All Exams >
Humanities/Arts >
History CUET Preparation >
All Questions
All questions of Theme 10 - Colonialism and the countryside for Humanities/Arts Exam
| 1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App |
Professionally, Buchanan was a/an- a)archaeologist.
- b)physician.
- c)philosopher.
- d)viceroy.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Professionally, Buchanan was a/an
a)
archaeologist.
b)
physician.
c)
philosopher.
d)
viceroy.
|
Milan Das answered |
Francis Buchanan was a physician who came to India and served in Bengal Medical Service from 1794 to 1815. He published reports on several districts of Eastern India.
Till 1832, a large area of land given to Santhals was demarcated as- a)Damin-i-Koh.
- b)Twenty four kos.
- c)Santhal property.
- d)Paharias property.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Till 1832, a large area of land given to Santhals was demarcated as
a)
Damin-i-Koh.
b)
Twenty four kos.
c)
Santhal property.
d)
Paharias property.
|
|
Rajdeep Choudhury answered |
The Santhals were given land and persuaded to settle in the foothills of Rajmahal. By 1832, a large area of land was demarcated as Damin-i-Koh. This was declared to be the land of the Santhals.
The life span of Maharaja Mehtab Chand was- a)1830-1889.
- b)1820-1879.
- c)1825-1863.
- d)1832-1888.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
The life span of Maharaja Mehtab Chand was
a)
1830-1889.
b)
1820-1879.
c)
1825-1863.
d)
1832-1888.
|
Jaideep Mehta answered |
The life span of Maharaja Mehtab Chand was 1820-1879. He was born in 1820 and ruled from 1832-1879. He was the Raja of Burdwan.
Under the Ryotwari system, the lands were resurveyed- a)every 10 years.
- b)every 20 years.
- c)every 30 years.
- d)every 40 years.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Under the Ryotwari system, the lands were resurveyed
a)
every 10 years.
b)
every 20 years.
c)
every 30 years.
d)
every 40 years.
|
Saptarshi Ghosh answered |
The Ryotwari system was instituted in some parts of British India. This system was used to collect revenues from the cultivators of the agricultural lands. Under this system, land was surveyed every 30 years.
Who did the permanent settlement limit the zamindar’s power to collect rent from?- a)King
- b)Ryot
- c)Tehsildar
- d)Peasant
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Who did the permanent settlement limit the zamindar’s power to collect rent from?
a)
King
b)
Ryot
c)
Tehsildar
d)
Peasant
|
Anuj Patel answered |
The Permanent Settlement of 1793 was an agreement between the East India Company and the zamindars of Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa. It aimed to establish a stable and predictable revenue system for the Company and to provide the zamindars with a secure source of income.
Limitation of Zamindar's Power:
The Permanent Settlement limited the zamindar’s power to collect rent from the ryot, or peasant. Before the settlement was introduced, the zamindars had almost unlimited power to extract rent from the ryots, often using force and coercion. The ryots were at the mercy of the zamindars and had to pay whatever rent was demanded of them, regardless of their ability to pay.
Under the Permanent Settlement, the zamindars were given the right to collect rent from the ryots, but their power was limited in several ways:
1. Fixed Rent: The zamindars were required to pay a fixed revenue to the Company, which was based on the estimated value of the land. This meant that they could not raise the rent arbitrarily and had to manage their estates efficiently to generate enough revenue to meet their obligations.
2. Hereditary Rights: The zamindars were granted hereditary rights to the land, but these rights were subject to the payment of revenue to the Company. They could not sell or mortgage their estates without the Company’s permission.
3. Legal Ownership: The zamindars were recognized as legal owners of the land, but their ownership was subject to the payment of revenue to the Company. They could not evict the ryots from their land without a legal process.
Impact of Limitation on Ryots:
The limitation of the zamindar’s power had a significant impact on the ryots. They were no longer at the mercy of the zamindars and had some protection against arbitrary rent increases and evictions. However, the fixed rent system also meant that they had to pay the same amount of rent regardless of their ability to pay. This led to widespread indebtedness and poverty among the ryots, who often had to borrow money at high interest rates to meet their rent obligations.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the Permanent Settlement limited the power of the zamindars to collect rent from the ryots, but it also created a system of fixed rents that had negative consequences for the ryots. The settlement was a significant development in the history of land revenue systems in India and had a lasting impact on the social and economic structure of the country.
Limitation of Zamindar's Power:
The Permanent Settlement limited the zamindar’s power to collect rent from the ryot, or peasant. Before the settlement was introduced, the zamindars had almost unlimited power to extract rent from the ryots, often using force and coercion. The ryots were at the mercy of the zamindars and had to pay whatever rent was demanded of them, regardless of their ability to pay.
Under the Permanent Settlement, the zamindars were given the right to collect rent from the ryots, but their power was limited in several ways:
1. Fixed Rent: The zamindars were required to pay a fixed revenue to the Company, which was based on the estimated value of the land. This meant that they could not raise the rent arbitrarily and had to manage their estates efficiently to generate enough revenue to meet their obligations.
2. Hereditary Rights: The zamindars were granted hereditary rights to the land, but these rights were subject to the payment of revenue to the Company. They could not sell or mortgage their estates without the Company’s permission.
3. Legal Ownership: The zamindars were recognized as legal owners of the land, but their ownership was subject to the payment of revenue to the Company. They could not evict the ryots from their land without a legal process.
Impact of Limitation on Ryots:
The limitation of the zamindar’s power had a significant impact on the ryots. They were no longer at the mercy of the zamindars and had some protection against arbitrary rent increases and evictions. However, the fixed rent system also meant that they had to pay the same amount of rent regardless of their ability to pay. This led to widespread indebtedness and poverty among the ryots, who often had to borrow money at high interest rates to meet their rent obligations.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the Permanent Settlement limited the power of the zamindars to collect rent from the ryots, but it also created a system of fixed rents that had negative consequences for the ryots. The settlement was a significant development in the history of land revenue systems in India and had a lasting impact on the social and economic structure of the country.
The Royatwari system was implemented mainly in- a)Bombay Deccan
- b)Calcutta and Northern India
- c)Northern India only
- d)Bihar and Assam.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
The Royatwari system was implemented mainly in
a)
Bombay Deccan
b)
Calcutta and Northern India
c)
Northern India only
d)
Bihar and Assam.
|
Swara Patel answered |
Ryotwari system was first introduced in Madras Presidency, later it was extended to Bombay Deccan. Under this system, the revenue was directly settled with the ryot (cultivator).
What did the zamindar retain the difference as?- a)Taxes
- b)Tax
- c)Income
- d)Earnings
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
What did the zamindar retain the difference as?
a)
Taxes
b)
Tax
c)
Income
d)
Earnings
|
|
Arnab Gupta answered |
The zamindar retained the difference as "income".
Explanation:
A zamindar was a landowner in colonial India who had the right to collect revenue from the peasants who worked on his land. The zamindar system was a revenue collection system introduced by the British in India. Under this system, the British government would grant a zamindar the right to collect revenue from a particular area of land, and in return, the zamindar had to pay a fixed amount of revenue to the government.
The zamindar would collect taxes from the peasants and retain a portion of it as his income. The difference between the total revenue collected and the fixed amount paid to the government was the zamindar's income. The zamindar was free to use this income as he pleased, and he often spent it on his own luxurious lifestyle.
Therefore, the correct answer is option C, income.
Explanation:
A zamindar was a landowner in colonial India who had the right to collect revenue from the peasants who worked on his land. The zamindar system was a revenue collection system introduced by the British in India. Under this system, the British government would grant a zamindar the right to collect revenue from a particular area of land, and in return, the zamindar had to pay a fixed amount of revenue to the government.
The zamindar would collect taxes from the peasants and retain a portion of it as his income. The difference between the total revenue collected and the fixed amount paid to the government was the zamindar's income. The zamindar was free to use this income as he pleased, and he often spent it on his own luxurious lifestyle.
Therefore, the correct answer is option C, income.
The jotedars, who were more powerful than zamindars in rural Bengal, were most powerful in- a)East Bengal.
- b)North Bengal.
- c)South Bengal.
- d)West Bengal.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
The jotedars, who were more powerful than zamindars in rural Bengal, were most powerful in
a)
East Bengal.
b)
North Bengal.
c)
South Bengal.
d)
West Bengal.
|
Arjun Chaudhary answered |
Within the villages of Bengal, jotedars were more powerful than the zamindars. They were most powerful in North Bengal.
In villages, the power of Jotedars was more effective than that of whom?- a)Land-Owners
- b)Feudal
- c)Zamindars
- d)Farmers
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
In villages, the power of Jotedars was more effective than that of whom?
a)
Land-Owners
b)
Feudal
c)
Zamindars
d)
Farmers
|
|
Arjun Singhania answered |
In villages in India, the power of Jotedars (also known as Jotedar or Jotedaripara) was often more effective than that of other local elites, such as land-owners, feudal lords, zamindars, and farmers.
Jotedars were a class of influential landlords or village headmen who held considerable power and influence in rural communities. They were often wealthy and well-connected, and they used their wealth and influence to dominate local politics and control the lives of the villagers.
In many cases, the power of Jotedars was greater than that of other local elites because they had a more direct and personal relationship with the villagers, who often relied on them for protection, credit, and other forms of support. Jotedars also had a strong political presence in the village, and they were often able to use their connections and influence to sway decisions and shape local policies.
Overall, the power of Jotedars in villages was often more effective than that of other local elites, such as land-owners, feudal lords, zamindars, and farmers, due to their wealth, influence, and personal relationships with the villagers.
Taluqdar refers to- a)Government official.
- b)King's official.
- c)One who holds territorial unit.
- d)poor peasants.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Taluqdar refers to
a)
Government official.
b)
King's official.
c)
One who holds territorial unit.
d)
poor peasants.
|
Ruchi Joshi answered |
Taluqdar refers to one who holds a taluq or a connection. Taluq also refers to a territorial unit. After the Permanent Settlement, a new variety of taluqs were created by zamindars.
The Company established its rule in Bengal in mid- a)1770s.
- b)1760s.
- c)1750s.
- d)1740s.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
The Company established its rule in Bengal in mid
a)
1770s.
b)
1760s.
c)
1750s.
d)
1740s.
|
Arnav Basu answered |
The English East India Company (E.E.I.C.) established its raj in the countryside of Bengal and implemented its revenue policies there.
Village headmen in Bengal were known as- a)Jotedars.
- b)Ryots.
- c)Amins.
- d)Amlahs.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Village headmen in Bengal were known as
a)
Jotedars.
b)
Ryots.
c)
Amins.
d)
Amlahs.
|
|
Anuj Patel answered |
Village headmen were called Jotedars and Mandals. They controlled local trade as well as money lending. They were too happy to see the zamindar in trouble. The zamindar could not easily assert his power over them.
Rules of revenue payment were made what?- a)Flexible
- b)Adaptable
- c)Rigid
- d)Permanent
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Rules of revenue payment were made what?
a)
Flexible
b)
Adaptable
c)
Rigid
d)
Permanent
|
|
Siddharth Choudhary answered |
Flexibility of Rules in Revenue Payment
Revenue payment is the process of collecting and distributing funds to the government by taxpayers. The rules governing this process are crucial in ensuring that the government receives its due revenue and that taxpayers comply with the regulations. The rules can be flexible, adaptable, rigid, or permanent, depending on the needs of the government.
Flexible Rules
Flexible rules are those that can be adjusted to suit changing circumstances. In revenue payment, flexible rules can be used to accommodate taxpayers who experience financial challenges. For example, the government may allow taxpayers to pay their taxes in installments or negotiate a payment plan. This approach helps the government to collect revenue while minimizing the burden on taxpayers.
Benefits of Flexible Rules
Flexibility in revenue payment rules has several advantages.
1. It encourages compliance: When taxpayers know that they have options, they are more likely to comply with the regulations.
2. It reduces the burden on taxpayers: When taxpayers experience financial difficulties, flexible rules can help to reduce the burden of revenue payment.
3. It increases revenue collection: Flexible rules can help the government to collect more revenue by accommodating taxpayers who would otherwise be unable to pay their taxes.
4. It fosters goodwill: Flexible rules can help to create a positive relationship between the government and taxpayers, which can lead to increased trust and cooperation.
Conclusion
In conclusion, flexible rules are essential in revenue payment as they help to ensure compliance, reduce the burden on taxpayers, increase revenue collection, and foster goodwill. The government should, therefore, strive to make the rules as flexible as possible to accommodate the needs of taxpayers while still ensuring that revenue collection is effective.
Revenue payment is the process of collecting and distributing funds to the government by taxpayers. The rules governing this process are crucial in ensuring that the government receives its due revenue and that taxpayers comply with the regulations. The rules can be flexible, adaptable, rigid, or permanent, depending on the needs of the government.
Flexible Rules
Flexible rules are those that can be adjusted to suit changing circumstances. In revenue payment, flexible rules can be used to accommodate taxpayers who experience financial challenges. For example, the government may allow taxpayers to pay their taxes in installments or negotiate a payment plan. This approach helps the government to collect revenue while minimizing the burden on taxpayers.
Benefits of Flexible Rules
Flexibility in revenue payment rules has several advantages.
1. It encourages compliance: When taxpayers know that they have options, they are more likely to comply with the regulations.
2. It reduces the burden on taxpayers: When taxpayers experience financial difficulties, flexible rules can help to reduce the burden of revenue payment.
3. It increases revenue collection: Flexible rules can help the government to collect more revenue by accommodating taxpayers who would otherwise be unable to pay their taxes.
4. It fosters goodwill: Flexible rules can help to create a positive relationship between the government and taxpayers, which can lead to increased trust and cooperation.
Conclusion
In conclusion, flexible rules are essential in revenue payment as they help to ensure compliance, reduce the burden on taxpayers, increase revenue collection, and foster goodwill. The government should, therefore, strive to make the rules as flexible as possible to accommodate the needs of taxpayers while still ensuring that revenue collection is effective.
What did paharias collect from the forests?- a)Sharbat
- b)Mahua
- c)Monkeypod
- d)Margosa
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
What did paharias collect from the forests?
a)
Sharbat
b)
Mahua
c)
Monkeypod
d)
Margosa
|
|
Malavika Patel answered |
Mahua is the correct answer.
The Paharias, also known as Pahariyas or Pahadiyas, are a tribal community living in the hilly regions of Bihar, Jharkhand, and West Bengal in India. They have a close connection with the forests and rely on them for their livelihood.
The Paharias collect various resources from the forests, including Mahua. Mahua (Madhuca longifolia) is a tree native to the Indian subcontinent and is highly valued by the Paharias for its multiple uses.
Here are the details explaining why Mahua is collected by the Paharias:
1. Mahua Tree:
- The Mahua tree is a tall deciduous tree that grows in abundance in the forests where the Paharias reside.
- It has small, fragrant flowers that bloom during the summer season.
- The tree is known for its ability to withstand drought conditions and grow in rocky terrains.
2. Collection of Mahua Flowers:
- The Paharias collect the flowers of the Mahua tree, which are used for various purposes.
- The flowers are plucked from the tree during the blooming season.
- The collection process involves climbing the trees and carefully removing the flowers without damaging the tree.
3. Uses of Mahua Flowers:
- Mahua flowers are used to make a traditional alcoholic beverage called "Mahua liquor" or "Mahua wine."
- The flowers are also used to extract oil, which is used for cooking and as a base for hair oil.
- Additionally, the flowers are used in the preparation of traditional sweets, pickles, and other culinary items.
4. Economic Importance:
- Mahua collection plays a significant role in the economic sustenance of the Paharia community.
- The collected Mahua flowers are sold in local markets, providing a source of income for the tribal people.
- The sale of Mahua products contributes to the local economy and helps improve the livelihoods of the Paharias.
In conclusion, the Paharias collect Mahua flowers from the forests due to their multiple uses. These flowers are used for making liquor, extracting oil, and preparing various culinary items. The economic importance of Mahua collection cannot be understated, as it provides a source of income for the Paharia community.
The Paharias, also known as Pahariyas or Pahadiyas, are a tribal community living in the hilly regions of Bihar, Jharkhand, and West Bengal in India. They have a close connection with the forests and rely on them for their livelihood.
The Paharias collect various resources from the forests, including Mahua. Mahua (Madhuca longifolia) is a tree native to the Indian subcontinent and is highly valued by the Paharias for its multiple uses.
Here are the details explaining why Mahua is collected by the Paharias:
1. Mahua Tree:
- The Mahua tree is a tall deciduous tree that grows in abundance in the forests where the Paharias reside.
- It has small, fragrant flowers that bloom during the summer season.
- The tree is known for its ability to withstand drought conditions and grow in rocky terrains.
2. Collection of Mahua Flowers:
- The Paharias collect the flowers of the Mahua tree, which are used for various purposes.
- The flowers are plucked from the tree during the blooming season.
- The collection process involves climbing the trees and carefully removing the flowers without damaging the tree.
3. Uses of Mahua Flowers:
- Mahua flowers are used to make a traditional alcoholic beverage called "Mahua liquor" or "Mahua wine."
- The flowers are also used to extract oil, which is used for cooking and as a base for hair oil.
- Additionally, the flowers are used in the preparation of traditional sweets, pickles, and other culinary items.
4. Economic Importance:
- Mahua collection plays a significant role in the economic sustenance of the Paharia community.
- The collected Mahua flowers are sold in local markets, providing a source of income for the tribal people.
- The sale of Mahua products contributes to the local economy and helps improve the livelihoods of the Paharias.
In conclusion, the Paharias collect Mahua flowers from the forests due to their multiple uses. These flowers are used for making liquor, extracting oil, and preparing various culinary items. The economic importance of Mahua collection cannot be understated, as it provides a source of income for the Paharia community.
Who was the collector of Bhagalpur?- a)Augustus Cleveland
- b)Buchanan
- c)Paharias
- d)Santhals
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Who was the collector of Bhagalpur?
a)
Augustus Cleveland
b)
Buchanan
c)
Paharias
d)
Santhals
|
|
Sarthak Joshi answered |
Augustus Cleveland as the Collector of Bhagalpur
Augustus Cleveland was appointed as the Collector of Bhagalpur during the British colonial rule in India. He played a significant role in the administration and governance of the region during his tenure.
Responsibilities as a Collector
- As a Collector, Augustus Cleveland was responsible for the collection of revenue, maintenance of law and order, and overall administration of the district of Bhagalpur.
- He oversaw the implementation of British policies and regulations in the region, ensuring compliance among the local population.
Impact on Bhagalpur
- Augustus Cleveland's administration had a lasting impact on the development of Bhagalpur. He introduced various reforms and initiatives aimed at improving the socio-economic conditions of the people in the district.
- Under his leadership, infrastructure projects were initiated, educational institutions were established, and agricultural practices were modernized.
Legacy
- Augustus Cleveland is remembered as a proactive and efficient administrator who worked towards the welfare of the people in Bhagalpur.
- His contributions to the development of the region are recognized and appreciated by historians and scholars studying the colonial period in India.
Augustus Cleveland was appointed as the Collector of Bhagalpur during the British colonial rule in India. He played a significant role in the administration and governance of the region during his tenure.
Responsibilities as a Collector
- As a Collector, Augustus Cleveland was responsible for the collection of revenue, maintenance of law and order, and overall administration of the district of Bhagalpur.
- He oversaw the implementation of British policies and regulations in the region, ensuring compliance among the local population.
Impact on Bhagalpur
- Augustus Cleveland's administration had a lasting impact on the development of Bhagalpur. He introduced various reforms and initiatives aimed at improving the socio-economic conditions of the people in the district.
- Under his leadership, infrastructure projects were initiated, educational institutions were established, and agricultural practices were modernized.
Legacy
- Augustus Cleveland is remembered as a proactive and efficient administrator who worked towards the welfare of the people in Bhagalpur.
- His contributions to the development of the region are recognized and appreciated by historians and scholars studying the colonial period in India.
What did the ryots have to pay to the zamindar?- a)Condo
- b)Apartments
- c)Gift
- d)Rent
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
What did the ryots have to pay to the zamindar?
a)
Condo
b)
Apartments
c)
Gift
d)
Rent
|
|
Arjun Ghoshal answered |
The ryots, who were the peasant farmers in rural India, had to pay rent to the zamindar, who was the landowner or landlord in the village. This system of rent payment was prevalent during the colonial period in India.
Explanation:
1. The Zamindari System: The Zamindari system was a land revenue system introduced by the British during their rule in India. Under this system, the British government granted large landholdings to certain individuals known as zamindars. These zamindars became the intermediaries between the government and the peasants.
2. Rent Payment: The ryots, who were the actual cultivators of the land, had to pay rent to the zamindar for the use of the land. This rent was typically a fixed amount or a share of the agricultural produce. The ryots had to make these payments regularly, usually on an annual basis.
3. Forms of Rent: The rent payment could be made in different forms depending on the agreement between the ryot and the zamindar. It could be paid in cash, in kind (such as a portion of the agricultural produce), or through forced labor.
4. Economic Impact: The rent payment imposed a significant burden on the ryots. They had to give a substantial portion of their produce or income to the zamindar, which left them with minimal resources for their own sustenance and economic development. This further perpetuated the cycle of poverty and exploitation.
5. Exploitative Nature: The zamindars often took advantage of their position of power and exploited the ryots. They would extract excessive rents, impose arbitrary fines, and even evict the ryots from their land if they failed to make the payments. This led to widespread discontent and resistance among the ryots against the zamindari system.
Overall, the ryots had to pay rent to the zamindar as part of the exploitative zamindari system imposed by the British colonial administration. This rent payment was a significant source of economic burden and exploitation for the peasant farmers, further exacerbating their poverty and marginalization.
Explanation:
1. The Zamindari System: The Zamindari system was a land revenue system introduced by the British during their rule in India. Under this system, the British government granted large landholdings to certain individuals known as zamindars. These zamindars became the intermediaries between the government and the peasants.
2. Rent Payment: The ryots, who were the actual cultivators of the land, had to pay rent to the zamindar for the use of the land. This rent was typically a fixed amount or a share of the agricultural produce. The ryots had to make these payments regularly, usually on an annual basis.
3. Forms of Rent: The rent payment could be made in different forms depending on the agreement between the ryot and the zamindar. It could be paid in cash, in kind (such as a portion of the agricultural produce), or through forced labor.
4. Economic Impact: The rent payment imposed a significant burden on the ryots. They had to give a substantial portion of their produce or income to the zamindar, which left them with minimal resources for their own sustenance and economic development. This further perpetuated the cycle of poverty and exploitation.
5. Exploitative Nature: The zamindars often took advantage of their position of power and exploited the ryots. They would extract excessive rents, impose arbitrary fines, and even evict the ryots from their land if they failed to make the payments. This led to widespread discontent and resistance among the ryots against the zamindari system.
Overall, the ryots had to pay rent to the zamindar as part of the exploitative zamindari system imposed by the British colonial administration. This rent payment was a significant source of economic burden and exploitation for the peasant farmers, further exacerbating their poverty and marginalization.
Where were the Jotedars most powerful?- a)North Bengal
- b)West Bengal
- c)Karnataka
- d)Gantidars
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Where were the Jotedars most powerful?
a)
North Bengal
b)
West Bengal
c)
Karnataka
d)
Gantidars
|
|
Lakshmi Kulkarni answered |
North Bengal
The Jotedars were most powerful in North Bengal primarily due to historical and socio-economic factors that shaped their dominance in this region. Here are some key reasons why North Bengal was the stronghold of the Jotedars:
- Land Ownership: Jotedars in North Bengal were large landowners who controlled a significant portion of the agricultural land in the region. This gave them immense economic power and influence over the local population.
- Historical Context: North Bengal has a long history of feudalism and agrarian relations that favored the concentration of land and power in the hands of a few elite families. The Jotedars capitalized on this historical context to consolidate their power.
- Political Influence: The Jotedars in North Bengal often had close ties with political leaders and parties, which further strengthened their hold on the region. They played a significant role in shaping political decisions and policies that benefited their interests.
- Social Structure: The social structure in North Bengal was conducive to the dominance of the Jotedars, with a hierarchical system that placed them at the top of the social ladder. This allowed them to exert control over the lower classes and maintain their power.
In conclusion, the Jotedars were most powerful in North Bengal due to a combination of factors such as land ownership, historical context, political influence, and social structure that favored their dominance in the region.
The Jotedars were most powerful in North Bengal primarily due to historical and socio-economic factors that shaped their dominance in this region. Here are some key reasons why North Bengal was the stronghold of the Jotedars:
- Land Ownership: Jotedars in North Bengal were large landowners who controlled a significant portion of the agricultural land in the region. This gave them immense economic power and influence over the local population.
- Historical Context: North Bengal has a long history of feudalism and agrarian relations that favored the concentration of land and power in the hands of a few elite families. The Jotedars capitalized on this historical context to consolidate their power.
- Political Influence: The Jotedars in North Bengal often had close ties with political leaders and parties, which further strengthened their hold on the region. They played a significant role in shaping political decisions and policies that benefited their interests.
- Social Structure: The social structure in North Bengal was conducive to the dominance of the Jotedars, with a hierarchical system that placed them at the top of the social ladder. This allowed them to exert control over the lower classes and maintain their power.
In conclusion, the Jotedars were most powerful in North Bengal due to a combination of factors such as land ownership, historical context, political influence, and social structure that favored their dominance in the region.
Who resisted the entry of outsiders?- a)Traders
- b)Adivasis
- c)Vidarbha
- d)Ryots
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Who resisted the entry of outsiders?
a)
Traders
b)
Adivasis
c)
Vidarbha
d)
Ryots
|
|
Isha Kaur answered |
Resistance to the Entry of Outsiders by Ryots
Ryots, also known as peasants or farmers, were the ones who resisted the entry of outsiders. Let's understand why they did so:
Background:
During the colonial period, the British introduced the concept of private property and land revenue systems. They also introduced cash crops like indigo and opium, which required a large amount of land and labor. The British acquired land from the peasants, and the peasants became tenants. The British also introduced new technologies and machinery, which threatened the livelihoods of the peasants.
Reasons for Resistance:
1. Fear of Losing Land: The peasants feared that the entry of outsiders would lead to the loss of their land. They believed that the outsiders would acquire their land and turn them into tenants.
2. Threat to Livelihood: The British introduced new technologies and machinery, which threatened the livelihoods of the peasants. The peasants feared that the outsiders would bring in more machines and reduce their employment opportunities.
3. Exploitation: The peasants believed that the outsiders would exploit them by paying low wages and extracting maximum work. They felt that the outsiders would not treat them fairly and would take advantage of their poverty.
4. Cultural Differences: The peasants also had cultural differences with the outsiders. They had different customs, traditions, and beliefs. The peasants feared that the outsiders would impose their culture on them, leading to the loss of their identity.
Conclusion:
Ryots or peasants resisted the entry of outsiders due to various reasons. They feared losing their land, livelihood, and cultural identity. They also feared exploitation by the outsiders. The resistance of the peasants played a crucial role in shaping the history of India.
Ryots, also known as peasants or farmers, were the ones who resisted the entry of outsiders. Let's understand why they did so:
Background:
During the colonial period, the British introduced the concept of private property and land revenue systems. They also introduced cash crops like indigo and opium, which required a large amount of land and labor. The British acquired land from the peasants, and the peasants became tenants. The British also introduced new technologies and machinery, which threatened the livelihoods of the peasants.
Reasons for Resistance:
1. Fear of Losing Land: The peasants feared that the entry of outsiders would lead to the loss of their land. They believed that the outsiders would acquire their land and turn them into tenants.
2. Threat to Livelihood: The British introduced new technologies and machinery, which threatened the livelihoods of the peasants. The peasants feared that the outsiders would bring in more machines and reduce their employment opportunities.
3. Exploitation: The peasants believed that the outsiders would exploit them by paying low wages and extracting maximum work. They felt that the outsiders would not treat them fairly and would take advantage of their poverty.
4. Cultural Differences: The peasants also had cultural differences with the outsiders. They had different customs, traditions, and beliefs. The peasants feared that the outsiders would impose their culture on them, leading to the loss of their identity.
Conclusion:
Ryots or peasants resisted the entry of outsiders due to various reasons. They feared losing their land, livelihood, and cultural identity. They also feared exploitation by the outsiders. The resistance of the peasants played a crucial role in shaping the history of India.
What did the expansion of the peasant economy create in the Rajmahal hills?- a)Conflict
- b)Peace
- c)Friendship
- d)Problem
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
What did the expansion of the peasant economy create in the Rajmahal hills?
a)
Conflict
b)
Peace
c)
Friendship
d)
Problem
|
Mira Gupta answered |
The expansion of the peasant economy created conflict in the Rajmahal hills.
Introduction:
The Rajmahal hills, located in present-day Jharkhand, India, witnessed significant changes in their socio-economic structure during the expansion of the peasant economy. This expansion led to various consequences, including conflict in the region.
1. Growth of Peasant Economy:
The expansion of the peasant economy in the Rajmahal hills resulted in increased agricultural production and commercial activities. Peasants began cultivating more land, adopting new techniques, and engaging in trade. This growth enabled them to generate surplus wealth and transform their socio-economic status.
2. Disparities in Wealth Distribution:
As the peasant economy flourished, wealth disparities emerged in the region. Some peasants became prosperous, while others struggled to cope with the changes. The concentration of wealth in the hands of a few created social tensions and economic imbalances.
3. Land Disputes:
The expansion of the peasant economy also led to disputes over land ownership. As peasants sought to cultivate more land, conflicts arose between different communities and individuals over territorial claims. These disputes often resulted in violence and prolonged conflicts, as people fought for control over fertile lands.
4. Competition for Resources:
With the growth of agriculture and trade, there was an increased demand for natural resources such as water, forests, and grazing land. This competition for resources further escalated conflicts among different groups, including peasants, pastoralists, and forest-dwelling communities. Disagreements over resource allocation and access often led to clashes and animosity.
5. Social and Caste Conflicts:
The expansion of the peasant economy also exacerbated existing social and caste divisions. The wealthier peasants, often belonging to higher castes, exerted their dominance over lower-caste peasants and marginalized communities. This created social tensions and conflicts based on caste hierarchies and economic disparities.
6. Resistance from Indigenous Communities:
The expansion of the peasant economy encroached upon the territory and livelihoods of indigenous communities in the Rajmahal hills. These communities, often dependent on forest resources and traditional forms of subsistence, resisted the changes brought by the peasant economy. They viewed the encroachment as a threat to their culture, livelihoods, and autonomy, leading to conflicts with the peasant settlers.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the expansion of the peasant economy in the Rajmahal hills resulted in conflict due to wealth disparities, land disputes, competition for resources, social and caste divisions, and resistance from indigenous communities. These conflicts highlight the complex social and economic dynamics that arise during periods of rapid economic transformation and highlight the challenges of reconciling different interests and aspirations within a society.
Introduction:
The Rajmahal hills, located in present-day Jharkhand, India, witnessed significant changes in their socio-economic structure during the expansion of the peasant economy. This expansion led to various consequences, including conflict in the region.
1. Growth of Peasant Economy:
The expansion of the peasant economy in the Rajmahal hills resulted in increased agricultural production and commercial activities. Peasants began cultivating more land, adopting new techniques, and engaging in trade. This growth enabled them to generate surplus wealth and transform their socio-economic status.
2. Disparities in Wealth Distribution:
As the peasant economy flourished, wealth disparities emerged in the region. Some peasants became prosperous, while others struggled to cope with the changes. The concentration of wealth in the hands of a few created social tensions and economic imbalances.
3. Land Disputes:
The expansion of the peasant economy also led to disputes over land ownership. As peasants sought to cultivate more land, conflicts arose between different communities and individuals over territorial claims. These disputes often resulted in violence and prolonged conflicts, as people fought for control over fertile lands.
4. Competition for Resources:
With the growth of agriculture and trade, there was an increased demand for natural resources such as water, forests, and grazing land. This competition for resources further escalated conflicts among different groups, including peasants, pastoralists, and forest-dwelling communities. Disagreements over resource allocation and access often led to clashes and animosity.
5. Social and Caste Conflicts:
The expansion of the peasant economy also exacerbated existing social and caste divisions. The wealthier peasants, often belonging to higher castes, exerted their dominance over lower-caste peasants and marginalized communities. This created social tensions and conflicts based on caste hierarchies and economic disparities.
6. Resistance from Indigenous Communities:
The expansion of the peasant economy encroached upon the territory and livelihoods of indigenous communities in the Rajmahal hills. These communities, often dependent on forest resources and traditional forms of subsistence, resisted the changes brought by the peasant economy. They viewed the encroachment as a threat to their culture, livelihoods, and autonomy, leading to conflicts with the peasant settlers.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the expansion of the peasant economy in the Rajmahal hills resulted in conflict due to wealth disparities, land disputes, competition for resources, social and caste divisions, and resistance from indigenous communities. These conflicts highlight the complex social and economic dynamics that arise during periods of rapid economic transformation and highlight the challenges of reconciling different interests and aspirations within a society.
Who cultivated a large part of the land Jotedars acquired?- a)Ex-Slaves
- b)Robbers
- c)Landless
- d)Sharecroppers
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Who cultivated a large part of the land Jotedars acquired?
a)
Ex-Slaves
b)
Robbers
c)
Landless
d)
Sharecroppers
|
|
Krish Sharma answered |
Introduction:
In the context of land ownership and cultivation, Jotedars were a privileged class of landlords in Bengal, India, during the pre-independence era. They acquired large expanses of land and exerted control over the agricultural activities within their domain. However, the cultivation of this land was not carried out by Jotedars themselves.
Explanation:
The correct answer to the question is option 'D': Sharecroppers. Sharecroppers were the individuals who cultivated a large part of the land acquired by Jotedars. Let's delve into the explanation:
1. Jotedars as Landlords:
Jotedars were the upper-class landlords who held significant power and influence in the rural areas of Bengal. They amassed large tracts of agricultural land and established themselves as the owners of these properties.
2. Acquisition of Land:
Jotedars acquired land through various means, such as inheritance, purchase, or through the zamindari system, where they acted as intermediaries between the British colonial administration and the local peasants.
3. Sharecropping System:
Once Jotedars acquired the land, they employed a sharecropping system for agricultural cultivation. In this system, the Jotedars allowed landless individuals or families, known as sharecroppers, to cultivate a portion of their land in exchange for a share of the crops produced.
4. Role of Sharecroppers:
Sharecroppers, who were primarily landless peasants, would till and cultivate the land provided by the Jotedars. They would invest their labor, time, and resources in the cultivation process, including sowing, weeding, harvesting, and other agricultural activities.
5. Sharecropper's Share:
In return for their efforts, sharecroppers were entitled to a share of the harvested crops. The exact share varied depending on the agreement between the Jotedar and the sharecropper. Generally, the sharecropper would receive a certain percentage of the crop, while the Jotedar would retain the remaining portion.
6. Socio-economic Dynamics:
The sharecropping system was an exploitative arrangement, as the sharecroppers often received an inadequate share of the crops, leaving them in a cycle of poverty and dependence. This system perpetuated the socio-economic divide between the Jotedars and the landless peasants.
Conclusion:
In summary, the large part of the land acquired by Jotedars was cultivated by sharecroppers. These landless individuals or families would work on the land, investing their labor, and in return, receive a share of the crops produced. The sharecropping system created an exploitative relationship between the Jotedars and the sharecroppers, further reinforcing the socio-economic inequalities prevalent in rural Bengal during that time.
In the context of land ownership and cultivation, Jotedars were a privileged class of landlords in Bengal, India, during the pre-independence era. They acquired large expanses of land and exerted control over the agricultural activities within their domain. However, the cultivation of this land was not carried out by Jotedars themselves.
Explanation:
The correct answer to the question is option 'D': Sharecroppers. Sharecroppers were the individuals who cultivated a large part of the land acquired by Jotedars. Let's delve into the explanation:
1. Jotedars as Landlords:
Jotedars were the upper-class landlords who held significant power and influence in the rural areas of Bengal. They amassed large tracts of agricultural land and established themselves as the owners of these properties.
2. Acquisition of Land:
Jotedars acquired land through various means, such as inheritance, purchase, or through the zamindari system, where they acted as intermediaries between the British colonial administration and the local peasants.
3. Sharecropping System:
Once Jotedars acquired the land, they employed a sharecropping system for agricultural cultivation. In this system, the Jotedars allowed landless individuals or families, known as sharecroppers, to cultivate a portion of their land in exchange for a share of the crops produced.
4. Role of Sharecroppers:
Sharecroppers, who were primarily landless peasants, would till and cultivate the land provided by the Jotedars. They would invest their labor, time, and resources in the cultivation process, including sowing, weeding, harvesting, and other agricultural activities.
5. Sharecropper's Share:
In return for their efforts, sharecroppers were entitled to a share of the harvested crops. The exact share varied depending on the agreement between the Jotedar and the sharecropper. Generally, the sharecropper would receive a certain percentage of the crop, while the Jotedar would retain the remaining portion.
6. Socio-economic Dynamics:
The sharecropping system was an exploitative arrangement, as the sharecroppers often received an inadequate share of the crops, leaving them in a cycle of poverty and dependence. This system perpetuated the socio-economic divide between the Jotedars and the landless peasants.
Conclusion:
In summary, the large part of the land acquired by Jotedars was cultivated by sharecroppers. These landless individuals or families would work on the land, investing their labor, and in return, receive a share of the crops produced. The sharecropping system created an exploitative relationship between the Jotedars and the sharecroppers, further reinforcing the socio-economic inequalities prevalent in rural Bengal during that time.
Who were the raja's estates sold to at the auction?- a)Poors
- b)Sellers
- c)Consumers
- d)Purchasers
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Who were the raja's estates sold to at the auction?
a)
Poors
b)
Sellers
c)
Consumers
d)
Purchasers
|
|
Devansh Choudhary answered |
Raja's Estates sold at Auction
The raja's estates were sold at an auction, and the question asks who they were sold to. The correct answer is option D, purchasers. Let's take a closer look at why.
Explanation:
Auctions are a common method of selling property, including real estate. In an auction, potential buyers bid on the property being sold, and the highest bidder wins. In the case of the raja's estates, the auction would have been open to anyone who was interested in purchasing the property.
The raja's estates were likely large tracts of land that had been owned by the raja for many years. When the raja passed away, the estates would have been part of his estate and would have been inherited by his heirs. However, if the heirs were unable to manage the estates or did not want to keep them, they could have decided to sell them at an auction.
At the auction, potential buyers would have been able to bid on the estates. The highest bidder would have won the auction and would have become the new owner of the property. The purchasers could have been anyone, including individuals, companies, or other organizations.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the correct answer to the question of who the raja's estates were sold to at the auction is purchasers. This answer reflects the fact that auctions are an open and competitive process where anyone can bid on the property being sold, and the highest bidder wins.
The raja's estates were sold at an auction, and the question asks who they were sold to. The correct answer is option D, purchasers. Let's take a closer look at why.
Explanation:
Auctions are a common method of selling property, including real estate. In an auction, potential buyers bid on the property being sold, and the highest bidder wins. In the case of the raja's estates, the auction would have been open to anyone who was interested in purchasing the property.
The raja's estates were likely large tracts of land that had been owned by the raja for many years. When the raja passed away, the estates would have been part of his estate and would have been inherited by his heirs. However, if the heirs were unable to manage the estates or did not want to keep them, they could have decided to sell them at an auction.
At the auction, potential buyers would have been able to bid on the estates. The highest bidder would have won the auction and would have become the new owner of the property. The purchasers could have been anyone, including individuals, companies, or other organizations.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the correct answer to the question of who the raja's estates were sold to at the auction is purchasers. This answer reflects the fact that auctions are an open and competitive process where anyone can bid on the property being sold, and the highest bidder wins.
When was an auction in Burdwan?- a)1794
- b)1797
- c)1800
- d)1793
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
When was an auction in Burdwan?
a)
1794
b)
1797
c)
1800
d)
1793
|
|
Sarthak Joshi answered |
Auction in Burdwan in 1797
The correct answer to the question is option 'B' which is 1797. Let's explore the details to understand why this is the correct answer.
Background:
Burdwan is a city in the state of West Bengal, India. It is an important industrial and cultural center of the region. During the British colonial period, Burdwan was an important center for trade and commerce. The British East India Company had established its presence in the region and had taken over the administration of the area.
Auction in Burdwan:
The auction referenced in the question is likely related to the sale of land or property in the Burdwan region. During the British colonial period, the East India Company had acquired large tracts of land in the region. This land was then sold or leased to individuals or companies for various purposes.
The auction in Burdwan in 1797 was likely related to the sale of land or property. The specific details of the auction are not known, but it would have been an important event for the local community. The auction would have been conducted by the East India Company and would have involved local businessmen and landowners.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the correct answer to the question is option 'B' which is 1797. This was an important year for Burdwan and would have had a significant impact on the local community. The auction in Burdwan in 1797 was likely related to the sale of land or property in the region and would have been conducted by the East India Company.
The correct answer to the question is option 'B' which is 1797. Let's explore the details to understand why this is the correct answer.
Background:
Burdwan is a city in the state of West Bengal, India. It is an important industrial and cultural center of the region. During the British colonial period, Burdwan was an important center for trade and commerce. The British East India Company had established its presence in the region and had taken over the administration of the area.
Auction in Burdwan:
The auction referenced in the question is likely related to the sale of land or property in the Burdwan region. During the British colonial period, the East India Company had acquired large tracts of land in the region. This land was then sold or leased to individuals or companies for various purposes.
The auction in Burdwan in 1797 was likely related to the sale of land or property. The specific details of the auction are not known, but it would have been an important event for the local community. The auction would have been conducted by the East India Company and would have involved local businessmen and landowners.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the correct answer to the question is option 'B' which is 1797. This was an important year for Burdwan and would have had a significant impact on the local community. The auction in Burdwan in 1797 was likely related to the sale of land or property in the region and would have been conducted by the East India Company.
Who bears the costs of Buchanan’s travels?- a)Jotedars
- b)East India Company
- c)Santhal
- d)Mica
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Who bears the costs of Buchanan’s travels?
a)
Jotedars
b)
East India Company
c)
Santhal
d)
Mica
|
|
Sarthak Joshi answered |
The correct answer is option 'B' - East India Company.
Explanation:
The travels of Buchanan were funded by the East India Company. Let's delve into the details to understand this answer further.
1. The East India Company:
The East India Company was a British trading company that had a significant presence in India during the colonial era. It was granted a royal charter by Queen Elizabeth I in 1600, giving it a monopoly on English trade with the East Indies.
2. Buchanan's Travels:
Francis Buchanan, also known as Francis Hamilton, was a Scottish physician and naturalist who conducted extensive research and surveys in India during the early 19th century. His travels covered various regions of India, including Bengal, Bihar, Odisha, and Madhya Pradesh.
3. Purpose of Buchanan's Travels:
Buchanan's travels had multiple objectives. He conducted botanical, zoological, and geological surveys, documenting the flora, fauna, and natural resources of the region. Additionally, he also studied the social, economic, and cultural aspects of the areas he visited.
4. Sponsorship by the East India Company:
The East India Company sponsored Buchanan's travels in order to further their understanding of the Indian subcontinent. The company had a vested interest in gathering information about the region's natural resources, trade routes, and socio-cultural dynamics.
5. Cost Coverage:
As Buchanan's travels were commissioned by the East India Company, they bore the financial responsibility for his expeditions. The company provided funding for his transportation, accommodation, research materials, and other associated expenses.
6. Benefits to the East India Company:
By sponsoring Buchanan's travels, the East India Company gained valuable insights into the natural resources and potential trade opportunities in the regions he explored. This information was beneficial for their commercial activities, including the extraction of resources, establishment of trade routes, and overall governance of their territories.
In conclusion, the East India Company bore the costs of Buchanan's travels as part of their efforts to gather information and further their interests in India.
Explanation:
The travels of Buchanan were funded by the East India Company. Let's delve into the details to understand this answer further.
1. The East India Company:
The East India Company was a British trading company that had a significant presence in India during the colonial era. It was granted a royal charter by Queen Elizabeth I in 1600, giving it a monopoly on English trade with the East Indies.
2. Buchanan's Travels:
Francis Buchanan, also known as Francis Hamilton, was a Scottish physician and naturalist who conducted extensive research and surveys in India during the early 19th century. His travels covered various regions of India, including Bengal, Bihar, Odisha, and Madhya Pradesh.
3. Purpose of Buchanan's Travels:
Buchanan's travels had multiple objectives. He conducted botanical, zoological, and geological surveys, documenting the flora, fauna, and natural resources of the region. Additionally, he also studied the social, economic, and cultural aspects of the areas he visited.
4. Sponsorship by the East India Company:
The East India Company sponsored Buchanan's travels in order to further their understanding of the Indian subcontinent. The company had a vested interest in gathering information about the region's natural resources, trade routes, and socio-cultural dynamics.
5. Cost Coverage:
As Buchanan's travels were commissioned by the East India Company, they bore the financial responsibility for his expeditions. The company provided funding for his transportation, accommodation, research materials, and other associated expenses.
6. Benefits to the East India Company:
By sponsoring Buchanan's travels, the East India Company gained valuable insights into the natural resources and potential trade opportunities in the regions he explored. This information was beneficial for their commercial activities, including the extraction of resources, establishment of trade routes, and overall governance of their territories.
In conclusion, the East India Company bore the costs of Buchanan's travels as part of their efforts to gather information and further their interests in India.
The land grant to the Santhals stipulated that at least how much of the area was to be cleared and cultivated within the first.- a)One-Fourth
- b)One-Tenth
- c)One-Fifth
- d)One-Sixth
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
The land grant to the Santhals stipulated that at least how much of the area was to be cleared and cultivated within the first.
a)
One-Fourth
b)
One-Tenth
c)
One-Fifth
d)
One-Sixth
|
|
Pallavi Sen answered |
The land grant to the Santhals and its stipulation
The Santhals are a tribal community living in India. During the British colonial period, they were given a land grant in the Santhal Parganas region of present-day Jharkhand. The land grant was given to them in recognition of their historical and cultural ties to the area. The grant stipulated certain conditions that the Santhals had to follow in order to maintain their rights to the land.
One of the conditions of the land grant was that the Santhals had to clear and cultivate a certain amount of the land within a specified period of time. The exact amount of land to be cleared and cultivated was specified in the grant.
The stipulation was that at least one-tenth of the land had to be cleared and cultivated within the first few years of receiving the grant. This meant that the Santhals had to work hard to clear the forested land and prepare it for cultivation. This was a challenging task, as the Santhal Parganas region was known for its dense forests and hilly terrain.
The rationale behind the stipulation
The British colonial government had a vested interest in ensuring that the Santhals cleared and cultivated the land. This was because they wanted to increase agricultural production in the region and generate revenue from it. By requiring the Santhals to clear and cultivate the land, the British hoped to transform the region into a productive agricultural area.
Additionally, the stipulation was meant to ensure that the Santhals did not let the land lie fallow or use it for non-agricultural purposes. The British wanted to prevent the Santhals from using the land for traditional practices such as shifting cultivation, which they viewed as wasteful and destructive.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the land grant to the Santhals included a stipulation that at least one-tenth of the land had to be cleared and cultivated within the first few years of receiving the grant. This condition was imposed by the British colonial government to increase agricultural production in the region and prevent the Santhals from engaging in traditional practices that were seen as wasteful.
The Santhals are a tribal community living in India. During the British colonial period, they were given a land grant in the Santhal Parganas region of present-day Jharkhand. The land grant was given to them in recognition of their historical and cultural ties to the area. The grant stipulated certain conditions that the Santhals had to follow in order to maintain their rights to the land.
One of the conditions of the land grant was that the Santhals had to clear and cultivate a certain amount of the land within a specified period of time. The exact amount of land to be cleared and cultivated was specified in the grant.
The stipulation was that at least one-tenth of the land had to be cleared and cultivated within the first few years of receiving the grant. This meant that the Santhals had to work hard to clear the forested land and prepare it for cultivation. This was a challenging task, as the Santhal Parganas region was known for its dense forests and hilly terrain.
The rationale behind the stipulation
The British colonial government had a vested interest in ensuring that the Santhals cleared and cultivated the land. This was because they wanted to increase agricultural production in the region and generate revenue from it. By requiring the Santhals to clear and cultivate the land, the British hoped to transform the region into a productive agricultural area.
Additionally, the stipulation was meant to ensure that the Santhals did not let the land lie fallow or use it for non-agricultural purposes. The British wanted to prevent the Santhals from using the land for traditional practices such as shifting cultivation, which they viewed as wasteful and destructive.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the land grant to the Santhals included a stipulation that at least one-tenth of the land had to be cleared and cultivated within the first few years of receiving the grant. This condition was imposed by the British colonial government to increase agricultural production in the region and prevent the Santhals from engaging in traditional practices that were seen as wasteful.
Who could zamindars prosecute?- a)Bankrupts
- b)Marshals
- c)Innocents
- d)Defaulters
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Who could zamindars prosecute?
a)
Bankrupts
b)
Marshals
c)
Innocents
d)
Defaulters
|
|
Arjun Ghoshal answered |
Zamindars were landowners or landlords in the feudal system of India during the British colonial period. They were granted extensive land rights by the British authorities and had the power to collect revenue from the peasants who worked on their land. The zamindari system was characterized by a hierarchical structure, with zamindars at the top and peasants at the bottom.
In the context of the given options, zamindars had the authority to prosecute defaulters. Let's explore this in more detail:
Definition of a Defaulter:
A defaulter in this context refers to someone who failed to pay their rent or revenue to the zamindar on time. The zamindars relied on this revenue to maintain their lifestyle and fulfill their obligations to the British authorities. When a tenant or cultivator failed to pay the required amount, they were considered defaulters.
Prosecuting Defaulters:
Zamindars had the power to take legal action against defaulters in order to recover the unpaid revenue. This could involve filing a complaint with the local authorities or taking the matter to court. The zamindars could seek legal remedies to recover the outstanding amount, including enforcing the sale of the defaulter's property or seizing their assets.
Reasons for Prosecution:
There could be various reasons why a defaulter failed to pay their rent or revenue on time. Some common reasons include crop failure, economic hardships, or disputes over the amount to be paid. However, regardless of the reasons, zamindars had the right to prosecute defaulters as it was their source of income and it was essential for them to maintain their authority and control over the land.
Impact on Peasants:
The prosecution of defaulters by zamindars had a significant impact on the peasants. If a peasant was unable to pay their rent or revenue, they faced the risk of losing their land, eviction, or even imprisonment. This further exacerbated the already exploitative relationship between the zamindars and the peasants, as it increased the vulnerability of the latter.
In conclusion, zamindars had the authority to prosecute defaulters who failed to pay their rent or revenue on time. This was an essential aspect of their role as landowners in the feudal system and had significant implications for the peasants who were dependent on the land for their livelihood.
In the context of the given options, zamindars had the authority to prosecute defaulters. Let's explore this in more detail:
Definition of a Defaulter:
A defaulter in this context refers to someone who failed to pay their rent or revenue to the zamindar on time. The zamindars relied on this revenue to maintain their lifestyle and fulfill their obligations to the British authorities. When a tenant or cultivator failed to pay the required amount, they were considered defaulters.
Prosecuting Defaulters:
Zamindars had the power to take legal action against defaulters in order to recover the unpaid revenue. This could involve filing a complaint with the local authorities or taking the matter to court. The zamindars could seek legal remedies to recover the outstanding amount, including enforcing the sale of the defaulter's property or seizing their assets.
Reasons for Prosecution:
There could be various reasons why a defaulter failed to pay their rent or revenue on time. Some common reasons include crop failure, economic hardships, or disputes over the amount to be paid. However, regardless of the reasons, zamindars had the right to prosecute defaulters as it was their source of income and it was essential for them to maintain their authority and control over the land.
Impact on Peasants:
The prosecution of defaulters by zamindars had a significant impact on the peasants. If a peasant was unable to pay their rent or revenue, they faced the risk of losing their land, eviction, or even imprisonment. This further exacerbated the already exploitative relationship between the zamindars and the peasants, as it increased the vulnerability of the latter.
In conclusion, zamindars had the authority to prosecute defaulters who failed to pay their rent or revenue on time. This was an essential aspect of their role as landowners in the feudal system and had significant implications for the peasants who were dependent on the land for their livelihood.
What did Jotedars control?- a)Loansharking
- b)Moneylending
- c)Usurious
- d)Traders
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
What did Jotedars control?
a)
Loansharking
b)
Moneylending
c)
Usurious
d)
Traders
|
|
Arnav Chakraborty answered |
Jotedars were an influential group of landowners in Bengal, India during the colonial period. They were known for their control over the local economy and their exploitation of the rural population. They exercised their power over the peasants by manipulating the credit market and money lending.
Control over Moneylending:
Jotedars controlled the money lending business in rural Bengal. They provided loans to the peasants during the sowing season, and in return, they demanded a high rate of interest. This high-interest rate was used as a tool to keep the peasants in debt, and they remained under the control of the Jotedars. The Jotedars also controlled the repayment of the loans. They would often refuse to accept the principal amount, and instead, demand a higher amount, which resulted in the peasants falling deeper into debt.
Manipulation of credit market:
The Jotedars controlled the credit market in rural Bengal. They would often force the peasants to buy goods from their shops on credit and then manipulate the prices of these goods to ensure that the peasants would never be able to repay the debt. The Jotedars also controlled the market for agricultural produce. They would often buy the produce from the peasants at a low price and then sell it at a higher price in the market.
Exploitation of the Rural Population:
The Jotedars were known for their exploitation of the rural population. They would use their position of power to force the peasants to work on their land for low wages. The Jotedars would often confiscate the land of the peasants who were unable to repay their loans, and they would then force them to work on their land as bonded laborers.
Conclusion:
In summary, Jotedars controlled the money lending business in rural Bengal, and they used this power to manipulate the credit market and exploit the rural population. Their practices were usurious, and they played a significant role in keeping the peasants in debt and under their control.
Control over Moneylending:
Jotedars controlled the money lending business in rural Bengal. They provided loans to the peasants during the sowing season, and in return, they demanded a high rate of interest. This high-interest rate was used as a tool to keep the peasants in debt, and they remained under the control of the Jotedars. The Jotedars also controlled the repayment of the loans. They would often refuse to accept the principal amount, and instead, demand a higher amount, which resulted in the peasants falling deeper into debt.
Manipulation of credit market:
The Jotedars controlled the credit market in rural Bengal. They would often force the peasants to buy goods from their shops on credit and then manipulate the prices of these goods to ensure that the peasants would never be able to repay the debt. The Jotedars also controlled the market for agricultural produce. They would often buy the produce from the peasants at a low price and then sell it at a higher price in the market.
Exploitation of the Rural Population:
The Jotedars were known for their exploitation of the rural population. They would use their position of power to force the peasants to work on their land for low wages. The Jotedars would often confiscate the land of the peasants who were unable to repay their loans, and they would then force them to work on their land as bonded laborers.
Conclusion:
In summary, Jotedars controlled the money lending business in rural Bengal, and they used this power to manipulate the credit market and exploit the rural population. Their practices were usurious, and they played a significant role in keeping the peasants in debt and under their control.
Who hired the Santhals to reclaim land and expand cultivation?- a)Traders
- b)Zamindars
- c)Jotedars
- d)Farmers
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Who hired the Santhals to reclaim land and expand cultivation?
a)
Traders
b)
Zamindars
c)
Jotedars
d)
Farmers
|
|
Rohit Goyal answered |
Zamindars hired the Santhals to reclaim land and expand cultivation.
Explanation:
• Zamindars were the landlords of the villages and they had control over the land and resources.
• They wanted to expand cultivation and earn more profits by bringing more land under cultivation.
• But the land was covered with forests and was inhabited by the Santhal tribe, who were skilled in shifting cultivation.
• The Santhals were not interested in permanent cultivation and used to move to other places after the soil became infertile.
• The Zamindars realized that they could not clear the forests and cultivate the land on their own as it required a lot of labor and expertise.
• So they hired the Santhals to clear the forests and cultivate the land.
• The Santhals were paid a wage for their labor and were allowed to cultivate a portion of the land for their own use.
• This arrangement was beneficial for both parties as the Zamindars got the land cleared and cultivated, and the Santhals got a source of income and a portion of the land for their own use.
• However, this led to the displacement of the Santhals from their traditional way of life and the destruction of their forests and environment.
Explanation:
• Zamindars were the landlords of the villages and they had control over the land and resources.
• They wanted to expand cultivation and earn more profits by bringing more land under cultivation.
• But the land was covered with forests and was inhabited by the Santhal tribe, who were skilled in shifting cultivation.
• The Santhals were not interested in permanent cultivation and used to move to other places after the soil became infertile.
• The Zamindars realized that they could not clear the forests and cultivate the land on their own as it required a lot of labor and expertise.
• So they hired the Santhals to clear the forests and cultivate the land.
• The Santhals were paid a wage for their labor and were allowed to cultivate a portion of the land for their own use.
• This arrangement was beneficial for both parties as the Zamindars got the land cleared and cultivated, and the Santhals got a source of income and a portion of the land for their own use.
• However, this led to the displacement of the Santhals from their traditional way of life and the destruction of their forests and environment.
Chapter doubts & questions for Theme 10 - Colonialism and the countryside - History CUET Preparation 2024 is part of Humanities/Arts exam preparation. The chapters have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. The Chapter doubts & questions, notes, tests & MCQs are made for Humanities/Arts 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests here.
Chapter doubts & questions of Theme 10 - Colonialism and the countryside - History CUET Preparation in English & Hindi are available as part of Humanities/Arts exam.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.
History CUET Preparation
29 videos|16 docs|31 tests
|
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Study with 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos & Tests
10M+ students study on EduRev
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup