All Exams >
BPSC (Bihar) >
Indian Polity for State PSC Exams >
All Questions
All questions of Class-wise NCERT Tests for BPSC (Bihar) Exam
What was the main purpose behind bringing Panchayati Raj system in India?- a) To Prevent criminalization of politics
- b) Development of villages
- c) Decentralisation of the political power to the general peoples
- d) To reduce election expenses
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
What was the main purpose behind bringing Panchayati Raj system in India?
a)
To Prevent criminalization of politics
b)
Development of villages
c)
Decentralisation of the political power to the general peoples
d)
To reduce election expenses
|
Suresh Reddy answered |
- Decentralising the democratic process In India, election to these local bodies has been carried out on a regular basis, in most cases, freely and fairly. Though some states have seen allegations of violence, these are primarily law and order issues.
Which of the following statements is not correct?- a) According to the 42nd and the 44th amendment, it is compulsory for president to comply with the advice of the Council of Ministers
- b) Presidential System is based on double executive
- c) Members of all Union Territories
- d) All of the above
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following statements is not correct?
a)
According to the 42nd and the 44th amendment, it is compulsory for president to comply with the advice of the Council of Ministers
b)
Presidential System is based on double executive
c)
Members of all Union Territories
d)
All of the above
|
Rohit Jain answered |
In the Presidential election, elected members of both houses of parliament, elected members of the state legislature and only elected members of Delhi and Puducherry Legislatures participate.
1. Both elected and nominated members of the State legislative council
2. Along with elected and nominated members of the State Legislative Council, other members who do NOT participate directly in the election of the President are: nominated members of both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, nominated members of legislative assemblies of the Union Territories of Delhi and Puducherry
3. Following members directly participate in the election:
a. the elected members of Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha
b. the elected members of the legislative assemblies of the state
c. the elected members of the legislative assemblies of the Union Territories of Delhi and Puducherry.
Which of the following are judicial and electoral powers and functions of the Parliament?1. It can impeach the President.2. The Parliament is authorized to make laws to regulate the elections.3. It can amend the constitution.4. It can punish its members for the breach of its privileges or its contempt.- a) 1, 3
- b) 1, 2, 3
- c) 1, 2, 4
- d) All of the above
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following are judicial and electoral powers and functions of the Parliament?
1. It can impeach the President.
2. The Parliament is authorized to make laws to regulate the elections.
3. It can amend the constitution.
4. It can punish its members for the breach of its privileges or its contempt.
a)
1, 3
b)
1, 2, 3
c)
1, 2, 4
d)
All of the above
|
Kavita Shah answered |
Judicial Powers and Functions -
1. It can impeach the President for the violation of the Constitution.
2. It can remove the Vice-President from his office.
3. It can recommend the removal of judges (including chief justice) of the Supreme Court and the high courts, chief election commissioner, comptroller and auditor general to the president.
4. It can punish its members or outsiders for the breach of its privileges or its contempt.
Electoral Powers and Functions -1. The Parliament participates in the election of the President (along with the state legislative assemblies) and elects the Vice-President.
2. The Lok Sabha elects its Speaker and Deputy Speaker, while the Rajya Sabha elects its Deputy Chairman.
3. The Parliament is also authorized to make laws to regulate the elections to the offices of President and Vice-President, to both the Houses of Parliament and to both the Houses of state legislature.
4. Accordingly, Parliament enacted the Presidential and Vice-Presidential Election Act (1952), the Representation of People Act (1950), the Representation of People Act (1951), etc.
Other Powers and Functions -
1. It serves as the highest deliberative body in the country.
2. It discusses various issues of national and international significance.
3. It approves all the three types of emergencies (national, state and financial) proclaimed by the President.
4. It can create or abolish the state legislative councils on the recommendation of the concerned state legislative assemblies.
5. It can increase or decrease the area, alter the boundaries and change the names of states of the Indian Union.
6. It can regulate the organization and jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and high courts and can establish a common high court for two or more states.
Consider the following statements. 1. Sri Lanka and India have successfully operated a democratic system since their independence from the British2. Nepal is a constitutional monarchy3. Pakistan began the post- Cold War period with successive democratic governmentsWhich of these statements are correct?- a) 1 Only
- b) 2 Only
- c) 3 Only
- d) 1 and 2 only
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements.
1. Sri Lanka and India have successfully operated a democratic system since their independence from the British
2. Nepal is a constitutional monarchy
3. Pakistan began the post- Cold War period with successive democratic governments
Which of these statements are correct?
a)
1 Only
b)
2 Only
c)
3 Only
d)
1 and 2 only
|
Dishani Das answered |
Explanation:
2 Only
- Statement 1 is incorrect because both Sri Lanka and India have faced challenges to their democratic systems since independence. Sri Lanka, in particular, has experienced periods of political instability and conflict.
- Statement 2 is correct. Nepal is indeed a constitutional monarchy, where the monarch's powers are limited by a constitution.
- Statement 3 is incorrect. Pakistan has had a tumultuous political history with periods of military rule interspersed with democratic governments. It was only after the early 2000s that Pakistan saw more consistent democratic governance.
Therefore, the correct answer is option C) 2 Only.
2 Only
- Statement 1 is incorrect because both Sri Lanka and India have faced challenges to their democratic systems since independence. Sri Lanka, in particular, has experienced periods of political instability and conflict.
- Statement 2 is correct. Nepal is indeed a constitutional monarchy, where the monarch's powers are limited by a constitution.
- Statement 3 is incorrect. Pakistan has had a tumultuous political history with periods of military rule interspersed with democratic governments. It was only after the early 2000s that Pakistan saw more consistent democratic governance.
Therefore, the correct answer is option C) 2 Only.
Which statement is not correct in the case of "Sovereign India"?- a) India is not dependent on any country
- b) India is not a colony of any other country
- c) India can give any part of its country to any other country
- d) Is obliged to obey the UN in its internal affairs
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Which statement is not correct in the case of "Sovereign India"?
a)
India is not dependent on any country
b)
India is not a colony of any other country
c)
India can give any part of its country to any other country
d)
Is obliged to obey the UN in its internal affairs
|
Deepa Iyer answered |
- The word Sovereign means a state having independent authority and a Right to govern itself without any outside influence.
- The Preamble of India proclaims India as a state to be sovereign, it testifies to the fact that India is no longer a dependency or colony or possession of British Crown.
- As a sovereign independent state, India is free both internally and externally to take her own decisions and implement these for her people and territories. Thus, being a free sovereign country India has the power and authority to rule its subjects, manage its own security and assert its Sovereignty against any outside powers or nations
Consider the following statements:1. In our country, the Parliament consists of two Houses.2. The President of India is not a part of the Parliament.3. All laws made in the Houses come into force only after they receive the assent of the President.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?- a) 1 and 2 only
- b) 2 and 3 only
- c) 1 and 3 only
- d) 1, 2 and 3
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
1. In our country, the Parliament consists of two Houses.
2. The President of India is not a part of the Parliament.
3. All laws made in the Houses come into force only after they receive the assent of the President.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
a)
1 and 2 only
b)
2 and 3 only
c)
1 and 3 only
d)
1, 2 and 3
|
|
Rohit Jain answered |
- The Parliament plays a central role in modern democracies, most large countries divide the role and powers of the Parliament in two parts. They are called Chambers or Houses. One House is usually directly elected by the people and exercises the real power on behalf of the people.
- The second House is usually elected indirectly and performs some special functions. The most common work for the second House is to look after the interests of various states, regions or federal units. In our country, the Parliament consists of two Houses.
- The two Houses are known as the Council of States (Rajya Sabha) and the House of the People (Lok Sabha). The President of India is a part of the Parliament, although she is not a member of either House. That is why all laws made in the Houses come into force only after they receive the assent of the President.
In modern democracies, power sharing arrangements can take which of the following form:1. Power is shared among different organs of government2. Power can be shared among governments at different levels3. Power can be shared among different social groups, such as the religious and linguistic groupsSelect the correct answer using the code given below:- a) 1 and 2 only
- b) 2 and 3 only
- c) 1, and 3 only
- d) 1, 2 and 3 only
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
In modern democracies, power sharing arrangements can take which of the following form:
1. Power is shared among different organs of government
2. Power can be shared among governments at different levels
3. Power can be shared among different social groups, such as the religious and linguistic groups
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
a)
1 and 2 only
b)
2 and 3 only
c)
1, and 3 only
d)
1, 2 and 3 only
|
Karan Karan answered |
Answer is D
"The language of Preamble" of Indian constitution is taken from the constitution of- a) America
- b) Canada
- c) Australia
- d) Ireland
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
"The language of Preamble" of Indian constitution is taken from the constitution of
a)
America
b)
Canada
c)
Australia
d)
Ireland
|
Niti Basak answered |
Explanation:
The Preamble of the Indian Constitution is a brief introductory statement that sets out the objectives and purposes of the Constitution. It was adopted on 26 November 1949 by the Constituent Assembly of India.
The language of the Preamble is inspired by the Constitution of Australia. However, the idea of including a Preamble in the Constitution was borrowed from the Constitution of the United States of America.
The Preamble is a non-justiciable part of the Constitution, meaning that it cannot be enforced by a court of law. However, it serves as a guiding principle for the interpretation of the Constitution.
The Preamble of the Indian Constitution reads as follows:
"We, the people of India, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic and to secure to all its citizens:
Justice, social, economic and political;
Liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship;
Equality of status and of opportunity;
and to promote among them all
Fraternity assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation;
In our constituent assembly this twenty-sixth day of November, 1949, do hereby adopt, enact and give to ourselves this Constitution."
Conclusion:
Thus, it can be concluded that the language of the Preamble of the Indian Constitution is taken from the Constitution of Australia, but the idea of including a Preamble in the Constitution was borrowed from the Constitution of the United States of America.
The Preamble of the Indian Constitution is a brief introductory statement that sets out the objectives and purposes of the Constitution. It was adopted on 26 November 1949 by the Constituent Assembly of India.
The language of the Preamble is inspired by the Constitution of Australia. However, the idea of including a Preamble in the Constitution was borrowed from the Constitution of the United States of America.
The Preamble is a non-justiciable part of the Constitution, meaning that it cannot be enforced by a court of law. However, it serves as a guiding principle for the interpretation of the Constitution.
The Preamble of the Indian Constitution reads as follows:
"We, the people of India, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic and to secure to all its citizens:
Justice, social, economic and political;
Liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship;
Equality of status and of opportunity;
and to promote among them all
Fraternity assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation;
In our constituent assembly this twenty-sixth day of November, 1949, do hereby adopt, enact and give to ourselves this Constitution."
Conclusion:
Thus, it can be concluded that the language of the Preamble of the Indian Constitution is taken from the Constitution of Australia, but the idea of including a Preamble in the Constitution was borrowed from the Constitution of the United States of America.
Who among the following is hailed as the father of local self-government in India?- a) Lord Mayo
- b) Lord Ripon
- c) Jawaharlal Nehru
- d) Mahatma Gandhi
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Who among the following is hailed as the father of local self-government in India?
a)
Lord Mayo
b)
Lord Ripon
c)
Jawaharlal Nehru
d)
Mahatma Gandhi
|
|
Rahul Choudhury answered |
- Lord Ripon is known to have granted the Indians first taste of freedom by introducing the Local Self Government in 1882. His scheme of local self government in 1882. His scheme of local self-government developed the Municipal institutions which had been growing up in the country ever since India was occupied by the British Crown.
- He led a series of enactments in which larger powers of the Local self government were given to the rural and urban bodies and the elective people received some wider rights.
- Lord Ripon is known as Father of Local Self Government in India. This was not enacted by any act, it was a resolution that was passed in 1882.
Which of the following challenges are faced by the democratic countries all over the world?1. Applying the basic principle of democratic government across all the regions, different social groups and various institutions.2. Extension of federal principle to all the units of the federation.3. Deepening of democracy.Select the correct answer using the code given below:- a) 1, 2 and 3
- b) 2 and 3 only
- c) 1 and 3 only
- d) 1 and 2 only
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following challenges are faced by the democratic countries all over the world?
1. Applying the basic principle of democratic government across all the regions, different social groups and various institutions.
2. Extension of federal principle to all the units of the federation.
3. Deepening of democracy.
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
a)
1, 2 and 3
b)
2 and 3 only
c)
1 and 3 only
d)
1 and 2 only
|
Anjali Rao answered |
- At least one fourth of the globe is still not under democratic government. The challenge for democracy in these parts of the world is very stark.
- These countries face the foundational challenge of making the transition to democracy and then instituting democratic government.
- This involves bringing down the existing non-democratic regime, keeping the military away from controlling government and establishing a sovereign and functional state. Most of the established democracies face the challenge of expansion.
Where is the parliament of European Union?
- a)Belgium
- b)Britain
- c)Germany
- d)USA
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Where is the parliament of European Union?
a)
Belgium
b)
Britain
c)
Germany
d)
USA
|
Ojasvi Mehta answered |
Location of the European Union Parliament:
- The European Union Parliament is located in Belgium.
Explanation:
- The European Union Parliament is the legislative body of the European Union (EU), which is a political and economic union of 27 member states.
- The EU Parliament is responsible for representing the interests of EU citizens and passing laws that affect all member states.
- The EU Parliament is located in the capital city of Belgium, which is Brussels.
- Brussels is chosen as the location for the EU Parliament because it is considered to be a neutral and central location within the EU.
- Brussels is also home to many other EU institutions and organizations, making it an important hub for European politics and decision-making.
Summary:
- The parliament of the European Union is located in Belgium, specifically in the city of Brussels. Brussels is chosen as the location due to its central and neutral position within the EU, as well as its status as a hub for European politics.
- The European Union Parliament is located in Belgium.
Explanation:
- The European Union Parliament is the legislative body of the European Union (EU), which is a political and economic union of 27 member states.
- The EU Parliament is responsible for representing the interests of EU citizens and passing laws that affect all member states.
- The EU Parliament is located in the capital city of Belgium, which is Brussels.
- Brussels is chosen as the location for the EU Parliament because it is considered to be a neutral and central location within the EU.
- Brussels is also home to many other EU institutions and organizations, making it an important hub for European politics and decision-making.
Summary:
- The parliament of the European Union is located in Belgium, specifically in the city of Brussels. Brussels is chosen as the location due to its central and neutral position within the EU, as well as its status as a hub for European politics.
Which of the following statements regarding the Seventy-Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of India are correct?1. It provides for the insertion of a new Schedule to the Constitution.2. It restructures the working of the municipalities.3. It provides for the reservation of seats for women and Scheduled Castes in the municipalities.4. It is applicable only to some specified states.Select the correct answer using the codes given below:- a) 1, 2 and 3
- b) 1, 2 and 4
- c) 1, 3 and 4
- d) 1, 2, 3 and 4
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following statements regarding the Seventy-Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of India are correct?
1. It provides for the insertion of a new Schedule to the Constitution.
2. It restructures the working of the municipalities.
3. It provides for the reservation of seats for women and Scheduled Castes in the municipalities.
4. It is applicable only to some specified states.
Select the correct answer using the codes given below:
a)
1, 2 and 3
b)
1, 2 and 4
c)
1, 3 and 4
d)
1, 2, 3 and 4
|
Priya Menon answered |
The 74th Amendment Act gave Constitutional status to the Municipalities. It has brought them under the purview of the justiciable part of the Constitution. In other words, the state governments are under constitutional obligation to adopt the new system of municipalities in accordance with the provisions of the Act.
Reservation of Seats
1. There shall be provisions for the reservation of seats for the scheduled castes and the scheduled tribes in every municipality in proportion of their population to the total population in the municipal area.
2. Further, there shall be the reservation of not less than one-third of the total number of seats for women (including the number of seats reserved for women belonging to the SCs and STs). 3. The state legislature may provide for the manner of reservation of offices of chairpersons in the municipalities for the SCs, the STs and the women.
4. It may also make any provision for the reservation of seats in any municipality or offices of chairpersons in municipalities in favour of backward classes.
Which of the following can be a reason for power sharing in a polity?1. Power sharing is good because it helps to reduce the possibility of conflict between social groups.2. Power sharing is the very spirit of democracy.Select the correct answer using the code given below:- a) 1 Only
- b) 2 Only
- c) Both of them
- d) Neither of them
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following can be a reason for power sharing in a polity?
1. Power sharing is good because it helps to reduce the possibility of conflict between social groups.
2. Power sharing is the very spirit of democracy.
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
a)
1 Only
b)
2 Only
c)
Both of them
d)
Neither of them
|
|
Kabir Verma answered |
- Two different sets of reasons can be given in favour of power sharing. Firstly, power sharing is good because it helps to reduce the possibility of conflict between social groups.
- Since social conflict often leads to violence and political instability, power sharing is a good way to ensure the stability of political order. Imposing the will of the majority community over others may look like an attractive option in the short run, but in the long run it undermines the unity of the nation.
- Tyranny of the majority is not just oppressive for the minority; it often brings ruin to the majority as well.
Assertion: Most of these economies, especially Russia, started reviving in 2000, ten years after their independenceReason: Export of natural resources like oil, natural gas and minerals increased Select the correct code:- a) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.
- b) Both A and R are true but R is not a correct explanation of A.
- c) A is true but R is false
- d) A is false but R is true
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Assertion: Most of these economies, especially Russia, started reviving in 2000, ten years after their independence
Reason: Export of natural resources like oil, natural gas and minerals increased
Select the correct code:
a)
Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.
b)
Both A and R are true but R is not a correct explanation of A.
c)
A is true but R is false
d)
A is false but R is true
|
|
Priya Menon answered |
Most of these economies, especially Russia, started reviving in 2000, ten years after their independence.
The reason for the revival for most of their economies was the export of natural resources like oil, natural gas and minerals. Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Russia,Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan are major oil and gas producers. Other countries have gained because of the oil pipelines that cross their territories for which they get rent. Some amount of manufacturing has restarted.
Which of the following are legislative and executive powers and functions of the Parliament?1. Parliament can make laws on the subjects enumerated in the State List.2. Parliament exercises control over the Executive through question-hour.3. Lok Sabha can express lack of confidence in the government by no confidence motion.4. It can recommend removal of judges.- a) 1, 2, 3
- b) 2, 4
- c) 2, 3
- d) All of the above
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following are legislative and executive powers and functions of the Parliament?
1. Parliament can make laws on the subjects enumerated in the State List.
2. Parliament exercises control over the Executive through question-hour.
3. Lok Sabha can express lack of confidence in the government by no confidence motion.
4. It can recommend removal of judges.
a)
1, 2, 3
b)
2, 4
c)
2, 3
d)
All of the above
|
Akanksha Saha answered |
Legislative and Executive Powers and Functions of Parliament
1. Parliament can make laws on the subjects enumerated in the State List:
- This is a legislative power of Parliament where it can make laws on subjects specified in the State List as per the distribution of powers between the Union and State governments under the Constitution.
2. Parliament exercises control over the Executive through question-hour:
- Question hour is a significant tool through which Members of Parliament can seek information and hold the government accountable for its actions. This helps in ensuring transparency and oversight over the Executive.
3. Lok Sabha can express lack of confidence in the government by no confidence motion:
- This is a crucial legislative power where the Lok Sabha can express lack of confidence in the government by passing a no-confidence motion. If the motion is passed, the government is bound to resign.
Therefore, the correct answer is option 'A' as these are the legislative and executive powers and functions of Parliament.
1. Parliament can make laws on the subjects enumerated in the State List:
- This is a legislative power of Parliament where it can make laws on subjects specified in the State List as per the distribution of powers between the Union and State governments under the Constitution.
2. Parliament exercises control over the Executive through question-hour:
- Question hour is a significant tool through which Members of Parliament can seek information and hold the government accountable for its actions. This helps in ensuring transparency and oversight over the Executive.
3. Lok Sabha can express lack of confidence in the government by no confidence motion:
- This is a crucial legislative power where the Lok Sabha can express lack of confidence in the government by passing a no-confidence motion. If the motion is passed, the government is bound to resign.
Therefore, the correct answer is option 'A' as these are the legislative and executive powers and functions of Parliament.
Which of the following is/are true: 1. The Supreme Court can review its own judgements.2. Scope of Judicial review in the USA is broader than that in India.- a) Only 1
- b) Only 2
- c) Both 1 and 2
- d) Neither 1 nor 2
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following is/are true:
1. The Supreme Court can review its own judgements.
2. Scope of Judicial review in the USA is broader than that in India.
a)
Only 1
b)
Only 2
c)
Both 1 and 2
d)
Neither 1 nor 2
|
Samarth Gupta answered |
Supreme Court Review of Judgments:
- Yes, the Supreme Court can review its own judgments through a process known as a review petition. This allows parties to request a review of a judgment if they believe there has been a judicial error or an oversight in the decision. However, the grounds for review are limited and the court will not reconsider the merits of the case.
Scope of Judicial Review in the USA and India:
- The scope of judicial review in the USA is broader than that in India. In the USA, the Supreme Court has the power to review the constitutionality of laws passed by the legislature and actions taken by the executive branch. This allows the court to strike down laws that are found to be unconstitutional.
- In India, judicial review is also a part of the legal system, but it is more limited compared to the USA. The Indian Supreme Court can review laws and government actions to ensure they are in line with the Constitution, but the scope is narrower than in the USA. The court cannot strike down laws as easily as the US Supreme Court.
Therefore, both statements are true. The Supreme Court can review its own judgments, and the scope of judicial review in the USA is indeed broader than that in India.
- Yes, the Supreme Court can review its own judgments through a process known as a review petition. This allows parties to request a review of a judgment if they believe there has been a judicial error or an oversight in the decision. However, the grounds for review are limited and the court will not reconsider the merits of the case.
Scope of Judicial Review in the USA and India:
- The scope of judicial review in the USA is broader than that in India. In the USA, the Supreme Court has the power to review the constitutionality of laws passed by the legislature and actions taken by the executive branch. This allows the court to strike down laws that are found to be unconstitutional.
- In India, judicial review is also a part of the legal system, but it is more limited compared to the USA. The Indian Supreme Court can review laws and government actions to ensure they are in line with the Constitution, but the scope is narrower than in the USA. The court cannot strike down laws as easily as the US Supreme Court.
Therefore, both statements are true. The Supreme Court can review its own judgments, and the scope of judicial review in the USA is indeed broader than that in India.
Consider the following statements.1. 21 years to be the minimum age for contesting elections to Panchayats.2. Reservation of one-fourth seats (both members & chair persons) for women in Panchayats at all the three levels.3. Panchayati-Raj election is conducted by the State Election Commission.4. Direct elections to the post of Chairperson of Panchayats at the intermediate and district level.Which of the statements given above is / are correct.- a) 1 & 2 only
- b) 1 & 3 only
- c) 1 & 4 only
- d) All of the above
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements.
1. 21 years to be the minimum age for contesting elections to Panchayats.
2. Reservation of one-fourth seats (both members & chair persons) for women in Panchayats at all the three levels.
3. Panchayati-Raj election is conducted by the State Election Commission.
4. Direct elections to the post of Chairperson of Panchayats at the intermediate and district level.
Which of the statements given above is / are correct.
a)
1 & 2 only
b)
1 & 3 only
c)
1 & 4 only
d)
All of the above
|
|
Muskaan Nambiar answered |
Explanation:
1. 21 years to be the minimum age for contesting elections to Panchayats:
This statement is correct as per the 73rd Amendment Act of the Constitution, which states that a person must be at least 21 years old to contest elections to Panchayats.
2. Reservation of one-fourth seats for women in Panchayats at all the three levels:
This statement is also correct as per the 73rd Amendment Act, which mandates the reservation of one-third of seats for women in Panchayats at all levels - village, intermediate, and district.
3. Panchayati-Raj election is conducted by the State Election Commission:
This statement is incorrect. Panchayati Raj elections are conducted by the State Election Commission in some states, while in other states, they are conducted by the State Election Commission concerned.
4. Direct elections to the post of Chairperson of Panchayats at the intermediate and district level:
This statement is incorrect. The Chairperson of Panchayats at the intermediate and district levels is elected indirectly by the elected members.
Therefore, the correct statements are 1 and 3.
Which of the following are correct regarding the Parliamentary System?1. It is governed by experts.2. It is an unstable government.3. It is against separation of powers.4. It can lead to despotism.5. It is a responsible government.- a) 1, 4, 5
- b) 2, 3, 5
- c) 1, 3, 4
- d) All of the above
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following are correct regarding the Parliamentary System?
1. It is governed by experts.
2. It is an unstable government.
3. It is against separation of powers.
4. It can lead to despotism.
5. It is a responsible government.
a)
1, 4, 5
b)
2, 3, 5
c)
1, 3, 4
d)
All of the above
|
|
Meera Kapoor answered |
A. Unstable Government -
1. There is no guarantee that a government can survive its tenure.
2. The ministers depend on the mercy of the majority legislators.
3. A no-confidence motion or political defection or multi-party coalition can make the government unstable.
B. No Continuity of Policies -
1. Uncertainty of the tenure is not conductive for the formulation and implementation of long-term policies.
2. Change in the ruling party is usually followed by changes in the policies of the government.
C. Dictatorship of the Cabinet -
1. When the ruling party enjoys an absolute majority in the Parliament, the cabinet becomes autocratic and exercises nearly unlimited powers.
D. Against Separation of Powers -
1. In the parliamentary system, the legislature and the executive are together and inseparable.
2. Thus it goes against the theory of separation of powers. In fact, there is a fusion of powers.
With reference to the ‘Gram Nyayalaya Act’, which of the following statements is/are not correct:
1. The presiding officer, Nyayadhikari shall be appointed by the Gram Panchayat with the consultation of the State Government.
2. As per the Act, Gram Nyayalayas can hear only civil cases and not criminal cases.
3. The Act allows local social activists as mediators/re-conciliators.
Select the correct answer code:
- a)1, 2
- b)3 only
- c)1, 3
- d)2, 3
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
With reference to the ‘Gram Nyayalaya Act’, which of the following statements is/are not correct:
1. The presiding officer, Nyayadhikari shall be appointed by the Gram Panchayat with the consultation of the State Government.
2. As per the Act, Gram Nyayalayas can hear only civil cases and not criminal cases.
3. The Act allows local social activists as mediators/re-conciliators.
Select the correct answer code:
a)
1, 2
b)
3 only
c)
1, 3
d)
2, 3
|
|
Hrishikesh Mehta answered |
Gram Nyayalaya Act: Incorrect Statements
Introduction: The Gram Nyayalaya Act, 2008 was enacted to provide for the establishment of Gram Nyayalayas at the grass-roots level for the purposes of providing access to justice to the citizens of India residing in rural areas. The Act seeks to provide inexpensive, speedy, and decentralized justice to the rural population.
Incorrect Statements:
1. The presiding officer, Nyayadhikari shall be appointed by the Gram Panchayat with the consultation of the State Government.
This statement is incorrect. As per the Gram Nyayalaya Act, the presiding officer or Nyayadhikari shall be appointed by the State Government in consultation with the High Court of the State. The Nyayadhikari is a judicial officer who exercises the powers and functions of a Civil Judge.
2. As per the Act, Gram Nyayalayas can hear only civil cases and not criminal cases.
This statement is incorrect. Gram Nyayalayas can hear both civil and criminal cases. The Act provides that Gram Nyayalayas shall have jurisdiction to try all suits of a civil nature, except those specified in the Act, and all criminal cases, except those punishable with death, imprisonment for life, or imprisonment for a term exceeding seven years.
3. The Act allows local social activists as mediators/re-conciliators.
This statement is correct. The Gram Nyayalaya Act provides for the appointment of Nyay Sahayaks or social activists to assist the Nyayadhikari in the discharge of his functions. The Nyay Sahayaks are responsible for assisting the parties in the settlement of disputes through mediation, conciliation, and arbitration.
Conclusion: The Gram Nyayalaya Act, 2008 is a significant legislation that aims to provide access to justice to the rural population of India. The Act provides for the establishment of Gram Nyayalayas at the grass-roots level, which are empowered to hear both civil and criminal cases. The Act also allows for the appointment of social activists as Nyay Sahayaks to assist the Nyayadhikari in the settlement of disputes.
Introduction: The Gram Nyayalaya Act, 2008 was enacted to provide for the establishment of Gram Nyayalayas at the grass-roots level for the purposes of providing access to justice to the citizens of India residing in rural areas. The Act seeks to provide inexpensive, speedy, and decentralized justice to the rural population.
Incorrect Statements:
1. The presiding officer, Nyayadhikari shall be appointed by the Gram Panchayat with the consultation of the State Government.
This statement is incorrect. As per the Gram Nyayalaya Act, the presiding officer or Nyayadhikari shall be appointed by the State Government in consultation with the High Court of the State. The Nyayadhikari is a judicial officer who exercises the powers and functions of a Civil Judge.
2. As per the Act, Gram Nyayalayas can hear only civil cases and not criminal cases.
This statement is incorrect. Gram Nyayalayas can hear both civil and criminal cases. The Act provides that Gram Nyayalayas shall have jurisdiction to try all suits of a civil nature, except those specified in the Act, and all criminal cases, except those punishable with death, imprisonment for life, or imprisonment for a term exceeding seven years.
3. The Act allows local social activists as mediators/re-conciliators.
This statement is correct. The Gram Nyayalaya Act provides for the appointment of Nyay Sahayaks or social activists to assist the Nyayadhikari in the discharge of his functions. The Nyay Sahayaks are responsible for assisting the parties in the settlement of disputes through mediation, conciliation, and arbitration.
Conclusion: The Gram Nyayalaya Act, 2008 is a significant legislation that aims to provide access to justice to the rural population of India. The Act provides for the establishment of Gram Nyayalayas at the grass-roots level, which are empowered to hear both civil and criminal cases. The Act also allows for the appointment of social activists as Nyay Sahayaks to assist the Nyayadhikari in the settlement of disputes.
Consider the following statements.1. The slogan of the anti-arrack movement was simple — prohibition on the sale of arrack2. But this simple demand touched upon larger social, economic and political issues of the region that affected women’s life3. A close nexus between crime and politics was established around the business of arrackWhich of these statements are correct?- a) 1 Only
- b) 2 only
- c) 3 only
- d) All of the above
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements.
1. The slogan of the anti-arrack movement was simple — prohibition on the sale of arrack
2. But this simple demand touched upon larger social, economic and political issues of the region that affected women’s life
3. A close nexus between crime and politics was established around the business of arrack
Which of these statements are correct?
a)
1 Only
b)
2 only
c)
3 only
d)
All of the above
|
|
Ojasvi Mehta answered |
- The slogan of the anti-arrack movement was simple - prohibition on the sale of arrack. But this simple demand touched upon larger social, economic and political issues of the region that affected women’s life.
- A close nexus between crime and politics was established around the business of arrack. The State government collected huge revenues by way of taxes imposed on the sale of arrack and was therefore not willing to impose a ban.
- Groups of local women tried to address these complex issues in their agitation against arrack. They also openly discussed the issue of domestic violence. Their movement, for the first time, provided a platform to discuss private issues of domestic violence.
In which of the following states of India the Kittiko-Hachchiko movement took place during the 1980s?- a) Karnataka
- b) Sikkim
- c) Meghalaya
- d) Kerala
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
In which of the following states of India the Kittiko-Hachchiko movement took place during the 1980s?
a)
Karnataka
b)
Sikkim
c)
Meghalaya
d)
Kerala
|
Uday Chawla answered |
Kittiko-Hachchiko movement took place in the state of Karnataka in India during the 1980s.
Explanation:
The Kittiko-Hachchiko movement was a social movement that emerged in the state of Karnataka in the 1980s. It was led by the Karnataka Rajya Raitha Sangha (KRRS), a farmers' organization that aimed to address the issues faced by farmers in the region.
Under the leadership of M.D. Nanjundaswamy, the KRRS launched the Kittiko-Hachchiko movement to protest against the exploitation of farmers by moneylenders and middlemen. The movement aimed to create awareness about the plight of farmers and press for their rights and welfare.
The movement derived its name from the two slogans used by the KRRS. "Kittiko" means "reclaim what is rightfully yours" and "Hachchiko" means "become aware and fight for your rights". These slogans encapsulated the core objectives of the movement - to empower farmers and fight against exploitation.
During the movement, the KRRS organized rallies, protests, and demonstrations across various parts of Karnataka. They highlighted issues such as land reforms, fair prices for agricultural produce, access to credit, and the abolition of the moneylender system. The movement gained significant support from farmers and agricultural laborers who were struggling with poverty and debt.
The Kittiko-Hachchiko movement played a crucial role in bringing the issues faced by farmers to the forefront of public discourse. It also led to the formation of the Karnataka Rajya Raitha Sangha Party, a political party dedicated to championing the cause of farmers.
In conclusion, the Kittiko-Hachchiko movement took place in the state of Karnataka in India during the 1980s. It was a significant movement that aimed to address the issues faced by farmers and empower them in their fight against exploitation.
Explanation:
The Kittiko-Hachchiko movement was a social movement that emerged in the state of Karnataka in the 1980s. It was led by the Karnataka Rajya Raitha Sangha (KRRS), a farmers' organization that aimed to address the issues faced by farmers in the region.
Under the leadership of M.D. Nanjundaswamy, the KRRS launched the Kittiko-Hachchiko movement to protest against the exploitation of farmers by moneylenders and middlemen. The movement aimed to create awareness about the plight of farmers and press for their rights and welfare.
The movement derived its name from the two slogans used by the KRRS. "Kittiko" means "reclaim what is rightfully yours" and "Hachchiko" means "become aware and fight for your rights". These slogans encapsulated the core objectives of the movement - to empower farmers and fight against exploitation.
During the movement, the KRRS organized rallies, protests, and demonstrations across various parts of Karnataka. They highlighted issues such as land reforms, fair prices for agricultural produce, access to credit, and the abolition of the moneylender system. The movement gained significant support from farmers and agricultural laborers who were struggling with poverty and debt.
The Kittiko-Hachchiko movement played a crucial role in bringing the issues faced by farmers to the forefront of public discourse. It also led to the formation of the Karnataka Rajya Raitha Sangha Party, a political party dedicated to championing the cause of farmers.
In conclusion, the Kittiko-Hachchiko movement took place in the state of Karnataka in India during the 1980s. It was a significant movement that aimed to address the issues faced by farmers and empower them in their fight against exploitation.
Which of the following statements is true?- a) In the Berubari case the Supreme Court had said that the preamble of the Constitution is not a part of the Constitution
- b) In the Kesavananda Bharati case, the Supreme Court had said that the preamble of the Constitution is part of the Constitution
- c) "Preamble" of the Indian Constitution has been taken from the Constitution of Canada
- d) None of the above
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following statements is true?
a)
In the Berubari case the Supreme Court had said that the preamble of the Constitution is not a part of the Constitution
b)
In the Kesavananda Bharati case, the Supreme Court had said that the preamble of the Constitution is part of the Constitution
c)
"Preamble" of the Indian Constitution has been taken from the Constitution of Canada
d)
None of the above
|
Vikram Verma answered |
1. What was the Kesavananda bharati case? : “ This case is famous for the victory of Indian Constitution, and is remarkable for the fight between the Parliament and Judiciary ”
The motion adopted by the Constituent Assembly stated in so many words that the Preamble stands as a part of the Constitution. The error came to be corrected in Kesavananda Bharti case where the majority specifically ruled that the Preamble was as much a part of the constitution as any other provision therein.
- The story begins with GOLAKNATH CASE, 1967, in which the petitioner challenged the 7th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1964 under Article 32 for violation of his fundamental rights. The Apex Court ruled, “Parliament cannot take away or abridge and amend any of the fundamental rights, even cannot touch, because these are sacrosanct in nature”.
2. Technically, the term and idea of the Indian Preamble was borrowed from the US. However, its context and form has been shaped by different ideas. In December 1946, Jawaharlal Nehru moved a document in the Cabinet titled Objectives Resolution. It outlined what type of nation India should strive to become.
3. The Supreme Court in the Berubari Union case (1960) held that the Preamble is not a part of the Constitution. However, it recognised that the Preamble could be used as a guiding principle if a term in any article of the Constitution is ambiguous or has more than one meaning.
Consider the following statements.1. A significant component of his industrialisation plans was the nuclear programme initiated in the late 1940s under the guidance of Homi J.Bhabha2. India wanted to generate atomic energy for peaceful purposes3. So he pleaded with the superpowers for comprehensive nuclear disarmamentWhich of these statements are not correct?- a) 1 and 2 only
- b) 2 and 3 only
- c) 1 and 3 only
- d) All of the above
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements.
1. A significant component of his industrialisation plans was the nuclear programme initiated in the late 1940s under the guidance of Homi J.
Bhabha
2. India wanted to generate atomic energy for peaceful purposes
3. So he pleaded with the superpowers for comprehensive nuclear disarmament
Which of these statements are not correct?
a)
1 and 2 only
b)
2 and 3 only
c)
1 and 3 only
d)
All of the above
|
|
Pranab Patel answered |
The correct answer is option 'D' - All of the above. Let's analyze each statement to understand why it is incorrect:
1. A significant component of his industrialization plans was the nuclear program initiated in the late 1940s under the guidance of Homi J. Bhabha.
This statement is correct. Homi J. Bhabha played a crucial role in the establishment of India's nuclear program. His vision and efforts laid the foundation for India's nuclear energy and atomic research.
2. India wanted to generate atomic energy for peaceful purposes.
This statement is correct. India's nuclear program was primarily aimed at generating atomic energy for peaceful purposes such as electricity generation, agriculture, and medicine. India has consistently advocated for the peaceful use of nuclear energy and has not shown any intentions of using it for military purposes.
3. So, he pleaded with the superpowers for comprehensive nuclear disarmament.
This statement is incorrect. While India has always been a proponent of nuclear disarmament and has called for global efforts towards it, there is no specific mention of Homi J. Bhabha pleading with superpowers for comprehensive nuclear disarmament. His focus was more on developing India's own nuclear program rather than disarmament negotiations.
In conclusion, statement 1 and 2 are correct, but statement 3 is incorrect. Hence, the correct answer is option 'D' - All of the above.
1. A significant component of his industrialization plans was the nuclear program initiated in the late 1940s under the guidance of Homi J. Bhabha.
This statement is correct. Homi J. Bhabha played a crucial role in the establishment of India's nuclear program. His vision and efforts laid the foundation for India's nuclear energy and atomic research.
2. India wanted to generate atomic energy for peaceful purposes.
This statement is correct. India's nuclear program was primarily aimed at generating atomic energy for peaceful purposes such as electricity generation, agriculture, and medicine. India has consistently advocated for the peaceful use of nuclear energy and has not shown any intentions of using it for military purposes.
3. So, he pleaded with the superpowers for comprehensive nuclear disarmament.
This statement is incorrect. While India has always been a proponent of nuclear disarmament and has called for global efforts towards it, there is no specific mention of Homi J. Bhabha pleading with superpowers for comprehensive nuclear disarmament. His focus was more on developing India's own nuclear program rather than disarmament negotiations.
In conclusion, statement 1 and 2 are correct, but statement 3 is incorrect. Hence, the correct answer is option 'D' - All of the above.
Consider the following statements:1. Democracy produces a government that is accountable to the citizens, and responsive to the needs and expectations of the citizens.2. Democratic government is inefficient because a lot of delay takes place while taking decisions.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?- a) 1 Only
- b) 2 Only
- c) Both of them
- d) Neither of them
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
1. Democracy produces a government that is accountable to the citizens, and responsive to the needs and expectations of the citizens.
2. Democratic government is inefficient because a lot of delay takes place while taking decisions.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
a)
1 Only
b)
2 Only
c)
Both of them
d)
Neither of them
|
|
Ojasvi Mehta answered |
- The most basic outcome of democracy should be that it produces a government that is accountable to the citizens, and responsive to the needs and expectations of the citizens.
- Democracy is based on the idea of deliberation and negotiation. So, some delay is bound to take place but that does not make democratic government inefficient. Suppose, a government that may take decisions very fast.
Consider the following statements:1. The judge of the Supreme Court can resign his office by writing to the Chief Justice of India.2. The judge of the Supreme Court can be removed from his office by the President on the recommendation of the Chief Justice of India.3. The Removal of a Supreme Court judge is based on two grounds - proved misbehaviour or incapacity.Which of the statements given above is / are correct?- a) 1 only
- b) 2 only
- c) 3 only
- d) 1, 3 only
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
1. The judge of the Supreme Court can resign his office by writing to the Chief Justice of India.
2. The judge of the Supreme Court can be removed from his office by the President on the recommendation of the Chief Justice of India.
3. The Removal of a Supreme Court judge is based on two grounds - proved misbehaviour or incapacity.
Which of the statements given above is / are correct?
a)
1 only
b)
2 only
c)
3 only
d)
1, 3 only
|
|
Anshika Basak answered |
Statement 1: The judge of the Supreme Court can resign his office by writing to the Chief Justice of India.
This statement is correct. According to Article 124(2) of the Constitution of India, a judge of the Supreme Court can resign his office by writing to the President. However, it is customary for the judge to write to the Chief Justice of India, who then forwards the resignation to the President.
Statement 2: The judge of the Supreme Court can be removed from his office by the President on the recommendation of the Chief Justice of India.
This statement is incorrect. According to Article 124(4) of the Constitution of India, a judge of the Supreme Court can be removed from his office only by an order of the President, passed after an address by each House of Parliament supported by a majority of the total membership of that House and by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members of that House present and voting, has been presented to the President in the same session for such removal on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity. The recommendation of the Chief Justice of India is not required for the removal of a Supreme Court judge.
Statement 3: The removal of a Supreme Court judge is based on two grounds - proved misbehaviour or incapacity.
This statement is correct. Article 124(4) of the Constitution of India states that a judge of the Supreme Court can be removed on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity. However, it is important to note that the process for removal is elaborate and requires the support of both Houses of Parliament as mentioned in the previous statement.
In conclusion, statement 1 is correct as a judge of the Supreme Court can resign his office by writing to the Chief Justice of India. Statement 2 is incorrect as the removal of a Supreme Court judge requires an address by each House of Parliament and does not solely depend on the recommendation of the Chief Justice of India. Statement 3 is correct as the removal of a Supreme Court judge is based on proved misbehaviour or incapacity. Therefore, the correct answer is option C - 3 only.
This statement is correct. According to Article 124(2) of the Constitution of India, a judge of the Supreme Court can resign his office by writing to the President. However, it is customary for the judge to write to the Chief Justice of India, who then forwards the resignation to the President.
Statement 2: The judge of the Supreme Court can be removed from his office by the President on the recommendation of the Chief Justice of India.
This statement is incorrect. According to Article 124(4) of the Constitution of India, a judge of the Supreme Court can be removed from his office only by an order of the President, passed after an address by each House of Parliament supported by a majority of the total membership of that House and by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members of that House present and voting, has been presented to the President in the same session for such removal on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity. The recommendation of the Chief Justice of India is not required for the removal of a Supreme Court judge.
Statement 3: The removal of a Supreme Court judge is based on two grounds - proved misbehaviour or incapacity.
This statement is correct. Article 124(4) of the Constitution of India states that a judge of the Supreme Court can be removed on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity. However, it is important to note that the process for removal is elaborate and requires the support of both Houses of Parliament as mentioned in the previous statement.
In conclusion, statement 1 is correct as a judge of the Supreme Court can resign his office by writing to the Chief Justice of India. Statement 2 is incorrect as the removal of a Supreme Court judge requires an address by each House of Parliament and does not solely depend on the recommendation of the Chief Justice of India. Statement 3 is correct as the removal of a Supreme Court judge is based on proved misbehaviour or incapacity. Therefore, the correct answer is option C - 3 only.
Consider the following statements:1. In 1928, Motilal Nehru and other Congress leaders drafted a constitution for India.2. In 1941, the resolution at the Karachi session of the Indian National Congress dwelt on how independent India’s constitution should look like.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?- a) 1 only
- b) 2 only
- c) Both 1 and 2
- d) Neither 1 nor 2
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
1. In 1928, Motilal Nehru and other Congress leaders drafted a constitution for India.
2. In 1941, the resolution at the Karachi session of the Indian National Congress dwelt on how independent India’s constitution should look like.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
a)
1 only
b)
2 only
c)
Both 1 and 2
d)
Neither 1 nor 2
|
|
Meera Kapoor answered |
- As far back as in 1928, Motilal Nehru and eight other Congress leaders drafted a constitution for India. In 1931, the resolution at the Karachi session of the Indian National Congress dwelt on how independent India’s constitution should look like.
- Both these documents were committed to the inclusion of universal adult franchise, right to freedom and equality and to protecting the rights of minorities in the constitution of independent India.
Which of the following are the features of Caste system:1. It is based on exclusion of and discrimination against the ‘outcaste’ groups.2. In it hereditary occupational divisions are not sanctioned by rituals.3. Members of the same caste group are supposed to form a social community that practiced the same or similar occupation.Select the correct answer using the code given below:- a) 1 and 2
- b) 1 and 3
- c) 1, 2 and 3
- d) 2 and 3
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following are the features of Caste system:
1. It is based on exclusion of and discrimination against the ‘outcaste’ groups.
2. In it hereditary occupational divisions are not sanctioned by rituals.
3. Members of the same caste group are supposed to form a social community that practiced the same or similar occupation.
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
a)
1 and 2
b)
1 and 3
c)
1, 2 and 3
d)
2 and 3
|
|
Kavita Shah answered |
- Caste inequalities Unlike gender and religion, caste division is special to India. All societies have some kind of social inequality and some form of division of labour. In most societies, occupations are passed on from one generation to another. Caste system is an extreme form of this.
- What makes it different from other societies is that in this system, hereditary occupational division was sanctioned by rituals.
- Members of the same caste group were supposed to form a social community that practiced the same or similar occupation, married within the caste group and did not eat with members from other caste groups. Caste system was based on exclusion of and discrimination against the ‘outcaste’ groups.
Which of the following conditions must be fulfilled in a democracy to produce a harmonious social life.1. In a democracy Majority and minority opinions are not permanent.2. Democracy remains democracy only as long as every citizen has a chance of being in majority at some point of time.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?- a) 1 Only
- b) 2 Only
- c) Both of them
- d) All of the above
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following conditions must be fulfilled in a democracy to produce a harmonious social life.
1. In a democracy Majority and minority opinions are not permanent.
2. Democracy remains democracy only as long as every citizen has a chance of being in majority at some point of time.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
a)
1 Only
b)
2 Only
c)
Both of them
d)
All of the above
|
|
Deepa Iyer answered |
- It will be a fair expectation that democracy should produce a harmonious social life. Through democracy we can certainly learn to respect these differences and we can also evolve mechanisms to negotiate the differences.
- Democracy is best suited to produce this outcome. Non-democratic regimes often turn a blind eye to or suppress internal social differences. Ability to handle social differences, divisions and conflicts is thus a definite plus point of democratic regimes. Democracy must fulfil two conditions in order to achieve this outcome: 1. It is necessary to understand that democracy is not simply ruled by majority opinion. The majority always needs to work with the minority so that governments function to represent the general view. Majority and minority opinions are not permanent. 2. It is also necessary that rule by majority does not become rule by majority community in terms of religion or race or linguistic group, etc.
Which of the following Indian states were formed to recognise differences based on culture, ethnicity or geography rather than on linguistic basis? 1. Nagaland2. Uttarakhand3. JharkhandSelect the correct answer using the code given below:- a) 1 and 2 only
- b) 2 and 3 only
- c) 1 and 3 only
- d) 1, 2 and 3
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following Indian states were formed to recognise differences based on culture, ethnicity or geography rather than on linguistic basis?
1. Nagaland
2. Uttarakhand
3. Jharkhand
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
a)
1 and 2 only
b)
2 and 3 only
c)
1 and 3 only
d)
1, 2 and 3
|
|
Gitanjali Bajaj answered |
The correct answer is option 'D' which includes all three states - Nagaland, Uttarakhand, and Jharkhand. These states were formed to recognize differences based on culture, ethnicity, or geography rather than on a linguistic basis.
1. Nagaland:
Nagaland is a state in Northeast India, which was formed in 1963. It was primarily created to address the aspirations of the Naga people, who have a distinct culture, ethnicity, and history. The Naga people are spread across Nagaland and other neighboring states, and they have been demanding a separate state for themselves. The Nagaland statehood was granted to fulfill their aspirations and recognize their unique identity.
2. Uttarakhand:
Uttarakhand is a state in northern India, which was carved out of the state of Uttar Pradesh in the year 2000. The formation of Uttarakhand was primarily based on the geographical and cultural differences of the region. The hilly terrain, distinct culture, and the aspirations of the people of the region led to the demand for a separate state. Uttarakhand was formed to recognize and address these differences, and to provide better governance and development to the people of the region.
3. Jharkhand:
Jharkhand is a state in eastern India, which was created in the year 2000. The formation of Jharkhand was a result of the long-standing demands of the tribal communities in the region. The region has a significant tribal population with distinct cultural and ethnic identities. The demand for a separate state of Jharkhand was based on the aspirations of these tribal communities to have self-governance and to preserve their cultural heritage. The formation of Jharkhand aimed to address these aspirations and provide better governance and development to the tribal communities.
In conclusion, Nagaland, Uttarakhand, and Jharkhand were formed to recognize differences based on culture, ethnicity, or geography rather than on a linguistic basis. These states were created to fulfill the aspirations of the people of these regions and to provide better governance and development.
1. Nagaland:
Nagaland is a state in Northeast India, which was formed in 1963. It was primarily created to address the aspirations of the Naga people, who have a distinct culture, ethnicity, and history. The Naga people are spread across Nagaland and other neighboring states, and they have been demanding a separate state for themselves. The Nagaland statehood was granted to fulfill their aspirations and recognize their unique identity.
2. Uttarakhand:
Uttarakhand is a state in northern India, which was carved out of the state of Uttar Pradesh in the year 2000. The formation of Uttarakhand was primarily based on the geographical and cultural differences of the region. The hilly terrain, distinct culture, and the aspirations of the people of the region led to the demand for a separate state. Uttarakhand was formed to recognize and address these differences, and to provide better governance and development to the people of the region.
3. Jharkhand:
Jharkhand is a state in eastern India, which was created in the year 2000. The formation of Jharkhand was a result of the long-standing demands of the tribal communities in the region. The region has a significant tribal population with distinct cultural and ethnic identities. The demand for a separate state of Jharkhand was based on the aspirations of these tribal communities to have self-governance and to preserve their cultural heritage. The formation of Jharkhand aimed to address these aspirations and provide better governance and development to the tribal communities.
In conclusion, Nagaland, Uttarakhand, and Jharkhand were formed to recognize differences based on culture, ethnicity, or geography rather than on a linguistic basis. These states were created to fulfill the aspirations of the people of these regions and to provide better governance and development.
Consider the following statements:1. Every social difference leads to social division.2. People belonging to different social groups share only differences and no similarities.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?- a) 1 Only
- b) 2 Only
- c) Both of them
- d) Neither of them
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
1. Every social difference leads to social division.
2. People belonging to different social groups share only differences and no similarities.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
a)
1 Only
b)
2 Only
c)
Both of them
d)
Neither of them
|
|
Rajesh Kulkarni answered |
Statement 1: Every social difference leads to social division.
Social differences can refer to various factors such as race, religion, caste, gender, etc. It is important to note that not every social difference necessarily leads to social division. Social division implies the creation of barriers, conflicts, and inequalities between different social groups. While social differences can sometimes contribute to social division, it is not an automatic outcome. Many societies have managed to embrace and celebrate their diversity without experiencing significant social divisions. Therefore, Statement 1 is not always correct.
Statement 2: People belonging to different social groups share only differences and no similarities.
This statement is an oversimplification and does not accurately reflect the reality of human interactions. While people belonging to different social groups may indeed have differences, it is incorrect to assume that they share no similarities. Human beings share fundamental attributes and experiences such as emotions, desires, and aspirations that transcend social divisions. Additionally, there are often shared values, customs, traditions, and even interests across social groups. Recognizing these shared aspects can help bridge gaps and foster understanding among diverse groups. Therefore, Statement 2 is not correct.
Conclusion:
Neither of the given statements is correct. While social differences can sometimes lead to social division, it is not a universal outcome. Similarly, people belonging to different social groups share both differences and similarities. It is crucial to recognize and appreciate these shared aspects to promote inclusivity, harmony, and social cohesion in society.
Where was the first Municipal Corporation set up in India?- a) Bombay
- b) Calcutta
- c) Madras
- d) Surat
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Where was the first Municipal Corporation set up in India?
a)
Bombay
b)
Calcutta
c)
Madras
d)
Surat
|
|
Rahul Mehta answered |
Urban Local Government’ in India means the governance of a specific urban area, demarcated for this purpose by the state government, by the people through their elected representatives. 74th Constitutional Amendment Act of 1992 constitutionalised the system of urban government. At the Central level, ‘urban local government’ is dealt by -
1. Ministry of Urban Development (created as a separate ministry in 1985).
2. Ministry of Defense (in the case of cantonment boards).
3. Ministry of Home Affairs (in the case of Union Territories). Significance of the 74th Amendment Act of 1992 – This Act added a new Part 9-A to the Constitution of India entitled ‘The Municipalities’ giving constitutional status to municipalities.
1. It has provisions from Articles 243-P to 243-ZG.
2. It also added a new Twelfth Schedule to the Constitution containing 18 functional items of municipalities.
3. 12th Schedule deals with Article 243-W. 4. It made them a justiciable part of the Constitution.
Which of the following are illegal as per election laws of India?
1. Bribing or threatening voters.
2. Appealing to voters in the name of caste or religion.
3. Use government resources for election campaigns by party or candidate.
4. A candidate can spend more than Rs. 25 lakh in a constituency for an Lok Sabha election.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
- a)1 and 2 only
- b)3 and 4 only
- c)1, 2, 3 and 4
- d)1, 2 and 3 only
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following are illegal as per election laws of India?
1. Bribing or threatening voters.
2. Appealing to voters in the name of caste or religion.
3. Use government resources for election campaigns by party or candidate.
4. A candidate can spend more than Rs. 25 lakh in a constituency for an Lok Sabha election.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
a)
1 and 2 only
b)
3 and 4 only
c)
1, 2, 3 and 4
d)
1, 2 and 3 only
|
|
Saptarshi Banerjee answered |
The correct answer is option 'C' - 1, 2, and 3 only.
Explanation:
1. Bribing or threatening voters:
Bribing or threatening voters is illegal as per election laws in India. It is considered an electoral offense to offer or give any gratification to a voter with the intent to induce or influence the voter to exercise their electoral right in a particular manner. Similarly, threatening or intimidating voters to influence their voting choice is also illegal.
2. Appealing to voters in the name of caste or religion:
Appealing to voters in the name of caste or religion is also illegal in India. The Election Commission of India (ECI) has laid down guidelines that prohibit candidates and political parties from seeking votes on the basis of religion, caste, community, or language. This rule is aimed at promoting a fair and secular election process, ensuring that voters are not influenced by religious or caste considerations.
3. Use of government resources for election campaigns by party or candidate:
Using government resources for election campaigns by a party or candidate is illegal in India. The Model Code of Conduct (MCC), enforced by the Election Commission, prohibits the misuse of government machinery, vehicles, buildings, and other resources for election campaigning purposes. This ensures a level playing field for all candidates and parties and prevents unfair advantages based on access to government resources.
4. Candidate spending limit:
The statement about a candidate not being able to spend more than Rs. 10 lakh in a constituency for an Assembly election is incorrect. The spending limit for candidates in elections varies depending on the type of election. For Assembly elections, the spending limit is set by the ECI for each state and is typically higher than Rs. 10 lakh. The actual limit is subject to change and is revised by the ECI from time to time.
In conclusion, statements 1, 2, and 3 are correct as they represent illegal actions under the election laws of India. However, statement 4 is incorrect as the spending limit for candidates in an Assembly election is not fixed at Rs. 10 lakh.
Explanation:
1. Bribing or threatening voters:
Bribing or threatening voters is illegal as per election laws in India. It is considered an electoral offense to offer or give any gratification to a voter with the intent to induce or influence the voter to exercise their electoral right in a particular manner. Similarly, threatening or intimidating voters to influence their voting choice is also illegal.
2. Appealing to voters in the name of caste or religion:
Appealing to voters in the name of caste or religion is also illegal in India. The Election Commission of India (ECI) has laid down guidelines that prohibit candidates and political parties from seeking votes on the basis of religion, caste, community, or language. This rule is aimed at promoting a fair and secular election process, ensuring that voters are not influenced by religious or caste considerations.
3. Use of government resources for election campaigns by party or candidate:
Using government resources for election campaigns by a party or candidate is illegal in India. The Model Code of Conduct (MCC), enforced by the Election Commission, prohibits the misuse of government machinery, vehicles, buildings, and other resources for election campaigning purposes. This ensures a level playing field for all candidates and parties and prevents unfair advantages based on access to government resources.
4. Candidate spending limit:
The statement about a candidate not being able to spend more than Rs. 10 lakh in a constituency for an Assembly election is incorrect. The spending limit for candidates in elections varies depending on the type of election. For Assembly elections, the spending limit is set by the ECI for each state and is typically higher than Rs. 10 lakh. The actual limit is subject to change and is revised by the ECI from time to time.
In conclusion, statements 1, 2, and 3 are correct as they represent illegal actions under the election laws of India. However, statement 4 is incorrect as the spending limit for candidates in an Assembly election is not fixed at Rs. 10 lakh.
Which statement is not correct regarding "Gram Sabha"?- a) It is a body consisting of persons registered in the electoral rolls of a village within the area of the Panchayat level.
- b) It is a village assembly consisting of all the registered voters in the area of the Panchayat.
- c) Its powers have been determined by the Central Government
- d) Its powers and functions at village level are like state legislature at the state level.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Which statement is not correct regarding "Gram Sabha"?
a)
It is a body consisting of persons registered in the electoral rolls of a village within the area of the Panchayat level.
b)
It is a village assembly consisting of all the registered voters in the area of the Panchayat.
c)
Its powers have been determined by the Central Government
d)
Its powers and functions at village level are like state legislature at the state level.
|
|
Suresh Reddy answered |
- The Gram Sabha is the fulcrum of the Panchayati Raj and village development. People use the forum of the Gram Sabha to discuss local governance and development, and make need- based plans for the village.
- The Panchayat implements development programs under the overarching mandate, supervision and monitoring of the Gram Sabha. All decisions of the Panchayat are taken through the Gram Sabha and no decision is official and valid without the consent of the Gram Sabha.
Regarding the powers of Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha , consider the following statements: 1. Any ordinary law needs to be passed by both the Houses.2. Lok Sabha exercises more powers in money matters.3. The Rajya Sabha can only delay the budget passed Lok sabha by 28 days or suggest changes in it.4. If the majority of the Rajya Sabha members say they have ‘no confidence’ in the Council of Ministers, all ministers including the Prime Minister, have to quit.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?- a) 1 and 2 only
- b) 3 and 4 only
- c) 1, 2 and 4 only
- d) All of the above
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Regarding the powers of Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha , consider the following statements:
1. Any ordinary law needs to be passed by both the Houses.
2. Lok Sabha exercises more powers in money matters.
3. The Rajya Sabha can only delay the budget passed Lok sabha by 28 days or suggest changes in it.
4. If the majority of the Rajya Sabha members say they have ‘no confidence’ in the Council of Ministers, all ministers including the Prime Minister, have to quit.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
a)
1 and 2 only
b)
3 and 4 only
c)
1, 2 and 4 only
d)
All of the above
|
|
Rahul Choudhury answered |
- Our Constitution does give the Rajya Sabha some special powers over the states. But on most matters, the Lok Sabha exercises supreme power.
1. Any ordinary law needs to be passed by both the Houses. But if there is a difference between the two Houses, the final decision is taken in a joint session in which members of both the Houses sit together. Because of the larger number of members, the view of the Lok Sabha is likely to prevail in such a meeting.
2. Lok Sabha exercises more powers in money matters.
3. Once the Lok Sabha passes the budget of the government or any other money related law, the Rajya Sabha cannot reject it. The Rajya Sabha can only delay it by 14 days or suggest changes in it. The Lok Sabha may or may not accept these changes.
Which of the following are the minimum conditions of a democratic election?1. Everyone should have one vote and every vote should have equal value.2. Parties and candidates should be free to contest elections.3. Elections may or may not be held regularly.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?- a) 1 and 2 Only
- b) 2 and 3 Only
- c) 1 and 3 only
- d) 1, 2 and 3 only
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following are the minimum conditions of a democratic election?
1. Everyone should have one vote and every vote should have equal value.
2. Parties and candidates should be free to contest elections.
3. Elections may or may not be held regularly.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
a)
1 and 2 Only
b)
2 and 3 Only
c)
1 and 3 only
d)
1, 2 and 3 only
|
|
Kavita Shah answered |
The minimum conditions of a democratic election
1. First, everyone should be able to choose. This means that everyone should have one vote and every vote should have equal value.
2. Second, there should be something to choose from. Parties and candidates should be free to contest elections and should offer some real choice to the voters.
3. Third, the choice should be offered at regular intervals. Elections must be held regularly after every few years
4. Fourth, the candidate preferred by the people should get elected.
5. Fifth, elections should be conducted in a free and fair manner where people can choose as they really wish.
Consider the following statements:1. In a democracy any group of citizens is free to form a political party.2. In a one-party system only one party is allowed to control and run the government.3. Any democratic system must allow at least two parties to compete in elections.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?- a) 1 and 2 only
- b) 2 and 3 only
- c) 1 and 3 only
- d) All of the above
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
1. In a democracy any group of citizens is free to form a political party.
2. In a one-party system only one party is allowed to control and run the government.
3. Any democratic system must allow at least two parties to compete in elections.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
a)
1 and 2 only
b)
2 and 3 only
c)
1 and 3 only
d)
All of the above
|
|
Dishani Choudhary answered |
Explanation:
The correct answer is option 'D' - All of the above. Let's analyze each statement one by one to understand why.
Statement 1: In a democracy any group of citizens is free to form a political party.
- This statement is correct. In a democratic system, citizens have the freedom to form political parties. This is an essential element of democracy as it allows for diverse representation and multiple viewpoints to be expressed.
Statement 2: In a one-party system only one party is allowed to control and run the government.
- This statement is also correct. In a one-party system, only one political party is allowed to exist and control the government. This means that other political parties are either not allowed or heavily restricted in their activities. This type of system is often associated with authoritarian regimes and lacks the principles of multi-party democracy.
Statement 3: Any democratic system must allow at least two parties to compete in elections.
- This statement is correct. In a democratic system, it is important to have multiple parties competing in elections. This ensures that the citizens have a choice and can vote for the party that aligns with their views and interests. It also promotes healthy competition and accountability among political parties.
Conclusion:
All three statements are correct as they describe different aspects of democratic systems. In a democracy, citizens have the freedom to form political parties, while in a one-party system, only one party is allowed to control the government. However, in any democratic system, it is necessary to have at least two parties competing in elections to ensure representation and choice for the citizens.
The correct answer is option 'D' - All of the above. Let's analyze each statement one by one to understand why.
Statement 1: In a democracy any group of citizens is free to form a political party.
- This statement is correct. In a democratic system, citizens have the freedom to form political parties. This is an essential element of democracy as it allows for diverse representation and multiple viewpoints to be expressed.
Statement 2: In a one-party system only one party is allowed to control and run the government.
- This statement is also correct. In a one-party system, only one political party is allowed to exist and control the government. This means that other political parties are either not allowed or heavily restricted in their activities. This type of system is often associated with authoritarian regimes and lacks the principles of multi-party democracy.
Statement 3: Any democratic system must allow at least two parties to compete in elections.
- This statement is correct. In a democratic system, it is important to have multiple parties competing in elections. This ensures that the citizens have a choice and can vote for the party that aligns with their views and interests. It also promotes healthy competition and accountability among political parties.
Conclusion:
All three statements are correct as they describe different aspects of democratic systems. In a democracy, citizens have the freedom to form political parties, while in a one-party system, only one party is allowed to control the government. However, in any democratic system, it is necessary to have at least two parties competing in elections to ensure representation and choice for the citizens.
Consider the following statements.1. Elections in 1989 led to the defeat of the Congress party but did not result in a majority for any other party2. Though the Congress was the largest party in the Lok Sabha, it did not have a clear majority and therefore, it decided to sit in the oppositionWhich of these statements are correct?- a) 1 Only
- b) 2 Only
- c) Both of them
- d) Neither of them
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements.
1. Elections in 1989 led to the defeat of the Congress party but did not result in a majority for any other party
2. Though the Congress was the largest party in the Lok Sabha, it did not have a clear majority and therefore, it decided to sit in the opposition
Which of these statements are correct?
a)
1 Only
b)
2 Only
c)
Both of them
d)
Neither of them
|
|
Sanjay Rana answered |
- Elections in 1989 led to the defeat of the Congress party but did not result in a majority for any other party. Though the Congress was the largest party in the Lok Sabha, it did not have a clear majority and therefore, it decided to sit in the opposition.
- The National Front (which itself was an alliance of Janata Dal and some other regional parties) received support from two diametrically opposite political groups: the BJP and the Left Front. On this basis, the National Front formed a coalition government, but the BJP and the Left Front did not join in this government.
Consider the following statements:1. Democracy evolves through popular struggles.2. Democratic conflict can be resolved through mass mobilisation.Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?- a) 1 Only
- b) 2 Only
- c) Both of them
- d) Neither of them
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
1. Democracy evolves through popular struggles.
2. Democratic conflict can be resolved through mass mobilisation.
Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?
a)
1 Only
b)
2 Only
c)
Both of them
d)
Neither of them
|
|
Harshitha Yadav answered |
Democracy is a form of government where the power lies in the hands of the people, and they have the right to elect their leaders and participate in decision-making processes. It is a system that evolves through popular struggles and allows for the resolution of conflicts through mass mobilization.
1. Democracy evolves through popular struggles:
- Democracy is not a static system but an evolving one. It has been shaped by various popular struggles throughout history. Examples include the civil rights movement, women's suffrage movements, labor movements, and protests against authoritarian regimes.
- These struggles have led to the expansion of democratic rights and freedoms, the inclusion of marginalized groups, and the establishment of checks and balances to prevent the concentration of power.
- Therefore, the statement "Democracy evolves through popular struggles" is correct.
2. Democratic conflict can be resolved through mass mobilization:
- In a democratic society, conflicts are inevitable due to differences in opinions, interests, and values. However, democracy provides a framework for resolving these conflicts peacefully and through dialogue.
- Mass mobilization, such as protests, demonstrations, and strikes, is one of the ways through which conflicts can be addressed in a democratic system.
- By mobilizing large numbers of people, individuals and groups can express their grievances, demand change, and put pressure on the government to take action.
- Through mass mobilization, issues that were previously ignored or marginalized can gain visibility and become part of the political agenda.
- Therefore, the statement "Democratic conflict can be resolved through mass mobilization" is also correct.
Conclusion:
Both statements given above are correct. Democracy indeed evolves through popular struggles, and democratic conflicts can be resolved through mass mobilization. These are inherent characteristics of a democratic system, as it allows for the active participation of citizens and the peaceful resolution of conflicts.
1. Democracy evolves through popular struggles:
- Democracy is not a static system but an evolving one. It has been shaped by various popular struggles throughout history. Examples include the civil rights movement, women's suffrage movements, labor movements, and protests against authoritarian regimes.
- These struggles have led to the expansion of democratic rights and freedoms, the inclusion of marginalized groups, and the establishment of checks and balances to prevent the concentration of power.
- Therefore, the statement "Democracy evolves through popular struggles" is correct.
2. Democratic conflict can be resolved through mass mobilization:
- In a democratic society, conflicts are inevitable due to differences in opinions, interests, and values. However, democracy provides a framework for resolving these conflicts peacefully and through dialogue.
- Mass mobilization, such as protests, demonstrations, and strikes, is one of the ways through which conflicts can be addressed in a democratic system.
- By mobilizing large numbers of people, individuals and groups can express their grievances, demand change, and put pressure on the government to take action.
- Through mass mobilization, issues that were previously ignored or marginalized can gain visibility and become part of the political agenda.
- Therefore, the statement "Democratic conflict can be resolved through mass mobilization" is also correct.
Conclusion:
Both statements given above are correct. Democracy indeed evolves through popular struggles, and democratic conflicts can be resolved through mass mobilization. These are inherent characteristics of a democratic system, as it allows for the active participation of citizens and the peaceful resolution of conflicts.
Recommendation of Ashok Mehta Committee includes. 1. The three-tier system of Panchayati-Raj should be replaced by the two-tier system.2. The state government should not supersede the Panchayati Raj institution.3. Seats for SCs and STs should be reserved on the basis of their population.Which of the statements given above is / are correct.- a) 1 & 2 only
- b) 2 & 3 only
- c) 1 & 3 only
- d) All of the above
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Recommendation of Ashok Mehta Committee includes.
1. The three-tier system of Panchayati-Raj should be replaced by the two-tier system.
2. The state government should not supersede the Panchayati Raj institution.
3. Seats for SCs and STs should be reserved on the basis of their population.
Which of the statements given above is / are correct.
a)
1 & 2 only
b)
2 & 3 only
c)
1 & 3 only
d)
All of the above
|
|
Meera Singh answered |
- In December 1977, the Janata Government appointed a committee on panchayati raj institutions under the chairmanship of Ashok Mehta. It submitted its report in August 1978 and made 132 recommendations to revive and strengthen the declining panchayati raj system in the country. Its main recommendations were:
1. The three-tier system of panchayati raj should be replaced by the two-tier sys-tem, that is, zila parishad at the district level, and below it, the mandaI panchayat consisting of a group of villages with a total population of 15,000 to 20,000.
2. A district should be the first point for decentralisation under popular supervision below the state level.
3. Zila parishad should be the executive body and made responsible for planning at the district level.
4. There should be an official participation of political parties at all levels of panchayat elections.
5. The panchayati raj institutions should have compulsory powers of taxation to mobilise their own financial resources.
6. There should be a regular social audit by a district level agency and by a committee of legislators to check whether the funds allotted for the vulnerable social and economic groups are actually spent on them.
7. The state government should not supersede the panchayati raj institutions. In case of an imperative supersession, elections should be held within six months from the date of supersession.
8. The nyaya panchayats should be kept as separate bodies from that of development panchayats. They should be presided over by a qualified judge.
9. The chief electoral officer of a state in consultation with the chief election com-missioner should organise and conduct the panchayati raj elections.
10. Development functions should be transferred to the zila parishad and all development staff should work under its control and supervision.
11. The voluntary agencies should play an important role in mobilising the support of the people for panchayati raj.
12. A minister for panchayati raj should be appointed in the state council of ministers to look after the affairs of the panchayati raj institutions.
13. Seats for SCs and STs should be reserved on the basis of their population. Due to the collapse of the Janata Government before the completion of its term, no action could be taken on the recommendations of the Ashok Mehta Committee at the central level.
With respect to communal politics, consider the following statements:1. In communal politics religion is expressed in politics in exclusive and partisan terms.2. Communal politics is based on the idea that religion is the principal basis of social community.Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?- a) 1 Only
- b) 2 Only
- c) Both of them
- d) Neither of them
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
With respect to communal politics, consider the following statements:
1. In communal politics religion is expressed in politics in exclusive and partisan terms.
2. Communal politics is based on the idea that religion is the principal basis of social community.
Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?
a)
1 Only
b)
2 Only
c)
Both of them
d)
Neither of them
|
|
Kavita Mehta answered |
Communalism
1. The problem begins when religion is seen as the basis of the nation and it becomes more acute when religion is expressed in politics in exclusive and partisan terms, when one religion and its followers are pitted against another.
2. This happens when beliefs of one religion are presented as superior to those of other religions, when the demands of one religious group are formed in opposition to another and when state power is used to establish domination of one religious group over the rest. This manner of using religion in politics is communal politics.
3. Communal politics is based on the idea that religion is the principal basis of social community.
Which of the following factors are responsible factors for the weakening of the position of caste hierarchy in India?1. Large scale Urbanisation2. Growth of literacy and education3. Occupational mobility4. Weakening of the position of landlords in the villagesSelect the correct answer using the code given below:- a) 1 and 2 only
- b) 2 and 3 only
- c) 1 only
- d) All of the above
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following factors are responsible factors for the weakening of the position of caste hierarchy in India?
1. Large scale Urbanisation
2. Growth of literacy and education
3. Occupational mobility
4. Weakening of the position of landlords in the villages
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
a)
1 and 2 only
b)
2 and 3 only
c)
1 only
d)
All of the above
|
|
Sanjay Rana answered |
1. Partly due to efforts of socio religious reformers and partly due to other socio-economic changes, castes and caste system in modern India have undergone great changes. With economic development, large scale URBANISATION, growth of literacy and education, OCCUPATIONAL MOBILITY and the weakening of the position of landlords in the villages, the old notions of CASTE HIERARCHY are breaking down.
2. Now, most of the time, in urban areas it does not matter much who is walking along next to us on a street or eating at the next table in a restaurant. The Constitution of India prohibited any castebased discrimination and laid the foundations of policies to reverse the injustices of the caste system.
Consider the following statements:Statement-I:
Democracy is a form of government where elected representatives hold decision-making power and the term originates from the Greek words 'demos' and 'Kratos', meaning "rule of the people".Statement-II:
Monarchy involves rule by a king or queen, sometimes referred to as an emperor, and can be of two types: absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?- a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
- b)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
- c)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
- d)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
Statement-I:
Democracy is a form of government where elected representatives hold decision-making power and the term originates from the Greek words 'demos' and 'Kratos', meaning "rule of the people".
Democracy is a form of government where elected representatives hold decision-making power and the term originates from the Greek words 'demos' and 'Kratos', meaning "rule of the people".
Statement-II:
Monarchy involves rule by a king or queen, sometimes referred to as an emperor, and can be of two types: absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy.
Monarchy involves rule by a king or queen, sometimes referred to as an emperor, and can be of two types: absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
a)
Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
b)
Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
c)
Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
d)
Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
|
Innovative Classes answered |
Statement-I correctly defines democracy as a form of government where elected representatives hold decision-making power, and it accurately mentions the origin of the term 'democracy' from Greek roots. Statement-II provides a valid explanation of monarchy, distinguishing between absolute and constitutional monarchy. Therefore, both statements are correct, and Statement-II effectively explains Statement-I.
Consider the following statements:1. Partisan is a person who is strongly committed to a party, group or faction.2. Parties are about a part of the society and thus involve Partisanship.Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?- a) 1 Only
- b) 2 Only
- c) Both of them
- d) Neither of them
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
1. Partisan is a person who is strongly committed to a party, group or faction.
2. Parties are about a part of the society and thus involve Partisanship.
Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?
a)
1 Only
b)
2 Only
c)
Both of them
d)
Neither of them
|
|
Kavita Shah answered |
- Partisan is a person who is strongly committed to a party, group or faction. Partisanship is marked by a tendency to take a side and inability to take a balanced view on an issue. Parties are about a part of the society and thus involve PARTISANSHIP.
- Thus a party is known by which part it stands for, which policies it supports and whose interests it upholds. A political party has three components: 1. The leaders 2. The active members 3. Followers.
Consider the following statements.1. The Mandal Commission was set up to investigate the extent of educational and social backwardness among various sections of Indian society and recommend ways of identifying these ‘backward classes’2. The Mandal Commission also made many other recommendations, like land reform, to improve the conditions of the OBCs.3. In August 1990, the National Front government decided to implement one of the recommendations of Mandal Commission pertaining to reservations for OBCs in jobs in the central government and its undertakingsWhich of these statements are correct?- a) 1 and 2 only
- b) 2 and 3 only
- c) 1 and 3 only
- d) All of the above
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements.
1. The Mandal Commission was set up to investigate the extent of educational and social backwardness among various sections of Indian society and recommend ways of identifying these ‘backward classes’
2. The Mandal Commission also made many other recommendations, like land reform, to improve the conditions of the OBCs.
3. In August 1990, the National Front government decided to implement one of the recommendations of Mandal Commission pertaining to reservations for OBCs in jobs in the central government and its undertakings
Which of these statements are correct?
a)
1 and 2 only
b)
2 and 3 only
c)
1 and 3 only
d)
All of the above
|
|
Sanjay Rana answered |
- The Mandal Commission Reservations for the OBC were in existence in southern States since the 1960s, if not earlier. But this policy was not operative in north Indian States. It was during the tenure of Janata Party government in 1977-79 that the demand for reservations for backward castes in north India and at the national level was strongly raised.
- Karpoori Thakur, the then Chief Minister of Bihar, was a pioneer in this direction. His government had introduced a new policy of reservations for OBCs in Bihar. Following this, the central government appointed a Commission in 1978 to look into and recommend ways to improve the conditions of the backward classes. This was the second time since Independence that the government had appointed such a commission.
- In August 1990, the National Front government decided to implement one of the recommendations of Mandal Commission pertaining to reservations for OBCs in jobs in the central government and its undertakings. This decision sparked agitations and violent protests in many cities of north India. The decision was also challenged in the Supreme Court and came to be known as the ‘Indira Sawhney case’, after the name of one of the petitioners.
Consider the following statements regarding non alignment movement. 1. The first non-aligned summit was held in Belgrade in 19612. The first summit was attended by more than 100 member statesWhich of these statements are correct?- a) 1 Only
- b) 2 Only
- c) Both of them
- d) Neither of them
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements regarding non alignment movement.
1. The first non-aligned summit was held in Belgrade in 1961
2. The first summit was attended by more than 100 member states
Which of these statements are correct?
a)
1 Only
b)
2 Only
c)
Both of them
d)
Neither of them
|
|
Rishika Basak answered |
Introduction:
The Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) is a forum of countries that are not formally aligned with or against any major power bloc. It was founded in 1961 in Belgrade, Yugoslavia, and aimed to create an independent path for countries that were not part of the Cold War rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union.
Explanation:
The given statements are as follows:
1. The first non-aligned summit was held in Belgrade in 1961.
2. The first summit was attended by more than 100 member states.
Statement 1: The first non-aligned summit was held in Belgrade in 1961.
This statement is correct. The first summit of the Non-Aligned Movement took place in Belgrade, Yugoslavia (now Serbia) in September 1961. The summit was attended by representatives from 25 countries, including Yugoslavia, India, Egypt, Indonesia, Ghana, and Sri Lanka. The purpose of the summit was to bring together countries that wanted to maintain their independence and sovereignty and not be aligned with any major power blocs.
Statement 2: The first summit was attended by more than 100 member states.
This statement is incorrect. The first summit of the Non-Aligned Movement was attended by representatives from 25 countries, not more than 100 member states. Over the years, the Non-Aligned Movement has grown in membership, and currently, it consists of 120 member states. However, at the time of the first summit, the number of member states was much smaller.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, statement 1 is correct, and statement 2 is incorrect. The first non-aligned summit was held in Belgrade in 1961, but it was attended by representatives from 25 countries, not more than 100 member states. The Non-Aligned Movement provided a platform for countries to pursue their own interests and maintain their independence during the Cold War era.
The Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) is a forum of countries that are not formally aligned with or against any major power bloc. It was founded in 1961 in Belgrade, Yugoslavia, and aimed to create an independent path for countries that were not part of the Cold War rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union.
Explanation:
The given statements are as follows:
1. The first non-aligned summit was held in Belgrade in 1961.
2. The first summit was attended by more than 100 member states.
Statement 1: The first non-aligned summit was held in Belgrade in 1961.
This statement is correct. The first summit of the Non-Aligned Movement took place in Belgrade, Yugoslavia (now Serbia) in September 1961. The summit was attended by representatives from 25 countries, including Yugoslavia, India, Egypt, Indonesia, Ghana, and Sri Lanka. The purpose of the summit was to bring together countries that wanted to maintain their independence and sovereignty and not be aligned with any major power blocs.
Statement 2: The first summit was attended by more than 100 member states.
This statement is incorrect. The first summit of the Non-Aligned Movement was attended by representatives from 25 countries, not more than 100 member states. Over the years, the Non-Aligned Movement has grown in membership, and currently, it consists of 120 member states. However, at the time of the first summit, the number of member states was much smaller.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, statement 1 is correct, and statement 2 is incorrect. The first non-aligned summit was held in Belgrade in 1961, but it was attended by representatives from 25 countries, not more than 100 member states. The Non-Aligned Movement provided a platform for countries to pursue their own interests and maintain their independence during the Cold War era.
Consider the following statements regarding the Cold War. 1. The Cold War referred to the competition, the tensions and a series of confrontations between the United States and Soviet Union, backed by their respective allies2. The eastern alliance, headed by the US, represented the ideology of liberal democracy and capitalism while the western alliance, headed by the Soviet Union, was committed to the ideology of socialism and communismWhich of these statements are correct?- a) 1 Only
- b) 2 Only
- c) Both of them
- d) Neither of them
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements regarding the Cold War.
1. The Cold War referred to the competition, the tensions and a series of confrontations between the United States and Soviet Union, backed by their respective allies
2. The eastern alliance, headed by the US, represented the ideology of liberal democracy and capitalism while the western alliance, headed by the Soviet Union, was committed to the ideology of socialism and communism
Which of these statements are correct?
a)
1 Only
b)
2 Only
c)
Both of them
d)
Neither of them
|
|
Amit Kumar answered |
- The Cuban Missile Crisis was a high point of what came to be known as the Cold War. The Cold War referred to the competition, the tensions and a series of confrontations between the United States and Soviet Union, backed by their respective allies.
- Fortunately, however, it never escalated into a ‘hot war’, that is, a full-scale war between these two powers. There were wars in various regions, with the two powers and their allies involved in warfare and in supporting regional allies, but at least the world avoided another global war.
- The Cold War was not simply a matter of power rivalries, of military alliances, and of the balance of power. These were accompanied by a real ideological conflict as well, a difference over the best and the most appropriate way of organising political, economic, and social life all over the world.
- The western alliance, headed by the US, represented the ideology of liberal democracy and capitalism while the eastern alliance, headed by the Soviet Union, was committed to the ideology of socialism and communism.
Consider the following statements.1. The British Indian Provinces were directly under the control of the British government2. The Princely States, enjoyed some form of control over their internal affairs as long as they opposed British supremacy3. Princely States covered one-third of the land area of the British Indian EmpireWhich of these statements are correct?- a) 1 and 2 only
- b) 2 and 3 only
- c) 1 and 3 only
- d) All of the above
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements.
1. The British Indian Provinces were directly under the control of the British government
2. The Princely States, enjoyed some form of control over their internal affairs as long as they opposed British supremacy
3. Princely States covered one-third of the land area of the British Indian Empire
Which of these statements are correct?
a)
1 and 2 only
b)
2 and 3 only
c)
1 and 3 only
d)
All of the above
|
Isha Mehta answered |
The princely states were able to enjoy control over their internal affairs till they did not oppose the Britishers.
Consider the following statements.1. The rulers of most of the states signed a document called the ‘Instrument of Accession’ which meant that their state agreed to become a part of the Union of India2. The issue of Junagarh was resolved after a plebiscite confirmed people’s desire to join IndiaWhich of these statements are correct?- a) 1 Only
- b) 2 Only
- c) Both of them
- d) Neither of them
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements.
1. The rulers of most of the states signed a document called the ‘Instrument of Accession’ which meant that their state agreed to become a part of the Union of India
2. The issue of Junagarh was resolved after a plebiscite confirmed people’s desire to join India
Which of these statements are correct?
a)
1 Only
b)
2 Only
c)
Both of them
d)
Neither of them
|
|
Deepa Iyer answered |
- Before 15 August 1947, peaceful negotiations had brought almost all states whose territories were contiguous to the new boundaries of India, into the Indian Union.
- The rulers of most of the states signed a document called the ‘Instrument of Accession’ which meant that their state agreed to become a part of the Union of India. Accession of the Princely States of Junagadh, Hyderabad, Kashmir and Manipur proved more difficult than the rest.
- The issue of Junagarh was resolved after a plebiscite confirmed people’s desire to join India. You will read about Kashmir in Chapter Eight. Here, let us look at the cases of Hyderabad and Manipur.
Consider the following statements:1. Both Interest groups and movement groups attempt to influence politics rather than directly take part in electoral competition.2. Both Interest groups and movement groups have strong organisations.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?- a) 1 Only
- b) 2 Only
- c) Both of them
- d) Neither of them
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
1. Both Interest groups and movement groups attempt to influence politics rather than directly take part in electoral competition.
2. Both Interest groups and movement groups have strong organisations.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
a)
1 Only
b)
2 Only
c)
Both of them
d)
Neither of them
|
|
Ojasvi Mehta answered |
- Like an interest group, a movement attempts to influence politics rather than directly take part in electoral competition. But unlike the interest groups, movements have a loose organisation.
- Their decision making is more informal and flexible. They depend much more on spontaneous mass participation than an interest group. The groups involved with movements also include a very wide variety.
- Most of the movements are issue specific movements that seek to achieve a single objective within a limited time frame.
- Others are more general or generic movements that seek to achieve a broad goal in the very long term. The Nepalese movement for democracy arose with the specific objective of reversing the king’s orders that led to suspension of democracy.
Which of the following is/are correct?1. Both India and Britain allow only members of Parliament to be appointed as minister.2. Both India and Britain can have a PM from the lower or upper house.- a) 1 Only
- b) 2 Only
- c) Both of them
- d) Neither of them
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following is/are correct?
1. Both India and Britain allow only members of Parliament to be appointed as minister.
2. Both India and Britain can have a PM from the lower or upper house.
a)
1 Only
b)
2 Only
c)
Both of them
d)
Neither of them
|
Suyash Dasgupta answered |
D. Neither of them
Explanation:
Both statements 1 and 2 are incorrect.
1. Both India and Britain allow only members of Parliament to be appointed as ministers.
This statement is incorrect. In India, the Constitution does not specifically require that ministers be members of Parliament. However, it is a common practice for ministers to be members of either the Lok Sabha (lower house) or the Rajya Sabha (upper house). It is not a legal requirement, but a political convention.
In Britain, ministers are typically members of Parliament, but it is not a legal requirement. There have been instances where individuals who are not members of Parliament have been appointed as ministers.
2. Both India and Britain can have a PM from the lower or upper house.
This statement is incorrect. In India, the Prime Minister must be a member of either the Lok Sabha or the Rajya Sabha. The Prime Minister is usually the leader of the majority party in the Lok Sabha.
In Britain, the Prime Minister must be a member of the House of Commons (lower house). The Prime Minister is typically the leader of the majority party in the House of Commons.
Therefore, neither statement 1 nor statement 2 is correct.
Explanation:
Both statements 1 and 2 are incorrect.
1. Both India and Britain allow only members of Parliament to be appointed as ministers.
This statement is incorrect. In India, the Constitution does not specifically require that ministers be members of Parliament. However, it is a common practice for ministers to be members of either the Lok Sabha (lower house) or the Rajya Sabha (upper house). It is not a legal requirement, but a political convention.
In Britain, ministers are typically members of Parliament, but it is not a legal requirement. There have been instances where individuals who are not members of Parliament have been appointed as ministers.
2. Both India and Britain can have a PM from the lower or upper house.
This statement is incorrect. In India, the Prime Minister must be a member of either the Lok Sabha or the Rajya Sabha. The Prime Minister is usually the leader of the majority party in the Lok Sabha.
In Britain, the Prime Minister must be a member of the House of Commons (lower house). The Prime Minister is typically the leader of the majority party in the House of Commons.
Therefore, neither statement 1 nor statement 2 is correct.
Chapter doubts & questions for Class-wise NCERT Tests - Indian Polity for State PSC Exams 2025 is part of BPSC (Bihar) exam preparation. The chapters have been prepared according to the BPSC (Bihar) exam syllabus. The Chapter doubts & questions, notes, tests & MCQs are made for BPSC (Bihar) 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests here.
Chapter doubts & questions of Class-wise NCERT Tests - Indian Polity for State PSC Exams in English & Hindi are available as part of BPSC (Bihar) exam.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for BPSC (Bihar) Exam by signing up for free.
Indian Polity for State PSC Exams
144 videos|544 docs|207 tests
|
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Study with 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos & Tests
10M+ students study on EduRev
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup