CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  What is the significance of May 13, 1952 with... Start Learning for Free
What is the significance of May 13, 1952 with regard to Indian polity?
  • a)
     First sitting of the Lok Sabha
  • b)
    First sitting of the Rajya Sabha
  • c)
    First sitting of the Supreme Court of India
  • d)
    Formation of the Election Commission of India
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
What is the significance of May 13, 1952 with regard to Indian polity?...
The First Rajya Sabha

According to the official website of Rajya Sabha, the first time Council of States was constituted was on 3 April 1952. It had 216 members, of which one was a nominated woman member – Rukmini Devi Arundale. The first Chairman was Dr. S Radhakrishnan, also the first Vice President of the nation. The Deputy Chairman was S V Krishnamoorthy Rao, and the Leader of the House was N Gopalaswami Ayyangar.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
What is the significance of May 13, 1952 with regard to Indian polity?...
First Sitting of the Rajya Sabha

On May 13, 1952, an important event took place in Indian polity - the first sitting of the Rajya Sabha, the upper house of the Parliament of India. This event holds significant importance in the political history of India. Let's delve into the details and understand its significance.

Introduction to Rajya Sabha

The Rajya Sabha, also known as the Council of States, is the upper house of the Parliament of India. It represents the states and union territories of India, with members elected by the elected members of the State Legislative Assemblies. The Rajya Sabha plays a crucial role in the legislative process and serves as a platform for constructive debates and discussions.

Key Significance of the First Sitting

The first sitting of the Rajya Sabha on May 13, 1952, marked an important milestone in Indian polity for several reasons:

1. Foundation of Democracy: The first sitting of the Rajya Sabha symbolized the strengthening of India's democratic foundations. It showcased the successful implementation of the Constitution and the establishment of a bicameral parliamentary system.

2. Representation of States: The Rajya Sabha represents the states and union territories, ensuring their voices and interests are adequately represented in the legislative process. The first sitting marked the formal commencement of this representation.

3. Checks and Balances: The Rajya Sabha acts as a check on the Lok Sabha, the lower house of Parliament, by providing a platform for revising, reviewing, and scrutinizing legislation. Its first sitting represented the initiation of this important constitutional function.

4. Expertise and Experience: The Rajya Sabha comprises members who bring their expertise and experience from various fields such as academics, business, arts, and social service. The first sitting marked the beginning of their valuable contributions to the legislative process.

5. Stability and Continuity: The Rajya Sabha provides stability and continuity in the functioning of the Parliament. With one-third of its members retiring every two years, it ensures that the functioning of the Parliament is not disrupted by sudden changes.

6. Representative of Diverse Opinions: The Rajya Sabha acts as a platform for diverse opinions and perspectives, ensuring that legislation is carefully deliberated upon. The first sitting demonstrated the inclusiveness of the Indian polity by providing a space for these diverse voices.

In conclusion, the first sitting of the Rajya Sabha on May 13, 1952, was a significant event in Indian polity. It marked the formal establishment of the upper house of Parliament, representing the states and union territories and playing a crucial role in the legislative process.
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The Representation of the People Act, 1951 provides that a person will be disqualified if convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for two years or more. The person is disqualified for the period of imprisonment and a further six years. There is an exception for sitting members; they have been provided a period of three months from the date of conviction to appeal; the disqualification will not be applicable until the appeal is decided. The differential treatment of candidates for elections and sitting members was challenged under Article 14 (right to equality). A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court, in 2005 (K. Prabhakaran vs P. Jayarajan), decided that the consequences of disqualifying a contestant and a sitting member were different. In the latter case, the strength of the party in the legislature would change, and could have an adverse impact if a government had a thin majority. It would also trigger a byelection. Therefore, it was reasonable to treat the two categories differently.The Court also considered whether in case of a disqualified candidate who is later acquitted, the disqualification would be removed with retrospective effect. It stated that this could not be done as this would require the results of the election to be cancelled. Therefore, the removal of disqualification would be prospective and for future elections. In 2013, a two-judge Bench of the Supreme Court again considered whether this exception was constitutionally invalid (Lily Thomas vs Union of Indi

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The Representation of the People Act, 1951 provides that a person will be disqualified if convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for two years or more. The person is disqualified for the period of imprisonment and a further six years. There is an exception for sitting members; they have been provided a period of three months from the date of conviction to appeal; the disqualification will not be applicable until the appeal is decided. The differential treatment of candidates for elections and sitting members was challenged under Article 14 (right to equality). A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court, in 2005 (K. Prabhakaran vs P. Jayarajan), decided that the consequences of disqualifying a contestant and a sitting member were different. In the latter case, the strength of the party in the legislature would change, and could have an adverse impact if a government had a thin majority. It would also trigger a byelection. Therefore, it was reasonable to treat the two categories differently.The Court also considered whether in case of a disqualified candidate who is later acquitted, the disqualification would be removed with retrospective effect. It stated that this could not be done as this would require the results of the election to be cancelled. Therefore, the removal of disqualification would be prospective and for future elections. In 2013, a two-judge Bench of the Supreme Court again considered whether this exception was constitutionally invalid (Lily Thomas vs Union of Indi

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The Representation of the People Act, 1951 provides that a person will be disqualified if convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for two years or more. The person is disqualified for the period of imprisonment and a further six years. There is an exception for sitting members; they have been provided a period of three months from the date of conviction to appeal; the disqualification will not be applicable until the appeal is decided. The differential treatment of candidates for elections and sitting members was challenged under Article 14 (right to equality). A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court, in 2005 (K. Prabhakaran vs P. Jayarajan), decided that the consequences of disqualifying a contestant and a sitting member were different. In the latter case, the strength of the party in the legislature would change, and could have an adverse impact if a government had a thin majority. It would also trigger a byelection. Therefore, it was reasonable to treat the two categories differently.The Court also considered whether in case of a disqualified candidate who is later acquitted, the disqualification would be removed with retrospective effect. It stated that this could not be done as this would require the results of the election to be cancelled. Therefore, the removal of disqualification would be prospective and for future elections. In 2013, a two-judge Bench of the Supreme Court again considered whether this exception was constitutionally invalid (Lily Thomas vs Union of Indi

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The Representation of the People Act, 1951 provides that a person will be disqualified if convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for two years or more. The person is disqualified for the period of imprisonment and a further six years. There is an exception for sitting members; they have been provided a period of three months from the date of conviction to appeal; the disqualification will not be applicable until the appeal is decided. The differential treatment of candidates for elections and sitting members was challenged under Article 14 (right to equality). A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court, in 2005 (K. Prabhakaran vs P. Jayarajan), decided that the consequences of disqualifying a contestant and a sitting member were different. In the latter case, the strength of the party in the legislature would change, and could have an adverse impact if a government had a thin majority. It would also trigger a byelection. Therefore, it was reasonable to treat the two categories differently.The Court also considered whether in case of a disqualified candidate who is later acquitted, the disqualification would be removed with retrospective effect. It stated that this could not be done as this would require the results of the election to be cancelled. Therefore, the removal of disqualification would be prospective and for future elections. In 2013, a two-judge Bench of the Supreme Court again considered whether this exception was constitutionally invalid (Lily Thomas vs Union of Indi

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The Representation of the People Act, 1951 provides that a person will be disqualified if convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for two years or more. The person is disqualified for the period of imprisonment and a further six years. There is an exception for sitting members; they have been provided a period of three months from the date of conviction to appeal; the disqualification will not be applicable until the appeal is decided. The differential treatment of candidates for elections and sitting members was challenged under Article 14 (right to equality). A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court, in 2005 (K. Prabhakaran vs P. Jayarajan), decided that the consequences of disqualifying a contestant and a sitting member were different. In the latter case, the strength of the party in the legislature would change, and could have an adverse impact if a government had a thin majority. It would also trigger a byelection. Therefore, it was reasonable to treat the two categories differently.The Court also considered whether in case of a disqualified candidate who is later acquitted, the disqualification would be removed with retrospective effect. It stated that this could not be done as this would require the results of the election to be cancelled. Therefore, the removal of disqualification would be prospective and for future elections. In 2013, a two-judge Bench of the Supreme Court again considered whether this exception was constitutionally invalid (Lily Thomas vs Union of Indi

Top Courses for CLAT

What is the significance of May 13, 1952 with regard to Indian polity?a)First sitting of the Lok Sabhab)First sitting of the Rajya Sabhac)First sitting of the Supreme Court of Indiad)Formation of the Election Commission of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
What is the significance of May 13, 1952 with regard to Indian polity?a)First sitting of the Lok Sabhab)First sitting of the Rajya Sabhac)First sitting of the Supreme Court of Indiad)Formation of the Election Commission of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about What is the significance of May 13, 1952 with regard to Indian polity?a)First sitting of the Lok Sabhab)First sitting of the Rajya Sabhac)First sitting of the Supreme Court of Indiad)Formation of the Election Commission of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for What is the significance of May 13, 1952 with regard to Indian polity?a)First sitting of the Lok Sabhab)First sitting of the Rajya Sabhac)First sitting of the Supreme Court of Indiad)Formation of the Election Commission of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for What is the significance of May 13, 1952 with regard to Indian polity?a)First sitting of the Lok Sabhab)First sitting of the Rajya Sabhac)First sitting of the Supreme Court of Indiad)Formation of the Election Commission of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of What is the significance of May 13, 1952 with regard to Indian polity?a)First sitting of the Lok Sabhab)First sitting of the Rajya Sabhac)First sitting of the Supreme Court of Indiad)Formation of the Election Commission of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of What is the significance of May 13, 1952 with regard to Indian polity?a)First sitting of the Lok Sabhab)First sitting of the Rajya Sabhac)First sitting of the Supreme Court of Indiad)Formation of the Election Commission of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for What is the significance of May 13, 1952 with regard to Indian polity?a)First sitting of the Lok Sabhab)First sitting of the Rajya Sabhac)First sitting of the Supreme Court of Indiad)Formation of the Election Commission of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of What is the significance of May 13, 1952 with regard to Indian polity?a)First sitting of the Lok Sabhab)First sitting of the Rajya Sabhac)First sitting of the Supreme Court of Indiad)Formation of the Election Commission of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice What is the significance of May 13, 1952 with regard to Indian polity?a)First sitting of the Lok Sabhab)First sitting of the Rajya Sabhac)First sitting of the Supreme Court of Indiad)Formation of the Election Commission of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev