Analysis: Daily, Weekly & Monthly - UPSC is a part of the UPSC Course Current Affairs & Hindu Analysis: Daily, Weekly & Monthly.
All you need of UPSC at this link: UPSC
39 videos|4130 docs|867 tests

Top Courses for UPSC

FAQs on The Hindu Editorial Analysis- 14th December 2023 - Current Affairs & Hindu Analysis: Daily, Weekly & Monthly - UPSC

1. What is Article 370 and why is it significant?
Ans. Article 370 of the Indian Constitution granted special autonomous status to Jammu and Kashmir, allowing the state to have its own constitution and separate laws. It provided the state with a degree of sovereignty and limited the powers of the central government in relation to Jammu and Kashmir. The significance of Article 370 lies in its role in shaping the relationship between the Indian government and Jammu and Kashmir.
2. What does the judgment on Article 370 signify?
Ans. The judgment on Article 370 signifies a case of constitutional monism, which means that the Constitution of India is the supreme law of the land and prevails over any conflicting laws or provisions. The judgment implies that Article 370, which granted special status to Jammu and Kashmir, can be abrogated or modified by the central government in accordance with the Constitution if deemed necessary.
3. How does the judgment impact the autonomous status of Jammu and Kashmir?
Ans. The judgment effectively removes the special autonomous status of Jammu and Kashmir that was granted under Article 370. This means that the state will no longer have its own constitution and separate laws, and will be governed by the laws and provisions of the Indian Constitution like any other state.
4. Does the judgment lead to the integration of Jammu and Kashmir with the rest of India?
Ans. Yes, the judgment can be seen as a step towards the integration of Jammu and Kashmir with the rest of India. By abrogating Article 370, the central government aims to bring Jammu and Kashmir under the direct governance of the Indian Constitution. This move aims to foster greater unity and equality among all states of India.
5. Are there any potential challenges or controversies surrounding the judgment on Article 370?
Ans. Yes, the judgment on Article 370 has faced criticism and sparked debates. Some argue that the abrogation of Article 370 violates the principles of federalism and undermines the unique identity and autonomy of Jammu and Kashmir. There are concerns about the impact on the region's demographics, as well as the potential for unrest and resistance from certain sections of the population. These challenges and controversies highlight the complex nature of the issue.
39 videos|4130 docs|867 tests
Download as PDF
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Related Searches

The Hindu Editorial Analysis- 14th December 2023 | Current Affairs & Hindu Analysis: Daily

,

The Hindu Editorial Analysis- 14th December 2023 | Current Affairs & Hindu Analysis: Daily

,

Weekly & Monthly - UPSC

,

Semester Notes

,

Weekly & Monthly - UPSC

,

study material

,

Objective type Questions

,

MCQs

,

Free

,

shortcuts and tricks

,

Important questions

,

Previous Year Questions with Solutions

,

video lectures

,

Exam

,

Weekly & Monthly - UPSC

,

pdf

,

ppt

,

The Hindu Editorial Analysis- 14th December 2023 | Current Affairs & Hindu Analysis: Daily

,

past year papers

,

practice quizzes

,

Summary

,

Extra Questions

,

mock tests for examination

,

Sample Paper

,

Viva Questions

;