All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  In case the President of India wants to resig... Start Learning for Free
In case the President of India wants to resign, he shall address his resignation to the
  • a)
    Chief Justice of India
  • b)
    Vice President
  • c)
    Chief Election Commissioner
  • d)
    Prime Minister
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your CLAT doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
In case the President of India wants to resign, he shall address his r...
President has to give his resignation to vice president before completing his/her tenure.
Hence option B is the answer
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
In case the President of India wants to resign, he shall address his r...
B is the correct option. He may, by writing under his hand addressed to the Vice-President, resign his office. Executive power of the Union is vested in the President, and is exercised by him either directly or through officers subordinate to him in accordance with the Constitution.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]Q.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will require the President of India to follow the advice of a Committee. This Committee is composed of__

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed summoned his secretary, K. Balachandran, at around 11:15 p.m. on 25 June 1975. Ten minutes later, Balachandran met the pyjama-clad president in the private sitting room of his official residence at Rashtrapati Bhavan. The president handed his secretary a one-page letter from Indira Gandhi marked 'Top Secret'. Referring to the prime minister's discussion with the president earlier that day, the letter said she was in receipt of information that internal disturbances posed an imminent threat to India's internal security. It requested a proclamation of Emergency under Article 352 (1) if the president was satisfied on this score. She would have preferred to have first consulted the cabinet, but there was no time to lose. Therefore, she was invoking a departure from the Transaction of Business Rules in exercise of her powers under Rule 12 thereof. The president asked for his aide's opinion on the letter, which did not have the proposed proclamation attached. Balachandran said that such a proclamation was constitutionally impermissible on more than one ground. At this, the president said that he wanted to consult the Indian Constitution. Balachandran retreated to his office to locate a copy. Meanwhile, the deputy secretary in the president's secretariat showed up. The two officials launched into a discussion about the constitutionality of the prime minister's proposal before they returned to President Ahmed with a copy of the Constitution. Balachandran explained that the president's personal satisfaction that internal disturbances posed a threat to internal security was constitutionally irrelevant. What the Constitution required was the advice of the council of ministers. Balachandran withdrew when the president said he wanted to speak to the prime minister. When he re-entered the room 10 minutes later, President Ahmed informed him that R. K. Dhawan had come over with a draft Emergency proclamation, which he had signed. Then the president swallowed a tranquilizer and went to bed.This late-night concern for constitutional propriety is revealing. What we see unfolding in the hunt for a copy of the Constitution, the leafing through of its pages to make sure that the draft proclamation met the letter of the law, is the meticulous process of the paradoxical suspension of the law by law. The substance of the discussion concerns the legality of the procedures to follow in issuing the Emergency proclamation. The political will behind the act goes unmentioned. This is because Article 352 (1) of the Constitution itself had left the judgement of the necessity for the Emergency proclamation outside the law. The doctrine of necessity regards the judgement of crisis conditions as something that the law itself cannot handle; it is a lacuna in the juridical order that the executive is obligated to remedy.Q. Why does the author state that the late-night concern for constitutional propriety is revealing?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed summoned his secretary, K. Balachandran, at around 11:15 p.m. on 25 June 1975. Ten minutes later, Balachandran met the pyjama-clad president in the private sitting room of his official residence at Rashtrapati Bhavan. The president handed his secretary a one-page letter from Indira Gandhi marked 'Top Secret'. Referring to the prime minister's discussion with the president earlier that day, the letter said she was in receipt of information that internal disturbances posed an imminent threat to India's internal security. It requested a proclamation of Emergency under Article 352 (1) if the president was satisfied on this score. She would have preferred to have first consulted the cabinet, but there was no time to lose. Therefore, she was invoking a departure from the Transaction of Business Rules in exercise of her powers under Rule 12 thereof. The president asked for his aide's opinion on the letter, which did not have the proposed proclamation attached. Balachandran said that such a proclamation was constitutionally impermissible on more than one ground. At this, the president said that he wanted to consult the Indian Constitution. Balachandran retreated to his office to locate a copy. Meanwhile, the deputy secretary in the president's secretariat showed up. The two officials launched into a discussion about the constitutionality of the prime minister's proposal before they returned to President Ahmed with a copy of the Constitution. Balachandran explained that the president's personal satisfaction that internal disturbances posed a threat to internal security was constitutionally irrelevant. What the Constitution required was the advice of the council of ministers. Balachandran withdrew when the president said he wanted to speak to the prime minister. When he re-entered the room 10 minutes later, President Ahmed informed him that R. K. Dhawan had come over with a draft Emergency proclamation, which he had signed. Then the president swallowed a tranquilizer and went to bed.This late-night concern for constitutional propriety is revealing. What we see unfolding in the hunt for a copy of the Constitution, the leafing through of its pages to make sure that the draft proclamation met the letter of the law, is the meticulous process of the paradoxical suspension of the law by law. The substance of the discussion concerns the legality of the procedures to follow in issuing the Emergency proclamation. The political will behind the act goes unmentioned. This is because Article 352 (1) of the Constitution itself had left the judgement of the necessity for the Emergency proclamation outside the law. The doctrine of necessity regards the judgement of crisis conditions as something that the law itself cannot handle; it is a lacuna in the juridical order that the executive is obligated to remedy.Q. According to the passage, why did Balachandran advise the President that Gandhi's request for a proclamation of Emergency was impermissible?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed summoned his secretary, K. Balachandran, at around 11:15 p.m. on 25 June 1975. Ten minutes later, Balachandran met the pyjama-clad president in the private sitting room of his official residence at Rashtrapati Bhavan. The president handed his secretary a one-page letter from Indira Gandhi marked 'Top Secret'. Referring to the prime minister's discussion with the president earlier that day, the letter said she was in receipt of information that internal disturbances posed an imminent threat to India's internal security. It requested a proclamation of Emergency under Article 352 (1) if the president was satisfied on this score. She would have preferred to have first consulted the cabinet, but there was no time to lose. Therefore, she was invoking a departure from the Transaction of Business Rules in exercise of her powers under Rule 12 thereof. The president asked for his aide's opinion on the letter, which did not have the proposed proclamation attached. Balachandran said that such a proclamation was constitutionally impermissible on more than one ground. At this, the president said that he wanted to consult the Indian Constitution. Balachandran retreated to his office to locate a copy. Meanwhile, the deputy secretary in the president's secretariat showed up. The two officials launched into a discussion about the constitutionality of the prime minister's proposal before they returned to President Ahmed with a copy of the Constitution. Balachandran explained that the president's personal satisfaction that internal disturbances posed a threat to internal security was constitutionally irrelevant. What the Constitution required was the advice of the council of ministers. Balachandran withdrew when the president said he wanted to speak to the prime minister. When he re-entered the room 10 minutes later, President Ahmed informed him that R. K. Dhawan had come over with a draft Emergency proclamation, which he had signed. Then the president swallowed a tranquilizer and went to bed.This late-night concern for constitutional propriety is revealing. What we see unfolding in the hunt for a copy of the Constitution, the leafing through of its pages to make sure that the draft proclamation met the letter of the law, is the meticulous process of the paradoxical suspension of the law by law. The substance of the discussion concerns the legality of the procedures to follow in issuing the Emergency proclamation. The political will behind the act goes unmentioned. This is because Article 352 (1) of the Constitution itself had left the judgement of the necessity for the Emergency proclamation outside the law. The doctrine of necessity regards the judgement of crisis conditions as something that the law itself cannot handle; it is a lacuna in the juridical order that the executive is obligated to remedy.Q. What can be inferred from the passage about the request for the Emergency proclamation?

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

In case the President of India wants to resign, he shall address his resignation to thea)Chief Justice of Indiab)Vice Presidentc)Chief Election Commissionerd)Prime MinisterCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
In case the President of India wants to resign, he shall address his resignation to thea)Chief Justice of Indiab)Vice Presidentc)Chief Election Commissionerd)Prime MinisterCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about In case the President of India wants to resign, he shall address his resignation to thea)Chief Justice of Indiab)Vice Presidentc)Chief Election Commissionerd)Prime MinisterCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for In case the President of India wants to resign, he shall address his resignation to thea)Chief Justice of Indiab)Vice Presidentc)Chief Election Commissionerd)Prime MinisterCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for In case the President of India wants to resign, he shall address his resignation to thea)Chief Justice of Indiab)Vice Presidentc)Chief Election Commissionerd)Prime MinisterCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of In case the President of India wants to resign, he shall address his resignation to thea)Chief Justice of Indiab)Vice Presidentc)Chief Election Commissionerd)Prime MinisterCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of In case the President of India wants to resign, he shall address his resignation to thea)Chief Justice of Indiab)Vice Presidentc)Chief Election Commissionerd)Prime MinisterCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for In case the President of India wants to resign, he shall address his resignation to thea)Chief Justice of Indiab)Vice Presidentc)Chief Election Commissionerd)Prime MinisterCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of In case the President of India wants to resign, he shall address his resignation to thea)Chief Justice of Indiab)Vice Presidentc)Chief Election Commissionerd)Prime MinisterCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice In case the President of India wants to resign, he shall address his resignation to thea)Chief Justice of Indiab)Vice Presidentc)Chief Election Commissionerd)Prime MinisterCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup