Why did kunti not save draupadi from the dire situation?
Ans.
Drupada, the king of Panchala, organised a competition where the challenge was to string a
bow and hit a target; the winner would be chosen to marry his daughter Draupadi. Arjuna
was victorious and was garlanded by Draupadi. The Pandavas returned with her to their
mother Kunti, who, even before she saw them, asked them to share whatever they had got.
She realised her mistake when she saw Draupadi, but her command could not be violated.
After much deliberation, Yudhisthira decided that Draupadi would be their common wife.
When Drupada was told about this, he protested. However, the seer Vyasa arrived and told
him that the Pandavas were in reality incarnations of Indra, whose wife had been reborn as
Draupadi, and they were thus destined for each other. Vyasa added that in another instance
a young woman had prayed to Shiva for a husband, and in her enthusiasm, had prayed five
times instead of once. This woman was now reborn as Draupadi, and Shiva had fulfilled her
prayers. Convinced by these stories, Drupada consented to the marriage.
This question is part of UPSC exam. View all Humanities/Arts courses
Why did kunti not save draupadi from the dire situation?
Kunti couldn't save Draupadi because she was unaware of that Pandavas were in the court of king Drupad,where Arjun married Draupadi and the five pandavas together bought her as there Dakshina.When they reached Kunti,She was busy with her work in making food and didn't looked behind. So,when the pandavas said that they bought Dakshina, She said them to divide that Dakshina into 5 for each pandav brother. It was a very Dire matter for Draupadi.Because they were the members of royal family,they need to obey their mother. That's why,because of Royal Dharma or duty,all the 5 brothers married Draupadi..
Why did kunti not save draupadi from the dire situation?
Introduction:
Kunti, the mother of the Pandavas, found herself in a dire situation when Draupadi was being disrobed in the court of the Kuru kingdom. Despite being aware of the unjust treatment towards Draupadi, Kunti did not intervene to save her. Several factors contribute to this decision.
Loyalty to the Elders:
Kunti was brought up with traditional values that emphasized obedience and respect towards elders. In the situation where Draupadi was being humiliated, Kunti may have felt conflicted between her duty as a mother and her duty towards her elders. Kunti's respect for Bheeshma and Dronacharya, who were present in the court, might have influenced her decision to remain silent.
Fear of the Consequences:
Kunti was well aware of the volatile nature of the Kuru kingdom and the enmity between the Pandavas and the Kauravas. Intervening to save Draupadi could have escalated the situation and resulted in severe consequences for her sons. Kunti may have prioritized the safety and well-being of her sons over Draupadi's honor.
Observance of Dharma:
In Hindu mythology, the concept of dharma plays a significant role. Kunti may have believed that Draupadi's destiny was tied to her own sons and their dharma. As per the dharma of the time, it was the responsibility of the Pandavas to protect Draupadi's honor, not Kunti's. Kunti might have considered it necessary for her sons to face this trial and prove their worthiness.
Reliance on Divine Intervention:
Kunti had a deep faith in the divine and believed that Krishna, the incarnation of Lord Vishnu, would intervene and rescue Draupadi. She might have trusted that Krishna's divine plan would unfold and that Draupadi would be saved by his intervention. Kunti's belief in the divine plan could have influenced her decision not to interfere.
Conclusion:
Kunti's decision to not save Draupadi from the dire situation can be attributed to her loyalty to the elders, fear of the consequences, observance of dharma, and reliance on divine intervention. While this decision may seem controversial, it is important to understand the complexities of the situation and the cultural and moral values prevailing during that time.