Question Description
Principle: Mere silence as to the facts likely to affect the willingness of a person to enter into a contract is not a fraud, unless the circumstances of the case are such that, on close examination it is found to be the duty of the person keeping silent to speak, or unless his silence is, in itself, equivalent to speech.Facts: X sells by auction to Y, a horse which X knows to be of unsound state of mind. X says nothing to Y about the horse’s unsound state of mind. Give the correct answer-a)X can be held liable for fraud.b)X can be held liable for misrepresentationc)X cannot be held liable, because he did not say anything positive about the mental state of the horse.d)X cannot be held liable because it is the buyer who must be aware of the things.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle: Mere silence as to the facts likely to affect the willingness of a person to enter into a contract is not a fraud, unless the circumstances of the case are such that, on close examination it is found to be the duty of the person keeping silent to speak, or unless his silence is, in itself, equivalent to speech.Facts: X sells by auction to Y, a horse which X knows to be of unsound state of mind. X says nothing to Y about the horse’s unsound state of mind. Give the correct answer-a)X can be held liable for fraud.b)X can be held liable for misrepresentationc)X cannot be held liable, because he did not say anything positive about the mental state of the horse.d)X cannot be held liable because it is the buyer who must be aware of the things.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle: Mere silence as to the facts likely to affect the willingness of a person to enter into a contract is not a fraud, unless the circumstances of the case are such that, on close examination it is found to be the duty of the person keeping silent to speak, or unless his silence is, in itself, equivalent to speech.Facts: X sells by auction to Y, a horse which X knows to be of unsound state of mind. X says nothing to Y about the horse’s unsound state of mind. Give the correct answer-a)X can be held liable for fraud.b)X can be held liable for misrepresentationc)X cannot be held liable, because he did not say anything positive about the mental state of the horse.d)X cannot be held liable because it is the buyer who must be aware of the things.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Principle: Mere silence as to the facts likely to affect the willingness of a person to enter into a contract is not a fraud, unless the circumstances of the case are such that, on close examination it is found to be the duty of the person keeping silent to speak, or unless his silence is, in itself, equivalent to speech.Facts: X sells by auction to Y, a horse which X knows to be of unsound state of mind. X says nothing to Y about the horse’s unsound state of mind. Give the correct answer-a)X can be held liable for fraud.b)X can be held liable for misrepresentationc)X cannot be held liable, because he did not say anything positive about the mental state of the horse.d)X cannot be held liable because it is the buyer who must be aware of the things.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Principle: Mere silence as to the facts likely to affect the willingness of a person to enter into a contract is not a fraud, unless the circumstances of the case are such that, on close examination it is found to be the duty of the person keeping silent to speak, or unless his silence is, in itself, equivalent to speech.Facts: X sells by auction to Y, a horse which X knows to be of unsound state of mind. X says nothing to Y about the horse’s unsound state of mind. Give the correct answer-a)X can be held liable for fraud.b)X can be held liable for misrepresentationc)X cannot be held liable, because he did not say anything positive about the mental state of the horse.d)X cannot be held liable because it is the buyer who must be aware of the things.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Principle: Mere silence as to the facts likely to affect the willingness of a person to enter into a contract is not a fraud, unless the circumstances of the case are such that, on close examination it is found to be the duty of the person keeping silent to speak, or unless his silence is, in itself, equivalent to speech.Facts: X sells by auction to Y, a horse which X knows to be of unsound state of mind. X says nothing to Y about the horse’s unsound state of mind. Give the correct answer-a)X can be held liable for fraud.b)X can be held liable for misrepresentationc)X cannot be held liable, because he did not say anything positive about the mental state of the horse.d)X cannot be held liable because it is the buyer who must be aware of the things.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle: Mere silence as to the facts likely to affect the willingness of a person to enter into a contract is not a fraud, unless the circumstances of the case are such that, on close examination it is found to be the duty of the person keeping silent to speak, or unless his silence is, in itself, equivalent to speech.Facts: X sells by auction to Y, a horse which X knows to be of unsound state of mind. X says nothing to Y about the horse’s unsound state of mind. Give the correct answer-a)X can be held liable for fraud.b)X can be held liable for misrepresentationc)X cannot be held liable, because he did not say anything positive about the mental state of the horse.d)X cannot be held liable because it is the buyer who must be aware of the things.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle: Mere silence as to the facts likely to affect the willingness of a person to enter into a contract is not a fraud, unless the circumstances of the case are such that, on close examination it is found to be the duty of the person keeping silent to speak, or unless his silence is, in itself, equivalent to speech.Facts: X sells by auction to Y, a horse which X knows to be of unsound state of mind. X says nothing to Y about the horse’s unsound state of mind. Give the correct answer-a)X can be held liable for fraud.b)X can be held liable for misrepresentationc)X cannot be held liable, because he did not say anything positive about the mental state of the horse.d)X cannot be held liable because it is the buyer who must be aware of the things.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Principle: Mere silence as to the facts likely to affect the willingness of a person to enter into a contract is not a fraud, unless the circumstances of the case are such that, on close examination it is found to be the duty of the person keeping silent to speak, or unless his silence is, in itself, equivalent to speech.Facts: X sells by auction to Y, a horse which X knows to be of unsound state of mind. X says nothing to Y about the horse’s unsound state of mind. Give the correct answer-a)X can be held liable for fraud.b)X can be held liable for misrepresentationc)X cannot be held liable, because he did not say anything positive about the mental state of the horse.d)X cannot be held liable because it is the buyer who must be aware of the things.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.