CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Principle : An unlawful interference with a p...
Start Learning for Free
Principle : An unlawful interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it, is a nuisance in law of tort.
Facts : During the scarcity of onions, long queues were made outside the defendant’s shop who having a license to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 kg of onion per ration card. The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighbouring shops. The neighbouring shopkeepers filed a suit for nuisance against the defendant. Which one of the following decision will be correct in this suit?
Facts : During the scarcity of onions, long queues were made outside the defendant’s shop who having a license to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 kg of onion per ration card. The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighbouring shops. The neighbouring shopkeepers filed a suit for nuisance against the defendant. Which one of the following decision will be correct in this suit?
- a)The defendant is liable for nuisance
- b)The defendant is not liable for nuisance
- c)The defendant is liable under the principle of strict liability
- d)The plaintiff’s suit should be declared in favour of the neighbouring shopkeeper
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Principle : An unlawful interference with a person’s use or enjo...
The correct option is B.
The word “nuisance” is derived from the French word “nuire”, which means “to do hurt, or to annoy”. Nuisance is an unlawful interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of land, or of some right over, or in connection with it. Nuisance is an injury to the right of a person in possession of a property to undisturbed enjoyment of it and result from an improper use by another person in his property.
In the present case, the fruits and vegetable seller was lawfully selling his fruits and vegetables as he had a license to do so. Moreover, the queue before his shops was because of people who needed onions from him and not directly because of him as he is not interfering with others' use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it. Hence, the defendant is not liable for nuisance.
The word “nuisance” is derived from the French word “nuire”, which means “to do hurt, or to annoy”. Nuisance is an unlawful interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of land, or of some right over, or in connection with it. Nuisance is an injury to the right of a person in possession of a property to undisturbed enjoyment of it and result from an improper use by another person in his property.
In the present case, the fruits and vegetable seller was lawfully selling his fruits and vegetables as he had a license to do so. Moreover, the queue before his shops was because of people who needed onions from him and not directly because of him as he is not interfering with others' use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it. Hence, the defendant is not liable for nuisance.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
Principle : An unlawful interference with a person’s use or enjo...
The principle being referred to in the statement is the concept of unlawful interference with a person. This principle asserts that it is illegal for someone to interfere with another individual's rights, privacy, or well-being without legal justification or authority.
Unlawful interference can take various forms, such as physical assault, harassment, stalking, invasion of privacy, or any intentional act that causes harm or distress to an individual. This principle is based on the idea that every person has certain fundamental rights and freedoms that should be protected and respected by others.
Under this principle, individuals have the right to live their lives without fear of unlawful interference or harm. When someone violates this principle, they can be held accountable through legal means, such as criminal charges or civil lawsuits.
It is important to distinguish between lawful interference, such as actions taken by law enforcement or other authorized individuals for legitimate reasons, and unlawful interference, which involves actions that are not justified or authorized by law.
Overall, the principle of unlawful interference with a person serves as a foundation for protecting individuals' rights and ensuring that everyone is treated with dignity, respect, and fairness.
Unlawful interference can take various forms, such as physical assault, harassment, stalking, invasion of privacy, or any intentional act that causes harm or distress to an individual. This principle is based on the idea that every person has certain fundamental rights and freedoms that should be protected and respected by others.
Under this principle, individuals have the right to live their lives without fear of unlawful interference or harm. When someone violates this principle, they can be held accountable through legal means, such as criminal charges or civil lawsuits.
It is important to distinguish between lawful interference, such as actions taken by law enforcement or other authorized individuals for legitimate reasons, and unlawful interference, which involves actions that are not justified or authorized by law.
Overall, the principle of unlawful interference with a person serves as a foundation for protecting individuals' rights and ensuring that everyone is treated with dignity, respect, and fairness.
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Top Courses for CLATView all
Principle : An unlawful interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it, is a nuisance in law of tort.Facts : During the scarcity of onions, long queues were made outside the defendant’s shop who having a license to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 kg of onion per ration card. The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighbouring shops. The neighbouring shopkeepers filed a suit for nuisance against the defendant. Which one of the following decision will be correct in this suit?a)The defendant is liable for nuisanceb)The defendant is not liable for nuisancec)The defendant is liable under the principle of strict liabilityd)The plaintiff’s suit should be declared in favour of the neighbouring shopkeeperCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Principle : An unlawful interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it, is a nuisance in law of tort.Facts : During the scarcity of onions, long queues were made outside the defendant’s shop who having a license to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 kg of onion per ration card. The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighbouring shops. The neighbouring shopkeepers filed a suit for nuisance against the defendant. Which one of the following decision will be correct in this suit?a)The defendant is liable for nuisanceb)The defendant is not liable for nuisancec)The defendant is liable under the principle of strict liabilityd)The plaintiff’s suit should be declared in favour of the neighbouring shopkeeperCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle : An unlawful interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it, is a nuisance in law of tort.Facts : During the scarcity of onions, long queues were made outside the defendant’s shop who having a license to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 kg of onion per ration card. The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighbouring shops. The neighbouring shopkeepers filed a suit for nuisance against the defendant. Which one of the following decision will be correct in this suit?a)The defendant is liable for nuisanceb)The defendant is not liable for nuisancec)The defendant is liable under the principle of strict liabilityd)The plaintiff’s suit should be declared in favour of the neighbouring shopkeeperCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle : An unlawful interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it, is a nuisance in law of tort.Facts : During the scarcity of onions, long queues were made outside the defendant’s shop who having a license to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 kg of onion per ration card. The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighbouring shops. The neighbouring shopkeepers filed a suit for nuisance against the defendant. Which one of the following decision will be correct in this suit?a)The defendant is liable for nuisanceb)The defendant is not liable for nuisancec)The defendant is liable under the principle of strict liabilityd)The plaintiff’s suit should be declared in favour of the neighbouring shopkeeperCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Principle : An unlawful interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it, is a nuisance in law of tort.Facts : During the scarcity of onions, long queues were made outside the defendant’s shop who having a license to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 kg of onion per ration card. The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighbouring shops. The neighbouring shopkeepers filed a suit for nuisance against the defendant. Which one of the following decision will be correct in this suit?a)The defendant is liable for nuisanceb)The defendant is not liable for nuisancec)The defendant is liable under the principle of strict liabilityd)The plaintiff’s suit should be declared in favour of the neighbouring shopkeeperCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle : An unlawful interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it, is a nuisance in law of tort.Facts : During the scarcity of onions, long queues were made outside the defendant’s shop who having a license to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 kg of onion per ration card. The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighbouring shops. The neighbouring shopkeepers filed a suit for nuisance against the defendant. Which one of the following decision will be correct in this suit?a)The defendant is liable for nuisanceb)The defendant is not liable for nuisancec)The defendant is liable under the principle of strict liabilityd)The plaintiff’s suit should be declared in favour of the neighbouring shopkeeperCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle : An unlawful interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it, is a nuisance in law of tort.Facts : During the scarcity of onions, long queues were made outside the defendant’s shop who having a license to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 kg of onion per ration card. The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighbouring shops. The neighbouring shopkeepers filed a suit for nuisance against the defendant. Which one of the following decision will be correct in this suit?a)The defendant is liable for nuisanceb)The defendant is not liable for nuisancec)The defendant is liable under the principle of strict liabilityd)The plaintiff’s suit should be declared in favour of the neighbouring shopkeeperCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Principle : An unlawful interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it, is a nuisance in law of tort.Facts : During the scarcity of onions, long queues were made outside the defendant’s shop who having a license to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 kg of onion per ration card. The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighbouring shops. The neighbouring shopkeepers filed a suit for nuisance against the defendant. Which one of the following decision will be correct in this suit?a)The defendant is liable for nuisanceb)The defendant is not liable for nuisancec)The defendant is liable under the principle of strict liabilityd)The plaintiff’s suit should be declared in favour of the neighbouring shopkeeperCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Principle : An unlawful interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it, is a nuisance in law of tort.Facts : During the scarcity of onions, long queues were made outside the defendant’s shop who having a license to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 kg of onion per ration card. The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighbouring shops. The neighbouring shopkeepers filed a suit for nuisance against the defendant. Which one of the following decision will be correct in this suit?a)The defendant is liable for nuisanceb)The defendant is not liable for nuisancec)The defendant is liable under the principle of strict liabilityd)The plaintiff’s suit should be declared in favour of the neighbouring shopkeeperCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Principle : An unlawful interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it, is a nuisance in law of tort.Facts : During the scarcity of onions, long queues were made outside the defendant’s shop who having a license to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 kg of onion per ration card. The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighbouring shops. The neighbouring shopkeepers filed a suit for nuisance against the defendant. Which one of the following decision will be correct in this suit?a)The defendant is liable for nuisanceb)The defendant is not liable for nuisancec)The defendant is liable under the principle of strict liabilityd)The plaintiff’s suit should be declared in favour of the neighbouring shopkeeperCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle : An unlawful interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it, is a nuisance in law of tort.Facts : During the scarcity of onions, long queues were made outside the defendant’s shop who having a license to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 kg of onion per ration card. The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighbouring shops. The neighbouring shopkeepers filed a suit for nuisance against the defendant. Which one of the following decision will be correct in this suit?a)The defendant is liable for nuisanceb)The defendant is not liable for nuisancec)The defendant is liable under the principle of strict liabilityd)The plaintiff’s suit should be declared in favour of the neighbouring shopkeeperCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle : An unlawful interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it, is a nuisance in law of tort.Facts : During the scarcity of onions, long queues were made outside the defendant’s shop who having a license to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 kg of onion per ration card. The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighbouring shops. The neighbouring shopkeepers filed a suit for nuisance against the defendant. Which one of the following decision will be correct in this suit?a)The defendant is liable for nuisanceb)The defendant is not liable for nuisancec)The defendant is liable under the principle of strict liabilityd)The plaintiff’s suit should be declared in favour of the neighbouring shopkeeperCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Principle : An unlawful interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it, is a nuisance in law of tort.Facts : During the scarcity of onions, long queues were made outside the defendant’s shop who having a license to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 kg of onion per ration card. The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighbouring shops. The neighbouring shopkeepers filed a suit for nuisance against the defendant. Which one of the following decision will be correct in this suit?a)The defendant is liable for nuisanceb)The defendant is not liable for nuisancec)The defendant is liable under the principle of strict liabilityd)The plaintiff’s suit should be declared in favour of the neighbouring shopkeeperCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup