CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference w...
Start Learning for Free
PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebody’s possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.
FACTS: A purchased a car from a person who had no little to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.
- a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.
- b)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.
- c)X has not committed any wrong.
- d)None of the above.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebody...
Explanation:
Overview:
Trespass to goods occurs when there is a direct physical interference with someone else's possession of goods without lawful justification.
Analysis:
a) X can be held responsible for trespass to goods:
- X's action of removing the car from the garage without lawful justification constitutes trespass to goods.
- Even though X may have believed he owned the car, his mistaken belief does not excuse the act of physically interfering with A's possession of the car.
- Therefore, X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.
b) X cannot be held responsible for trespass to goods as he was under a wrong belief:
- While X may have been under a mistaken belief that the car belonged to him, this does not negate the fact that he physically interfered with A's possession of the car.
- Trespass to goods focuses on the act of interference with possession, not on the intent or belief of the trespasser.
- Hence, X can still be held responsible for trespass to goods.
c) X has not committed any wrong:
- X's act of removing the car from the garage without lawful justification is considered a wrong under the principle of trespass to goods.
- Regardless of X's belief or intention, the physical interference with A's possession of the car constitutes a legal wrong.
Conclusion:
In this case, X can be held responsible for trespass to goods as his actions directly interfered with A's possession of the car without lawful justification.
Overview:
Trespass to goods occurs when there is a direct physical interference with someone else's possession of goods without lawful justification.
Analysis:
a) X can be held responsible for trespass to goods:
- X's action of removing the car from the garage without lawful justification constitutes trespass to goods.
- Even though X may have believed he owned the car, his mistaken belief does not excuse the act of physically interfering with A's possession of the car.
- Therefore, X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.
b) X cannot be held responsible for trespass to goods as he was under a wrong belief:
- While X may have been under a mistaken belief that the car belonged to him, this does not negate the fact that he physically interfered with A's possession of the car.
- Trespass to goods focuses on the act of interference with possession, not on the intent or belief of the trespasser.
- Hence, X can still be held responsible for trespass to goods.
c) X has not committed any wrong:
- X's act of removing the car from the garage without lawful justification is considered a wrong under the principle of trespass to goods.
- Regardless of X's belief or intention, the physical interference with A's possession of the car constitutes a legal wrong.
Conclusion:
In this case, X can be held responsible for trespass to goods as his actions directly interfered with A's possession of the car without lawful justification.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebody...
X removed the car from garage which is owned by A so he is liablefor trespass to goods
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Similar CLAT Doubts
Top Courses for CLATView all
PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebody’s possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACTS: A purchased a car from a person who had no little to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.b)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.c)X has not committed any wrong.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebody’s possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACTS: A purchased a car from a person who had no little to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.b)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.c)X has not committed any wrong.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebody’s possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACTS: A purchased a car from a person who had no little to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.b)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.c)X has not committed any wrong.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebody’s possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACTS: A purchased a car from a person who had no little to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.b)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.c)X has not committed any wrong.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebody’s possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACTS: A purchased a car from a person who had no little to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.b)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.c)X has not committed any wrong.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebody’s possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACTS: A purchased a car from a person who had no little to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.b)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.c)X has not committed any wrong.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebody’s possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACTS: A purchased a car from a person who had no little to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.b)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.c)X has not committed any wrong.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebody’s possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACTS: A purchased a car from a person who had no little to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.b)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.c)X has not committed any wrong.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebody’s possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACTS: A purchased a car from a person who had no little to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.b)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.c)X has not committed any wrong.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebody’s possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACTS: A purchased a car from a person who had no little to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.b)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.c)X has not committed any wrong.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebody’s possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACTS: A purchased a car from a person who had no little to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.b)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.c)X has not committed any wrong.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebody’s possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACTS: A purchased a car from a person who had no little to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.b)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.c)X has not committed any wrong.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebody’s possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACTS: A purchased a car from a person who had no little to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.b)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.c)X has not committed any wrong.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup