Question Description
The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q.PRINCIPLE: Everybody is under a legal obligation to take reasonable care to avoid an act or omission which he can foresee would injure his neighbor. The neighbor for this purpose, is any person whom he should have in his mind as likely to be affected by his act.FACT: Krishanan, while driving a car at high speed in a crowded road, knocked down a cyclist. The cyclist died on the spot with a lot of blood spilling around, Lakshmi, a pregnant woman passing by, suffered from a nervous shock, leading to abortion. Lakshmi filed a suit against Krishnan claiming damages.a)Krishna will be liable, because he owed a duty of reasonable care to everybody on the road including Lakshmib)Krishna will not be liable, because he could not have foreseen Lakshmi suffering from nervous shock as a result of his act.c)Krishna will be liable to Lakshmi because he failed to drive carefullyd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q.PRINCIPLE: Everybody is under a legal obligation to take reasonable care to avoid an act or omission which he can foresee would injure his neighbor. The neighbor for this purpose, is any person whom he should have in his mind as likely to be affected by his act.FACT: Krishanan, while driving a car at high speed in a crowded road, knocked down a cyclist. The cyclist died on the spot with a lot of blood spilling around, Lakshmi, a pregnant woman passing by, suffered from a nervous shock, leading to abortion. Lakshmi filed a suit against Krishnan claiming damages.a)Krishna will be liable, because he owed a duty of reasonable care to everybody on the road including Lakshmib)Krishna will not be liable, because he could not have foreseen Lakshmi suffering from nervous shock as a result of his act.c)Krishna will be liable to Lakshmi because he failed to drive carefullyd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q.PRINCIPLE: Everybody is under a legal obligation to take reasonable care to avoid an act or omission which he can foresee would injure his neighbor. The neighbor for this purpose, is any person whom he should have in his mind as likely to be affected by his act.FACT: Krishanan, while driving a car at high speed in a crowded road, knocked down a cyclist. The cyclist died on the spot with a lot of blood spilling around, Lakshmi, a pregnant woman passing by, suffered from a nervous shock, leading to abortion. Lakshmi filed a suit against Krishnan claiming damages.a)Krishna will be liable, because he owed a duty of reasonable care to everybody on the road including Lakshmib)Krishna will not be liable, because he could not have foreseen Lakshmi suffering from nervous shock as a result of his act.c)Krishna will be liable to Lakshmi because he failed to drive carefullyd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q.PRINCIPLE: Everybody is under a legal obligation to take reasonable care to avoid an act or omission which he can foresee would injure his neighbor. The neighbor for this purpose, is any person whom he should have in his mind as likely to be affected by his act.FACT: Krishanan, while driving a car at high speed in a crowded road, knocked down a cyclist. The cyclist died on the spot with a lot of blood spilling around, Lakshmi, a pregnant woman passing by, suffered from a nervous shock, leading to abortion. Lakshmi filed a suit against Krishnan claiming damages.a)Krishna will be liable, because he owed a duty of reasonable care to everybody on the road including Lakshmib)Krishna will not be liable, because he could not have foreseen Lakshmi suffering from nervous shock as a result of his act.c)Krishna will be liable to Lakshmi because he failed to drive carefullyd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q.PRINCIPLE: Everybody is under a legal obligation to take reasonable care to avoid an act or omission which he can foresee would injure his neighbor. The neighbor for this purpose, is any person whom he should have in his mind as likely to be affected by his act.FACT: Krishanan, while driving a car at high speed in a crowded road, knocked down a cyclist. The cyclist died on the spot with a lot of blood spilling around, Lakshmi, a pregnant woman passing by, suffered from a nervous shock, leading to abortion. Lakshmi filed a suit against Krishnan claiming damages.a)Krishna will be liable, because he owed a duty of reasonable care to everybody on the road including Lakshmib)Krishna will not be liable, because he could not have foreseen Lakshmi suffering from nervous shock as a result of his act.c)Krishna will be liable to Lakshmi because he failed to drive carefullyd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q.PRINCIPLE: Everybody is under a legal obligation to take reasonable care to avoid an act or omission which he can foresee would injure his neighbor. The neighbor for this purpose, is any person whom he should have in his mind as likely to be affected by his act.FACT: Krishanan, while driving a car at high speed in a crowded road, knocked down a cyclist. The cyclist died on the spot with a lot of blood spilling around, Lakshmi, a pregnant woman passing by, suffered from a nervous shock, leading to abortion. Lakshmi filed a suit against Krishnan claiming damages.a)Krishna will be liable, because he owed a duty of reasonable care to everybody on the road including Lakshmib)Krishna will not be liable, because he could not have foreseen Lakshmi suffering from nervous shock as a result of his act.c)Krishna will be liable to Lakshmi because he failed to drive carefullyd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q.PRINCIPLE: Everybody is under a legal obligation to take reasonable care to avoid an act or omission which he can foresee would injure his neighbor. The neighbor for this purpose, is any person whom he should have in his mind as likely to be affected by his act.FACT: Krishanan, while driving a car at high speed in a crowded road, knocked down a cyclist. The cyclist died on the spot with a lot of blood spilling around, Lakshmi, a pregnant woman passing by, suffered from a nervous shock, leading to abortion. Lakshmi filed a suit against Krishnan claiming damages.a)Krishna will be liable, because he owed a duty of reasonable care to everybody on the road including Lakshmib)Krishna will not be liable, because he could not have foreseen Lakshmi suffering from nervous shock as a result of his act.c)Krishna will be liable to Lakshmi because he failed to drive carefullyd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q.PRINCIPLE: Everybody is under a legal obligation to take reasonable care to avoid an act or omission which he can foresee would injure his neighbor. The neighbor for this purpose, is any person whom he should have in his mind as likely to be affected by his act.FACT: Krishanan, while driving a car at high speed in a crowded road, knocked down a cyclist. The cyclist died on the spot with a lot of blood spilling around, Lakshmi, a pregnant woman passing by, suffered from a nervous shock, leading to abortion. Lakshmi filed a suit against Krishnan claiming damages.a)Krishna will be liable, because he owed a duty of reasonable care to everybody on the road including Lakshmib)Krishna will not be liable, because he could not have foreseen Lakshmi suffering from nervous shock as a result of his act.c)Krishna will be liable to Lakshmi because he failed to drive carefullyd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q.PRINCIPLE: Everybody is under a legal obligation to take reasonable care to avoid an act or omission which he can foresee would injure his neighbor. The neighbor for this purpose, is any person whom he should have in his mind as likely to be affected by his act.FACT: Krishanan, while driving a car at high speed in a crowded road, knocked down a cyclist. The cyclist died on the spot with a lot of blood spilling around, Lakshmi, a pregnant woman passing by, suffered from a nervous shock, leading to abortion. Lakshmi filed a suit against Krishnan claiming damages.a)Krishna will be liable, because he owed a duty of reasonable care to everybody on the road including Lakshmib)Krishna will not be liable, because he could not have foreseen Lakshmi suffering from nervous shock as a result of his act.c)Krishna will be liable to Lakshmi because he failed to drive carefullyd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.