Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a andquot;gapandquot; in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that andquot;a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides.andquot;[Adapted from: andquot;Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI,andquot; Live Law]Q.Which article in the Indian Constitution grants the President the authority to request the Supreme Courts opinion on matters of significant public interest or specific laws deemed necessary for the Constitutions functionality?a)Article 127b)Article 148c)Article 143d)Article 141Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Directions: Study the following information c...

Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.

A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.

The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.

The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.

The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."

[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]

Q. Which article in the Indian Constitution grants the President the authority to request the Supreme Court's opinion on matters of significant public interest or specific laws deemed necessary for the Constitution's functionality?

a)
Article 127
b)
Article 148
c)
Article 143
d)
Article 141

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the q...

Article 143 of the Indian Constitution grants the President the authority to seek the opinion of the Supreme Court on matters of significant public importance or certain laws essential for the Constitution's effective operation.

Additional Key Points:

Article 127 deals with the appointment of ad-hoc judges, where the Chief Justice of India appoints ad-hoc judges in collaboration with the President of India.
Article 148 establishes the independent office of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG), who heads the Indian Audit and Accounts Department.
Article 141 stipulates that decisions and rulings made by the Supreme Court are legally binding on all other courts.

Therefore, option C remains the correct choice.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]Q.Which article of the Indian Constitution has been replaced with ‘[1]’ in the passage above?

View answer

Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]Q.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will require the President of India to follow the advice of a Committee. This Committee is composed of__

View answer

Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]Q.According to the 2021 Democracy Index by the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU), India held the 46th position. In terms of this ranking, India was categorized as ___

View answer

The makers of our Constitution designed the institutions of our republic with great care and attention to detail. The deliberations of the Constituent Assembly bear witness to the extraordinary quality of thought which went into the making of these institutions. They were designed to endure and it was expected that as the republic grew, a body of good practices, conventions and intangible legacies would nourish and sustain them and make them stronger.Instead, we have seen every party in power since Indira Gandhi try to weaken and diminish these institutions. The Parliament, the Supreme Court, the Chief Election Commissioner, the Comptroller & Auditor General, the Union Public Service Commission are among the long list of institutions wherein constant attempts have been made to subdue them, erode their autonomy and authority (sometimes in the guise of reform) and have them subordinated to the will of the political executive, particularly the Prime Minister’s Office. Yet, their structural strength has enabled them to resist these attacks and substantially retain their character although each of them is probably weaker than before.The one institution that has received the maximum battering from every quarter is that of the Indian Administrative Service (IAS). In the sixty four years of its existence (it came into existence in 1951 by an Act of Parliament under Article 312 of the Constitution), there have been more than fifty Commissions, Committees, Task Forces etc that have questioned and investigated different aspects of its architecture, tinkered with the recruitment system, and re-engineered it to change the socio-cultural and age profile of the entrants, introduced an OBC quota in addition to the original one for SC and ST, and suggested several other ‘reforms’ which have substantially changed its character.Some changes have been necessitated by major sociological and political developments, for instance, the acceptance of the recommendations of the Mandal Commission. Some others have been motivated by the desire to make the IAS politically and culturally more acceptable. Yet despite these changes in the original architecture — or maybe because of them — the institution remains central to the working of the Government and, in the minds of the public, still exercises disproportionate power in the scheme of things.Q.If the Indian Administrative Service is diminished, completely weakened and the officers are selected from their birth state and posted to the same. In such a situation according to author

View answer

Passage:The makers of our Constitution designed the institutions of our republic with great care and attention to detail. The deliberations of the Constituent Assembly bear witness to the extraordinary quality of thought which went into the making of these institutions. They were designed to endure and it was expected that as the republic grew, a body of good practices, conventions and intangible legacies would nourish and sustain them and make them stronger.Instead, we have seen every party in power since Indira Gandhi try to weaken and diminish these institutions. The Parliament, the Supreme Court, the Chief Election Commissioner, the Comptroller & Auditor General, the Union Public Service Commission are among the long list of institutions where constant attempts have been made to subdue them, erode their autonomy and authority (sometimes in the guise of reform) andhave them subordinated to the will of the political executive, particularly the Prime Minister’s Office. Yet, their structural strength has enabled them to resist these attacks and substantially retain their character although each of them is probably weaker than before. The one institution that has received the maximum battering from every quarter is that of the Indian Administrative Service (IAS). In the sixty four years of its existence (it came into existence in 1951 by an Act of Parliament under Article 312 of the Constitution), there have been more than fifty Commissions, Committees, Task Forces etc that have questioned and investigated different aspects of its architecture, tinkered with the recruitment system, and re-engineered it to change the socio-cultural and age profile of the entrants, introduced an OBC quota in addition to the original one for SC and ST, and suggested several other ‘reforms’ which have substantially changed its character.Some changes have been necessitated by major sociological and political developments, for instance, the acceptance of the recommendations of the Mandal Commission. Some others have been motivated by the desire to make the IAS politically and culturally more acceptable. Yet despite these changes in the original architecture — or maybe because of them — the institution remains central to the working of the Government and, in the minds of the public, still exercises disproportionate power in the scheme of things.Q.The Indian Administrative Service (IAS) is diminished, completely weakened and the officers are selected from their birth state and posted to the same. In such a situation, according to the author;

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Crash Course for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]Q.Which article in the Indian Constitution grants the President the authority to request the Supreme Courts opinion on matters of significant public interest or specific laws deemed necessary for the Constitutions functionality?a)Article 127b)Article 148c)Article 143d)Article 141Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]Q.Which article in the Indian Constitution grants the President the authority to request the Supreme Courts opinion on matters of significant public interest or specific laws deemed necessary for the Constitutions functionality?a)Article 127b)Article 148c)Article 143d)Article 141Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]Q.Which article in the Indian Constitution grants the President the authority to request the Supreme Courts opinion on matters of significant public interest or specific laws deemed necessary for the Constitutions functionality?a)Article 127b)Article 148c)Article 143d)Article 141Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]Q.Which article in the Indian Constitution grants the President the authority to request the Supreme Courts opinion on matters of significant public interest or specific laws deemed necessary for the Constitutions functionality?a)Article 127b)Article 148c)Article 143d)Article 141Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]Q.Which article in the Indian Constitution grants the President the authority to request the Supreme Courts opinion on matters of significant public interest or specific laws deemed necessary for the Constitutions functionality?a)Article 127b)Article 148c)Article 143d)Article 141Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]Q.Which article in the Indian Constitution grants the President the authority to request the Supreme Courts opinion on matters of significant public interest or specific laws deemed necessary for the Constitutions functionality?a)Article 127b)Article 148c)Article 143d)Article 141Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]Q.Which article in the Indian Constitution grants the President the authority to request the Supreme Courts opinion on matters of significant public interest or specific laws deemed necessary for the Constitutions functionality?a)Article 127b)Article 148c)Article 143d)Article 141Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]Q.Which article in the Indian Constitution grants the President the authority to request the Supreme Courts opinion on matters of significant public interest or specific laws deemed necessary for the Constitutions functionality?a)Article 127b)Article 148c)Article 143d)Article 141Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]Q.Which article in the Indian Constitution grants the President the authority to request the Supreme Courts opinion on matters of significant public interest or specific laws deemed necessary for the Constitutions functionality?a)Article 127b)Article 148c)Article 143d)Article 141Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]Q.Which article in the Indian Constitution grants the President the authority to request the Supreme Courts opinion on matters of significant public interest or specific laws deemed necessary for the Constitutions functionality?a)Article 127b)Article 148c)Article 143d)Article 141Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam