Q5: Answer the following in about 150 words each : (10x 5 = 50)
(a) “The Constitution of French Republic does not prohibit ministers from being the leader of political party; it is customary that minister should not occupy such a post to ensure impartiality.” Explain.
Ans:
Introduction:
In France, the Constitution of the French Republic does not explicitly prohibit ministers from being the leader of a political party. However, it is a long-standing tradition that ministers do not simultaneously hold the position of party leader. This practice is rooted in the principles of impartiality and good governance.
Customary Practice
Impartiality: The primary reason for this practice is to ensure the impartiality of ministers in carrying out their official duties. When ministers also serve as political party leaders, there is a risk of their decisions and actions being influenced by partisan politics rather than the best interests of the nation. This separation helps maintain the integrity of the government.
Conflict of Interest: Holding both positions can lead to conflicts of interest. For example, if a minister is also a party leader, they might prioritize their party's agenda over the broader national agenda, potentially undermining the principles of democracy and representation.
Separation of Powers: This practice reinforces the separation of powers between the executive branch (the government) and the legislative branch (the parliament). Ministers being separate from party leadership helps prevent any undue influence on the legislative process.
Examples: An illustrative example is that of Édouard Philippe, who served as the Prime Minister of France from 2017 to 2020. Although he was a member of The Republicans party, he relinquished his role as party leader to maintain impartiality while leading the government. This allowed him to make decisions based on the national interest rather than his party's objectives.
Conclusion:
While the French Constitution may not explicitly prohibit ministers from being party leaders, the long-established custom of maintaining this separation is crucial to upholding the principles of impartiality, conflict of interest avoidance, and the separation of powers. This tradition helps ensure that government officials prioritize the welfare of the nation over partisan politics.
(b) The ultimate goal of using Management Information System (MIS) is to increase values and productivity in organizations. Explain.
Ans:
Introduction:
Management Information Systems (MIS) are crucial tools for organizations seeking to enhance their efficiency, productivity, and overall value. The ultimate goal of using MIS is to facilitate data-driven decision-making, streamline processes, and ultimately boost the organization's effectiveness.
Facilitating Informed Decision-Making
Data Aggregation and Analysis: MIS collect, process, and present data in a structured and easily understandable manner. This enables managers to make informed decisions based on real-time and historical data.
Forecasting and Planning: MIS provide tools for predictive analytics, allowing organizations to anticipate future trends and plan accordingly. For example, sales data can be used to forecast demand and adjust inventory levels.
Streamlining Operations
Process Automation: MIS can automate routine tasks, reducing human errors and saving time. For instance, employee payroll processing can be automated, reducing administrative workload.
Resource Allocation: MIS help allocate resources more efficiently. They can optimize scheduling, inventory management, and resource allocation, leading to cost savings and improved productivity.
Enhancing Collaboration
Data Sharing: MIS facilitate data sharing and collaboration across different departments and locations. This fosters a more cohesive and productive work environment.
Remote Access: In an increasingly remote work-friendly world, MIS enable employees to access critical information and systems from anywhere, improving productivity and flexibility.
Increasing Customer Value
Personalization: MIS enable organizations to gather and analyze customer data to provide personalized experiences, products, and services, increasing customer satisfaction and loyalty.
Feedback Loops: Customer feedback and satisfaction data collected through MIS can be used to continuously improve products and services.
Conclusion:
The utilization of Management Information Systems is pivotal for organizations aiming to increase their value and productivity. By providing the tools for informed decision-making, process optimization, and enhanced collaboration, MIS can help organizations stay competitive and deliver value to their stakeholders.
(c) “Cost-benefit analysis is of great help to the policy makers in framing policies and providing advice on developing public policy.” Examine.
Ans:
Introduction:
Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is a critical tool for policy makers to evaluate and make informed decisions about various policy options. It provides a systematic framework for assessing the potential impact of policies on society, helping governments and organizations allocate resources efficiently.
Evaluating Policy Effectiveness
Quantifying Benefits: CBA allows policy makers to quantify the benefits of a proposed policy, which can include economic, social, and environmental factors. For example, a government considering an infrastructure project can use CBA to assess its potential economic benefits, such as job creation and increased economic activity.
Weighing Costs: CBA also quantifies the costs associated with a policy. This includes not just the financial costs but also the social and environmental costs. For instance, a healthcare policy may have costs associated with funding and implementation, which can be compared to the expected benefits of improved public health.
Resource Allocation
Limited Resources: Governments and organizations often face budget constraints. CBA helps allocate resources to policies that offer the highest return on investment, ensuring that funds are spent where they will have the most significant positive impact.
Comparative Analysis: By comparing different policy options, CBA assists in identifying the most cost-effective approach. It allows for an objective assessment of whether the benefits outweigh the costs.
Policy Advice and Accountability
Informed Decision-Making: CBA provides policy makers with the necessary information to make decisions based on evidence and analysis rather than political or emotional considerations.
Accountability: Using CBA in policy making enhances transparency and accountability. It allows for the assessment of whether a policy met its intended goals and whether the benefits outweighed the costs, aiding in accountability and future planning.
Conclusion:
Cost-benefit analysis is a valuable tool for policy makers, enabling them to make informed decisions, allocate resources efficiently, and be accountable for the policies they implement. By quantifying the potential benefits and costs of policies, CBA supports the development of policies that enhance public welfare and societal well-being.
(d) “Monetary policy and fiscal policy are different; but both are used to regulate economy.” Discuss.
Ans:
Introduction:
Monetary policy and fiscal policy are distinct but complementary tools used by governments to regulate their economies. Both policies serve different purposes and are implemented by different entities.
Monetary Policy
Controlled by Central Banks: Monetary policy is primarily controlled by a country's central bank, such as the Federal Reserve in the United States or the European Central Bank in the Eurozone.
Affects Money Supply and Interest Rates: It focuses on managing the money supply and interest rates. Central banks adjust interest rates to influence borrowing and lending, which, in turn, affects consumer spending, investment, and inflation.
Macroeconomic Stabilization: The primary goal of monetary policy is to maintain price stability and control inflation. It can also address unemployment by encouraging or discouraging borrowing.
Fiscal Policy
Controlled by Governments: Fiscal policy is the domain of governments, specifically finance ministries and legislatures.
Involves Taxation and Spending: Fiscal policy involves decisions related to taxation and government spending. Governments can use changes in tax rates and spending levels to influence the overall demand in the economy.
Stimulating or Restraining Demand: Fiscal policy can be expansionary (increasing government spending and cutting taxes) to stimulate economic growth during a recession. It can also be contractionary (reducing spending and increasing taxes) to cool down an overheating economy and control inflation.
Complementary Roles
Counter-Cyclical Measures: Both policies can be used in a counter-cyclical manner. For example, during an economic downturn, monetary policy may lower interest rates, while fiscal policy may increase government spending to stimulate demand.
Long-term Planning vs. Short-term Adjustments: Fiscal policy is generally more suited for long-term economic planning, as it involves setting budgets and tax policies. Monetary policy is more flexible for short-term adjustments.
Conclusion:
Monetary policy and fiscal policy are essential tools in economic regulation. While they have distinct roles and are implemented by different entities, they work together to achieve stable economic growth, control inflation, and manage unemployment. Understanding their differences and complementary nature is crucial for effective economic governance.
(e) “Instead of conflicting, the employer-employee relationship should be one of mutual reliance.” Explain.
Ans:
Introduction:
The relationship between employers and employees is pivotal to the success of any organization. Instead of being adversarial, it should be characterized by mutual reliance, trust, and collaboration for the betterment of both parties.
Shared Goals and Objectives
Organizational Success: Both employers and employees share the common goal of ensuring the success and prosperity of the organization. When they work together, they are more likely to achieve this shared objective.
Career Growth and Development: Employers benefit from having motivated and skilled employees, while employees benefit from opportunities for career advancement and skill development.
Open Communication and Trust
Transparency: Employers should communicate openly about the company's goals, challenges, and expectations. Likewise, employees should feel comfortable expressing their concerns, ideas, and needs.
Trust-building: Trust is the foundation of any healthy relationship. Employers should trust their employees to perform their roles effectively, and employees should trust that their contributions are valued and recognized.
Recognition and Appreciation
Acknowledging Contributions: Employers should acknowledge and appreciate the efforts and achievements of their employees. This recognition fosters a positive work environment and motivates employees to continue performing at their best.
Fair Compensation and Benefits: Employees should be compensated fairly for their work, reflecting their skills, experience, and contributions to the organization.
Balancing Work-life Needs
Flexibility: Employers should provide flexible work arrangements when possible to accommodate employees' personal needs. This could include options for remote work, flexible hours, or family-friendly policies.
Well-being and Health: Employers should prioritize the health and well-being of their employees, offering benefits like healthcare, wellness programs, and paid time off.
Conclusion:
The employer-employee relationship should not be one of conflict, but rather one of mutual reliance and collaboration. When both parties work together towards common goals, with open communication, trust, and appreciation, the organization thrives, and employees feel valued and motivated. This positive dynamic leads to a more productive and successful work environment.
Q6:
(a) “The studies in Comparative Public Administration (CPA) got momentum in 1980’s and 1990’s with a new objective and orientation than its previous counterparts.” Critically examine. (20 Marks)
Ans:
Introduction:
Comparative Public Administration (CPA) is the study of public administration systems and practices across different countries to identify similarities, differences, and best practices. In the 1980s and 1990s, CPA underwent significant changes in its objectives and orientations compared to its earlier forms.
Shift in Objectives and Orientation
From Structural to Functional Focus: Earlier forms of CPA primarily focused on comparing the structural elements of public administration, such as organizational setups and hierarchies. In the 1980s and 1990s, the emphasis shifted towards understanding the functional aspects, including policy implementation, service delivery, and governance effectiveness.
Globalization and Interconnectedness: The increasing globalization and interconnectedness of the world during this period prompted scholars to explore how public administration practices in one country were influenced by, and in turn, influenced practices in other countries. This led to a more interconnected and interdependent approach to CPA.
Policy Transfer and Learning: The new orientation of CPA recognized that countries could learn from each other's successes and failures. It sought to analyze how policy ideas and administrative practices were transferred and adapted across borders. For example, the adoption of performance-based budgeting practices from the U.S. to various European countries.
Comparative Studies on Governance Models
Focus on Governance Models: The evolving CPA placed a greater emphasis on studying different governance models and assessing their effectiveness in achieving public policy objectives. For example, comparing the decentralized governance model in Switzerland with the centralized model in France.
Incorporation of Normative Considerations: The newer forms of CPA also incorporated normative considerations, such as ethics, accountability, and transparency, into their analyses. This reflected a broader understanding of the role of public administration in promoting good governance.
Conclusion:
The evolution of Comparative Public Administration in the 1980s and 1990s marked a shift towards a more dynamic, functional, and interconnected approach. This transformation allowed for a deeper understanding of how public administration functions in different contexts and how lessons from one country can inform practices in others.
(b) In explaining the ‘development’, Weidner made a distinction between change in the output and change in the system itself; and warned that what is growth from one point of view may decline from another.” Comment. (15 Marks)
Ans:
Introduction:
Weidner's distinction between change in output and change in the system itself is a fundamental concept in the study of development. It highlights that growth or progress in one aspect of a system may not necessarily indicate overall improvement.
Output Change vs. System Change
Output Change: This refers to improvements in specific indicators or outcomes within a system. For example, an increase in GDP, a rise in educational attainment, or a decrease in poverty rates can all be considered output changes.
System Change: This pertains to fundamental transformations in the underlying structures, processes, and institutions of a system. It involves alterations in the way the system functions and is organized. For instance, a shift from an authoritarian regime to a democratic one represents a significant system change.
Warning on Perceptions of Growth Weidner's warning suggests that what may appear as growth or progress from one perspective (e.g., economic growth) may actually mask underlying issues or declines in other aspects (e.g., social inequality, environmental degradation).
Example: Consider a scenario where a country experiences rapid economic growth, leading to a substantial increase in GDP. This would be seen as an output change indicating economic development. However, if this growth is accompanied by a widening wealth gap and environmental degradation, it highlights the importance of considering system-level changes for a comprehensive understanding of development.
Conclusion:
Weidner's distinction serves as a reminder that a holistic assessment of development should consider both output changes and system-level transformations. It cautions against overly simplistic assessments based solely on isolated indicators.
(c) “Zero-based budgeting (ZBB) is based on programme efficiency rather than budget histoiy.” In the light of this, examine the advantages of ZBB over traditional budget. (15 Marks)
Ans:
Introduction:
Zero-Based Budgeting (ZBB) is an approach to budgeting that requires every expense to be justified from scratch, regardless of the previous year's budget. It focuses on program efficiency rather than relying on historical spending patterns.
Program Efficiency and Value Assessment
Elimination of Inefficient Programs: ZBB forces organizations to evaluate each program's effectiveness and necessity. This can lead to the identification and elimination of programs that are no longer delivering value.
Resource Reallocation: ZBB allows for a more dynamic allocation of resources. Funding is directed towards programs that demonstrate the highest returns, leading to more efficient resource utilization.
Cost Control and Prioritization
Cost Reduction: By scrutinizing every expense, ZBB encourages cost-consciousness. This can lead to significant cost savings as unnecessary expenditures are eliminated.
Prioritization of High-Impact Programs: ZBB ensures that resources are directed towards programs that align with organizational objectives and have a meaningful impact on outcomes.
Encourages Innovation and Creativity
Promotes Innovation: ZBB encourages managers to think innovatively about how to achieve program objectives within budget constraints. This can lead to the development of more cost-effective approaches.
Breaks from Inertia: Traditional budgeting can perpetuate the status quo. ZBB challenges assumptions and provides an opportunity for fresh ideas and approaches.
Flexibility and Adaptability
Responsive to Changing Priorities: ZBB is adaptable to changing circumstances and priorities. It allows organizations to reallocate resources in response to shifting needs or emerging opportunities.
Avoids Budget Padding: Unlike traditional budgeting, where managers may pad budgets to ensure they have enough resources, ZBB discourages such practices by requiring a detailed justification for every expense.
Example: A government agency employing ZBB might find that a certain social welfare program, despite being historically funded, is not achieving its intended outcomes. Through ZBB, they can reevaluate the program's objectives, costs, and alternatives, potentially leading to a reallocation of resources to more effective programs.
Conclusion:
Zero-Based Budgeting offers distinct advantages over traditional budgeting by prioritizing program efficiency, promoting cost control, encouraging innovation, and providing flexibility in resource allocation. By focusing on value and outcomes, ZBB can lead to more effective and efficient use of resources in organizations.
Q7:
(a) “Public policy-maMng is an effort to apply the methods of political analysis to policy areas but has concerns with processes inside the bureaucracy and stakeholders.” Discuss. (20 Marks)
Ans:
Introduction:
Public policy-making involves the application of political analysis methods to address various issues. However, it also entails considerations of bureaucratic processes and the involvement of stakeholders. This duality presents challenges in the effective implementation of policies.
Political Analysis in Policy-Making
Understanding Political Dynamics: Public policy-making requires a thorough understanding of the political landscape, including the interests, ideologies, and power dynamics among various political actors. This is crucial for formulating policies that can garner support and overcome potential opposition.
Policy Formulation and Implementation: Political analysis helps in crafting policies that align with the government's objectives and have a higher likelihood of being successfully implemented.
Concerns with Bureaucracy
Policy Implementation Challenges: Bureaucracies are responsible for executing policies, and their internal processes can sometimes be slow, inefficient, or resistant to change. This can hinder the effective implementation of well-formulated policies.
Risk of Policy Drift: Once a policy leaves the hands of policy-makers and enters the bureaucratic machinery, there's a risk of it being diluted or altered due to administrative interpretations or unforeseen challenges.
Stakeholder Engagement and Influence: Bureaucracies interact with a range of stakeholders, including interest groups, businesses, and citizens. Balancing the diverse interests and ensuring policies are not unduly influenced by powerful stakeholders can be a challenge.
Example:Consider a government aiming to implement a healthcare reform policy. The political analysis would involve understanding the various political factions' positions on healthcare, potential sources of opposition, and crafting a policy that can garner sufficient support. However, once the policy reaches the healthcare bureaucracy, challenges may arise in efficiently allocating resources, managing healthcare providers, and ensuring equitable access to services.
Conclusion:
Public policy-making requires a keen understanding of political dynamics, but it also grapples with the realities of bureaucratic processes and stakeholder engagement. Striking a balance between these aspects is crucial for the successful implementation of policies.
(b) “In career advancement, civil servants are necessitated to political superiors and hence the phenomenon poses the challenges to civil service neutrality.” Comment. (15 Marks)
Ans:
Introduction:
Civil servants often navigate their careers within hierarchical structures that necessitate interactions with political superiors. This phenomenon can raise concerns about the potential impact on civil service neutrality, which is fundamental to the functioning of a professional and impartial bureaucracy.
Necessitated Interactions with Political Superiors
Hierarchy and Chain of Command: Civil servants typically report to higher-ranking officials within their respective agencies or departments. Advancement often involves seeking approval, guidance, and mentorship from these superiors.
Policy Implementation and Advice: Civil servants play a crucial role in implementing policies. They may need to work closely with political leaders to ensure the smooth execution of government initiatives. This necessitates regular interactions with political superiors.
Challenges to Civil Service Neutrality
Risk of Politicization: Excessive dependence on political superiors for career progression may lead civil servants to prioritize political objectives over the objective and impartial execution of policies.
Pressure to Conform: Civil servants might face pressure to align their recommendations and actions with the preferences of political superiors, potentially compromising their independence and professional judgment.
Potential for Favoritism: If career advancement is perceived as contingent on political loyalty, there's a risk of favoritism in promotions and assignments, undermining the meritocratic principles of civil service.
Example: Imagine a civil servant working in a regulatory agency responsible for overseeing environmental policies. If career advancement is strongly tied to political endorsements, the civil servant might face a dilemma when a policy favored by a political superior conflicts with their professional assessment of its environmental impact.
Conclusion:
Balancing career advancement with the imperative of civil service neutrality is a critical challenge. It requires clear guidelines, merit-based evaluation, and safeguards to ensure civil servants can provide objective advice and implement policies without undue political influence.
(c) “Information Communication Technology (ICT) can harness the power of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to execute the policies more intelligently creating an efficient and effective Government.” Examine and identify the challenges. (15 Marks)
Ans:
Introduction:
Information Communication Technology (ICT) coupled with Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionize policy execution, making government operations more efficient and effective. However, this transformation is not without its challenges.
Harnessing AI for Policy Execution
Automating Routine Tasks: AI can handle repetitive and time-consuming tasks, allowing civil servants to focus on more strategic and complex issues. For example, AI-powered chatbots can handle citizen inquiries, freeing up staff for more nuanced interactions.
Data-Driven Decision-Making: AI can process large volumes of data to provide insights and recommendations for policy formulation and implementation. This enhances the accuracy and effectiveness of decision-making processes.
Challenges in Implementing ICT and AI
Data Privacy and Security: Managing sensitive citizen data requires robust security measures to prevent breaches and ensure privacy rights are protected.
Skills and Training: Introducing AI requires training civil servants in its use and ensuring they have the skills to effectively utilize these technologies.
Ethical Considerations: AI algorithms must be designed and regulated to avoid bias, discrimination, and ethical lapses in decision-making processes.
Example: Consider a government agency responsible for social welfare programs. By implementing AI-driven data analytics, the agency can identify patterns of need more accurately and allocate resources accordingly. This reduces the likelihood of resources being misallocated or individuals falling through the cracks.
Conclusion:
The integration of ICT and AI in government operations has the potential to significantly enhance efficiency and effectiveness. However, addressing challenges related to data privacy, skills development, and ethical considerations is crucial for ensuring these technologies are deployed responsibly and with maximum benefit to society.
Q8:
(a) “The management of sound public finances used to be the backbone of administrative systems; but unfortunately, it has become the prisoner of populist policies.” Critically evaluate. (20 Marks)
Ans:
Introduction:
Sound management of public finances has traditionally been a cornerstone of effective governance. However, in recent times, there has been a growing concern that populist policies, driven by short-term political gains, may undermine the prudent management of public funds.
Public Finances as Administrative Backbone
Fiscal Responsibility: Sound public finances entail responsible fiscal policies, including balanced budgets, controlled deficits, and sustainable debt levels. This provides stability and confidence in a country's economic management.
Resource Allocation: Effective management of public finances ensures that resources are allocated efficiently to meet the needs of citizens, including investments in infrastructure, healthcare, education, and social welfare.
Prisoner of Populist Policies
Short-Term Focus: Populist policies often prioritize immediate benefits to gain popularity and secure votes in the short term. This can lead to overspending, fiscal deficits, and unsustainable debt levels.
Eroding Fiscal Discipline: Populist measures, such as tax cuts or large-scale spending programs without corresponding revenue sources, can erode fiscal discipline and jeopardize long-term economic stability.
Impact on Future Generations: Excessive use of populist policies can burden future generations with the costs of servicing increased debt, potentially leading to economic instability and reduced public services in the long run.
Example: A government might implement tax cuts and increase spending on popular programs in the lead-up to an election to gain favor with voters. While this may provide short-term economic stimulus and garner political support, it can strain public finances in the long term.
Conclusion:
While addressing the immediate needs and aspirations of citizens is important, it is crucial to strike a balance between populism and responsible fiscal management. Prioritizing sound public finances ensures a stable and sustainable economic environment for future generations.
(b) “Women empowerment is essential for sustainable development; hence it should not be reflected only in programmes but promoting concrete actions to ensure the participation across institutions and communities.” Critically examine. (15 Marks)
Ans:
Introduction:
Women empowerment is a critical factor for achieving sustainable development. It goes beyond mere programmatic inclusion and requires concrete actions to ensure women's meaningful participation across institutions and communities.
Essential for Sustainable Development
Economic Growth: Empowering women in economic activities leads to increased productivity, income generation, and poverty reduction. This, in turn, contributes to overall economic growth and stability.
Social Well-being: Women's empowerment is linked to improved health, education, and overall well-being of families and communities. When women have decision-making power, resources are more likely to be allocated for the betterment of the entire household.
Beyond Programmatic Inclusion
Political Participation: Empowerment involves ensuring women's active participation in political processes, including representation in legislatures, local governments, and decision-making bodies.
Economic Opportunities: Concrete actions should focus on creating an enabling environment for women entrepreneurs, ensuring equal access to credit, markets, and resources.
Education and Skill-building: Women should have access to quality education and skill development programs that enable them to participate in diverse sectors of the economy.
Example Rwanda is often cited as a positive example of women's empowerment in politics. Through targeted policies and efforts, Rwanda has achieved one of the highest levels of women's representation in parliament globally, contributing to a more inclusive and diverse political landscape.
Conclusion:
Women empowerment is not a peripheral issue; it is central to sustainable development. It requires concerted efforts to break down systemic barriers and promote concrete actions that ensure women's active participation in all spheres of society.
(c) “Training is not a short affair; rather it is a step-by-step process of developing skills, habits, knowledge and aptitude.” Elucidate. (15 Marks)
Ans:
Introduction:
Training is a systematic process that involves the development of skills, habits, knowledge, and aptitude. It is not a one-time event, but rather a continuous, step-by-step approach to building expertise.
Skills Development
Building Competencies: Training aims to enhance specific skills and competencies required for a particular job or role. This can include technical skills, communication skills, leadership abilities, etc.
Adaptation to Changing Environments: In a rapidly evolving world, ongoing training is essential to adapt to new technologies, methodologies, and best practices.
Habit Formation
Repetition and Consistency: Training involves regular practice and reinforcement to ensure that new behaviors and practices become ingrained habits.
Sustainability of Performance: Through consistent training, individuals can maintain high levels of performance and productivity over the long term.
Knowledge Enhancement
Continuous Learning: Training provides opportunities for individuals to acquire new knowledge, stay updated on industry trends, and deepen their expertise in specific areas.
Problem-solving and Innovation: Well-rounded training programs stimulate critical thinking and creativity, enabling individuals to tackle complex challenges and drive innovation.
Aptitude Development
Attitude and Mindset: Training can also influence attitudes, beliefs, and mindsets, fostering a positive and growth-oriented approach to work and personal development.
Professional Development: Through training, individuals can align their skills, knowledge, and attitudes with organizational goals, contributing to their own growth and the success of the organization.
Example: Consider a sales team in a company. Regular training sessions on product knowledge, negotiation skills, and customer relationship management can significantly improve their performance and effectiveness in driving sales.
Conclusion:
Training is a dynamic and multifaceted process that encompasses skills development, habit formation, knowledge enhancement, and aptitude development. It is essential for personal and professional growth and plays a crucial role in achieving organizational objectives.
1. What is the pattern of the UPSC Mains Public Administration Paper 1? |
2. What is the significance of Section B in the UPSC Mains Public Administration Paper 1? |
3. How should one prepare for Section B of the UPSC Mains Public Administration Paper 1? |
4. Are there any specific topics or areas that candidates should pay more attention to in Section B of the UPSC Mains Public Administration Paper 1? |
5. How can candidates effectively manage their time while attempting Section B of the UPSC Mains Public Administration Paper 1? |
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|