All Exams >
BPSC (Bihar) >
History for State PSC Exams >
All Questions
All questions of The Advent of Europeans in India for BPSC (Bihar) Exam
Which Portuguese Governor initiated the policy of marrying with the natives of India and banned the practice of Sati in his area of influence?- a) Francisco De Almeida
- b) Alfonso De Albuquerque
- c) Nino De Cunha
- d) None of them
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Which Portuguese Governor initiated the policy of marrying with the natives of India and banned the practice of Sati in his area of influence?
a)
Francisco De Almeida
b)
Alfonso De Albuquerque
c)
Nino De Cunha
d)
None of them
|
Garima Tiwari answered |
Alfonso De Albuquerque, the Portuguese Governor, initiated the policy of marrying with the natives of India and banned the practice of Sati in his area of influence. Here are some details about his contributions:
Alfonso De Albuquerque:
- Alfonso De Albuquerque was a Portuguese general, admiral, and statesman, who established a Portuguese empire in the Indian Ocean with his conquests of Goa, Malacca, and Hormuz.
- He was the second governor of Portuguese India, succeeding Francisco De Almeida in 1509.
- He is known for his policies of assimilation and integration with the local population of India, which included the promotion of intermarriage between Portuguese men and Indian women.
- He also banned the practice of Sati, which was the ritual of burning widows on their husband's funeral pyre, in his area of influence.
- His policies were aimed at creating a stable and peaceful relationship between the Portuguese and the local population, and he believed that assimilation was the key to achieving this goal.
- However, his policies were not always successful, and he faced opposition from both the Portuguese authorities and the local population.
- Despite this, his contributions to Portuguese India are significant, and his legacy is still felt in the region today.
In conclusion, Alfonso De Albuquerque was the Portuguese Governor who initiated the policy of marrying with the natives of India and banned the practice of Sati in his area of influence. His policies were aimed at creating a stable and peaceful relationship between the Portuguese and the local population, and his legacy is still felt in the region today.
Alfonso De Albuquerque:
- Alfonso De Albuquerque was a Portuguese general, admiral, and statesman, who established a Portuguese empire in the Indian Ocean with his conquests of Goa, Malacca, and Hormuz.
- He was the second governor of Portuguese India, succeeding Francisco De Almeida in 1509.
- He is known for his policies of assimilation and integration with the local population of India, which included the promotion of intermarriage between Portuguese men and Indian women.
- He also banned the practice of Sati, which was the ritual of burning widows on their husband's funeral pyre, in his area of influence.
- His policies were aimed at creating a stable and peaceful relationship between the Portuguese and the local population, and he believed that assimilation was the key to achieving this goal.
- However, his policies were not always successful, and he faced opposition from both the Portuguese authorities and the local population.
- Despite this, his contributions to Portuguese India are significant, and his legacy is still felt in the region today.
In conclusion, Alfonso De Albuquerque was the Portuguese Governor who initiated the policy of marrying with the natives of India and banned the practice of Sati in his area of influence. His policies were aimed at creating a stable and peaceful relationship between the Portuguese and the local population, and his legacy is still felt in the region today.
Which of the following were among the causes of the French failure? 1. Inadequate military and financial support 2. France's involvement in Europe 3. Sound Commercial base of the English Company 4. Lack of commercial incentive to the French company Choose from the following options:- a) 1 and 2 only
- b) 3 and 4 only
- c) 1 and 4 Only
- d) All of them
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following were among the causes of the French failure?
1. Inadequate military and financial support
2. France's involvement in Europe
3. Sound Commercial base of the English Company
4. Lack of commercial incentive to the French company
Choose from the following options:
a)
1 and 2 only
b)
3 and 4 only
c)
1 and 4 Only
d)
All of them
|
Nisha Nair answered |
All are the causes of French Failure. Causes of the French Failure:
- Inadequate Military and Financial Support
- France's Involvement in Europe
- I managed Policy of Imperial France
- Lack of Commercial Incentive to the French Company
- Sound Commercial Base of the English Company
He assumed the office of the governor of Portuguese in India in 1529. He shifted the headquarters of the Portuguese government in India from Cochin to Goa. He also attempted to increase Portuguese influence in Bengal by settling many Portuguese nationals there with Hooghly as their headquarters. Which personality is being discussed?- a) Francisco De Almeida
- b) Alfonso De Albuquerque
- c) Nino Da Cunha
- d) Pedro Alvares Cabral
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
He assumed the office of the governor of Portuguese in India in 1529. He shifted the headquarters of the Portuguese government in India from Cochin to Goa. He also attempted to increase Portuguese influence in Bengal by settling many Portuguese nationals there with Hooghly as their headquarters. Which personality is being discussed?
a)
Francisco De Almeida
b)
Alfonso De Albuquerque
c)
Nino Da Cunha
d)
Pedro Alvares Cabral
|
Meera Kapoor answered |
- Nino da Cunha assumed the office of the governor of Portuguese interests in India in November 1529 and almost one year later shifted the headquarters of the Portuguese government in India from Cochin to Goa.
- Da Cunha also attempted to increase Portuguese influence in Bengal by settling many Portuguese nationals there with Hooghly as their headquarters.
Consider the following statements:Statement-I:
Francis de Almeida captured Goa from the ruler of Bijapur in 1510.Statement-II:
The British East India Company gained a foothold in India in 1612 when Mughal emperor Jahangir granted the rights to establish a factory in Surat.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?- a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
- b)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
- c)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
- d)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
Statement-I:
Francis de Almeida captured Goa from the ruler of Bijapur in 1510.
Francis de Almeida captured Goa from the ruler of Bijapur in 1510.
Statement-II:
The British East India Company gained a foothold in India in 1612 when Mughal emperor Jahangir granted the rights to establish a factory in Surat.
The British East India Company gained a foothold in India in 1612 when Mughal emperor Jahangir granted the rights to establish a factory in Surat.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
a)
Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
b)
Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
c)
Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
d)
Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
|
Upsc Rank Holders answered |
Afonso de Albuquerque succeeded Dom Francisco de Almeida as Governor of the Portuguese State of India in 1509. Afonso de Albuquerque conquered Goa in 1510 CE. He conquered Goa by defeating Bijapur Sultanate Adil Shah.
It gained a foothold in India with the establishment of a factory in Masulipatnam on the Eastern coast of India in 1611 and the grant of the rights to establish a factory in Surat in 1612 by the Mughal emperor Jahangir.
so Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
It gained a foothold in India with the establishment of a factory in Masulipatnam on the Eastern coast of India in 1611 and the grant of the rights to establish a factory in Surat in 1612 by the Mughal emperor Jahangir.
so Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
Which of these statements are correct about Farrukhsiyar's Farmans?
1. The company was permitted to rent more land around Calcutta
2. It was decreed that the coins of the company minted at Bombay was to have currency throughout the Mughal Empire
3. The company was permitted to issue Dastaks (Passes) for transportation of goods
Choose from the following options:
- a)1 and 3 Only
- b)2 and 3 Only
- c)1 and 2 only
- d)1, 2, and 3 only
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of these statements are correct about Farrukhsiyar's Farmans?
1. The company was permitted to rent more land around Calcutta
2. It was decreed that the coins of the company minted at Bombay was to have currency throughout the Mughal Empire
3. The company was permitted to issue Dastaks (Passes) for transportation of goods
Choose from the following options:
a)
1 and 3 Only
b)
2 and 3 Only
c)
1 and 2 only
d)
1, 2, and 3 only
|
Shilpa Bajaj answered |
Farrukhsiyar's Farmans were a series of royal edicts issued by Mughal Emperor Farrukhsiyar to the English East India Company. The correct statement about these farmans are:
1. Permission to rent more land around Calcutta: This is a correct statement. In 1717, Farrukhsiyar issued a farman that granted the English East India Company the right to rent additional land around Calcutta for business purposes.
2. Decree for coins of the company to have currency throughout the Mughal Empire: This is also a correct statement. In 1717, the emperor granted the company the right to mint coins at its Bombay mint that would be recognized and accepted as currency throughout the Mughal Empire.
3. Permission to issue Dastaks (Passes) for transportation of goods: This is also a correct statement. In 1717, Farrukhsiyar issued a farman that allowed the English East India Company to issue dastaks or passes for the transportation of goods, which would exempt them from paying tolls and other taxes.
Therefore, the correct answer is option D, which states that none of the statements are incorrect.
1. Permission to rent more land around Calcutta: This is a correct statement. In 1717, Farrukhsiyar issued a farman that granted the English East India Company the right to rent additional land around Calcutta for business purposes.
2. Decree for coins of the company to have currency throughout the Mughal Empire: This is also a correct statement. In 1717, the emperor granted the company the right to mint coins at its Bombay mint that would be recognized and accepted as currency throughout the Mughal Empire.
3. Permission to issue Dastaks (Passes) for transportation of goods: This is also a correct statement. In 1717, Farrukhsiyar issued a farman that allowed the English East India Company to issue dastaks or passes for the transportation of goods, which would exempt them from paying tolls and other taxes.
Therefore, the correct answer is option D, which states that none of the statements are incorrect.
Consider the following statements: 1. The industrial revolution reached other European Nations late and this helped England to maintain its hegemony 2. The English learned from the Portuguese the importance of an efficient Navy and improved their fleet technologically 3. One of the major and innovative reasons, why Britain succeeded between the mid 18th century and mid-19th century, while other European Nations fell, was that it used the Dept market to fund its wars Which of these statements is/are correct?- a) 1 and 2 only
- b) 1 Only
- c) 1 and 3 Only
- d) All are Correct
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
1. The industrial revolution reached other European Nations late and this helped England to maintain its hegemony
2. The English learned from the Portuguese the importance of an efficient Navy and improved their fleet technologically
3. One of the major and innovative reasons, why Britain succeeded between the mid 18th century and mid-19th century, while other European Nations fell, was that it used the Dept market to fund its wars
Which of these statements is/are correct?
a)
1 and 2 only
b)
1 Only
c)
1 and 3 Only
d)
All are Correct
|
Athul Chauhan answered |
- The industrial revolution started in England in the early 18th century. With the invention of new machines like the steam engine and the power loom, the industrial revolution helped England to maintain its hegemony. Hence, statement 1st is correct.
- The Royal Navy of Britain was not only the largest but it was the most advanced of its Times. In India, the British were able to defeat the Portuguese and the French due to the strong and fast movement of the naval ships, the English learn from the Portuguese the importance of an efficient Navy and improve their fleet technologically. Hence, statement 2nd is correct.
- The world's first Central Bank, the Bank of England, was established to sell government debt to the money market on the promise of a decent return on Britain's defeating Rival companies like France and Spain. So Britain used the Debt market to fund it. Hence, statement 3rd is also correct.
Who was the real founder of Portuguese power in the East?- a)Francisco De Almeida
- b)Alfonso de Albuquerque
- c)Nino da Cunha
- d)Bahadur Shah of Gujarat
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Who was the real founder of Portuguese power in the East?
a)
Francisco De Almeida
b)
Alfonso de Albuquerque
c)
Nino da Cunha
d)
Bahadur Shah of Gujarat
|
Goel UPSC Coaching Center answered |
Alfonso de Albuquerque is recognized as the real founder of Portuguese power in the East. His strategic strongholds in East Africa and key locations in India significantly bolstered Portuguese influence in the region. Albuquerque's leadership and military prowess played a pivotal role in establishing and expanding Portuguese dominance in these territories.
Consider the following statements:1. Francisco De Almeida was appointed by the King of Portugal to consolidate the Portuguese position in India and destroy Muslim trade.2. Nuno da Cunha shifted the headquarters of the Portuguese government in India from Cochin to Goa.3. The Portuguese administration in India was known for its tolerant religious policies towards Muslims.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?- a)1 Only
- b)1 and 2 Only
- c)1 and 3 Only
- d)1, 2 and 3
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
1. Francisco De Almeida was appointed by the King of Portugal to consolidate the Portuguese position in India and destroy Muslim trade.
2. Nuno da Cunha shifted the headquarters of the Portuguese government in India from Cochin to Goa.
3. The Portuguese administration in India was known for its tolerant religious policies towards Muslims.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
a)
1 Only
b)
1 and 2 Only
c)
1 and 3 Only
d)
1, 2 and 3
|
|
Abhijeet Shah answered |
Analysis of Statements
To determine the correctness of the statements regarding the Portuguese in India, we analyze each one:
Statement 1: Francisco De Almeida's Appointment
- Francisco De Almeida was indeed appointed by the King of Portugal as the first Viceroy of India in 1505.
- His primary objectives included consolidating Portuguese power in the region and disrupting Muslim trade routes.
Verdict: This statement is correct.
Statement 2: Nuno da Cunha's Shift of Headquarters
- Nuno da Cunha, who served as the Governor of India, did transfer the Portuguese headquarters from Cochin to Goa in 1530.
- This move was strategic, enhancing Portuguese control and influence in India.
Verdict: This statement is also correct.
Statement 3: Religious Policies Towards Muslims
- The Portuguese administration in India was not known for its religious tolerance, especially towards Muslims.
- They often imposed restrictions and were more aligned with promoting Christianity, leading to conflicts with Muslim traders and rulers.
Verdict: This statement is incorrect.
Conclusion
- The correct statements are 1 and 2, while statement 3 is false.
Correct Answer: Option 'B' (1 and 2 Only).
To determine the correctness of the statements regarding the Portuguese in India, we analyze each one:
Statement 1: Francisco De Almeida's Appointment
- Francisco De Almeida was indeed appointed by the King of Portugal as the first Viceroy of India in 1505.
- His primary objectives included consolidating Portuguese power in the region and disrupting Muslim trade routes.
Verdict: This statement is correct.
Statement 2: Nuno da Cunha's Shift of Headquarters
- Nuno da Cunha, who served as the Governor of India, did transfer the Portuguese headquarters from Cochin to Goa in 1530.
- This move was strategic, enhancing Portuguese control and influence in India.
Verdict: This statement is also correct.
Statement 3: Religious Policies Towards Muslims
- The Portuguese administration in India was not known for its religious tolerance, especially towards Muslims.
- They often imposed restrictions and were more aligned with promoting Christianity, leading to conflicts with Muslim traders and rulers.
Verdict: This statement is incorrect.
Conclusion
- The correct statements are 1 and 2, while statement 3 is false.
Correct Answer: Option 'B' (1 and 2 Only).
Consider the following pairs:1. Francisco de Almeida - Established a factory at Calicut2. Vasco Da Gama - Led by a Gujarati pilot named Abdul Majid3. Francisco de Almeida - Opposed establishing a territorial empire4. Afonso de Albuquerque - Took control of GoaHow many pairs given above are correctly matched?- a)Only one pair
- b)Only two pairs
- c)Only three pairs
- d)All four pairs
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following pairs:
1. Francisco de Almeida - Established a factory at Calicut
2. Vasco Da Gama - Led by a Gujarati pilot named Abdul Majid
3. Francisco de Almeida - Opposed establishing a territorial empire
4. Afonso de Albuquerque - Took control of Goa
How many pairs given above are correctly matched?
a)
Only one pair
b)
Only two pairs
c)
Only three pairs
d)
All four pairs
|
|
Ayush Yadav answered |
Correctly Matched Pairs:
1. Francisco de Almeida - Established a factory at Calicut
Francisco de Almeida, the Portuguese viceroy, indeed established the first Portuguese factory in India at Calicut in 1502. This move marked the beginning of Portuguese presence in India and their trade relations with the region.
2. Vasco Da Gama - Led by a Gujarati pilot named Abdul Majid
Vasco Da Gama, the famous Portuguese explorer, was indeed led by a Gujarati pilot named Abdul Majid during his voyage to India in 1498. Abdul Majid played a crucial role in guiding Da Gama through the Indian Ocean.
3. Francisco de Almeida - Opposed establishing a territorial empire
Francisco de Almeida, despite being a powerful viceroy, was known for his opposition to the idea of establishing a territorial empire in India. He believed in focusing on trade and maintaining a network of factories rather than territorial conquests.
Incorrectly Matched Pair:
4. Afonso de Albuquerque - Took control of Goa
The pair mentioning Afonso de Albuquerque taking control of Goa is incorrect. It was actually Albuquerque who conquered Goa in 1510, not Francisco de Almeida. Albuquerque's conquest of Goa played a significant role in establishing Portuguese dominance in the region.
Therefore, out of the given pairs, three are correctly matched while one pair is incorrect. The correct answer is option 'C) Only three pairs'.
1. Francisco de Almeida - Established a factory at Calicut
Francisco de Almeida, the Portuguese viceroy, indeed established the first Portuguese factory in India at Calicut in 1502. This move marked the beginning of Portuguese presence in India and their trade relations with the region.
2. Vasco Da Gama - Led by a Gujarati pilot named Abdul Majid
Vasco Da Gama, the famous Portuguese explorer, was indeed led by a Gujarati pilot named Abdul Majid during his voyage to India in 1498. Abdul Majid played a crucial role in guiding Da Gama through the Indian Ocean.
3. Francisco de Almeida - Opposed establishing a territorial empire
Francisco de Almeida, despite being a powerful viceroy, was known for his opposition to the idea of establishing a territorial empire in India. He believed in focusing on trade and maintaining a network of factories rather than territorial conquests.
Incorrectly Matched Pair:
4. Afonso de Albuquerque - Took control of Goa
The pair mentioning Afonso de Albuquerque taking control of Goa is incorrect. It was actually Albuquerque who conquered Goa in 1510, not Francisco de Almeida. Albuquerque's conquest of Goa played a significant role in establishing Portuguese dominance in the region.
Therefore, out of the given pairs, three are correctly matched while one pair is incorrect. The correct answer is option 'C) Only three pairs'.
Consider the following statements:
Statement-I:
The English secured permission to set up Agra, Ahmedabad, and Broach factories.
Statement-II:
The French East India Company was reorganized as the 'Perpetual Company of the Indies' in 1720.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
- a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
- b)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
- c)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
- d)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
Statement-I:
The English secured permission to set up Agra, Ahmedabad, and Broach factories.
The English secured permission to set up Agra, Ahmedabad, and Broach factories.
Statement-II:
The French East India Company was reorganized as the 'Perpetual Company of the Indies' in 1720.
The French East India Company was reorganized as the 'Perpetual Company of the Indies' in 1720.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
a)
Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
b)
Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
c)
Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
d)
Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
|
|
Tanishq Sengupta answered |
Explanation:
Statement-I:
- The statement is incorrect. It was actually the English who secured permission to set up Agra, Ahmedabad, and Broach factories in India, not the French. These factories played a significant role in the establishment of English trade in India.
Statement-II:
- The statement is incorrect. The French East India Company was actually reorganized as the 'Company of the Indies' in 1719, not in 1720 as mentioned in the statement.
Conclusion:
- From the above explanation, it can be concluded that Statement-I is correct (regarding the English securing permission for factories) while Statement-II is incorrect (regarding the reorganization of the French East India Company).
Statement-I:
- The statement is incorrect. It was actually the English who secured permission to set up Agra, Ahmedabad, and Broach factories in India, not the French. These factories played a significant role in the establishment of English trade in India.
Statement-II:
- The statement is incorrect. The French East India Company was actually reorganized as the 'Company of the Indies' in 1719, not in 1720 as mentioned in the statement.
Conclusion:
- From the above explanation, it can be concluded that Statement-I is correct (regarding the English securing permission for factories) while Statement-II is incorrect (regarding the reorganization of the French East India Company).
Consider the following statements:
- The Anglo-Dutch Treaty of 1824 required the Dutch to withdraw from their possessions in India, marking the end of their commercial presence in the region.
- The system of Cartazes was introduced by the British to regulate maritime trade in the Indian Ocean.
- The Battle of Wandiwash in 1760 was a decisive victory for the British over the French, significantly reducing French territorial claims in India.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- a)Only one
- b)Only two
- c)All three
- d)None
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
- The Anglo-Dutch Treaty of 1824 required the Dutch to withdraw from their possessions in India, marking the end of their commercial presence in the region.
- The system of Cartazes was introduced by the British to regulate maritime trade in the Indian Ocean.
- The Battle of Wandiwash in 1760 was a decisive victory for the British over the French, significantly reducing French territorial claims in India.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
a)
Only one
b)
Only two
c)
All three
d)
None
|
Amrutha Kapoor answered |
Explanation:
Statement 1: The Anglo-Dutch Treaty of 1824 did not require the Dutch to withdraw from their possessions in India. Instead, it established clear territorial boundaries between British and Dutch colonies in Southeast Asia, particularly in Sumatra and Java. The Dutch retained their presence in the region after the treaty.
Statement 2: The system of Cartazes was actually introduced by the Portuguese, not the British, to regulate maritime trade in the Indian Ocean. Cartazes were permits or passes that ships had to obtain to navigate in Portuguese-controlled waters, and they also served as a form of taxation on trade.
Statement 3: The Battle of Wandiwash in 1760 was indeed a decisive victory for the British over the French. This battle significantly weakened French territorial claims in India and paved the way for British dominance in the region.
Therefore, only statement 3 is correct. The correct answer is option 'B'.
Statement 1: The Anglo-Dutch Treaty of 1824 did not require the Dutch to withdraw from their possessions in India. Instead, it established clear territorial boundaries between British and Dutch colonies in Southeast Asia, particularly in Sumatra and Java. The Dutch retained their presence in the region after the treaty.
Statement 2: The system of Cartazes was actually introduced by the Portuguese, not the British, to regulate maritime trade in the Indian Ocean. Cartazes were permits or passes that ships had to obtain to navigate in Portuguese-controlled waters, and they also served as a form of taxation on trade.
Statement 3: The Battle of Wandiwash in 1760 was indeed a decisive victory for the British over the French. This battle significantly weakened French territorial claims in India and paved the way for British dominance in the region.
Therefore, only statement 3 is correct. The correct answer is option 'B'.
Consider the following statements: - The defeat of the Dutch at the Battle of Bedara (Bedaara) in 1759 effectively ended their ambitions in India and left the English East India Company as the dominant European power in the region.
- The 'Golden Farman' issued by the Sultan of Golconda in 1632 granted the English East India Company significant trading privileges, including the right to trade freely in the ports of Golconda.
- The Battle of Plassey in 1757 was primarily between the English East India Company and the Dutch East India Company over control of Bengal.
How many of the statements given above are correct?- a)Only one
- b)Only two
- c)All three
- d)None
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
- The defeat of the Dutch at the Battle of Bedara (Bedaara) in 1759 effectively ended their ambitions in India and left the English East India Company as the dominant European power in the region.
- The 'Golden Farman' issued by the Sultan of Golconda in 1632 granted the English East India Company significant trading privileges, including the right to trade freely in the ports of Golconda.
- The Battle of Plassey in 1757 was primarily between the English East India Company and the Dutch East India Company over control of Bengal.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
a)
Only one
b)
Only two
c)
All three
d)
None
|
Rhea Kulkarni answered |
Statement Analysis:
Statement 1:
The defeat of the Dutch at the Battle of Bedara (Bedaara) in 1759 effectively ended their ambitions in India and left the English East India Company as the dominant European power in the region.
This statement is correct. The Battle of Bedara in 1759 indeed marked the decline of Dutch influence in India, paving the way for the English East India Company to emerge as the dominant power.
Statement 2:
The Golden Farman issued by the Sultan of Golconda in 1632 granted the English East India Company significant trading privileges, including the right to trade freely in the ports of Golconda.
This statement is also correct. The Golden Farman of 1632 was a pivotal document that granted the English East India Company exclusive trading rights and other privileges in the Golconda region.
Statement 3:
The Battle of Plassey in 1757 was primarily between the English East India Company and the Dutch East India Company over control of Bengal.
This statement is incorrect. The Battle of Plassey in 1757 was fought between the English East India Company and the Nawab of Bengal, Siraj-ud-daulah, not the Dutch East India Company. This battle marked the beginning of British dominance in Bengal.
Therefore, only two of the statements provided are correct, which are statement 1 and statement 2.
Statement 1:
The defeat of the Dutch at the Battle of Bedara (Bedaara) in 1759 effectively ended their ambitions in India and left the English East India Company as the dominant European power in the region.
This statement is correct. The Battle of Bedara in 1759 indeed marked the decline of Dutch influence in India, paving the way for the English East India Company to emerge as the dominant power.
Statement 2:
The Golden Farman issued by the Sultan of Golconda in 1632 granted the English East India Company significant trading privileges, including the right to trade freely in the ports of Golconda.
This statement is also correct. The Golden Farman of 1632 was a pivotal document that granted the English East India Company exclusive trading rights and other privileges in the Golconda region.
Statement 3:
The Battle of Plassey in 1757 was primarily between the English East India Company and the Dutch East India Company over control of Bengal.
This statement is incorrect. The Battle of Plassey in 1757 was fought between the English East India Company and the Nawab of Bengal, Siraj-ud-daulah, not the Dutch East India Company. This battle marked the beginning of British dominance in Bengal.
Therefore, only two of the statements provided are correct, which are statement 1 and statement 2.
Consider the following statements:
- Nino da Cunha shifted the Portuguese capital in India from Cochin to Goa in 1530 to strengthen Portuguese control over the Indian Ocean trade.
- The Battle of Hooghly in 1632 was a significant event that demonstrated the Portuguese's declining influence in the Bengal region.
- The Treaty of Bassein (1534) between the Portuguese and Bahadur Shah of Gujarat was instrumental in the Portuguese acquisition of several key territories along the western coast of India.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- a)Only one
- b)Only two
- c)All three
- d)None
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
- Nino da Cunha shifted the Portuguese capital in India from Cochin to Goa in 1530 to strengthen Portuguese control over the Indian Ocean trade.
- The Battle of Hooghly in 1632 was a significant event that demonstrated the Portuguese's declining influence in the Bengal region.
- The Treaty of Bassein (1534) between the Portuguese and Bahadur Shah of Gujarat was instrumental in the Portuguese acquisition of several key territories along the western coast of India.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
a)
Only one
b)
Only two
c)
All three
d)
None
|
|
Alok Saini answered |
Correct Statements Explained:
Nino da Cunha shifting the Portuguese capital in India to Goa in 1530:
- This statement is correct. Nino da Cunha, the Governor of Portuguese India, indeed shifted the capital from Cochin to Goa in 1530. This move was aimed at consolidating Portuguese control over the Indian Ocean trade as Goa's strategic location provided better access and control over maritime routes.
The Battle of Hooghly in 1632 demonstrating Portuguese declining influence:
- This statement is also correct. The Battle of Hooghly in 1632 was a significant event that showcased the diminishing power of the Portuguese in the Bengal region. The defeat suffered by the Portuguese forces at the hands of the Mughals highlighted their weakening hold in the area.
The Treaty of Bassein (1534) aiding Portuguese acquisition of territories:
- This statement is incorrect. The Treaty of Bassein was actually signed in 1534 between the Portuguese and Bahadur Shah of Gujarat but it did not lead to the acquisition of territories along the western coast of India. The treaty focused on establishing trade relations and securing Portuguese commercial interests in the region.
Therefore, only statement 1 and 2 are correct, making option 'B' the correct choice.
Nino da Cunha shifting the Portuguese capital in India to Goa in 1530:
- This statement is correct. Nino da Cunha, the Governor of Portuguese India, indeed shifted the capital from Cochin to Goa in 1530. This move was aimed at consolidating Portuguese control over the Indian Ocean trade as Goa's strategic location provided better access and control over maritime routes.
The Battle of Hooghly in 1632 demonstrating Portuguese declining influence:
- This statement is also correct. The Battle of Hooghly in 1632 was a significant event that showcased the diminishing power of the Portuguese in the Bengal region. The defeat suffered by the Portuguese forces at the hands of the Mughals highlighted their weakening hold in the area.
The Treaty of Bassein (1534) aiding Portuguese acquisition of territories:
- This statement is incorrect. The Treaty of Bassein was actually signed in 1534 between the Portuguese and Bahadur Shah of Gujarat but it did not lead to the acquisition of territories along the western coast of India. The treaty focused on establishing trade relations and securing Portuguese commercial interests in the region.
Therefore, only statement 1 and 2 are correct, making option 'B' the correct choice.
Consider the following statements:1. The Sultan of Golconda issued the 'Golden Farman' in 1632, allowing the English to trade freely in the ports of Golconda on payment of 500 pagodas a year.2. The English factory at Surat was established in 1613 under Thomas Aldworth.3. Sir Thomas Roe secured permission to set up factories at Agra, Ahmedabad, and Broach in 1615.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?- a)1 Only
- b)1 and 2 Only
- c)1 and 3 Only
- d)1, 2, and 3
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
1. The Sultan of Golconda issued the 'Golden Farman' in 1632, allowing the English to trade freely in the ports of Golconda on payment of 500 pagodas a year.
2. The English factory at Surat was established in 1613 under Thomas Aldworth.
3. Sir Thomas Roe secured permission to set up factories at Agra, Ahmedabad, and Broach in 1615.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
a)
1 Only
b)
1 and 2 Only
c)
1 and 3 Only
d)
1, 2, and 3
|
|
Tanishq Sengupta answered |
Explanation:
1. The Sultan of Golconda and the 'Golden Farman'
The statement that the Sultan of Golconda issued the 'Golden Farman' in 1632 allowing the English to trade freely in the ports of Golconda on payment of 500 pagodas a year is correct. This agreement was significant for the English East India Company as it provided them with trading rights in the region.
2. Establishment of English Factory at Surat
The statement that the English factory at Surat was established in 1613 under Thomas Aldworth is also correct. Surat was one of the key trading ports on the western coast of India, and the establishment of the factory there marked the beginning of English trade in the region.
3. Sir Thomas Roe and Expansion of Factories
Sir Thomas Roe was an English diplomat who visited the Mughal court in the early 17th century. He secured permission to set up factories at Agra, Ahmedabad, and Broach in 1615. This move was crucial in expanding English trade and influence in different parts of India during that period.
Therefore, all three statements are correct, and option 'D' is the correct answer. The 'Golden Farman', establishment of the English factory at Surat, and Sir Thomas Roe's role in expanding English factories in India were all significant events in the history of English trade in India during the early 17th century.
1. The Sultan of Golconda and the 'Golden Farman'
The statement that the Sultan of Golconda issued the 'Golden Farman' in 1632 allowing the English to trade freely in the ports of Golconda on payment of 500 pagodas a year is correct. This agreement was significant for the English East India Company as it provided them with trading rights in the region.
2. Establishment of English Factory at Surat
The statement that the English factory at Surat was established in 1613 under Thomas Aldworth is also correct. Surat was one of the key trading ports on the western coast of India, and the establishment of the factory there marked the beginning of English trade in the region.
3. Sir Thomas Roe and Expansion of Factories
Sir Thomas Roe was an English diplomat who visited the Mughal court in the early 17th century. He secured permission to set up factories at Agra, Ahmedabad, and Broach in 1615. This move was crucial in expanding English trade and influence in different parts of India during that period.
Therefore, all three statements are correct, and option 'D' is the correct answer. The 'Golden Farman', establishment of the English factory at Surat, and Sir Thomas Roe's role in expanding English factories in India were all significant events in the history of English trade in India during the early 17th century.
Consider the following pairs:
How many of the above pairs are correctly matched?
- a)Only two pair
- b)Only one pairs
- c)All three pairs
- d)None of the pairs
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following pairs:
How many of the above pairs are correctly matched?
How many of the above pairs are correctly matched?
a)
Only two pair
b)
Only one pairs
c)
All three pairs
d)
None of the pairs
|
Anish answered |
Alfonso de Almeida reversed the blue water policy to the policy of imperialism.
Francisco de Almeida started the blue water policy and also established Forts.
Nino da Cunha shifted capital from Cochin to Goa.
Francisco de Almeida started the blue water policy and also established Forts.
Nino da Cunha shifted capital from Cochin to Goa.
Consider the following statements:
Statement-I:
The Portuguese established military posts and settlements on the east coast at San Thome (in Chennai) and Nagapattinam (in Tamil Nadu).
Statement-II:
The Dutch founded their first factory in Masulipatnam (in Andhra) in 1605.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
- a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
- b)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
- c)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
- d)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
Statement-I:
The Portuguese established military posts and settlements on the east coast at San Thome (in Chennai) and Nagapattinam (in Tamil Nadu).
The Portuguese established military posts and settlements on the east coast at San Thome (in Chennai) and Nagapattinam (in Tamil Nadu).
Statement-II:
The Dutch founded their first factory in Masulipatnam (in Andhra) in 1605.
The Dutch founded their first factory in Masulipatnam (in Andhra) in 1605.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
a)
Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
b)
Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
c)
Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
d)
Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
|
|
Akshara Basak answered |
Explanation:
Statement-I:
- The Portuguese did establish military posts and settlements on the east coast of India, including San Thome in Chennai and Nagapattinam in Tamil Nadu.
- These posts were part of their efforts to establish trade relations and control over the region.
Statement-II:
- The Dutch did indeed found their first factory in Masulipatnam (in Andhra) in 1605.
- This marked the beginning of Dutch presence and trade activities in India.
Therefore, in respect of the above statements, Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct. The Portuguese did establish military posts and settlements as mentioned in Statement-I, but the Dutch founded their first factory in Masulipatnam, not the Portuguese.
Statement-I:
- The Portuguese did establish military posts and settlements on the east coast of India, including San Thome in Chennai and Nagapattinam in Tamil Nadu.
- These posts were part of their efforts to establish trade relations and control over the region.
Statement-II:
- The Dutch did indeed found their first factory in Masulipatnam (in Andhra) in 1605.
- This marked the beginning of Dutch presence and trade activities in India.
Therefore, in respect of the above statements, Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct. The Portuguese did establish military posts and settlements as mentioned in Statement-I, but the Dutch founded their first factory in Masulipatnam, not the Portuguese.
Consider the following pairs:1. Bombay given to East India Company - 16682. English factory established at Surat - 16163. Golden Farman issued by Sultan of Golconda - 16324. Foundation of Fort St. George in Madras - 1639How many pairs given above are correctly matched?- a)Only one pair
- b)Only two pairs
- c)Only three pairs
- d)All four pairs
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following pairs:
1. Bombay given to East India Company - 1668
2. English factory established at Surat - 1616
3. Golden Farman issued by Sultan of Golconda - 1632
4. Foundation of Fort St. George in Madras - 1639
How many pairs given above are correctly matched?
a)
Only one pair
b)
Only two pairs
c)
Only three pairs
d)
All four pairs
|
|
Poulomi Kumar answered |
Analysis of Correctly Matched Pairs:
1. Bombay given to East India Company - 1668:
- This pair is correctly matched as Bombay was given to the East India Company in 1668 by King Charles II of England as part of the dowry of Catherine of Braganza.
2. English factory established at Surat - 1616:
- This pair is correctly matched as the English East India Company established its first factory in Surat in 1616, marking the beginning of English trade in India.
3. Golden Farman issued by Sultan of Golconda - 1632:
- This pair is correctly matched as the Golden Farman was issued by the Sultan of Golconda in 1632, granting the English East India Company the right to establish a factory at Armagon.
Conclusion:
Out of the four pairs given in the question, three pairs are correctly matched. These events mark significant milestones in the history of British presence and trade in India during the colonial period.
1. Bombay given to East India Company - 1668:
- This pair is correctly matched as Bombay was given to the East India Company in 1668 by King Charles II of England as part of the dowry of Catherine of Braganza.
2. English factory established at Surat - 1616:
- This pair is correctly matched as the English East India Company established its first factory in Surat in 1616, marking the beginning of English trade in India.
3. Golden Farman issued by Sultan of Golconda - 1632:
- This pair is correctly matched as the Golden Farman was issued by the Sultan of Golconda in 1632, granting the English East India Company the right to establish a factory at Armagon.
Conclusion:
Out of the four pairs given in the question, three pairs are correctly matched. These events mark significant milestones in the history of British presence and trade in India during the colonial period.
Chapter doubts & questions for The Advent of Europeans in India - History for State PSC Exams 2025 is part of BPSC (Bihar) exam preparation. The chapters have been prepared according to the BPSC (Bihar) exam syllabus. The Chapter doubts & questions, notes, tests & MCQs are made for BPSC (Bihar) 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests here.
Chapter doubts & questions of The Advent of Europeans in India - History for State PSC Exams in English & Hindi are available as part of BPSC (Bihar) exam.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for BPSC (Bihar) Exam by signing up for free.
History for State PSC Exams
113 videos|409 docs|173 tests
|
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Study with 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos & Tests
10M+ students study on EduRev
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup