Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a andquot;gapandquot; in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that andquot;a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides.andquot;[Adapted from: andquot;Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI,andquot; Live Law]Q.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will require the President of India to follow the advice of a Committee. This Committee is composed of__a)Prime Ministerb)Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabhac)Chief Justice of Indiad)All of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Directions: Study the following information c...

Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.

A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.

The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.

The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.

The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."

[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]

Q. A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will require the President of India to follow the advice of a Committee. This Committee is composed of__

a)
Prime Minister
b)
Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha
c)
Chief Justice of India
d)
All of these

Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the q...

A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has issued a directive stating that the President of India must appoint Election Commissioners based on the guidance of a Committee. This Committee comprises the Prime Minister, the leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha (or the leader of the largest opposition party), and the Chief Justice of India.

Key Points:

As per the judgment, this procedure will be in effect until the Parliament enacts a law specifically addressing this matter.
The Constitution does not provide a precise legislative procedure for the appointment of the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and Election Commissioners (ECs).
The President carries out these appointments based on the advice of the Union Council of Ministers, led by the Prime Minister.

Therefore, option D is the correct choice.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]Q.Which article of the Indian Constitution has been replaced with ‘[1]’ in the passage above?

View answer

Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]Q.According to the 2021 Democracy Index by the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU), India held the 46th position. In terms of this ranking, India was categorized as ___

View answer

Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]Q.Which article in the Indian Constitution grants the President the authority to request the Supreme Courts opinion on matters of significant public interest or specific laws deemed necessary for the Constitutions functionality?

View answer

Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]Q. The largest-ever bench in the Supreme Court of India was assembled in 1973. This significant bench was convened for which specific case?

View answer

One of the reasons for recusal of a Judge is that litigants/ the public might entertain a reasonable apprehension about his impartiality. As Lord Chief Justice Hewart said:"It is not merely of some importance but is of fundamental importance that justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done."And therefore, in order to uphold the credibility of the integrity institution, the Judge recuses from hearing the case.A Judge of the Supreme Court or the High Court, while assuming Office, takes an oath as prescribed under Schedule III to the Constitution of India, that:"… I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of India as by law established, that I will uphold the sovereignty and integrity of India, that I will duly and faithfully and to the best of my ability, knowledge and judgment perform the duties of my office without fear or favour, affection or ill-will and that I will uphold the Constitution and the laws."Called upon to discharge the duties of the Office without fear or favour, affection or ill-will, it is only desirable, if not proper, that a Judge, for any unavoidable reason like some pecuniary interest, affinity or adversity with the parties in the case, direct or indirect interest in the outcome of the litigation, family directly involved in litigation on the same issue elsewhere, the Judge being aware that he or someone in his immediate family has an interest, financial or otherwise that could have a substantial bearing as a consequence of the decision in the litigation, etc., to recuse himself from the adjudication of a particular matter. No doubt, these examples are not exhaustive.The simple question is, whether the adjudication by the Judge concerned, would cause a reasonable doubt in the mind of a reasonably informed litigant and fair-minded public as to his impartiality. Being an institution whose hallmark is transparency, it is only proper that the Judge discharging high and noble duties, at least broadly indicate the reasons for recusing from the case so that the litigants or the well-meaning public may not entertain any misunderstanding.Once reasons for recusal are indicated, there will not be any room for attributing any motive for the recusal. To put it differently, it is part of his duty to be accountable to the Constitution by upholding it without fear or favour, affection or ill- will. Therefore, I am of the view that it is the constitutional duty, as reflected in one's oath, to be transparent and accountable, and hence, a Judge is required to indicate reasons for his recusal from a particular case.Q. Which of the following is the main point of the author in the given passage?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Crash Course for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]Q.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will require the President of India to follow the advice of a Committee. This Committee is composed of__a)Prime Ministerb)Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabhac)Chief Justice of Indiad)All of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]Q.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will require the President of India to follow the advice of a Committee. This Committee is composed of__a)Prime Ministerb)Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabhac)Chief Justice of Indiad)All of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]Q.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will require the President of India to follow the advice of a Committee. This Committee is composed of__a)Prime Ministerb)Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabhac)Chief Justice of Indiad)All of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]Q.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will require the President of India to follow the advice of a Committee. This Committee is composed of__a)Prime Ministerb)Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabhac)Chief Justice of Indiad)All of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]Q.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will require the President of India to follow the advice of a Committee. This Committee is composed of__a)Prime Ministerb)Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabhac)Chief Justice of Indiad)All of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]Q.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will require the President of India to follow the advice of a Committee. This Committee is composed of__a)Prime Ministerb)Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabhac)Chief Justice of Indiad)All of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]Q.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will require the President of India to follow the advice of a Committee. This Committee is composed of__a)Prime Ministerb)Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabhac)Chief Justice of Indiad)All of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]Q.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will require the President of India to follow the advice of a Committee. This Committee is composed of__a)Prime Ministerb)Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabhac)Chief Justice of Indiad)All of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]Q.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will require the President of India to follow the advice of a Committee. This Committee is composed of__a)Prime Ministerb)Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabhac)Chief Justice of Indiad)All of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]Q.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will require the President of India to follow the advice of a Committee. This Committee is composed of__a)Prime Ministerb)Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabhac)Chief Justice of Indiad)All of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam