Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Notes  >  Civil Law for Judiciary Exams  >  Essentials of Defamation

Essentials of Defamation | Civil Law for Judiciary Exams PDF Download

Essentials of Defamation

The essentials of defamation include: The statement must be defamatory, meaning it lowers the reputation of the plaintiff. The statement must refer to the plaintiff, and it must be published or communicated to a third party.

The Statement Must Lower the Reputation of the Plaintiff

  • To establish defamation, the statement in question must be defamatory, meaning it tends to lower the reputation of the plaintiff. Whether a statement is defamatory depends on how right-thinking members of society are likely to perceive it. The defendant cannot use a defense that the statement was not intended to be defamatory if it causes a feeling of hatred, contempt, or dislike.
  • For example, in a legal case such as Ram Jethmalani v. Subramanian Swamy, the court found that Dr. Swamy defamed Mr. Jethmalani by making false allegations. This case illustrates how defamation can harm an individual's reputation.

Question for Essentials of Defamation
Try yourself:
What are the essential elements of defamation?
View Solution

The Statement Must Refer to the Plaintiff

  • In a defamation case, the plaintiff must prove that the statement in question referred to them. It is immaterial whether the defendant intended to defame the plaintiff. If the statement was published in a way that could reasonably be inferred to refer to the plaintiff, the defendant can be held liable.
  • For instance, in the case of T.V. Ramasubha Iyer v. A.M.A Mohindeen, the defendants were held accountable for damaging the reputation of the plaintiff through a published statement, even though there was no malicious intent.

The Statement Must Be Published

  • Publication of a defamatory statement to someone other than the person defamed is crucial for legal action. Without publication, no defamation claim can be made.
  • For example, in the case of Mahendra Ram v. Harnandan Prasad, the defendant was held responsible for sending a defamatory letter to the plaintiff, even though the plaintiff couldn't read the letter himself.

Innuendo

  • Definition: In the realm of defamation law, innuendo alludes to the hidden or underlying meaning of a statement that might not be immediately evident.
  • Explanation: Even seemingly harmless statements can be considered defamatory if they carry a concealed or implied message that could damage someone's reputation.
  • Example 1: For instance, stating that a woman has given birth to a child might be defamatory if she is unmarried, implying socially unacceptable behavior.
  • Example 2: In the case of Tolley v J. S. Fry & Sons, Ltd (1931) A.C. 333, an advertisement implied that a golf champion endorsed a product, leading to a defamation ruling.
  • Key Point: Intent to defame is not a requirement for a statement to be deemed defamatory; it depends on how the statement is perceived by those who read or hear it.
  • Legal Precedent: In Cassidy v Daily Mirror Newspapers Ltd. (1929) 2 K.B. 331, an apparently innocent newspaper caption was found to carry defamatory innuendo, even though unintentional.

Question for Essentials of Defamation
Try yourself:
What is one of the key requirements for a statement to be considered defamatory in a defamation case?
View Solution

Conclusion

Defamation, a legal concept, refers to the dissemination of false statements that inflict harm on the reputation of an individual or entity. This constitutes a civil wrong and is subject to legal consequences under Indian law. The key elements of defamation include the requirement that the statement is defamatory, specifically refers to the plaintiff, and is published, establishing the grounds for holding the person responsible for the statement liable.

The document Essentials of Defamation | Civil Law for Judiciary Exams is a part of the Judiciary Exams Course Civil Law for Judiciary Exams.
All you need of Judiciary Exams at this link: Judiciary Exams
253 docs|259 tests

Up next

FAQs on Essentials of Defamation - Civil Law for Judiciary Exams

1. What is defamation?
Ans. Defamation is when someone makes a false statement about another person that harms their reputation.
2. What are the two types of defamation?
Ans. The two types of defamation are libel, which involves written statements, and slander, which involves spoken statements.
3. What are the elements needed to prove defamation?
Ans. To prove defamation, the plaintiff must show that the statement was false, that it was communicated to a third party, and that it caused harm to the plaintiff's reputation.
4. Can opinions be considered defamatory?
Ans. Generally, opinions are not considered defamatory because they are subjective and cannot be proven true or false.
5. What defenses are available for defamation?
Ans. Common defenses for defamation include truth (the statement is true), privilege (the statement was made in a privileged context), and consent (the plaintiff consented to the statement).
253 docs|259 tests
Download as PDF

Up next

Explore Courses for Judiciary Exams exam
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Related Searches

Objective type Questions

,

Essentials of Defamation | Civil Law for Judiciary Exams

,

MCQs

,

Sample Paper

,

practice quizzes

,

Extra Questions

,

Free

,

Semester Notes

,

video lectures

,

Exam

,

Essentials of Defamation | Civil Law for Judiciary Exams

,

Essentials of Defamation | Civil Law for Judiciary Exams

,

mock tests for examination

,

study material

,

shortcuts and tricks

,

Previous Year Questions with Solutions

,

Important questions

,

pdf

,

Viva Questions

,

ppt

,

Summary

,

past year papers

;