Question Description
Principle – Whoever stores a substance which would cause damage on escape shall be strictly liable (i.e., liable even when he has exercised necessary care) for any damage caused by the escape of that substance.Facts – Cobalamine Co. is a manufacturer of hydrogen peroxide which has several industrial uses, but is also dangerous. The Company has one of its factories set up in Dimapur, a small district. While transporting the hydrogen peroxide from that factory to another place in huge containers, the engine of the truck carrying the chemical got overheated, and this triggered an explosion of the concentrated hydrogen peroxide. The truck driver, and several other people on the road were grievously injured. The reaction was shortly contained by an expert team, and investigations revealed that reasonable precautions had been taken to prevent such a mishap.Q. Will Cobalamine be liable to pay damages to those injured?a)No, Cobalamine would not be liable, as they had taken reasonable precautions to prevent the mishap.b)The factory authorities at Dimapur would be liable, not Cobalamine.c)Cobalamine would be liable as hydrogen peroxide is a dangerous substance and its escape fixes liability, despite the taking of reasonable precautions.d)Both (b) and (c).Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle – Whoever stores a substance which would cause damage on escape shall be strictly liable (i.e., liable even when he has exercised necessary care) for any damage caused by the escape of that substance.Facts – Cobalamine Co. is a manufacturer of hydrogen peroxide which has several industrial uses, but is also dangerous. The Company has one of its factories set up in Dimapur, a small district. While transporting the hydrogen peroxide from that factory to another place in huge containers, the engine of the truck carrying the chemical got overheated, and this triggered an explosion of the concentrated hydrogen peroxide. The truck driver, and several other people on the road were grievously injured. The reaction was shortly contained by an expert team, and investigations revealed that reasonable precautions had been taken to prevent such a mishap.Q. Will Cobalamine be liable to pay damages to those injured?a)No, Cobalamine would not be liable, as they had taken reasonable precautions to prevent the mishap.b)The factory authorities at Dimapur would be liable, not Cobalamine.c)Cobalamine would be liable as hydrogen peroxide is a dangerous substance and its escape fixes liability, despite the taking of reasonable precautions.d)Both (b) and (c).Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle – Whoever stores a substance which would cause damage on escape shall be strictly liable (i.e., liable even when he has exercised necessary care) for any damage caused by the escape of that substance.Facts – Cobalamine Co. is a manufacturer of hydrogen peroxide which has several industrial uses, but is also dangerous. The Company has one of its factories set up in Dimapur, a small district. While transporting the hydrogen peroxide from that factory to another place in huge containers, the engine of the truck carrying the chemical got overheated, and this triggered an explosion of the concentrated hydrogen peroxide. The truck driver, and several other people on the road were grievously injured. The reaction was shortly contained by an expert team, and investigations revealed that reasonable precautions had been taken to prevent such a mishap.Q. Will Cobalamine be liable to pay damages to those injured?a)No, Cobalamine would not be liable, as they had taken reasonable precautions to prevent the mishap.b)The factory authorities at Dimapur would be liable, not Cobalamine.c)Cobalamine would be liable as hydrogen peroxide is a dangerous substance and its escape fixes liability, despite the taking of reasonable precautions.d)Both (b) and (c).Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Principle – Whoever stores a substance which would cause damage on escape shall be strictly liable (i.e., liable even when he has exercised necessary care) for any damage caused by the escape of that substance.Facts – Cobalamine Co. is a manufacturer of hydrogen peroxide which has several industrial uses, but is also dangerous. The Company has one of its factories set up in Dimapur, a small district. While transporting the hydrogen peroxide from that factory to another place in huge containers, the engine of the truck carrying the chemical got overheated, and this triggered an explosion of the concentrated hydrogen peroxide. The truck driver, and several other people on the road were grievously injured. The reaction was shortly contained by an expert team, and investigations revealed that reasonable precautions had been taken to prevent such a mishap.Q. Will Cobalamine be liable to pay damages to those injured?a)No, Cobalamine would not be liable, as they had taken reasonable precautions to prevent the mishap.b)The factory authorities at Dimapur would be liable, not Cobalamine.c)Cobalamine would be liable as hydrogen peroxide is a dangerous substance and its escape fixes liability, despite the taking of reasonable precautions.d)Both (b) and (c).Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Principle – Whoever stores a substance which would cause damage on escape shall be strictly liable (i.e., liable even when he has exercised necessary care) for any damage caused by the escape of that substance.Facts – Cobalamine Co. is a manufacturer of hydrogen peroxide which has several industrial uses, but is also dangerous. The Company has one of its factories set up in Dimapur, a small district. While transporting the hydrogen peroxide from that factory to another place in huge containers, the engine of the truck carrying the chemical got overheated, and this triggered an explosion of the concentrated hydrogen peroxide. The truck driver, and several other people on the road were grievously injured. The reaction was shortly contained by an expert team, and investigations revealed that reasonable precautions had been taken to prevent such a mishap.Q. Will Cobalamine be liable to pay damages to those injured?a)No, Cobalamine would not be liable, as they had taken reasonable precautions to prevent the mishap.b)The factory authorities at Dimapur would be liable, not Cobalamine.c)Cobalamine would be liable as hydrogen peroxide is a dangerous substance and its escape fixes liability, despite the taking of reasonable precautions.d)Both (b) and (c).Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Principle – Whoever stores a substance which would cause damage on escape shall be strictly liable (i.e., liable even when he has exercised necessary care) for any damage caused by the escape of that substance.Facts – Cobalamine Co. is a manufacturer of hydrogen peroxide which has several industrial uses, but is also dangerous. The Company has one of its factories set up in Dimapur, a small district. While transporting the hydrogen peroxide from that factory to another place in huge containers, the engine of the truck carrying the chemical got overheated, and this triggered an explosion of the concentrated hydrogen peroxide. The truck driver, and several other people on the road were grievously injured. The reaction was shortly contained by an expert team, and investigations revealed that reasonable precautions had been taken to prevent such a mishap.Q. Will Cobalamine be liable to pay damages to those injured?a)No, Cobalamine would not be liable, as they had taken reasonable precautions to prevent the mishap.b)The factory authorities at Dimapur would be liable, not Cobalamine.c)Cobalamine would be liable as hydrogen peroxide is a dangerous substance and its escape fixes liability, despite the taking of reasonable precautions.d)Both (b) and (c).Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle – Whoever stores a substance which would cause damage on escape shall be strictly liable (i.e., liable even when he has exercised necessary care) for any damage caused by the escape of that substance.Facts – Cobalamine Co. is a manufacturer of hydrogen peroxide which has several industrial uses, but is also dangerous. The Company has one of its factories set up in Dimapur, a small district. While transporting the hydrogen peroxide from that factory to another place in huge containers, the engine of the truck carrying the chemical got overheated, and this triggered an explosion of the concentrated hydrogen peroxide. The truck driver, and several other people on the road were grievously injured. The reaction was shortly contained by an expert team, and investigations revealed that reasonable precautions had been taken to prevent such a mishap.Q. Will Cobalamine be liable to pay damages to those injured?a)No, Cobalamine would not be liable, as they had taken reasonable precautions to prevent the mishap.b)The factory authorities at Dimapur would be liable, not Cobalamine.c)Cobalamine would be liable as hydrogen peroxide is a dangerous substance and its escape fixes liability, despite the taking of reasonable precautions.d)Both (b) and (c).Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle – Whoever stores a substance which would cause damage on escape shall be strictly liable (i.e., liable even when he has exercised necessary care) for any damage caused by the escape of that substance.Facts – Cobalamine Co. is a manufacturer of hydrogen peroxide which has several industrial uses, but is also dangerous. The Company has one of its factories set up in Dimapur, a small district. While transporting the hydrogen peroxide from that factory to another place in huge containers, the engine of the truck carrying the chemical got overheated, and this triggered an explosion of the concentrated hydrogen peroxide. The truck driver, and several other people on the road were grievously injured. The reaction was shortly contained by an expert team, and investigations revealed that reasonable precautions had been taken to prevent such a mishap.Q. Will Cobalamine be liable to pay damages to those injured?a)No, Cobalamine would not be liable, as they had taken reasonable precautions to prevent the mishap.b)The factory authorities at Dimapur would be liable, not Cobalamine.c)Cobalamine would be liable as hydrogen peroxide is a dangerous substance and its escape fixes liability, despite the taking of reasonable precautions.d)Both (b) and (c).Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Principle – Whoever stores a substance which would cause damage on escape shall be strictly liable (i.e., liable even when he has exercised necessary care) for any damage caused by the escape of that substance.Facts – Cobalamine Co. is a manufacturer of hydrogen peroxide which has several industrial uses, but is also dangerous. The Company has one of its factories set up in Dimapur, a small district. While transporting the hydrogen peroxide from that factory to another place in huge containers, the engine of the truck carrying the chemical got overheated, and this triggered an explosion of the concentrated hydrogen peroxide. The truck driver, and several other people on the road were grievously injured. The reaction was shortly contained by an expert team, and investigations revealed that reasonable precautions had been taken to prevent such a mishap.Q. Will Cobalamine be liable to pay damages to those injured?a)No, Cobalamine would not be liable, as they had taken reasonable precautions to prevent the mishap.b)The factory authorities at Dimapur would be liable, not Cobalamine.c)Cobalamine would be liable as hydrogen peroxide is a dangerous substance and its escape fixes liability, despite the taking of reasonable precautions.d)Both (b) and (c).Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.