Legal Principle: Agreements in restraint of trade are void and unenforceable.Fact Situation: Manu has been working as a blacksmith in his village for many decades. Somu has been undergoing training with him for the past three years. After his training is over, Somu enters into an agreement with Manu that he will not start a competing business in the same village while Manu is alive.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?a)This agreement is void and unenforceable since it is a restraint on trade.b)This agreement is valid and enforceable since Manu is Somuandrsquo;s teacher.c)This agreement is valid but not enforceable after Manuandrsquo;s death.d)This agreement is valid and enforceable since it is to protect Manuandrsquo;s interest in consideration for teaching Somu to be a blacksmith.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Legal Principle: Agreements in restraint of t...

Join the Discussion on the App

Legal Principle: Agreements in restraint of trade are void and unenforceable.

Fact Situation: Manu has been working as a blacksmith in his village for many decades. Somu has been undergoing training with him for the past three years. After his training is over, Somu enters into an agreement with Manu that he will not start a competing business in the same village while Manu is alive.

Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?

a)
This agreement is void and unenforceable since it is a restraint on trade.
b)
This agreement is valid and enforceable since Manu is Somu’s teacher.
c)
This agreement is valid but not enforceable after Manu’s death.
d)
This agreement is valid and enforceable since it is to protect Manu’s interest in consideration for teaching Somu to be a blacksmith.

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Test: CLAT 2018 Past Year Paper

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

Legal Principle: Agreements in restraint of trade are void and unenfor...

's trainer and has a legitimate interest in protecting his business.c)This agreement is valid and enforceable since it is limited to the duration of Manu's life.d)This agreement is void and unenforceable since it restricts Somu's ability to earn a livelihood.

The most appropriate statement is a) This agreement is void and unenforceable since it is a restraint on trade. The legal principle stated above states that agreements in restraint of trade are void and unenforceable. In this case, the agreement between Somu and Manu restricts Somu's ability to start a competing business in the same village, which is a restraint on trade. Therefore, the agreement is not valid and cannot be enforced.

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

Free Test

FREE

Test: CLAT 2018 Past Year Paper
200 Ques | 120 Min

Start Free Test

View all free CLAT tests

Community Answer

Legal Principle: Agreements in restraint of trade are void and unenfor...

The following option a is correct because restraint that means keeping the other person in control hence the agreement is void

Share via Whatsapp

Attention CLAT Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

CLAT Mock Test Series 2025

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Read the following passage carefully:Agreement without consideration is void, unless it is in writing and registered, or it is a promise to compensate for something done, or is a promise to pay a debt barred by limitation.In India, contractual relationships between two or more parties are mainly dealt with by the Indian Contract Act, 1872, enacted by the British imperial government which exercised control over the country at that time. Section 26 of the Indian Contract Act of 1872 states that every agreement in restraint of marriage, except those in restraint of marriage of minors, is void.The Contract Act was the first law to be placed in India which expressly made any such agreement, which in its effect would result in restraining the liberty of either of the parties to marry as per their wish, void. The fundamental idea behind this provision was to ensure that the citizens did not lose their right to marry as per their choice, which is an essential part of a civil society having both personal and social significance, due to some contractual obligation entered into at any point of time.Any agreement between the two parties that debars either or both of them from going to a court of law in case of non-compliance of the contract, is a void agreement. Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act says that any agreement that restricts an aggrieved party from enforcing his rights to approach a relevant court or tribunal in case of a breach of contract, or limits the time within which he may do so, is a void agreement. There are two exceptions to Section 28, i.e. a future dispute or a past dispute can be referred to arbitration and an agreement stating the limit of time as per the Limitation Act, 1963.An agreement may be uncertain either because the terms in it are ambiguous or vague or because it is incomplete. The general rule is that if the terms of an agreement are vague or indefinite which cannot be ascertained with reasonable certainty of the intention of the parties, then there is no contract enforceable by law.The Indian Contract Act, 1872 does not define wager or a wagering agreement. It only states that agreements by way of the wager will be void and no action can lie to contracting parties to recover anything or claim performance of the wagering agreements. A wagering agreement has the characteristic of a contingent contract but is not enforceable by Section 30.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from Agreements without Consideration, blog by lawtimesjournal]Q.A and B entered into a contract for the processing of 200 kg of cotton fiber of the highest quality, which would be used in Bs plant to make yarn. The contract stated that in the event of a default, the dispute would be resolved through arbitration rather than going to court. By processing cotton of poorer quality, A made a mistake. B sued, claiming that his legal rights had been violated. Decide.

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage carefully:Agreement without consideration is void, unless it is in writing and registered, or it is a promise to compensate for something done, or is a promise to pay a debt barred by limitation.In India, contractual relationships between two or more parties are mainly dealt with by the Indian Contract Act, 1872, enacted by the British imperial government which exercised control over the country at that time. Section 26 of the Indian Contract Act of 1872 states that every agreement in restraint of marriage, except those in restraint of marriage of minors, is void.The Contract Act was the first law to be placed in India which expressly made any such agreement, which in its effect would result in restraining the liberty of either of the parties to marry as per their wish, void. The fundamental idea behind this provision was to ensure that the citizens did not lose their right to marry as per their choice, which is an essential part of a civil society having both personal and social significance, due to some contractual obligation entered into at any point of time.Any agreement between the two parties that debars either or both of them from going to a court of law in case of non-compliance of the contract, is a void agreement. Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act says that any agreement that restricts an aggrieved party from enforcing his rights to approach a relevant court or tribunal in case of a breach of contract, or limits the time within which he may do so, is a void agreement. There are two exceptions to Section 28, i.e. a future dispute or a past dispute can be referred to arbitration and an agreement stating the limit of time as per the Limitation Act, 1963.An agreement may be uncertain either because the terms in it are ambiguous or vague or because it is incomplete. The general rule is that if the terms of an agreement are vague or indefinite which cannot be ascertained with reasonable certainty of the intention of the parties, then there is no contract enforceable by law.The Indian Contract Act, 1872 does not define wager or a wagering agreement. It only states that agreements by way of the wager will be void and no action can lie to contracting parties to recover anything or claim performance of the wagering agreements. A wagering agreement has the characteristic of a contingent contract but is not enforceable by Section 30.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from Agreements without Consideration, blog by lawtimesjournal]Q.According to Section 26 of the Indian Contract Act of 1872, which of the following statements regarding agreements in restraint of marriage is true?

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage carefully:Agreement without consideration is void, unless it is in writing and registered, or it is a promise to compensate for something done, or is a promise to pay a debt barred by limitation.In India, contractual relationships between two or more parties are mainly dealt with by the Indian Contract Act, 1872, enacted by the British imperial government which exercised control over the country at that time. Section 26 of the Indian Contract Act of 1872 states that every agreement in restraint of marriage, except those in restraint of marriage of minors, is void.The Contract Act was the first law to be placed in India which expressly made any such agreement, which in its effect would result in restraining the liberty of either of the parties to marry as per their wish, void. The fundamental idea behind this provision was to ensure that the citizens did not lose their right to marry as per their choice, which is an essential part of a civil society having both personal and social significance, due to some contractual obligation entered into at any point of time.Any agreement between the two parties that debars either or both of them from going to a court of law in case of non-compliance of the contract, is a void agreement. Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act says that any agreement that restricts an aggrieved party from enforcing his rights to approach a relevant court or tribunal in case of a breach of contract, or limits the time within which he may do so, is a void agreement. There are two exceptions to Section 28, i.e. a future dispute or a past dispute can be referred to arbitration and an agreement stating the limit of time as per the Limitation Act, 1963.An agreement may be uncertain either because the terms in it are ambiguous or vague or because it is incomplete. The general rule is that if the terms of an agreement are vague or indefinite which cannot be ascertained with reasonable certainty of the intention of the parties, then there is no contract enforceable by law.The Indian Contract Act, 1872 does not define wager or a wagering agreement. It only states that agreements by way of the wager will be void and no action can lie to contracting parties to recover anything or claim performance of the wagering agreements. A wagering agreement has the characteristic of a contingent contract but is not enforceable by Section 30.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from Agreements without Consideration, blog by lawtimesjournal]Q.What does Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act state regarding agreements that restrict a party from approaching a court or tribunal in case of a breach of contract?

View answer

PrincipleI. An agreement enforceable in a court of law is a contract.II. In order for an agreement to be enforceable in a court of law, there must be a meeting of minds between both the parties.III. Parties to a contract should do something for the other party. The obligation to do something for the other party is mutual. This is called consideration and absence of consideration render the contract unenforceable.Facts Ashwini promised to take Rohit out or a dinner in Le Meridian. Even after 2 weeks, Ashwini did not fulfil his promise. Rohit wants to sue Ashwini to enforce that promise. If Rohit goes to court.

View answer

Principle : A contract between the father and his son is a contract of utmost good faith. In such a type of contract law presumes that at the time of entering into the contract the father was in a position to dominate the will of his son. Where one of the parties was in position to dominate the will of the party, the contract is enforceable only at the option of the party whose will was so dominated.Facts : Ram had advanced a sum of Rs. 10000 to his minor son Shyam. When Shyam became major, his father Ram misused his parental position and entered into an agreement with Shyam and obtained a bond from him for a sum of Rs. 30000 in respect of the advance. Whether this agreement is enforceable?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

CLAT Mock Test Series 2025

Crash Course for CLAT

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Legal Principle: Agreements in restraint of trade are void and unenforceable.Fact Situation: Manu has been working as a blacksmith in his village for many decades. Somu has been undergoing training with him for the past three years. After his training is over, Somu enters into an agreement with Manu that he will not start a competing business in the same village while Manu is alive.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?a)This agreement is void and unenforceable since it is a restraint on trade.b)This agreement is valid and enforceable since Manu is Somu’s teacher.c)This agreement is valid but not enforceable after Manu’s death.d)This agreement is valid and enforceable since it is to protect Manu’s interest in consideration for teaching Somu to be a blacksmith.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Legal Principle: Agreements in restraint of trade are void and unenforceable.Fact Situation: Manu has been working as a blacksmith in his village for many decades. Somu has been undergoing training with him for the past three years. After his training is over, Somu enters into an agreement with Manu that he will not start a competing business in the same village while Manu is alive.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?a)This agreement is void and unenforceable since it is a restraint on trade.b)This agreement is valid and enforceable since Manu is Somu’s teacher.c)This agreement is valid but not enforceable after Manu’s death.d)This agreement is valid and enforceable since it is to protect Manu’s interest in consideration for teaching Somu to be a blacksmith.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Legal Principle: Agreements in restraint of trade are void and unenforceable.Fact Situation: Manu has been working as a blacksmith in his village for many decades. Somu has been undergoing training with him for the past three years. After his training is over, Somu enters into an agreement with Manu that he will not start a competing business in the same village while Manu is alive.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?a)This agreement is void and unenforceable since it is a restraint on trade.b)This agreement is valid and enforceable since Manu is Somu’s teacher.c)This agreement is valid but not enforceable after Manu’s death.d)This agreement is valid and enforceable since it is to protect Manu’s interest in consideration for teaching Somu to be a blacksmith.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Legal Principle: Agreements in restraint of trade are void and unenforceable.Fact Situation: Manu has been working as a blacksmith in his village for many decades. Somu has been undergoing training with him for the past three years. After his training is over, Somu enters into an agreement with Manu that he will not start a competing business in the same village while Manu is alive.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?a)This agreement is void and unenforceable since it is a restraint on trade.b)This agreement is valid and enforceable since Manu is Somu’s teacher.c)This agreement is valid but not enforceable after Manu’s death.d)This agreement is valid and enforceable since it is to protect Manu’s interest in consideration for teaching Somu to be a blacksmith.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Legal Principle: Agreements in restraint of trade are void and unenforceable.Fact Situation: Manu has been working as a blacksmith in his village for many decades. Somu has been undergoing training with him for the past three years. After his training is over, Somu enters into an agreement with Manu that he will not start a competing business in the same village while Manu is alive.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?a)This agreement is void and unenforceable since it is a restraint on trade.b)This agreement is valid and enforceable since Manu is Somu’s teacher.c)This agreement is valid but not enforceable after Manu’s death.d)This agreement is valid and enforceable since it is to protect Manu’s interest in consideration for teaching Somu to be a blacksmith.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Legal Principle: Agreements in restraint of trade are void and unenforceable.Fact Situation: Manu has been working as a blacksmith in his village for many decades. Somu has been undergoing training with him for the past three years. After his training is over, Somu enters into an agreement with Manu that he will not start a competing business in the same village while Manu is alive.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?a)This agreement is void and unenforceable since it is a restraint on trade.b)This agreement is valid and enforceable since Manu is Somu’s teacher.c)This agreement is valid but not enforceable after Manu’s death.d)This agreement is valid and enforceable since it is to protect Manu’s interest in consideration for teaching Somu to be a blacksmith.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Legal Principle: Agreements in restraint of trade are void and unenforceable.Fact Situation: Manu has been working as a blacksmith in his village for many decades. Somu has been undergoing training with him for the past three years. After his training is over, Somu enters into an agreement with Manu that he will not start a competing business in the same village while Manu is alive.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?a)This agreement is void and unenforceable since it is a restraint on trade.b)This agreement is valid and enforceable since Manu is Somu’s teacher.c)This agreement is valid but not enforceable after Manu’s death.d)This agreement is valid and enforceable since it is to protect Manu’s interest in consideration for teaching Somu to be a blacksmith.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Legal Principle: Agreements in restraint of trade are void and unenforceable.Fact Situation: Manu has been working as a blacksmith in his village for many decades. Somu has been undergoing training with him for the past three years. After his training is over, Somu enters into an agreement with Manu that he will not start a competing business in the same village while Manu is alive.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?a)This agreement is void and unenforceable since it is a restraint on trade.b)This agreement is valid and enforceable since Manu is Somu’s teacher.c)This agreement is valid but not enforceable after Manu’s death.d)This agreement is valid and enforceable since it is to protect Manu’s interest in consideration for teaching Somu to be a blacksmith.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Legal Principle: Agreements in restraint of trade are void and unenforceable.Fact Situation: Manu has been working as a blacksmith in his village for many decades. Somu has been undergoing training with him for the past three years. After his training is over, Somu enters into an agreement with Manu that he will not start a competing business in the same village while Manu is alive.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?a)This agreement is void and unenforceable since it is a restraint on trade.b)This agreement is valid and enforceable since Manu is Somu’s teacher.c)This agreement is valid but not enforceable after Manu’s death.d)This agreement is valid and enforceable since it is to protect Manu’s interest in consideration for teaching Somu to be a blacksmith.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Legal Principle: Agreements in restraint of trade are void and unenforceable.Fact Situation: Manu has been working as a blacksmith in his village for many decades. Somu has been undergoing training with him for the past three years. After his training is over, Somu enters into an agreement with Manu that he will not start a competing business in the same village while Manu is alive.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?a)This agreement is void and unenforceable since it is a restraint on trade.b)This agreement is valid and enforceable since Manu is Somu’s teacher.c)This agreement is valid but not enforceable after Manu’s death.d)This agreement is valid and enforceable since it is to protect Manu’s interest in consideration for teaching Somu to be a blacksmith.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam