Vishwanath Pratap Singh
Syed Salauddin
Mandal Commission, formed during Janata Party rule, submitted its report in December 1980; however, subsequent Congress governments, led by Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi, did not implement the recommendations.
The commission advocated a connection between caste and backwardness, emphasizing the underrepresentation of Other Backward Castes (OBCs) in higher administration. It proposed a 27% job reservation in the central government for OBCs, in addition to existing reservations for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST). Similar age relaxations were recommended for OBC candidates as for SC/ST.
Mandal Commission
V.P. Singh, seeking OBC support and to strengthen the Janata Dal's caste coalition, announced on August 7, 1990, the acceptance of the Mandal Commission recommendations, specifically implementing a 27% job reservation in the central government for socially and educationally backward classes.
Widespread protests erupted, particularly in North India, with instances of self-immolation and suicides among upper-caste youth who perceived heightened competition for government jobs. The southern states, already having reservation policies, remained largely unaffected.
The Supreme Court initially stayed the order, intervening in response to the protests. In November 1992, a nine-judge bench ruled 6-3 in favor of the reservation policy, with dissenting judges advocating for impersonal criteria over caste. The court imposed conditions: total reservations not to exceed 50%, and the caste criterion to be restricted to recruitment, not applicable to promotions.
By the time of the judgment, political parties acknowledged the electoral significance of the OBC factor in northern India and reconciled with the reservation order.
The BJP grappled with internal divisions regarding the Mandal Commission recommendations, with some members expressing concerns about potential Hindu society fragmentation, while others acknowledged the importance of addressing the aspirations of Other Backward Classes (OBCs).
In response to this internal dilemma, the BJP opted for a strategic shift in focus, emphasizing the construction of a Ram temple to mobilize Hindus. This decision was marked by L.K. Advani's leadership in initiating the Ram Rath Yatra, commencing in Somnath in September 1990.
The Ram Rath Yatra was planned to conclude in Ayodhya after touring various states, posing a significant challenge for Prime Minister V.P. Singh in terms of response and management.
Ram Rath Yatra, 1990
Chief Minister of Bihar, Lalu Prasad Yadav, took action to prevent the yatra from reaching Ayodhya, resulting in the arrest of Advani on charges of disturbing the peace and inciting communal tension. Advani was placed under preventive detention in a guest house during the yatra's passage through Bihar.
The aftermath of the yatra included widespread disturbances, particularly with the arrest of kar sevaks in Uttar Pradesh. This led to clashes and communal tensions between security forces and supporters of the temple construction.
As a consequence of these events, the BJP withdrew its support from the National Front government. Prime Minister V.P. Singh subsequently resigned in November 1990 following the loss of a confidence vote in the Lok Sabha.
Chandra Shekhar
The economic situation deteriorated significantly, with a dangerous reduction in foreign exchange levels due to fiscal imbalances and a substantial debt burden from previous Congress-led governments.
In January 1991, Chandra Shekhar's government, with Finance Minister Yashwant Sinha, secured IMF approval for two loans, committing to economic reforms in return.
During the February budget session, Congress withdrew support, preventing the minority government from presenting the complete budget.
Budget Session, 1991
In March 1991, facing a severe foreign exchange crisis, the government pledged the country's gold reserves, approved through an unconventional proposal involving confiscated gold.
Global credit-rating agencies placed India on watch by mid-March, making it challenging to secure funds. With no full budget or commitment to reforms, obtaining further funding from multilateral institutions became impossible.
Despite public criticism, Chandra Shekhar, as caretaker prime minister, authorized the gold pledge to address the liquidity crisis, a move crucial for the balance of payments and future economic reforms.
Chandra Shekhar's resignation in March 1991 led to the dissolution of the Lok Sabha, with President Venkataraman asking him to continue as caretaker prime minister until the new government assumed office in June.
The first phase of the General Elections unfolded in May 1991, only to be overshadowed by a tragic event on the night of May 21—the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi. The subsequent phase of elections proceeded in June.
Rajiv Gandhi
Notably, the election results portrayed a discernible difference between the two phases. Before Rajiv's assassination, the Congress party's performance was relatively modest. However, in the June phase, there was a significant upswing in Congress's performance, reflecting a distinct sympathy wave.
Ultimately, despite becoming the largest party with 244 seats, the Congress fell short of securing a simple majority in the House, highlighting the complex dynamics and impact of the tragic event on the electoral landscape.
111 videos|466 docs|173 tests
|
1. Who were V.P. Singh and Chandra Shekhar? |
2. What were the major accomplishments of the V.P. Singh and Chandra Shekhar governments? |
3. How did the V.P. Singh and Chandra Shekhar governments change India's political landscape? |
4. What were the key challenges faced by the V.P. Singh and Chandra Shekhar governments? |
5. What was the significance of the V.P. Singh and Chandra Shekhar governments in Indian history? |
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|