All Exams >
Humanities/Arts >
Political Science CUET Preparation >
All Questions
All questions of Politics of Planned Development for Humanities/Arts Exam
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:Assertion: India did not follow any of the two known paths to development – it did not accept the capitalist model of development in which development was left entirely to the private sector, nor did it follow the socialist model in which private property was abolished and all the production was controlled by the state.Reason: It was India’s one of the biggest mistakes that India did not adopt any one of the two models suggested above.- a)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
- b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
- c)(A) is true, but (R) is false.
- d)(A) is false, but (R) is true.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:
Assertion: India did not follow any of the two known paths to development – it did not accept the capitalist model of development in which development was left entirely to the private sector, nor did it follow the socialist model in which private property was abolished and all the production was controlled by the state.
Reason: It was India’s one of the biggest mistakes that India did not adopt any one of the two models suggested above.
a)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
b)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
c)
(A) is true, but (R) is false.
d)
(A) is false, but (R) is true.
|
Ansari Marwa answered |
I am not satisfied with the option (B) because it was not the mistake of india and atleast india merge both the ideologies...by my side it should be option (c).
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?i. The first two five-year plans in India laid the foundations for future economic growth through the establishment of mega dams and heavy industries.ii. The Green Revolution primarily benefited small-scale farmers, leading to widespread agricultural prosperity across all regions of India.iii. The abolition of the Zamindari system was a significant land reform that aimed to consolidate land holdings in India.iv. Operation Flood, also known as the White Revolution, was initiated to create a nationwide milk grid to enhance milk production.- a) i and iii
- b) ii and iv
- c) i, iii, and iv
- d) i, ii, iii, and iv
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
i. The first two five-year plans in India laid the foundations for future economic growth through the establishment of mega dams and heavy industries.
ii. The Green Revolution primarily benefited small-scale farmers, leading to widespread agricultural prosperity across all regions of India.
iii. The abolition of the Zamindari system was a significant land reform that aimed to consolidate land holdings in India.
iv. Operation Flood, also known as the White Revolution, was initiated to create a nationwide milk grid to enhance milk production.
a)
i and iii
b)
ii and iv
c)
i, iii, and iv
d)
i, ii, iii, and iv
|
EduRev Humanities answered |
- Statement i is correct as the first two five-year plans focused on establishing major infrastructure projects like dams and industries, which were crucial for economic growth.
- Statement ii is incorrect; while the Green Revolution did increase agricultural productivity, it primarily benefited wealthier farmers and large landholders, not small-scale farmers.
- Statement iii is correct; the abolition of the Zamindari system was a key reform aimed at redistributing land and consolidating holdings.
- Statement iv is correct; Operation Flood successfully organized milk producers into cooperatives, significantly increasing milk production across India.
Thus, the correct statements are i, iii, and iv, making Option C the correct choice.
Study the cartoon given below carefully and answer the questions that follow:
Q. Which type of economic model was adopted by India?- a)Capitalist
- b)Socialist
- c)Liberal socialist
- d)Mixed economic principle
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Study the cartoon given below carefully and answer the questions that follow:
Q. Which type of economic model was adopted by India?
a)
Capitalist
b)
Socialist
c)
Liberal socialist
d)
Mixed economic principle
|
Rajesh Gupta answered |
India did not accept the model in which development was left entirely to the private sector, nor did they follow in which private property was abolished and all the production was controlled by the state. Hence, they took elements from both these models and mixed them together. That is why it was described as ‘mixed economy’.
Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:On the eve of Independence, India had before it, two models of modern development: the liberalcapitalist model as in much of Europe and the US and the socialist model as in the USSR. There were many in India then who were deeply impressed by the Soviet model of development. These included not just the leaders of the Communist Party of India, but also those of the Socialist Party and leaders like Nehru within the Congress. There were very few supporters of the American style capitalist development. As in the USSR, the Planning Commission of India opted for Five Year Plans (FYP). The idea is very simple: The Government of India prepares a document that has a plan for all its income and expenditure for the next five years. Accordingly, the budget of the Central and all the State governments is divided into two parts: ‘non-plan’ budget that is spent on routine items on a yearly basis and ‘plan’ budget that is spent on a five-year basis as per the priorities fixed by the plan. A five-year plan has the advantage of permitting the government to focus on the larger picture and make long-term intervention in the economy. The draft of the First Five Year Plan and then the actual Plan Document, released in December 1951, generated a lot of excitement in the country.Q. The Budget is divided into which two parts?- a)Planned and semi planned budget
- b)Planned and non-planned budget
- c)Planned and reserved budget
- d)None of the above
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:
On the eve of Independence, India had before it, two models of modern development: the liberalcapitalist model as in much of Europe and the US and the socialist model as in the USSR. There were many in India then who were deeply impressed by the Soviet model of development. These included not just the leaders of the Communist Party of India, but also those of the Socialist Party and leaders like Nehru within the Congress. There were very few supporters of the American style capitalist development. As in the USSR, the Planning Commission of India opted for Five Year Plans (FYP). The idea is very simple: The Government of India prepares a document that has a plan for all its income and expenditure for the next five years. Accordingly, the budget of the Central and all the State governments is divided into two parts: ‘non-plan’ budget that is spent on routine items on a yearly basis and ‘plan’ budget that is spent on a five-year basis as per the priorities fixed by the plan. A five-year plan has the advantage of permitting the government to focus on the larger picture and make long-term intervention in the economy. The draft of the First Five Year Plan and then the actual Plan Document, released in December 1951, generated a lot of excitement in the country.
Q. The Budget is divided into which two parts?
a)
Planned and semi planned budget
b)
Planned and non-planned budget
c)
Planned and reserved budget
d)
None of the above
|
Kiran Mehta answered |
Plan expenditure is spent on productive asset creation through Centrally Sponsored programmes and flagship schemes, while “Non-plan” refers to all other expenditure such as defence expenditure, subsidies, interest payments, including expenditure on establishment and maintenance activities such as salaries.
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:Assertion: The example of Orissa shows us that it is not enough to say that everyone wants development.Reason: For ‘development’ has the same or similar meanings for different sections of the people.- a)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
- b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
- c)(A) is true, but (R) is false.
- d)(A) is false, but (R) is true.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:
Assertion: The example of Orissa shows us that it is not enough to say that everyone wants development.
Reason: For ‘development’ has the same or similar meanings for different sections of the people.
a)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
b)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
c)
(A) is true, but (R) is false.
d)
(A) is false, but (R) is true.
|
Shruti Joshi answered |
Assertion and Reason:
Assertion: The example of Orissa shows us that it is not enough to say that everyone wants development.
Reason: For ‘development’ has the same or similar meanings for different sections of the people.
Explanation:
The statement presents an assertion and a reason related to development in Orissa. Let's analyze each component individually to understand the correct answer.
Assertion: The example of Orissa shows us that it is not enough to say that everyone wants development.
This assertion implies that the example of Orissa demonstrates that merely stating that everyone wants development is insufficient. It suggests that there are specific factors or considerations that need to be taken into account when discussing development in Orissa.
Reason: For ‘development’ has the same or similar meanings for different sections of the people.
The reason provided states that the term 'development' has the same or similar meanings for different sections of the people. This implies that different sections of the population in Orissa may have different interpretations or expectations regarding development.
Analysis:
The assertion and reason both discuss the concept of development in Orissa, but they provide different perspectives. The assertion emphasizes that it is not enough to assume that everyone wants development, suggesting that there may be varying opinions or priorities. The reason suggests that the term 'development' holds different meanings for different sections of the people, further supporting the idea that there might be diverse interpretations of development in Orissa.
Correct Answer:
The correct answer is option 'C': (A) is true, but (R) is false.
The reason provided in the statement is not an accurate explanation of the assertion. While the assertion points out the insufficiency of assuming universal agreement on development, the reason focuses on the different interpretations of the term 'development' among different sections of the people. These two statements are related to the topic of development in Orissa but do not directly explain each other. Hence, option 'C' is the correct answer.
Overall, the example of Orissa highlights the complexity of development and the diverse perspectives and expectations associated with it. It emphasizes the need for a nuanced understanding and consideration of different viewpoints when discussing and implementing development initiatives.
Assertion: The example of Orissa shows us that it is not enough to say that everyone wants development.
Reason: For ‘development’ has the same or similar meanings for different sections of the people.
Explanation:
The statement presents an assertion and a reason related to development in Orissa. Let's analyze each component individually to understand the correct answer.
Assertion: The example of Orissa shows us that it is not enough to say that everyone wants development.
This assertion implies that the example of Orissa demonstrates that merely stating that everyone wants development is insufficient. It suggests that there are specific factors or considerations that need to be taken into account when discussing development in Orissa.
Reason: For ‘development’ has the same or similar meanings for different sections of the people.
The reason provided states that the term 'development' has the same or similar meanings for different sections of the people. This implies that different sections of the population in Orissa may have different interpretations or expectations regarding development.
Analysis:
The assertion and reason both discuss the concept of development in Orissa, but they provide different perspectives. The assertion emphasizes that it is not enough to assume that everyone wants development, suggesting that there may be varying opinions or priorities. The reason suggests that the term 'development' holds different meanings for different sections of the people, further supporting the idea that there might be diverse interpretations of development in Orissa.
Correct Answer:
The correct answer is option 'C': (A) is true, but (R) is false.
The reason provided in the statement is not an accurate explanation of the assertion. While the assertion points out the insufficiency of assuming universal agreement on development, the reason focuses on the different interpretations of the term 'development' among different sections of the people. These two statements are related to the topic of development in Orissa but do not directly explain each other. Hence, option 'C' is the correct answer.
Overall, the example of Orissa highlights the complexity of development and the diverse perspectives and expectations associated with it. It emphasizes the need for a nuanced understanding and consideration of different viewpoints when discussing and implementing development initiatives.
Study the cartoon given below carefully and answer the questions that follow:
Q. Who in the picture is balancing between the public and private sectors?- a)Nehru
- b)Sardar Patel
- c)K. Kamraj
- d)None of the above
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Study the cartoon given below carefully and answer the questions that follow:
Q. Who in the picture is balancing between the public and private sectors?
a)
Nehru
b)
Sardar Patel
c)
K. Kamraj
d)
None of the above
|
Sadiya answered |
The person who sit astride is nehru
Assertion (A): The Second Five Year Plan aimed to promote heavy industries and indigenous production to enhance national income. Reason (R): The plan was designed to reduce imports and increase exports, which directly impacts the level of savings in the economy.- a) If both Assertion and Reason are true and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion
- b) If both Assertion and Reason are true but Reason is not the correct explanation of Assertion
- c) If Assertion is true but Reason is false
- d) If both Assertion and Reason are false
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Assertion (A): The Second Five Year Plan aimed to promote heavy industries and indigenous production to enhance national income.
Reason (R): The plan was designed to reduce imports and increase exports, which directly impacts the level of savings in the economy.
a)
If both Assertion and Reason are true and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion
b)
If both Assertion and Reason are true but Reason is not the correct explanation of Assertion
c)
If Assertion is true but Reason is false
d)
If both Assertion and Reason are false
|
Crafty Classes answered |
- Assertion Evaluation: The assertion is correct; the Second Five Year Plan indeed focused on promoting heavy industries and indigenous production as key strategies for enhancing national income.
- Reason Evaluation: The reason is also correct; the plan aimed to reduce imports and boost exports, which would ideally lead to increased savings and investment in the economy.
- Explanation Relationship: The reason provided directly supports the assertion, as reducing imports and increasing exports are fundamental aspects of enhancing national income, thereby justifying the strategies outlined in the Second Five Year Plan.
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:Assertion: The draft of the First Five Year Plan and then the actual Plan Document, released in December 1951, generated a lot of excitement in the country.Reason: This draft failed to meet the expectations of the country as it did not have anything for common men.- a)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
- b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
- c)(A) is true, but (R) is false.
- d)(A) is false, but (R) is true.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:
Assertion: The draft of the First Five Year Plan and then the actual Plan Document, released in December 1951, generated a lot of excitement in the country.
Reason: This draft failed to meet the expectations of the country as it did not have anything for common men.
a)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
b)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
c)
(A) is true, but (R) is false.
d)
(A) is false, but (R) is true.
|
|
Akshita Saha answered |
Assertion: The draft of the First Five Year Plan and then the actual Plan Document, released in December 1951, generated a lot of excitement in the country.
Reason: This draft failed to meet the expectations of the country as it did not have anything for common men.
Explanation:
The assertion states that the draft of the First Five Year Plan and the subsequent release of the Plan Document in December 1951 created a great sense of excitement in the country. This indicates that the plan was eagerly anticipated and generated high expectations among the people.
The reason provided states that the draft failed to meet the expectations of the country as it did not include anything for the common men. This suggests that the plan did not address the needs and concerns of the general population, leading to disappointment and dissatisfaction.
Analysis:
The assertion and reason both seem to be true, but they do not establish a cause-and-effect relationship. While the assertion highlights the excitement generated by the plan, the reason suggests that it failed to meet the expectations of the common men. However, the reason does not provide any evidence or explanation to support its claim.
Conclusion:
Based on the analysis, the correct answer is option 'c' - (A) is true, but (R) is false. The assertion is true as it states that the First Five Year Plan generated excitement in the country. However, the reason is false as it lacks evidence and explanation to support its claim that the plan did not have anything for the common men.
Reason: This draft failed to meet the expectations of the country as it did not have anything for common men.
Explanation:
The assertion states that the draft of the First Five Year Plan and the subsequent release of the Plan Document in December 1951 created a great sense of excitement in the country. This indicates that the plan was eagerly anticipated and generated high expectations among the people.
The reason provided states that the draft failed to meet the expectations of the country as it did not include anything for the common men. This suggests that the plan did not address the needs and concerns of the general population, leading to disappointment and dissatisfaction.
Analysis:
The assertion and reason both seem to be true, but they do not establish a cause-and-effect relationship. While the assertion highlights the excitement generated by the plan, the reason suggests that it failed to meet the expectations of the common men. However, the reason does not provide any evidence or explanation to support its claim.
Conclusion:
Based on the analysis, the correct answer is option 'c' - (A) is true, but (R) is false. The assertion is true as it states that the First Five Year Plan generated excitement in the country. However, the reason is false as it lacks evidence and explanation to support its claim that the plan did not have anything for the common men.
Read the following paragraph and answer the questions that follow:NITI Aayog or National Institution for Transforming India Aayog is basically a policy think tank of Government of India and State Governments that replaces 65-year old Planning Commission. Union Government of India had announced formation of NITI Aayog on 1st January, 2015. The body is comprised of a CEO and a Vice Chairperson, to be appointed by the Prime Minister, in addition to some full-time members and two part-time members, while four Union Ministers would serve as ex-officio members. Besides, there would be specific regional councils, while experts and specialists from various fields would be called as special invitees nominated by the Prime Ministers. NITI Aayog will serve as a “think tank” of the government as a “directional and policy dynamo” and would provide both to the governments at the centre and in the states with strategic and technical advice on key policy matters including economic issues of national and international importance. NITI Aayog will have regional councils to focus on developmental activities on specific areas and is patterned on the National Reforms Development Commission of China.Q. How will NITI Aayog serve India?- a)Back Bone
- b)Think Tank
- c)Planning Commission
- d)None of the above
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Read the following paragraph and answer the questions that follow:
NITI Aayog or National Institution for Transforming India Aayog is basically a policy think tank of Government of India and State Governments that replaces 65-year old Planning Commission. Union Government of India had announced formation of NITI Aayog on 1st January, 2015. The body is comprised of a CEO and a Vice Chairperson, to be appointed by the Prime Minister, in addition to some full-time members and two part-time members, while four Union Ministers would serve as ex-officio members. Besides, there would be specific regional councils, while experts and specialists from various fields would be called as special invitees nominated by the Prime Ministers. NITI Aayog will serve as a “think tank” of the government as a “directional and policy dynamo” and would provide both to the governments at the centre and in the states with strategic and technical advice on key policy matters including economic issues of national and international importance. NITI Aayog will have regional councils to focus on developmental activities on specific areas and is patterned on the National Reforms Development Commission of China.
Q. How will NITI Aayog serve India?
a)
Back Bone
b)
Think Tank
c)
Planning Commission
d)
None of the above
|
|
Kiran Mehta answered |
NITI Aayog is supposed to be a think tank. This implies that while generating new ideas, it maintains a respectable intellectual distance from the government of the day.
Assertion (A): The mixed economy model in India aims to balance the roles of public and private sectors for optimal economic development. Reason (R): The public sector is primarily driven by profit motives, which leads to increased efficiency and productivity.- a)If both Assertion and Reason are true and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion
- b)If both Assertion and Reason are true but Reason is not the correct explanation of Assertion
- c)If Assertion is true but Reason is false
- d)If both Assertion and Reason are false
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Assertion (A): The mixed economy model in India aims to balance the roles of public and private sectors for optimal economic development.
Reason (R): The public sector is primarily driven by profit motives, which leads to increased efficiency and productivity.
a)
If both Assertion and Reason are true and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion
b)
If both Assertion and Reason are true but Reason is not the correct explanation of Assertion
c)
If Assertion is true but Reason is false
d)
If both Assertion and Reason are false
|
|
Pj Commerce Academy answered |
- The Assertion is true as the mixed economy model in India is designed to leverage both public and private sectors for economic growth.
- The Reason is false because the public sector is not primarily driven by profit motives; it is focused on social welfare and public service.
- Since the Reason does not correctly explain the Assertion, the correct answer is Option B.
Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:On the eve of Independence, India had before it, two models of modern development: the liberalcapitalist model as in much of Europe and the US and the socialist model as in the USSR. There were many in India then who were deeply impressed by the Soviet model of development. These included not just the leaders of the Communist Party of India, but also those of the Socialist Party and leaders like Nehru within the Congress. There were very few supporters of the American style capitalist development. As in the USSR, the Planning Commission of India opted for Five Year Plans (FYP). The idea is very simple: The Government of India prepares a document that has a plan for all its income and expenditure for the next five years. Accordingly, the budget of the Central and all the State governments is divided into two parts: ‘non-plan’ budget that is spent on routine items on a yearly basis and ‘plan’ budget that is spent on a five-year basis as per the priorities fixed by the plan. A five-year plan has the advantage of permitting the government to focus on the larger picture and make long-term intervention in the economy. The draft of the First Five Year Plan and then the actual Plan Document, released in December 1951, generated a lot of excitement in the country.Q. Which two models of modern development did India follow?- a)Liberal-capitalist and Socialist
- b)Liberal and Capitalist
- c)Socialist and Communist
- d)None of the above
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:
On the eve of Independence, India had before it, two models of modern development: the liberalcapitalist model as in much of Europe and the US and the socialist model as in the USSR. There were many in India then who were deeply impressed by the Soviet model of development. These included not just the leaders of the Communist Party of India, but also those of the Socialist Party and leaders like Nehru within the Congress. There were very few supporters of the American style capitalist development. As in the USSR, the Planning Commission of India opted for Five Year Plans (FYP). The idea is very simple: The Government of India prepares a document that has a plan for all its income and expenditure for the next five years. Accordingly, the budget of the Central and all the State governments is divided into two parts: ‘non-plan’ budget that is spent on routine items on a yearly basis and ‘plan’ budget that is spent on a five-year basis as per the priorities fixed by the plan. A five-year plan has the advantage of permitting the government to focus on the larger picture and make long-term intervention in the economy. The draft of the First Five Year Plan and then the actual Plan Document, released in December 1951, generated a lot of excitement in the country.
Q. Which two models of modern development did India follow?
a)
Liberal-capitalist and Socialist
b)
Liberal and Capitalist
c)
Socialist and Communist
d)
None of the above
|
Aditya Banerjee answered |
Models of Modern Development in India
On the eve of India's Independence, the country faced a crucial decision regarding its development model. The passage outlines the two primary models that were considered:
1. Liberal-Capitalist Model
- This model was prevalent in Europe and the United States.
- It emphasizes free market mechanisms, individual entrepreneurship, and minimal government intervention in the economy.
- Supporters of this model were few in India during this period.
2. Socialist Model
- Inspired by the USSR, this model advocates for state control over resources and centralized planning.
- It aims to ensure equitable distribution of wealth and reduce inequalities in society.
- Many influential leaders in India, including those from the Communist Party, Socialist Party, and even Jawaharlal Nehru from the Congress, were drawn to this model.
Conclusion
The passage indicates that India primarily adopted the socialist model, as reflected in the establishment of the Planning Commission and the implementation of Five Year Plans. The excitement generated by the First Five Year Plan in 1951 further solidified this direction.
Thus, the correct answer to the question about the models of modern development India followed is option 'A': Liberal-capitalist and Socialist, highlighting the contrast and the preference for the socialist approach over the liberal-capitalist one at that historical juncture.
On the eve of India's Independence, the country faced a crucial decision regarding its development model. The passage outlines the two primary models that were considered:
1. Liberal-Capitalist Model
- This model was prevalent in Europe and the United States.
- It emphasizes free market mechanisms, individual entrepreneurship, and minimal government intervention in the economy.
- Supporters of this model were few in India during this period.
2. Socialist Model
- Inspired by the USSR, this model advocates for state control over resources and centralized planning.
- It aims to ensure equitable distribution of wealth and reduce inequalities in society.
- Many influential leaders in India, including those from the Communist Party, Socialist Party, and even Jawaharlal Nehru from the Congress, were drawn to this model.
Conclusion
The passage indicates that India primarily adopted the socialist model, as reflected in the establishment of the Planning Commission and the implementation of Five Year Plans. The excitement generated by the First Five Year Plan in 1951 further solidified this direction.
Thus, the correct answer to the question about the models of modern development India followed is option 'A': Liberal-capitalist and Socialist, highlighting the contrast and the preference for the socialist approach over the liberal-capitalist one at that historical juncture.
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:Assertion: ‘Development’ was about becoming more ‘modern’ and modern was about becoming more like the industrialized countries of the West.Reason: It was believed that every country would go through the process of modernization as in the West, which involved the breakdown of traditional social structures and the rise of capitalism and liberalism.- a)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
- b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
- c)(A) is true, but (R) is false.
- d)(A) is false, but (R) is true.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:
Assertion: ‘Development’ was about becoming more ‘modern’ and modern was about becoming more like the industrialized countries of the West.
Reason: It was believed that every country would go through the process of modernization as in the West, which involved the breakdown of traditional social structures and the rise of capitalism and liberalism.
a)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
b)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
c)
(A) is true, but (R) is false.
d)
(A) is false, but (R) is true.
|
Learning Educators answered |
- Assertion (A): The statement that ‘development’ was about becoming more ‘modern’ and that modernity was defined by the standards of industrialized Western countries is accurate. This perspective reflects the historical context of development thinking in the mid-20th century.
- Reason (R): The belief that every country would follow a similar path to modernization, which involved dismantling traditional social structures and embracing capitalism and liberalism, is also true and directly supports the assertion about development.
Since both statements are true and the reason provides a valid explanation for the assertion, option A is the correct choice.
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:Assertion: The Second Five Year Plan stressed on heavy industries. It was drafted by a team of economists and planners under the leadership of P. C. Mahalanobis.Reason: However, the Second Five Year Plan was responsible for the ruin of agriculture as it did not have enough funding to support it.- a)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
- b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
- c)(A) is true, but (R) is false.
- d)(A) is false, but (R) is true.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:
Assertion: The Second Five Year Plan stressed on heavy industries. It was drafted by a team of economists and planners under the leadership of P. C. Mahalanobis.
Reason: However, the Second Five Year Plan was responsible for the ruin of agriculture as it did not have enough funding to support it.
a)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
b)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
c)
(A) is true, but (R) is false.
d)
(A) is false, but (R) is true.
|
Rajat Iyer answered |
Assertion: The Second Five Year Plan stressed on heavy industries. It was drafted by a team of economists and planners under the leadership of P. C. Mahalanobis.
The assertion states that the Second Five Year Plan focused on heavy industries and was formulated by a group of economists and planners led by P. C. Mahalanobis. This assertion is true.
Reason: However, the Second Five Year Plan was responsible for the ruin of agriculture as it did not have enough funding to support it.
The reason states that the Second Five Year Plan led to the decline of agriculture due to inadequate funding. This reason is false.
Explanation:
The Second Five Year Plan (1956-1961) in India was formulated with the objective of industrialization and economic growth. The plan aimed to promote heavy industries such as steel, machine tools, and capital goods, as it was believed that these industries would contribute to the overall development of the country.
The assertion is true because the Second Five Year Plan indeed emphasized the development of heavy industries. It was drafted by a team of economists and planners under the leadership of P. C. Mahalanobis, who was a renowned statistician and economist.
However, the reason provided in the statement is false. The Second Five Year Plan did not ruin agriculture. Although the plan focused more on heavy industries, it did not neglect agriculture entirely. The plan recognized the importance of agriculture in the Indian economy and allocated funds for the development of irrigation, rural electrification, and agricultural research and extension services. The plan also aimed to increase agricultural production and productivity through the implementation of land reforms, consolidation of landholdings, and the use of modern agricultural techniques.
While it is true that the Second Five Year Plan gave priority to industrial development, it did not result in the ruin of agriculture. In fact, during this period, agricultural production in India witnessed significant growth. The plan's focus on heavy industries was intended to create a strong industrial base, which was seen as necessary for long-term economic development and self-reliance.
Therefore, the correct answer is option 'C' - (A) is true, but (R) is false.
The assertion states that the Second Five Year Plan focused on heavy industries and was formulated by a group of economists and planners led by P. C. Mahalanobis. This assertion is true.
Reason: However, the Second Five Year Plan was responsible for the ruin of agriculture as it did not have enough funding to support it.
The reason states that the Second Five Year Plan led to the decline of agriculture due to inadequate funding. This reason is false.
Explanation:
The Second Five Year Plan (1956-1961) in India was formulated with the objective of industrialization and economic growth. The plan aimed to promote heavy industries such as steel, machine tools, and capital goods, as it was believed that these industries would contribute to the overall development of the country.
The assertion is true because the Second Five Year Plan indeed emphasized the development of heavy industries. It was drafted by a team of economists and planners under the leadership of P. C. Mahalanobis, who was a renowned statistician and economist.
However, the reason provided in the statement is false. The Second Five Year Plan did not ruin agriculture. Although the plan focused more on heavy industries, it did not neglect agriculture entirely. The plan recognized the importance of agriculture in the Indian economy and allocated funds for the development of irrigation, rural electrification, and agricultural research and extension services. The plan also aimed to increase agricultural production and productivity through the implementation of land reforms, consolidation of landholdings, and the use of modern agricultural techniques.
While it is true that the Second Five Year Plan gave priority to industrial development, it did not result in the ruin of agriculture. In fact, during this period, agricultural production in India witnessed significant growth. The plan's focus on heavy industries was intended to create a strong industrial base, which was seen as necessary for long-term economic development and self-reliance.
Therefore, the correct answer is option 'C' - (A) is true, but (R) is false.
Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:The Second Five Year Plan stressed on heavy industries. It was drafted by a team of economists and planners under the leadership of P.C. Mahalanobis. If the first plan had preached patience, the second wanted to bring about quick structural transformation by making changes simultaneously in all possible directions. Before this plan was finalized, the Congress party at its session held at Avadi near the then Madras city, passed an important resolution. It declared that ‘Socialist pattern of society’ was its goal. This was reflected in the Second Plan. The government imposed substantial tariffs on imports in order to protect domestic industries. Such protected environment helped both public and private sector industries to grow. As savings and investment were growing in this period, a bulk of these industries like electricity, railways, steel, machineries and communication could be developed in the public sector. Indeed, such a push for industrialisation marked a turning point in India’s development.Q. Why did government impose substantial tariffs on imports?- a)To increase the income from imports
- b)To create employment in import-export sector
- c)To restrict foreign goods
- d)To protect domestic industries
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:
The Second Five Year Plan stressed on heavy industries. It was drafted by a team of economists and planners under the leadership of P.C. Mahalanobis. If the first plan had preached patience, the second wanted to bring about quick structural transformation by making changes simultaneously in all possible directions. Before this plan was finalized, the Congress party at its session held at Avadi near the then Madras city, passed an important resolution. It declared that ‘Socialist pattern of society’ was its goal. This was reflected in the Second Plan. The government imposed substantial tariffs on imports in order to protect domestic industries. Such protected environment helped both public and private sector industries to grow. As savings and investment were growing in this period, a bulk of these industries like electricity, railways, steel, machineries and communication could be developed in the public sector. Indeed, such a push for industrialisation marked a turning point in India’s development.
Q. Why did government impose substantial tariffs on imports?
a)
To increase the income from imports
b)
To create employment in import-export sector
c)
To restrict foreign goods
d)
To protect domestic industries
|
Ojasvi Mehta answered |
Governments may impose tariffs to raise revenue or to protect domestic industries—especially nascent ones—from foreign competition. By making foreignproduced goods more expensive, tariffs can make domestically produced alternatives seem more attractive.
Assertion (A): Political contestation in a democracy is essential for representing diverse interests and preferences of the populace.
Reason (R): Democratic systems eliminate disagreement among political actors to ensure uniformity in decision-making.
- a)If both Assertion and Reason are true and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion
- b)If Assertion is true but Reason is false
- c)If both Assertion and Reason are true but Reason is not the correct explanation of Assertion
- d)If both Assertion and Reason are false
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Assertion (A): Political contestation in a democracy is essential for representing diverse interests and preferences of the populace.
Reason (R): Democratic systems eliminate disagreement among political actors to ensure uniformity in decision-making.
a)
If both Assertion and Reason are true and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion
b)
If Assertion is true but Reason is false
c)
If both Assertion and Reason are true but Reason is not the correct explanation of Assertion
d)
If both Assertion and Reason are false
|
|
Saumya Pillai answered |
Understanding the Assertion and Reason
The assertion (A) highlights the importance of political contestation in a democracy, emphasizing that a variety of interests and preferences must be represented to ensure effective governance. Conversely, the reason (R) suggests that democratic systems aim for uniformity by eliminating disagreement among political actors.
Analysis of Assertion (A)
- True Nature of Democracy: Democracy thrives on debate, discussion, and disagreement. Political contestation allows for:
- Representation of diverse voices.
- Inclusion of minority opinions.
- A mechanism for accountability and change.
Analysis of Reason (R)
- Inaccuracy in Reasoning: The claim that democratic systems eliminate disagreement contradicts the very essence of democracy. Key points include:
- Democracy is built on the premise of pluralism.
- Disagreement is not only inevitable but also desirable for healthy political discourse.
Conclusion
Given this analysis:
- Assertion (A) is true: It rightly identifies the necessity of political contestation for representation in a democracy.
- Reason (R) is false: It incorrectly states that democracies eliminate disagreement, which is contrary to democratic principles.
Therefore, the correct answer is option B: "If Assertion is true but Reason is false." This choice accurately reflects the relationship between the two statements, reinforcing the foundational belief that diversity and contestation are vital to a functioning democracy.
The assertion (A) highlights the importance of political contestation in a democracy, emphasizing that a variety of interests and preferences must be represented to ensure effective governance. Conversely, the reason (R) suggests that democratic systems aim for uniformity by eliminating disagreement among political actors.
Analysis of Assertion (A)
- True Nature of Democracy: Democracy thrives on debate, discussion, and disagreement. Political contestation allows for:
- Representation of diverse voices.
- Inclusion of minority opinions.
- A mechanism for accountability and change.
Analysis of Reason (R)
- Inaccuracy in Reasoning: The claim that democratic systems eliminate disagreement contradicts the very essence of democracy. Key points include:
- Democracy is built on the premise of pluralism.
- Disagreement is not only inevitable but also desirable for healthy political discourse.
Conclusion
Given this analysis:
- Assertion (A) is true: It rightly identifies the necessity of political contestation for representation in a democracy.
- Reason (R) is false: It incorrectly states that democracies eliminate disagreement, which is contrary to democratic principles.
Therefore, the correct answer is option B: "If Assertion is true but Reason is false." This choice accurately reflects the relationship between the two statements, reinforcing the foundational belief that diversity and contestation are vital to a functioning democracy.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?i. The Bombay Plan was a proposal for establishing a planned economy in India, drafted by industrialists in 1944.ii. The Planning Commission was created shortly after India gained independence in 1947.iii. The consensus among leaders was that development should be solely managed by private sectors.iv. The Prime Minister of India serves as the chairperson of the Planning Commission.- a)i and ii
- b)ii and iii
- c)i and iv
- d)i, ii, and iv
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
i. The Bombay Plan was a proposal for establishing a planned economy in India, drafted by industrialists in 1944.
ii. The Planning Commission was created shortly after India gained independence in 1947.
iii. The consensus among leaders was that development should be solely managed by private sectors.
iv. The Prime Minister of India serves as the chairperson of the Planning Commission.
a)
i and ii
b)
ii and iii
c)
i and iv
d)
i, ii, and iv
|
|
Anuj Nair answered |
The Bombay Plan
The Bombay Plan was indeed a significant proposal drafted in 1944 by prominent industrialists, including G.D. Birla and J.R.D. Tata.
- It aimed to establish a planned economy in India, emphasizing the role of the state in economic development.
- The plan called for increased industrialization, infrastructure development, and social welfare measures.
Creation of the Planning Commission
The Planning Commission was established in 1950, shortly after India gained independence in 1947.
- Its primary objective was to formulate and oversee the implementation of five-year plans aimed at economic development.
- The commission played a crucial role in shaping India's economic policy and development strategy.
Development Management Consensus
The statement that the consensus among leaders was that development should be solely managed by private sectors is incorrect.
- The leaders recognized the necessity of a mixed economy where both public and private sectors would contribute to development.
- The emphasis was placed on state intervention to address issues of inequality and poverty.
Prime Minister as Chairperson
The Prime Minister of India does serve as the chairperson of the Planning Commission.
- This structure ensures that the planning process is aligned with the government’s overall policy framework.
- The Prime Minister's involvement signifies the importance of planning in governance.
Conclusion
Thus, statements i, ii, and iv are correct, while statement iii is not. Therefore, the correct answer is option 'D': i, ii, and iv.
The Bombay Plan was indeed a significant proposal drafted in 1944 by prominent industrialists, including G.D. Birla and J.R.D. Tata.
- It aimed to establish a planned economy in India, emphasizing the role of the state in economic development.
- The plan called for increased industrialization, infrastructure development, and social welfare measures.
Creation of the Planning Commission
The Planning Commission was established in 1950, shortly after India gained independence in 1947.
- Its primary objective was to formulate and oversee the implementation of five-year plans aimed at economic development.
- The commission played a crucial role in shaping India's economic policy and development strategy.
Development Management Consensus
The statement that the consensus among leaders was that development should be solely managed by private sectors is incorrect.
- The leaders recognized the necessity of a mixed economy where both public and private sectors would contribute to development.
- The emphasis was placed on state intervention to address issues of inequality and poverty.
Prime Minister as Chairperson
The Prime Minister of India does serve as the chairperson of the Planning Commission.
- This structure ensures that the planning process is aligned with the government’s overall policy framework.
- The Prime Minister's involvement signifies the importance of planning in governance.
Conclusion
Thus, statements i, ii, and iv are correct, while statement iii is not. Therefore, the correct answer is option 'D': i, ii, and iv.
What year was the Planning Commission in India established and it was named as NITI Aayog on ?- a)1947, 15 august 1950
- b)1950, 1 January 2015
- c)1965, 1 march 2019
- d)1971, 2 october 2018
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
What year was the Planning Commission in India established and it was named as NITI Aayog on ?
a)
1947, 15 august 1950
b)
1950, 1 January 2015
c)
1965, 1 march 2019
d)
1971, 2 october 2018
|
|
Pj Commerce Academy answered |
The Planning Commission in India was set up in 1950. Its chairman is the Prime Minister of the country. The Planning Commission was renamed as NITI (National Institute for Transforming India) Aayog on 1 January 2015.
Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:On the eve of Independence, India had before it, two models of modern development: the liberalcapitalist model as in much of Europe and the US and the socialist model as in the USSR. There were many in India then who were deeply impressed by the Soviet model of development. These included not just the leaders of the Communist Party of India, but also those of the Socialist Party and leaders like Nehru within the Congress. There were very few supporters of the American style capitalist development. As in the USSR, the Planning Commission of India opted for Five Year Plans (FYP). The idea is very simple: The Government of India prepares a document that has a plan for all its income and expenditure for the next five years. Accordingly, the budget of the Central and all the State governments is divided into two parts: ‘non-plan’ budget that is spent on routine items on a yearly basis and ‘plan’ budget that is spent on a five-year basis as per the priorities fixed by the plan. A five-year plan has the advantage of permitting the government to focus on the larger picture and make long-term intervention in the economy. The draft of the First Five Year Plan and then the actual Plan Document, released in December 1951, generated a lot of excitement in the country.Q. Which model had the least supporters in India?- a)USSR
- b)Liberal
- c)Capitalist
- d)Socialist
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:
On the eve of Independence, India had before it, two models of modern development: the liberalcapitalist model as in much of Europe and the US and the socialist model as in the USSR. There were many in India then who were deeply impressed by the Soviet model of development. These included not just the leaders of the Communist Party of India, but also those of the Socialist Party and leaders like Nehru within the Congress. There were very few supporters of the American style capitalist development. As in the USSR, the Planning Commission of India opted for Five Year Plans (FYP). The idea is very simple: The Government of India prepares a document that has a plan for all its income and expenditure for the next five years. Accordingly, the budget of the Central and all the State governments is divided into two parts: ‘non-plan’ budget that is spent on routine items on a yearly basis and ‘plan’ budget that is spent on a five-year basis as per the priorities fixed by the plan. A five-year plan has the advantage of permitting the government to focus on the larger picture and make long-term intervention in the economy. The draft of the First Five Year Plan and then the actual Plan Document, released in December 1951, generated a lot of excitement in the country.
Q. Which model had the least supporters in India?
a)
USSR
b)
Liberal
c)
Capitalist
d)
Socialist
|
Aniket Khanna answered |
Capitalist model
- The passage mentions that on the eve of Independence, India had before it two models of modern development: the liberal capitalist model and the socialist model.
- It is stated that there were very few supporters of the American style capitalist development in India at that time.
- The leaders of the Communist Party of India, as well as those of the Socialist Party and leaders like Nehru within the Congress, were more impressed by the socialist model, particularly the Soviet model of development.
Reasons for least supporters of the capitalist model
- The capitalist model was less favored in India due to various reasons such as the prevalent socialist ideologies amongst the leaders, the influence of the USSR model, and the perception of socialism being more aligned with the aspirations of the newly independent nation.
- The socialist model was seen as more suitable for addressing the socio-economic challenges faced by India post-Independence, such as poverty, inequality, and underdevelopment.
- The emphasis on state intervention in the economy and the focus on collective welfare in the socialist model resonated more with the leaders and the public at that time.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the capitalist model had the least supporters in India on the eve of Independence due to the dominance of socialist ideologies, the influence of the Soviet model, and the perceived alignment of socialism with the developmental goals of the nation.
- The passage mentions that on the eve of Independence, India had before it two models of modern development: the liberal capitalist model and the socialist model.
- It is stated that there were very few supporters of the American style capitalist development in India at that time.
- The leaders of the Communist Party of India, as well as those of the Socialist Party and leaders like Nehru within the Congress, were more impressed by the socialist model, particularly the Soviet model of development.
Reasons for least supporters of the capitalist model
- The capitalist model was less favored in India due to various reasons such as the prevalent socialist ideologies amongst the leaders, the influence of the USSR model, and the perception of socialism being more aligned with the aspirations of the newly independent nation.
- The socialist model was seen as more suitable for addressing the socio-economic challenges faced by India post-Independence, such as poverty, inequality, and underdevelopment.
- The emphasis on state intervention in the economy and the focus on collective welfare in the socialist model resonated more with the leaders and the public at that time.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the capitalist model had the least supporters in India on the eve of Independence due to the dominance of socialist ideologies, the influence of the Soviet model, and the perceived alignment of socialism with the developmental goals of the nation.
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:Assertion: The First Five Year Plan (1951–1956) sought to get the country’s economy out of the cycle of poverty.
Reason: K. N. Raj, a young economist involved in drafting the plan, argued that India should ‘hasten slowly’ for the first two decades as a fast rate of development might endanger democracy- a)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
- b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
- c)(A) is true, but (R) is false.
- d)(A) is false, but (R) is true.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:
Assertion: The First Five Year Plan (1951–1956) sought to get the country’s economy out of the cycle of poverty.
Reason: K. N. Raj, a young economist involved in drafting the plan, argued that India should ‘hasten slowly’ for the first two decades as a fast rate of development might endanger democracy
Reason: K. N. Raj, a young economist involved in drafting the plan, argued that India should ‘hasten slowly’ for the first two decades as a fast rate of development might endanger democracy
a)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
b)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
c)
(A) is true, but (R) is false.
d)
(A) is false, but (R) is true.
|
|
Malavika Patel answered |
-1956) aimed at the rapid industrialization of India.
Reason: The First Five Year Plan focused on developing the agricultural sector in India.
Reason: The First Five Year Plan focused on developing the agricultural sector in India.
Study the cartoon given below carefully and answer the questions that follow:
Q. How did the public sector affect the private sector?- a)The prices in India remained in control
- b)The wealth of public was growing
- c)Public sector paid more tax to government
- d)Private sector was adversely affected
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Study the cartoon given below carefully and answer the questions that follow:
Q. How did the public sector affect the private sector?
a)
The prices in India remained in control
b)
The wealth of public was growing
c)
Public sector paid more tax to government
d)
Private sector was adversely affected
|
Craft World answered |
The planners refused to provide the private sector with enough space and stimulus to grow.
The enlarged public sector produced powerful vested interests that created enough hurdles for private capital, especially by way of installing systems of license and permits for investment.
Moreover, the state's policy to restrict import of goods that could be produced in the domestic market with no incentive to improve their products and make them cheaper.
The state controlled more things than were necessary and this led to inefficiency and corruption.
The enlarged public sector produced powerful vested interests that created enough hurdles for private capital, especially by way of installing systems of license and permits for investment.
Moreover, the state's policy to restrict import of goods that could be produced in the domestic market with no incentive to improve their products and make them cheaper.
The state controlled more things than were necessary and this led to inefficiency and corruption.
Who was the chief planner of the First Five Year Plan?- a) Jawaharlal Nehru
- b) K.N. Raj
- c) R. Ambedkar
- d) Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Who was the chief planner of the First Five Year Plan?
a)
Jawaharlal Nehru
b)
K.N. Raj
c)
R. Ambedkar
d)
Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel
|
|
EduRev Humanities answered |
K.N. Raj was the chief planner responsible for formulating the First Five Year Plan, which focused on agricultural development.
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:Assertion: Huge allocations were made for largescale projects like the Bhakhra Nangal Dam.Reason: Agricultural sector was hit hardest by Partition and needed urgent attention.- a)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
- b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
- c)(A) is true, but (R) is false.
- d)(A) is false, but (R) is true.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:
Assertion: Huge allocations were made for largescale projects like the Bhakhra Nangal Dam.
Reason: Agricultural sector was hit hardest by Partition and needed urgent attention.
a)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
b)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
c)
(A) is true, but (R) is false.
d)
(A) is false, but (R) is true.
|
Avi Kapoor answered |
Explanation:
Assertion and Reason Analysis:
- The assertion states that huge allocations were made for large-scale projects like the Bhakhra Nangal Dam.
- The reason provided is that the agricultural sector was hit hardest by Partition and needed urgent attention.
Evaluation of Assertion and Reason:
- The assertion is true as significant funds were indeed allocated for projects like the Bhakhra Nangal Dam to boost infrastructure development.
- The reason is also true as the agricultural sector in India faced severe challenges post-Partition and required immediate support to recover and grow.
Relationship between Assertion and Reason:
- In this case, the reason directly supports the assertion. The massive allocations for large-scale projects can be attributed to the urgent need to address the agricultural sector's distress post-Partition.
Conclusion:
- Therefore, the correct choice is option 'A' where both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion.
Assertion and Reason Analysis:
- The assertion states that huge allocations were made for large-scale projects like the Bhakhra Nangal Dam.
- The reason provided is that the agricultural sector was hit hardest by Partition and needed urgent attention.
Evaluation of Assertion and Reason:
- The assertion is true as significant funds were indeed allocated for projects like the Bhakhra Nangal Dam to boost infrastructure development.
- The reason is also true as the agricultural sector in India faced severe challenges post-Partition and required immediate support to recover and grow.
Relationship between Assertion and Reason:
- In this case, the reason directly supports the assertion. The massive allocations for large-scale projects can be attributed to the urgent need to address the agricultural sector's distress post-Partition.
Conclusion:
- Therefore, the correct choice is option 'A' where both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion.
Given below are two statements:
Statement I: Operation Flood was associated with the White Revolution in India.
Statement II: The Bombay Plan was a governmental initiative to promote public sector industries.
In the light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below:- a)Both Statement I and Statement II are true
- b)Both Statement I and Statement II are false
- c)Statement I is true, but Statement II is false
- d)Statement I is false, but Statement II is true
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Given below are two statements:
Statement I: Operation Flood was associated with the White Revolution in India.
Statement II: The Bombay Plan was a governmental initiative to promote public sector industries.
In the light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Statement I: Operation Flood was associated with the White Revolution in India.
Statement II: The Bombay Plan was a governmental initiative to promote public sector industries.
In the light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below:
a)
Both Statement I and Statement II are true
b)
Both Statement I and Statement II are false
c)
Statement I is true, but Statement II is false
d)
Statement I is false, but Statement II is true
|
|
Pj Commerce Academy answered |
Statement I is true because Operation Flood was indeed associated with the White Revolution, which aimed at increasing milk production in India. Statement II is false because the Bombay Plan was not a governmental initiative but a joint proposal by private industrialists to promote a planned economy.
Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:On the eve of Independence, India had before it, two models of modern development: the liberalcapitalist model as in much of Europe and the US and the socialist model as in the USSR. There were many in India then who were deeply impressed by the Soviet model of development. These included not just the leaders of the Communist Party of India, but also those of the Socialist Party and leaders like Nehru within the Congress. There were very few supporters of the American style capitalist development. As in the USSR, the Planning Commission of India opted for Five Year Plans (FYP). The idea is very simple: The Government of India prepares a document that has a plan for all its income and expenditure for the next five years. Accordingly, the budget of the Central and all the State governments is divided into two parts: ‘non-plan’ budget that is spent on routine items on a yearly basis and ‘plan’ budget that is spent on a five-year basis as per the priorities fixed by the plan. A five-year plan has the advantage of permitting the government to focus on the larger picture and make long-term intervention in the economy. The draft of the First Five Year Plan and then the actual Plan Document, released in December 1951, generated a lot of excitement in the country.Q. When was the draft of first five-year plan was released?- a)November 1950
- b)December 1950
- c)October 1951
- d)December 1951
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:
On the eve of Independence, India had before it, two models of modern development: the liberalcapitalist model as in much of Europe and the US and the socialist model as in the USSR. There were many in India then who were deeply impressed by the Soviet model of development. These included not just the leaders of the Communist Party of India, but also those of the Socialist Party and leaders like Nehru within the Congress. There were very few supporters of the American style capitalist development. As in the USSR, the Planning Commission of India opted for Five Year Plans (FYP). The idea is very simple: The Government of India prepares a document that has a plan for all its income and expenditure for the next five years. Accordingly, the budget of the Central and all the State governments is divided into two parts: ‘non-plan’ budget that is spent on routine items on a yearly basis and ‘plan’ budget that is spent on a five-year basis as per the priorities fixed by the plan. A five-year plan has the advantage of permitting the government to focus on the larger picture and make long-term intervention in the economy. The draft of the First Five Year Plan and then the actual Plan Document, released in December 1951, generated a lot of excitement in the country.
Q. When was the draft of first five-year plan was released?
a)
November 1950
b)
December 1950
c)
October 1951
d)
December 1951
|
|
Rajesh Gupta answered |
The First Five-year Plan was launched in 1951 which mainly focused in the development of the primary sector.
- a)A-2, B-3, C-1, D-4
- b)A-1, B-2, C-3, D-4
- c)A-3, B-4, C-2, D-1
- d)A-4, B-3, C-2, D-1
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
a)
A-2, B-3, C-1, D-4
b)
A-1, B-2, C-3, D-4
c)
A-3, B-4, C-2, D-1
d)
A-4, B-3, C-2, D-1
|
|
Crafty Classes answered |
Solution:
The Bombay Plan (A) refers to the 1944 joint proposal by industrialists for a planned economy in India (2). The Green Revolution (B) was an initiative aimed at increasing agricultural productivity using high-yield seeds (3). The Second Five Year Plan (C) focused on heavy industries, reducing imports, and promoting exports (1). The Planning Commission (D) was established in 1950 to prepare development plans for the country (4).
The Bombay Plan (A) refers to the 1944 joint proposal by industrialists for a planned economy in India (2). The Green Revolution (B) was an initiative aimed at increasing agricultural productivity using high-yield seeds (3). The Second Five Year Plan (C) focused on heavy industries, reducing imports, and promoting exports (1). The Planning Commission (D) was established in 1950 to prepare development plans for the country (4).
Study the cartoon given below carefully and answer the questions that follow:
Q. Why has a big tilt towards the public sector been shown in the cartoon?- a)The numbers of the public sector are meant to increase.
- b)over emphasis given to the public sector.
- c)the ruling parties in India believe to give importance to the public sector.
- d)All of the above
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Study the cartoon given below carefully and answer the questions that follow:
Q. Why has a big tilt towards the public sector been shown in the cartoon?
a)
The numbers of the public sector are meant to increase.
b)
over emphasis given to the public sector.
c)
the ruling parties in India believe to give importance to the public sector.
d)
All of the above
|
|
Rajesh Gupta answered |
The big tilt towards the public sector is shown because heavy industries, agricultural sectors were controlled by the state.
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:Assertion: The excitement with planning reached its peak with the launching of the Second Five Year Plan in 1956 and continued somewhat till the Third Five Year Plan in 1961.Reason: Though many criticisms emerged both about the process and the priorities of these plans, the foundation of India’s economic development was firmly in place by then.- a)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
- b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
- c)(A) is true, but (R) is false.
- d)(A) is false, but (R) is true.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:
Assertion: The excitement with planning reached its peak with the launching of the Second Five Year Plan in 1956 and continued somewhat till the Third Five Year Plan in 1961.
Reason: Though many criticisms emerged both about the process and the priorities of these plans, the foundation of India’s economic development was firmly in place by then.
a)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
b)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
c)
(A) is true, but (R) is false.
d)
(A) is false, but (R) is true.
|
|
Ankit Shah answered |
Assertion (A): The excitement with planning reached its peak with the launching of the Second Five Year Plan in 1956 and continued somewhat till the Third Five Year Plan in 1961.
Reason (R): Though many criticisms emerged both about the process and the priorities of these plans, the foundation of India’s economic development was firmly in place by then.
Explanation:
The Assertion states that the excitement with planning reached its peak with the launching of the Second Five Year Plan in 1956 and continued somewhat till the Third Five Year Plan in 1961. This means that during this period, there was a high level of enthusiasm and anticipation regarding the economic planning and development of India.
The Reason states that despite the criticisms that emerged about the process and priorities of these plans, the foundation of India's economic development was firmly in place by then. This means that although there were criticisms and concerns raised about the implementation and focus of the plans, the overall groundwork for India's economic progress had been established.
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
Explanation of the Assertion:
The Second Five Year Plan, launched in 1956, was a significant milestone in India's economic planning. It aimed at achieving rapid industrialization and self-sufficiency in agriculture. There was a great deal of enthusiasm and hope associated with this plan as it was seen as a crucial step towards the development of the country.
Similarly, the Third Five Year Plan, initiated in 1961, continued the efforts of the previous plans and focused on reducing poverty, increasing employment opportunities, and promoting economic growth. This also generated excitement and anticipation among the people, as they hoped for further progress and improvement in the country's economic conditions.
Explanation of the Reason:
While there were criticisms about the process and priorities of these plans, it is true that the foundation of India's economic development was firmly in place by then. The First Five Year Plan, which began in 1951, had already laid the groundwork for economic planning and development in the country. It focused on agriculture, industry, and infrastructure development, and set the stage for subsequent plans.
Despite the criticisms, the planning process had gained momentum and experience over time, and the government had gained valuable insights and lessons from the implementation of earlier plans. This helped in refining the subsequent plans and addressing some of the concerns raised. As a result, the foundation for India's economic development had become stronger and more robust by the time of the Second and Third Five Year Plans.
Overall, the excitement with planning during the Second and Third Five Year Plans was justified because of the progress made in the preceding years and the foundation that had been laid for India's economic development.
Reason (R): Though many criticisms emerged both about the process and the priorities of these plans, the foundation of India’s economic development was firmly in place by then.
Explanation:
The Assertion states that the excitement with planning reached its peak with the launching of the Second Five Year Plan in 1956 and continued somewhat till the Third Five Year Plan in 1961. This means that during this period, there was a high level of enthusiasm and anticipation regarding the economic planning and development of India.
The Reason states that despite the criticisms that emerged about the process and priorities of these plans, the foundation of India's economic development was firmly in place by then. This means that although there were criticisms and concerns raised about the implementation and focus of the plans, the overall groundwork for India's economic progress had been established.
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
Explanation of the Assertion:
The Second Five Year Plan, launched in 1956, was a significant milestone in India's economic planning. It aimed at achieving rapid industrialization and self-sufficiency in agriculture. There was a great deal of enthusiasm and hope associated with this plan as it was seen as a crucial step towards the development of the country.
Similarly, the Third Five Year Plan, initiated in 1961, continued the efforts of the previous plans and focused on reducing poverty, increasing employment opportunities, and promoting economic growth. This also generated excitement and anticipation among the people, as they hoped for further progress and improvement in the country's economic conditions.
Explanation of the Reason:
While there were criticisms about the process and priorities of these plans, it is true that the foundation of India's economic development was firmly in place by then. The First Five Year Plan, which began in 1951, had already laid the groundwork for economic planning and development in the country. It focused on agriculture, industry, and infrastructure development, and set the stage for subsequent plans.
Despite the criticisms, the planning process had gained momentum and experience over time, and the government had gained valuable insights and lessons from the implementation of earlier plans. This helped in refining the subsequent plans and addressing some of the concerns raised. As a result, the foundation for India's economic development had become stronger and more robust by the time of the Second and Third Five Year Plans.
Overall, the excitement with planning during the Second and Third Five Year Plans was justified because of the progress made in the preceding years and the foundation that had been laid for India's economic development.
Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:The Second Five Year Plan stressed on heavy industries. It was drafted by a team of economists and planners under the leadership of P.C. Mahalanobis. If the first plan had preached patience, the second wanted to bring about quick structural transformation by making changes simultaneously in all possible directions. Before this plan was finalized, the Congress party at its session held at Avadi near the then Madras city, passed an important resolution. It declared that ‘Socialist pattern of society’ was its goal. This was reflected in the Second Plan. The government imposed substantial tariffs on imports in order to protect domestic industries. Such a protected environment helped both public and private sector industries to grow. As savings and investment were growing in this period, a bulk of these industries like electricity, railways, steel, machineries and communication could be developed in the public sector. Indeed, such a push for industrialisation marked a turning point in India’s development.Q. What was anticipated from the Second Five Year Plan?- a)Structural transformation
- b)Economic transformation
- c)Infrastructural development
- d)Eradication of poverty
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:
The Second Five Year Plan stressed on heavy industries. It was drafted by a team of economists and planners under the leadership of P.C. Mahalanobis. If the first plan had preached patience, the second wanted to bring about quick structural transformation by making changes simultaneously in all possible directions. Before this plan was finalized, the Congress party at its session held at Avadi near the then Madras city, passed an important resolution. It declared that ‘Socialist pattern of society’ was its goal. This was reflected in the Second Plan. The government imposed substantial tariffs on imports in order to protect domestic industries. Such a protected environment helped both public and private sector industries to grow. As savings and investment were growing in this period, a bulk of these industries like electricity, railways, steel, machineries and communication could be developed in the public sector. Indeed, such a push for industrialisation marked a turning point in India’s development.
Q. What was anticipated from the Second Five Year Plan?
a)
Structural transformation
b)
Economic transformation
c)
Infrastructural development
d)
Eradication of poverty
|
Naina Sharma answered |
The main objectives of the Second Plan are an increase of 25 per cent in real national income over the five-year period 1956– 57 to 1960–61; a large expansion of employment opportunities; rapid industrialization; and reduction of economic inequalities.
Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:The Second Five Year Plan stressed on heavy industries. It was drafted by a team of economists and planners under the leadership of P.C. Mahalanobis. If the first plan had preached patience, the second wanted to bring about quick structural transformation by making changes simultaneously in all possible directions. Before this plan was finalized, the Congress party at its session held at Avadi near the then Madras city, passed an important resolution. It declared that ‘Socialist pattern of society’ was its goal. This was reflected in the Second Plan. The government imposed substantial tariffs on imports in order to protect domestic industries. Such protected environment helped both public and private sector industries to grow. As savings and investment were growing in this period, a bulk of these industries like electricity, railways, steel, machineries and communication could be developed in the public sector. Indeed, such a push for industrialisation marked a turning point in India’s development.Q. What goal was declared by the Congress Party at the session held at Avadi?- a)Religious pattern society
- b)Capitalist pattern society
- c)Socialist pattern society
- d)None of the above
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:
The Second Five Year Plan stressed on heavy industries. It was drafted by a team of economists and planners under the leadership of P.C. Mahalanobis. If the first plan had preached patience, the second wanted to bring about quick structural transformation by making changes simultaneously in all possible directions. Before this plan was finalized, the Congress party at its session held at Avadi near the then Madras city, passed an important resolution. It declared that ‘Socialist pattern of society’ was its goal. This was reflected in the Second Plan. The government imposed substantial tariffs on imports in order to protect domestic industries. Such protected environment helped both public and private sector industries to grow. As savings and investment were growing in this period, a bulk of these industries like electricity, railways, steel, machineries and communication could be developed in the public sector. Indeed, such a push for industrialisation marked a turning point in India’s development.
Q. What goal was declared by the Congress Party at the session held at Avadi?
a)
Religious pattern society
b)
Capitalist pattern society
c)
Socialist pattern society
d)
None of the above
|
|
Rajesh Gupta answered |
“Socialist pattern of society” , according to the planning Commission, means “that the basic criterion for determining the lines of advance must not be private profit but social gain, and that the pattern of development and the structure of socio-economic relations should be so planned so that the result not only in appreciable increases in national income and employment but also in greater equality in incomes and wealth”.
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:Assertion: Development could not be left to private actors, that there was the need for the government to develop a design or plan for development. UEReason: The Bombay Plan wanted the state to take major initiatives in industrial and other economic investments.- a)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
- b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
- c)(A) is true, but (R) is false.
- d)(A) is false, but (R) is true.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:
Assertion: Development could not be left to private actors, that there was the need for the government to develop a design or plan for development. UE
Reason: The Bombay Plan wanted the state to take major initiatives in industrial and other economic investments.
a)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
b)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
c)
(A) is true, but (R) is false.
d)
(A) is false, but (R) is true.
|
|
Shruti Joshi answered |
Assertion: Development could not be left to private actors, that there was the need for the government to develop a design or plan for development.
Reason: The Bombay Plan wanted the state to take major initiatives in industrial and other economic investments.
The correct answer is option 'B': Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
Explanation:
To understand the given assertion and reason, let's break them down and analyze them separately.
Assertion: Development could not be left to private actors, that there was the need for the government to develop a design or plan for development.
This statement asserts that development cannot be solely driven by private actors or individuals. It emphasizes the importance of government intervention and the need for a design or plan for development. This implies that the government should play a significant role in guiding and shaping the development process.
Reason: The Bombay Plan wanted the state to take major initiatives in industrial and other economic investments.
The reason provided states that The Bombay Plan, a proposal put forward by a group of influential industrialists in 1944, advocated for the state to take major initiatives in industrial and economic investments. The plan aimed to address the economic challenges faced by India and called for a more active role of the government in promoting industrialization and economic growth.
Analysis:
Both the assertion and reason are true. Development cannot be solely driven by private actors as it requires a coordinated effort and planning by the government. The Bombay Plan indeed called for the state to take major initiatives in industrial and economic investments.
However, the reason provided does not directly explain why development cannot be left to private actors. It merely highlights the stance of The Bombay Plan. The reason does not provide a cause-and-effect relationship or a direct explanation for the assertion. Therefore, option 'B' is the correct answer.
In conclusion, while both the assertion and reason are true, the reason does not provide a correct explanation for the assertion. It is important to recognize the role of the government in development and the need for a planned approach, but the reason does not directly support or explain this assertion.
Reason: The Bombay Plan wanted the state to take major initiatives in industrial and other economic investments.
The correct answer is option 'B': Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
Explanation:
To understand the given assertion and reason, let's break them down and analyze them separately.
Assertion: Development could not be left to private actors, that there was the need for the government to develop a design or plan for development.
This statement asserts that development cannot be solely driven by private actors or individuals. It emphasizes the importance of government intervention and the need for a design or plan for development. This implies that the government should play a significant role in guiding and shaping the development process.
Reason: The Bombay Plan wanted the state to take major initiatives in industrial and other economic investments.
The reason provided states that The Bombay Plan, a proposal put forward by a group of influential industrialists in 1944, advocated for the state to take major initiatives in industrial and economic investments. The plan aimed to address the economic challenges faced by India and called for a more active role of the government in promoting industrialization and economic growth.
Analysis:
Both the assertion and reason are true. Development cannot be solely driven by private actors as it requires a coordinated effort and planning by the government. The Bombay Plan indeed called for the state to take major initiatives in industrial and economic investments.
However, the reason provided does not directly explain why development cannot be left to private actors. It merely highlights the stance of The Bombay Plan. The reason does not provide a cause-and-effect relationship or a direct explanation for the assertion. Therefore, option 'B' is the correct answer.
In conclusion, while both the assertion and reason are true, the reason does not provide a correct explanation for the assertion. It is important to recognize the role of the government in development and the need for a planned approach, but the reason does not directly support or explain this assertion.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?i. The agricultural sector was crucial for providing food grains and raw materials for the Indian economy.ii. After independence, industries were in better condition compared to agriculture in India.iii. Planners faced a dilemma in prioritizing either agriculture or industry due to their distinct importance.iv. A greater focus on industrial development would have led to the backwardness of the agricultural sector.- a)i and ii
- b)i, iii and iv
- c)ii and iii
- d)i and iii
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
i. The agricultural sector was crucial for providing food grains and raw materials for the Indian economy.
ii. After independence, industries were in better condition compared to agriculture in India.
iii. Planners faced a dilemma in prioritizing either agriculture or industry due to their distinct importance.
iv. A greater focus on industrial development would have led to the backwardness of the agricultural sector.
a)
i and ii
b)
i, iii and iv
c)
ii and iii
d)
i and iii
|
|
Learning Educators answered |
- Statement i is correct because agriculture is essential for food security and raw materials.
- Statement ii is incorrect; agriculture was in a worse condition than industry post-independence.
- Statement iii is correct as planners indeed struggled with the balance between the two sectors.
- Statement iv is correct; focusing more on industrialization could neglect agricultural development, exacerbating its issues.
Thus, the correct options are i, iii, and iv, making Option B the correct choice.
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:Assertion: The nationalist leaders were clear that the economic concerns of the government of free India would have to be different from the narrowly defined commercial functions of the colonial government.Reason: It was further clear that the eradication of the poverty was not the responsibility of the government, but the people.- a)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
- b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
- c)(A) is true, but (R) is false.
- d)(A) is false, but (R) is true.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:
Assertion: The nationalist leaders were clear that the economic concerns of the government of free India would have to be different from the narrowly defined commercial functions of the colonial government.
Reason: It was further clear that the eradication of the poverty was not the responsibility of the government, but the people.
a)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
b)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
c)
(A) is true, but (R) is false.
d)
(A) is false, but (R) is true.
|
|
Shruti Joshi answered |
Assertion: The nationalist leaders were clear that the economic concerns of the government of free India would have to be different from the narrowly defined commercial functions of the colonial government.
Reason: It was further clear that the eradication of poverty was not the responsibility of the government, but the people.
Explanation:
The assertion states that the economic concerns of the government of free India would have to be different from the narrowly defined commercial functions of the colonial government. This means that the nationalist leaders recognized the need for a different approach to the economy in independent India compared to the colonial era. The reason given is that the eradication of poverty was not the responsibility of the government, but the people.
Reasoning behind the assertion:
1. Economic concerns: The nationalist leaders understood that the economic concerns of independent India would be different from the colonial government. They aimed to address the economic inequalities and ensure the overall development of the country.
2. Narrowly defined commercial functions: The colonial government's economic policies were primarily focused on the interests of the British Empire, often neglecting the welfare of the Indian population. The nationalist leaders wanted to shift the focus towards the welfare and development of the Indian people.
3. Economic policies: After gaining independence, the Indian government implemented policies such as land reforms, industrialization, and investment in infrastructure to promote economic growth and reduce poverty. These policies aimed to create a more inclusive and equitable economy.
4. Social responsibility: The government recognized its responsibility to uplift the impoverished sections of society and provide them with opportunities for socio-economic development. However, the eradication of poverty required the active participation and support of the people as well.
Reasoning behind the reason:
1. Shared responsibility: The reason states that the eradication of poverty was not solely the responsibility of the government but also the people. This reflects the understanding that poverty cannot be eliminated by government policies alone and requires collective efforts from all sections of society.
2. Participatory development: The nationalist leaders believed in the empowerment of the people and their active involvement in the development process. They encouraged initiatives such as community development programs, self-help groups, and cooperative movements to uplift the marginalized sections and alleviate poverty.
3. Role of government: While the government had a crucial role in formulating policies and creating an enabling environment for development, the reason emphasizes that poverty eradication required the participation and commitment of the people themselves.
Conclusion:
Both the assertion and the reason are true. The nationalist leaders recognized the need for a different economic approach in independent India and understood that poverty eradication required the active participation of the people. However, the reason does not provide a direct explanation of the assertion. It simply highlights the shared responsibility of the government and the people in addressing poverty. Therefore, the correct answer is option 'C' - (A) is true, but (R) is false.
Reason: It was further clear that the eradication of poverty was not the responsibility of the government, but the people.
Explanation:
The assertion states that the economic concerns of the government of free India would have to be different from the narrowly defined commercial functions of the colonial government. This means that the nationalist leaders recognized the need for a different approach to the economy in independent India compared to the colonial era. The reason given is that the eradication of poverty was not the responsibility of the government, but the people.
Reasoning behind the assertion:
1. Economic concerns: The nationalist leaders understood that the economic concerns of independent India would be different from the colonial government. They aimed to address the economic inequalities and ensure the overall development of the country.
2. Narrowly defined commercial functions: The colonial government's economic policies were primarily focused on the interests of the British Empire, often neglecting the welfare of the Indian population. The nationalist leaders wanted to shift the focus towards the welfare and development of the Indian people.
3. Economic policies: After gaining independence, the Indian government implemented policies such as land reforms, industrialization, and investment in infrastructure to promote economic growth and reduce poverty. These policies aimed to create a more inclusive and equitable economy.
4. Social responsibility: The government recognized its responsibility to uplift the impoverished sections of society and provide them with opportunities for socio-economic development. However, the eradication of poverty required the active participation and support of the people as well.
Reasoning behind the reason:
1. Shared responsibility: The reason states that the eradication of poverty was not solely the responsibility of the government but also the people. This reflects the understanding that poverty cannot be eliminated by government policies alone and requires collective efforts from all sections of society.
2. Participatory development: The nationalist leaders believed in the empowerment of the people and their active involvement in the development process. They encouraged initiatives such as community development programs, self-help groups, and cooperative movements to uplift the marginalized sections and alleviate poverty.
3. Role of government: While the government had a crucial role in formulating policies and creating an enabling environment for development, the reason emphasizes that poverty eradication required the participation and commitment of the people themselves.
Conclusion:
Both the assertion and the reason are true. The nationalist leaders recognized the need for a different economic approach in independent India and understood that poverty eradication required the active participation of the people. However, the reason does not provide a direct explanation of the assertion. It simply highlights the shared responsibility of the government and the people in addressing poverty. Therefore, the correct answer is option 'C' - (A) is true, but (R) is false.
Read the following paragraph and answer the questions that follow:NITI Aayog or National Institution for Transforming India Aayog is basically a policy think tank of Government of India and State Governments that replaces the 65-year old Planning Commission. Union Government of India had announced formation of NITI Aayog on 1st January, 2015. The body is comprised of a CEO and a Vice Chairperson, to be appointed by the Prime Minister, in addition to some full-time members and two part-time members, while four Union Ministers would serve as ex-officio members. Besides, there would be specific regional councils, while experts and specialists from various fields would be called as special invitees nominated by the Prime Ministers. NITI Aayog will serve as a “think tank” of the government as a “directional and policy dynamo” and would provide both to the governments at the centre and in the states with strategic and technical advice on key policy matters including economic issues of national and international importance. NITI Aayog will have regional councils to focus on developmental activities on specific areas and is patterned on the National Reforms Development Commission of China.Q. The CEO and Vice Chairperson of NITI Aayog is appointed by .................... .- a)President of India
- b)Members of Parliament
- c)Prime Minister of India
- d)Home minister of India
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Read the following paragraph and answer the questions that follow:
NITI Aayog or National Institution for Transforming India Aayog is basically a policy think tank of Government of India and State Governments that replaces the 65-year old Planning Commission. Union Government of India had announced formation of NITI Aayog on 1st January, 2015. The body is comprised of a CEO and a Vice Chairperson, to be appointed by the Prime Minister, in addition to some full-time members and two part-time members, while four Union Ministers would serve as ex-officio members. Besides, there would be specific regional councils, while experts and specialists from various fields would be called as special invitees nominated by the Prime Ministers. NITI Aayog will serve as a “think tank” of the government as a “directional and policy dynamo” and would provide both to the governments at the centre and in the states with strategic and technical advice on key policy matters including economic issues of national and international importance. NITI Aayog will have regional councils to focus on developmental activities on specific areas and is patterned on the National Reforms Development Commission of China.
Q. The CEO and Vice Chairperson of NITI Aayog is appointed by .................... .
a)
President of India
b)
Members of Parliament
c)
Prime Minister of India
d)
Home minister of India
|
Hansa Sharma answered |
The Prime Minister appoints the Vice Chairman of NITI Aayog.
Read the following paragraph and answer the questions that follow:NITI Aayog or National Institution for Transforming India Aayog is basically a policy think tank of Government of India and State Governments that replaces 65-year old Planning Commission. Union Government of India had announced formation of NITI Aayog on 1st January, 2015. The body is comprised of a CEO and a Vice Chairperson, to be appointed by the Prime Minister, in addition to some full-time members and two part-time members, while four Union Ministers would serve as ex-officio members. Besides, there would be specific regional councils, while experts and specialists from various fields would be called as special invitees nominated by the Prime Ministers. NITI Aayog will serve as a “think tank” of the government as a “directional and policy dynamo” and would provide both to the governments at the centre and in the states with strategic and technical advice on key policy matters including economic issues of national and international importance. NITI Aayog will have regional councils to focus on developmental activities on specific areas and is patterned on the National Reforms Development Commission of China.Q. When was NITI Aayog formed?- a)3rd January, 2015
- b)1st January, 2015
- c)1st January, 2016
- d)1st December, 2016
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Read the following paragraph and answer the questions that follow:
NITI Aayog or National Institution for Transforming India Aayog is basically a policy think tank of Government of India and State Governments that replaces 65-year old Planning Commission. Union Government of India had announced formation of NITI Aayog on 1st January, 2015. The body is comprised of a CEO and a Vice Chairperson, to be appointed by the Prime Minister, in addition to some full-time members and two part-time members, while four Union Ministers would serve as ex-officio members. Besides, there would be specific regional councils, while experts and specialists from various fields would be called as special invitees nominated by the Prime Ministers. NITI Aayog will serve as a “think tank” of the government as a “directional and policy dynamo” and would provide both to the governments at the centre and in the states with strategic and technical advice on key policy matters including economic issues of national and international importance. NITI Aayog will have regional councils to focus on developmental activities on specific areas and is patterned on the National Reforms Development Commission of China.
Q. When was NITI Aayog formed?
a)
3rd January, 2015
b)
1st January, 2015
c)
1st January, 2016
d)
1st December, 2016
|
|
Kiran Mehta answered |
National Institution for Transforming India, also known as NITI Aayog, was formed via a resolution of the Union Cabinet on 1 January 2015.
Read the following paragraph and answer the questions that follow:NITI Aayog or National Institution for Transforming India Aayog is basically a policy think tank of Government of India and State Governments that replaces 65-year old Planning Commission. Union Government of India had announced formation of NITI Aayog on 1st January, 2015. The body is comprised of a CEO and a Vice Chairperson, to be appointed by the Prime Minister, in addition to some full-time members and two part-time members, while four Union Ministers would serve as ex-officio members. Besides, there would be specific regional councils, while experts and specialists from various fields would be called as special invitees nominated by the Prime Ministers. NITI Aayog will serve as a “think tank” of the government as a “directional and policy dynamo” and would provide both to the governments at the centre and in the states with strategic and technical advice on key policy matters including economic issues of national and international importance. NITI Aayog will have regional councils to focus on developmental activities on specific areas and is patterned on the National Reforms Development Commission of China.Q. Which councils NITI Aayog will have to focus on developmental activities on specific areas and is patterned on the National Reforms Development Commission of China?- a)National Councils
- b)International Councils
- c)Regional Councils
- d)All the above
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Read the following paragraph and answer the questions that follow:
NITI Aayog or National Institution for Transforming India Aayog is basically a policy think tank of Government of India and State Governments that replaces 65-year old Planning Commission. Union Government of India had announced formation of NITI Aayog on 1st January, 2015. The body is comprised of a CEO and a Vice Chairperson, to be appointed by the Prime Minister, in addition to some full-time members and two part-time members, while four Union Ministers would serve as ex-officio members. Besides, there would be specific regional councils, while experts and specialists from various fields would be called as special invitees nominated by the Prime Ministers. NITI Aayog will serve as a “think tank” of the government as a “directional and policy dynamo” and would provide both to the governments at the centre and in the states with strategic and technical advice on key policy matters including economic issues of national and international importance. NITI Aayog will have regional councils to focus on developmental activities on specific areas and is patterned on the National Reforms Development Commission of China.
Q. Which councils NITI Aayog will have to focus on developmental activities on specific areas and is patterned on the National Reforms Development Commission of China?
a)
National Councils
b)
International Councils
c)
Regional Councils
d)
All the above
|
|
Arun Yadav answered |
Regional councils are multipurpose organizations with legal status. Most are voluntary associations and do not have the power to regulate or tax. Primarily funded by local governments and with state and federal funds, the councils are responsible to the representatives of the communities in their regions.
Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:The Second Five Year Plan stressed on heavy industries. It was drafted by a team of economists and planners under the leadership of P.C. Mahalanobis. If the first plan had preached patience, the second wanted to bring about quick structural transformation by making changes simultaneously in all possible directions. Before this plan was finalized, the Congress party at its session held at Avadi near the then Madras city, passed an important resolution. It declared that ‘Socialist pattern of society’ was its goal. This was reflected in the Second Plan. The government imposed substantial tariffs on imports in order to protect domestic industries. Such protected environment helped both public and private sector industries to grow. As savings and investment were growing in this period, a bulk of these industries like electricity, railways, steel, machineries and communication could be developed in the public sector. Indeed, such a push for industrialisation marked a turning point in India’s development.Q. Who drafted the Second Five Year Plan?- a)Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar
- b)P. C. Mahalanobis
- c)Morarji Desai
- d)Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:
The Second Five Year Plan stressed on heavy industries. It was drafted by a team of economists and planners under the leadership of P.C. Mahalanobis. If the first plan had preached patience, the second wanted to bring about quick structural transformation by making changes simultaneously in all possible directions. Before this plan was finalized, the Congress party at its session held at Avadi near the then Madras city, passed an important resolution. It declared that ‘Socialist pattern of society’ was its goal. This was reflected in the Second Plan. The government imposed substantial tariffs on imports in order to protect domestic industries. Such protected environment helped both public and private sector industries to grow. As savings and investment were growing in this period, a bulk of these industries like electricity, railways, steel, machineries and communication could be developed in the public sector. Indeed, such a push for industrialisation marked a turning point in India’s development.
Q. Who drafted the Second Five Year Plan?
a)
Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar
b)
P. C. Mahalanobis
c)
Morarji Desai
d)
Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru
|
|
Rajesh Gupta answered |
The Second Plan focused on the development of the public sector and “rapid Industrialization”. The plan followed the Mahalanobis model, an economic development model developed by the Indian statistician Prasanta Chandra Mahalanobis in 1953.
Chapter doubts & questions for Politics of Planned Development - Political Science CUET Preparation 2025 is part of Humanities/Arts exam preparation. The chapters have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. The Chapter doubts & questions, notes, tests & MCQs are made for Humanities/Arts 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests here.
Chapter doubts & questions of Politics of Planned Development - Political Science CUET Preparation in English & Hindi are available as part of Humanities/Arts exam.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.
Political Science CUET Preparation
32 videos|39 docs|62 tests
|
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup