Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Notes  >  Civil Law for Judiciary Exams  >  The Concept Of Defamation and Its Types

The Concept Of Defamation and Its Types | Civil Law for Judiciary Exams PDF Download

The Concept of Defamation

  • Defamation refers to an oral or written statement that harms another person's reputation.
  • Libel and slander are two types of defamation:
    • Libel: Written and published statements.
    • Slander: Spoken statements that lead to a loss of reputation.
  • Libel is actionable both as a tort and a criminal offense, while slander is a civil injury.

Elements to Prove Defamation

  • The statement must be made, either in writing, verbally, or through visible representation.
  • The statement must directly refer to the person claiming defamation.
  • The statement should be defamatory, diminishing others' good opinion of the person.
  • The statement must be false, as truth is a defense against defamation.
  • The statement must be published, causing actual loss of reputation.

The Defenses Available Against Defamation

1. If the Spoken Words are Truth: If a statement is true, it serves as an absolute defense against defamation. The burden of proof lies with the defendant to prove otherwise.
2. Fair and Bonafide Comment: A statement that is fair and serves the public's best interest is not considered defamatory.
3. Absolute Privilege: Privileged communication, such as that between a husband and wife or within certain official positions, is protected from defamation claims.

  • Example: In the case of T.J Ponnen vs M. C Verghese, the court ruled that communication between spouses is not defamatory.
  • Example: Chatterson vs Secretary of the State established that certain official positions, like parliamentary secretary, are also protected.

Question for The Concept Of Defamation and Its Types
Try yourself:
Which type of defamation refers to spoken statements that lead to a loss of reputation?
View Solution

Exemptions from Defamatory Statements

There are situations where statements are exempt from being considered defamatory:

  • During judicial proceedings.
  • By government officials.
  • By legislators during parliamentary debates.
  • During political speeches in parliamentary proceedings.
  • Communication between spouses.

Considerations for Determining Compensation

When deciding on the amount of compensation in defamation cases, the court considers various factors:

  • The conduct of the plaintiff.
  • The absence or refusal of retraction or apology by the defendant.
  • The defendant's conduct from the date of publication to the decree.
  • The defendant's social standing.
  • The nature of the libelous statement.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the defamation law serves as a crucial mechanism to safeguard individuals' reputations from false and misleading statements. When determining the amount of compensation, the court considers various factors such as the plaintiff's conduct, the presence or absence of a retraction or apology for the libel, the plaintiff's societal standing, and the nature of the libel. These considerations play a significant role in shaping the court's decision on the appropriate compensation in defamation cases.

Question for The Concept Of Defamation and Its Types
Try yourself:
Which of the following situations is exempt from being considered defamatory?
View Solution

The document The Concept Of Defamation and Its Types | Civil Law for Judiciary Exams is a part of the Judiciary Exams Course Civil Law for Judiciary Exams.
All you need of Judiciary Exams at this link: Judiciary Exams
253 docs|259 tests

Up next

FAQs on The Concept Of Defamation and Its Types - Civil Law for Judiciary Exams

1. What are the elements required to prove defamation?
Ans. The elements required to prove defamation typically include a false statement about the plaintiff, publication of the statement to a third party, fault on the part of the defendant in making the statement, and resulting harm to the plaintiff's reputation.
2. What are some common defenses available against defamation claims?
Ans. Some common defenses available against defamation claims include truth or substantial truth of the statement, privilege (such as absolute privilege or qualified privilege), opinion or fair comment, and consent.
3. Can a statement be considered defamatory if it is true?
Ans. Generally, truth is a complete defense to a defamation claim. If a statement is true, it cannot be considered defamatory as defamation requires the statement to be false.
4. How is defamation law summarized in terms of ensuring protection against false statements that harm a person's reputation?
Ans. Defamation law is summarized as providing a legal remedy for individuals who have been harmed by false statements that damage their reputation. It aims to balance the protection of reputation with freedom of speech.
5. What are the different types of defamation and how do they differ?
Ans. The two main types of defamation are libel (written defamation) and slander (spoken defamation). Libel is usually considered more harmful as it is more permanent and visible, while slander is typically more transient and harder to prove.
253 docs|259 tests
Download as PDF

Up next

Explore Courses for Judiciary Exams exam
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Related Searches

Exam

,

The Concept Of Defamation and Its Types | Civil Law for Judiciary Exams

,

Sample Paper

,

The Concept Of Defamation and Its Types | Civil Law for Judiciary Exams

,

The Concept Of Defamation and Its Types | Civil Law for Judiciary Exams

,

mock tests for examination

,

ppt

,

MCQs

,

Extra Questions

,

Semester Notes

,

practice quizzes

,

Viva Questions

,

Summary

,

pdf

,

Previous Year Questions with Solutions

,

Important questions

,

past year papers

,

Free

,

Objective type Questions

,

video lectures

,

shortcuts and tricks

,

study material

;